e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file Number 001-35066
IMAX Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Canada
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
98-0140269
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
2525 Speakman Drive,
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
L5K 1B1
(Postal Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(905) 403-6500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on Which Registered |
|
|
|
Common Shares, no par value
|
|
The New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge,
in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form
10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ | |
Accelerated filer o | |
Non-accelerated filer o | |
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell Company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the common shares of the registrant held by non-affiliates of
the registrant, computed by reference to the last sale price of such shares as of the close of
trading on June 30, 2010 was $763.6 million (52,302,294 common shares times $14.60).
As of January 31, 2011, there were 64,164,723, common shares of the registrant outstanding.
Document Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the registrants definitive Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days of the
close of IMAX Corporations fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A involving the election of directors and the annual meeting of
the stockholders of the registrant (the Proxy Statement) are incorporated by reference in Part
III of this Form 10-K to the extent described therein.
IMAX CORPORATION
December 31, 2010
Table of Contents
2
IMAX CORPORATION
EXCHANGE RATE DATA
Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar amounts in this document are expressed in United States
(U.S.) dollars. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain exchange rates
based on the noon buying rate in the City of New York for cable transfers in foreign currencies as
certified for customs purposes by the Bank of Canada (the Noon Buying Rate). Such rates quoted
are the number of U.S. dollars per one Canadian dollar and are the inverse of rates quoted by the
Bank of Canada for Canadian dollars per U.S. $1.00. The average exchange rate is based on the
average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during such periods. The Noon Buying
Rate on December 31, 2010 was U.S. $1.0054.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Exchange rate at end of period |
|
|
1.0054 |
|
|
|
0.9555 |
|
|
|
0.8170 |
|
|
|
1.0120 |
|
|
|
0.8582 |
|
Average exchange rate during period |
|
|
0.9709 |
|
|
|
0.8757 |
|
|
|
0.9381 |
|
|
|
0.9425 |
|
|
|
0.8818 |
|
High exchange rate during period |
|
|
1.0054 |
|
|
|
0.9716 |
|
|
|
1.0291 |
|
|
|
1.0908 |
|
|
|
0.9100 |
|
Low exchange rate during period |
|
|
0.9278 |
|
|
|
0.7692 |
|
|
|
0.7710 |
|
|
|
0.8437 |
|
|
|
0.8528 |
|
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain statements included in this quarterly report may constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, references to future
capital expenditures (including the amount and nature thereof), business and technology strategies
and measures to implement strategies, competitive strengths, goals, expansion and growth of
business, operations and technology, plans and references to the future success of IMAX Corporation
together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the Company) and expectations regarding the
Companys future operating, financial and technological results. These forward-looking statements
are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by the Company in light of its experience and
its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well
as other factors it believes are appropriate in the circumstances. However, whether actual results
and developments will conform with the expectations and predictions of the Company is subject to a
number of risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, general economic, market or
business conditions; including the length and severity of the current economic downturn, the
opportunities (or lack thereof) that may be presented to and pursued by the Company; competitive
actions by other companies; the performance of IMAX DMR films; conditions in the in-home and
out-of-home entertainment industries; the signing of theater system agreements; changes in laws or
regulations; conditions, changes and developments in the commercial exhibition industry; the
failure to convert theater system backlog into revenue; risks related to new business initiatives;
risks associated with investments and operations in foreign jurisdictions and any future
international expansion, including those related to economic, political and regulatory policies of
local governments and laws and policies of the United States and Canada; the potential impact of
increased competition in the markets the Company operates within; risks related to foreign currency
transactions; risks related to the Companys prior restatements and the related litigation and
investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) and the ongoing inquiry by the
Ontario Securities Commission (the OSC); and other factors, many of which are beyond the control
of the Company. Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this annual report are
qualified by these cautionary statements, and actual results or anticipated developments by the
Company may not be realized, and even if substantially realized, may not have the expected
consequences to, or effects on, the Company. The Company undertakes no obligation to update
publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
IMAX®, IMAX® Dome, IMAX® 3D, IMAX® 3D Dome, Experience It In IMAX®,
The IMAX Experience®, An IMAX Experience®, An IMAX 3D Experience®, IMAX DMR®, DMR®,
IMAX MPX®, IMAX think big® and think big® are trademarks and trade names of the Company or its subsidiaries that are registered or otherwise protected under laws of various jurisdictions.
3
PART I
Item 1. Business
GENERAL
IMAX Corporation, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the Company), is one of the
worlds leading entertainment technology companies, specializing in motion picture technologies and
presentations. The Companys principal business is the design and manufacture of premium digital
theater systems (IMAX theater systems) and the sale or lease of IMAX theater systems or the
contribution of IMAX theater systems under revenue-sharing arrangements to its customers. The IMAX
theater systems are based on proprietary and patented technology developed over the course of the
Companys 43-year history. The Companys customers who purchase, lease or otherwise acquire the
IMAX theater systems are theater exhibitors that operate commercial theaters (particularly
multiplex cinemas), museums, science centers, or destination entertainment sites. The Company
generally does not own IMAX theaters, but licenses the use of its trademarks along with the sale,
lease or contribution of its equipment. The Company refers to all theaters using the IMAX theater
system as IMAX theaters.
The Company is also engaged in the production and distribution of original large-format films,
the provision of post-production services for large-format films, the conversion of two-dimensional
(2D) and three-dimensional (3D) Hollywood feature films for exhibition on IMAX theater systems
around the world, the provision of services in support of IMAX theaters and the IMAX theater
network throughout the globe and the operation of four IMAX theaters.
The Company believes the IMAX theater network is the most extensive premium theater network in
the world with 518 theater systems (396 commercial, 122 institutional) operating in 46 countries as
at December 31, 2010. This compares to 430 theater systems (309 commercial, 121 institutional)
operating in 48 countries as at December 31, 2009. The success of the Companys digital and joint
revenue sharing strategies and the strength of its film slate has enabled the Companys theater
network to expand significantly since 2008, with the Companys overall network increasing by 47.6%
and the Companys commercial network increasing by 71.4%. This network growth has increased revenue
in several of the Companys segments. In 2010, the Company achieved a record number of theater
signings, which is expected to drive additional growth in 2011 and thereafter.
IMAX theater systems combine: (i) IMAX DMR (Digital Re-Mastering) conversion technology, which
results in higher image and sound fidelity than conventional cinema experiences; (ii) advanced,
high-resolution projectors with film handling equipment and automated theater control systems,
which result in significantly more contrast and brightness than conventional theater systems; (iii)
sound system components, which result in more expansive sound imagery and pinpointed origination of
sound to any specific spot in an IMAX theatre; (iv) large screens and proprietary theatre geometry,
which result in a substantially larger field of view so that the screen extends to the edge of a
viewers peripheral vision and creates more realistic images; and (v) theatre acoustics, which
results in a four-fold reduction in background noise. The combination of these components causes
audiences in IMAX theaters to feel as if they are a part of the on-screen action, creating a more
intense, immersive and exciting experience than in a traditional theater. In addition, the
Companys IMAX 3D theater systems combine the same theater systems with 3D images that further
enhance the audiences feeling of being immersed in the film. An IMAX film can also benefit from
enhancements made by individual filmmakers exclusively for the IMAX release, including by using
IMAX cameras in select scenes to further enhance the audiences immersion in the film. Filmmakers
such as Christopher Nolan and Michael Bay have used IMAX cameras to film select scenes in their
films The Dark Knight: The IMAX Experience and Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen: The IMAX
Experience. Brad Bird is using IMAX cameras to film certain sequences in his upcoming Mission:
Impossible Ghost Protocol: The IMAX Experience, set for release in December 2011. Mr. Nolan is
also using IMAX cameras to film sequences in his upcoming film, The Dark Knight Rises: The IMAX
Experience, set for release in July 2012.
While the Companys roots are in the institutional market, such as museums and science
centers, the Companys expanded commercial theater network and its initiatives to facilitate the
production and reduce the cost of exhibiting IMAX content have permitted IMAX to evolve into a key
distribution platform for Hollywood blockbuster films.
The Company believes that one of the key steps to becoming an important distribution platform
for Hollywoods biggest event films was the Companys development of a proprietary technology known
as IMAX DMR (Digital Re-Mastering) that can digitally convert live-action 35mm or digital films to
its large-format, while meeting the Companys high standards of image and sound quality. In a
typical IMAX DMR film arrangement, the Company will receive a percentage of box-office receipts of
the film, which generally range from 10-15%, from a film studio for conversion of the film to the
IMAX DMR format. At January 31, 2011, the Company had released 60 IMAX DMR films since the
introduction of IMAX DMR in 2002. As digital technology has been introduced to the DMR process and
improvements have been made in conversion time, the number of films converted through the DMR
process that have
4
been
released annually has increased as well. Accordingly, 15 films converted through the IMAX
DMR process were released in 2010 (2009 12), as compared to 4 in 2005.
An important step in becoming a distribution platform for Hollywoods biggest event films was
the Companys development of an IMAX digital projection system. Prior to 2008, when the Companys
digital projector was introduced, all of IMAXs large format projectors were film-based and
required analog film prints. The IMAX digital projection system, which operates without the need
for such film prints, was designed specifically for use by commercial multiplex operators and
allows operators to reduce the capital and operating costs required to run an IMAX theater without
sacrificing the image and sound quality of the The IMAX Experience. By making The IMAX Experience
more accessible for commercial multiplex operators, the introduction of the IMAX digital projection
system paved the way for several important joint revenue sharing arrangements which have allowed
the Company to rapidly expand its theater network. Since announcing that the Company was developing
digital projection technology, the vast majority of the Companys theater system signings have been
for digital systems. As at January 31, 2011, the Company has signed agreements for 498 digital
systems since 2007 (including the upgrade of film-based systems and agreements), 219 of which were
signed in 2010 alone. As at December 31, 2010, 276 IMAX digital projection systems were in
operation, an 83% increase compared to the 151 digital projection systems in operation as at
December 31, 2009.
As a result of the immersiveness and superior image and sound quality of The IMAX Experience,
the Companys exhibitor customers typically charge a premium for IMAX DMR films over films
exhibited in their conventional auditoriums. The premium pricing, combined with higher attendance
levels associated with IMAX films, generates incremental box office for the Companys exhibitor
customers and for the movie studios releasing their films to the IMAX network. The incremental box
office generated by IMAX DMR films has also helped to establish IMAX as a key premium distribution
platform for Hollywood blockbuster films.
The Company continues to expand its international business, with more than half of 2010
theater signings coming from outside the United States and Canada, as the Company believes growth in international markets will be an important driver of future revenues. The Company also intends to explore new
areas of brand extension in: 3D in-home entertainment technology, such as 3net, a new 3D television
channel operated by a Limited Liability Corporation owned by the Company, Discovery Communications
and Sony Corporation; alternative theater content; and partnerships with technology, studio,
programming, content and consumer electronics companies.
IMAX Corporation, a Canadian corporation, was formed in March 1994 as a result of an
amalgamation between WGIM Acquisition Corp. and the former IMAX Corporation (Predecessor IMAX).
Predecessor IMAX was incorporated in 1967.
On January 31, 2011, the Company provided notice to the NASDAQ Global Select Market (NASDAQ)
that the Company intended to voluntarily delist its common shares, without par value, from NASDAQ
and intended to subsequently list such common shares on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).
Trading commenced on the NYSE on February 11, 2011 under the Companys current trading symbol,
IMAX. The Companys common shares continued to trade on NASDAQ until the transfer of listing to
the NYSE was completed. The trading of the Companys common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange
(TSX), under the ticker symbol IMX remains unchanged.
PRODUCT LINES
The Company is the pioneer and leader in the large-format film industry. The Company believes
it is the worlds largest designer and manufacturer of specialty projection and sound system
components for large-format theaters around the world, as well as a significant producer and
distributor of large-format films. The Companys theater systems include specialized IMAX
projectors, advanced sound systems and specialty screens. The Company derives its revenues from:
IMAX theater systems (the sale and lease of, and provision of services related to, its theater
systems); films (production and digital re-mastering of films, the distribution of film products to
the IMAX theater network, post-production services for films); joint revenue sharing arrangements
(the provision of its theater system to an exhibitor in exchange for a certain percentage of
theater revenue); theater system maintenance (the use of maintenance services related to its
theater systems); theater operations (owning equipment, operating, managing or participating in the
revenues of IMAX theaters); and other activities, which include the sale of after market parts and
camera rentals. Segmented information is provided in note 20 to the accompanying audited
consolidated financial statements in Item 8.
IMAX Systems, Theater System Maintenance and Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangements
The Companys primary products are its theater systems. Traditional IMAX film-based theater
systems include a unique rolling loop 15/70-format projector that offers superior image quality and
stability and a digital theater control system; a 6-channel, digital audio system delivering up to
12,000 watts of sound; a screen with a proprietary coating technology; and, if applicable, 3D
glasses
5
cleaning equipment. The Companys digital projection system includes all of the above
components (including a digital projector rather than a rolling-loop projector) and operates
without the need for analog film prints. Since its introduction in 2008, the majority of the
Companys theater sales have been digital systems and the Company expects a majority of its future
theater systems sales to be IMAX digital systems. As part of the arrangement to sell or lease its
theater systems, the Company provides extensive advice on theater planning and design and
supervision of installation services. Theater systems are also leased or sold with a license for
the use of the world-famous IMAX brand. IMAX theater systems come in five configurations:
|
|
|
the GT projection systems, film-based theater systems for the largest IMAX theaters; |
|
|
|
the SR system, film-based theater systems for smaller theaters than the GT systems; |
|
|
|
the IMAX MPX systems, which are film-based systems targeted for multiplex theaters (MPX
theater systems); |
|
|
|
the IMAX digital systems, which are the replacement to the IMAX MPX systems and which are
accordingly targeted for multiplex theaters; and |
|
|
|
theater systems featuring heavily curved and tilted screens that are used in dome shaped
theaters. |
The GT, SR, IMAX MPX and IMAX digital systems are flat screens that have a minimum of
curvature and tilt and can exhibit both 2D and 3D films, while the screen components in dome shaped
theaters are 2D only and are popular with the Companys institutional clients. All IMAX theaters,
with the exception of dome configurations, feature a steeply inclined floor to provide each
audience member with a clear view of the screen. The Company holds patents on the geometrical
design of IMAX theaters.
The Companys analog projectors use the largest commercially available film format
(15-perforation film frame, 70mm), which is nearly 10 times larger than conventional film
(4-perforation film frame, 35mm) and therefore are able to project significantly more detail on a
larger screen. The Company believes these projectors, which utilize the Companys rolling loop
technology, are unsurpassed in their ability to project film with maximum steadiness and clarity
with minimal film wear, while substantially enhancing the quality of the projected image. As a
result, the Companys projectors deliver a higher level of clarity and detail as compared to
conventional movies and competing projectors.
In order to compete and evolve with the market, the Company introduced a digital projection
system in 2008 that provides a premium and differentiated experience to moviegoers that is
consistent with what they have come to expect from the IMAX brand. The shift from a film-based
projection system to a digital projection system for a large portion of the Companys customer base
has been compelling for a number of reasons. The savings to the studios as a result of eliminating
film prints are considerable, as the typical cost of an IMAX film print ranges from $20 thousand
per 2D print to $45 thousand per 3D print whereas a digital file
delivery totals approximately $200 per movie per system. Removing those costs significantly increases the profit
of an IMAX release for a studio which, the Company believes, has provided more incentive for
studios to release their films to IMAX theaters. The Company similarly believes that economics
change favorably for its exhibition clients since the costs associated with installing and
operating an IMAX digital system are lower than those for a film-based system, the print costs are
eliminated (digital file delivery totals approximately $200 per movie per system), and digital
delivery provides increased programming flexibility that allows theaters to program significantly
more IMAX DMR films per year, thereby increasing customer choice and potentially increasing total
box-office revenue. In 2010, 15 films converted through the IMAX DMR process were released to the
IMAX theater network (2009 12), as compared to 4 films in 2005. To date, the Company has
contracted for the release of 21 DMR films to its theater network in 2011, plus one IMAX original
production. The Company remains in active discussions with every major Hollywood
studio regarding future titles.
Digital projectors also typically require lower installation costs for exhibitors and potentially
allow for the opportunity to show attractive alternate programming, such as live sporting events
and concerts, in the immersive environment of an IMAX theater. Digital systems represent 97% of the
Companys current backlog and 53% of the Companys theater network. The Company continues to expect
a majority of its future theater system arrangements to be for digital systems.
To complement its viewing experience, the Company provides digital sound system components
which are specifically designed for IMAX theaters. These components are among the most advanced in
the industry and help to heighten the realistic feeling of an IMAX presentation, thereby providing
IMAX theater systems with an important competitive edge over other theater systems. The Company
believes it is a world leader in the design and manufacture of digital sound system components for
applications including traditional movie theaters, auditoriums and IMAX theaters.
The Companys arrangements for theater system equipment involve either a lease or sale. As
part of the arrangement for an IMAX theater system, the Company also advises the customer on
theater design, supervises the installation of the theater systems and
6
provides projectionists with training in using the equipment. Theater owners or operators are
responsible for providing the theater location, the design and construction of the theater
building, the installation of the system components and any other necessary improvements, as well
as the marketing and programming at the theater. The supervision of installation requires that the
equipment also be put through a complete functional start-up and test procedure to ensure proper
operation. The Companys typical arrangement also includes the trademark license rights which
commence on execution of the agreement with terms generally of 10 to 20 years that may be renewed.
The theater system equipment components (including the projector, sound system, screen system, and,
if applicable, 3D glasses cleaning machine), theater design support, supervision of installation,
projectionist training and trademark rights are all elements of what the Company considers the
system deliverable (the System Deliverable). For a separate fee, the Company provides ongoing
maintenance and extended warranty services for the theater system. The Companys contracts are
generally denominated in U.S. dollars, except in Canada, Japan and parts of Europe, where contracts
are sometimes denominated in local currency.
Leases, other than joint revenue sharing arrangements, generally have 10-20 year initial terms
and are typically renewable by the customer for one or more additional 5 to 10-year terms. Under
the terms of the typical lease agreement, the title to the theater system equipment (including the
projector, the sound system and the projection screen) remains with the Company. The Company has
the right to remove the equipment for non-payment or other defaults by the customer. The contracts
are generally not cancelable by the customer unless the Company fails to perform its obligations.
The Company also enters into sale agreements with its customers. Under a sales arrangement,
the title to the theater system remains with the customer. In certain instances, however, the
Company retains title or a security interest in the equipment until the customer has made all
payments required under the agreement.
The typical lease or sales arrangement provides for three major sources of cash flows for the
Company: (i) initial fees; (ii) ongoing minimum fixed and contingent fees; and (iii) ongoing
maintenance and extended warranty fees. Initial fees generally are received over the period of time
from the date the arrangement is executed to the date the equipment is installed and customer
acceptance has been received. However, in certain cases, the payments of the initial fee may be
scheduled over a period after the equipment is installed and customer acceptance has been received.
Ongoing minimum fixed and contingent fees and ongoing maintenance and extended warranty fees are
generally received over the life of the arrangement and are usually adjusted annually based on
changes in the local consumer price index. The ongoing minimum fixed and contingent fees generally
provide for a fee which is the greater of a fixed amount or a certain percentage of the theater
box-office. The terms of each arrangement vary according to the configuration of the theater system
provided and the geographic location of the customer.
Over the last several years, the Company has increasingly entered into joint revenue sharing
arrangements with customers, pursuant to which the Company provides the System Deliverable in
return for a portion of the customers IMAX box-office receipts and concession revenue. Under these
revenue sharing arrangements, the Company retains title to the theater system (including the
projector, the sound system and the projection screen) and rent payments are contingent, instead of
fixed or determinable. The Company has the right to remove the equipment for non-payment or other
defaults by the customer. The contracts are generally not cancelable by the customer unless the
Company fails to perform its obligations. In rare cases, the contract provides certain performance
thresholds that, if not met by either party, allows the other party to terminate the agreement.
Joint revenue sharing arrangements generally have a 7 to 10-year initial term and may be renewed by
the customer for an additional term. By offering arrangements whereby exhibitors do not need to
invest the initial capital required in a lease or a sale arrangement, the Company has been able to
expand its theater network at a significantly faster pace than it had previously. As at January 31,
2011, the Company has entered into joint revenue sharing arrangements for 230 systems with 14
partners, 171 of which were in operation as at December 31, 2010.
Sales Backlog. Signed contracts for theater systems are listed as sales backlog prior to the
time of revenue recognition. The value of sales backlog represents the total value of all signed
theater system sales and sales-type lease agreements that are expected to be recognized as revenue
in the future. Sales backlog includes initial fees along with the estimated present value of
contractual fixed minimum fees due over the term, but excludes contingent fees in excess of
contractual minimums and maintenance and extended warranty fees that might be received in the
future.
7
The Companys sales backlog is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Dollar Value |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Dollar Value |
|
|
|
Systems |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Systems |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Sales and sales-type lease arrangements |
|
|
165 |
(1) |
|
$ |
184,588 |
|
|
|
94 |
(1) |
|
$ |
117,157 |
|
Joint revenue sharing arrangements |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
(2) |
|
$ |
184,588 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
$ |
117,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 25 upgrades from film-based IMAX theater systems to IMAX
digital theater systems as at December 31, 2010, and 1 upgrade from a
film-based IMAX theater system to an IMAX digital theater system as at
December 31, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects the minimum number of theaters arising from signed contracts
in backlog. Up to an additional 25 theaters (2009 1) may be
installed pursuant to certain provisions in signed contracts in
backlog. |
The value of the sales backlog does not include anticipated revenues from theaters in which
the Company has an equity-interest, joint revenue sharing arrangements, agreements covered by
letters of intent or conditional sale or lease commitments, though the number of systems contracted
for under these arrangements is included.
The following chart shows the number of the Companys theater systems by configuration, opened
theater network base and backlog as at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
Theater |
|
|
|
|
|
Theater |
|
|
|
|
Network |
|
|
|
|
|
Network |
|
|
|
|
Base |
|
Backlog |
|
Base |
|
Backlog |
Flat Screen (2D) |
|
|
30 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dome Screen (2D) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
IMAX 3D Dome (3D) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX 3D GT (3D) |
|
|
80 |
(1) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
IMAX 3D SR (3D) |
|
|
44 |
(1) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
IMAX MPX (3D) |
|
|
19 |
(1) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
37 |
(2) |
|
|
13 |
|
IMAX digital (3D) |
|
|
276 |
(1) |
|
|
217 |
(3) |
|
|
151 |
(2) |
|
|
115 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In 2010, the Company upgraded 32 film-based IMAX theater
systems across various categories to
IMAX digital theater systems (30 sales arrangements and 2 joint
revenue sharing arrangements). |
|
(2) |
|
In 2009, the Company upgraded 25 film-based IMAX theater
systems across various categories to
IMAX digital theater systems (14 sales arrangements, 2 treated
previously as operating lease arrangements and 9 systems under joint
revenue sharing arrangements). |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 59 and 42 theater systems as at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, under joint revenue sharing arrangements. |
IMAX Flat Screen and IMAX Dome Systems. IMAX flat screen and IMAX Dome systems comprise 99 of
the Companys opened theater base and primarily reside in institutions such as museums and science
centers. Flat screen IMAX theaters were introduced in 1970, while IMAX Dome theaters, which are
designed for tilted dome screens, were introduced in 1973. There have been several significant
proprietary and patented enhancements to these systems since their introduction.
IMAX 3D GT and IMAX 3D SR Systems. IMAX 3D theaters utilize a flat screen 3D system, which
produces realistic 3D images on an IMAX screen. The Company believes that the IMAX 3D theater
systems offer consumers one of the most realistic 3D experiences available today. To create the 3D
effect, the audience uses either polarized or electronic glasses that separate the left-eye and
right-eye
8
images. The IMAX 3D projectors can project both 2D and 3D films, allowing theater owners the
flexibility to exhibit either type of film.
In 1997, the Company launched a smaller IMAX 3D system called IMAX 3D SR, a patented theater
system configuration that combines a proprietary theater design, a more automated projector and
specialized sound system components to replicate the experience of a larger IMAX 3D theater in a
smaller space.
As at December 31, 2010, there were 124 IMAX 3D GT and IMAX 3D SR theaters in operation
compared to 139 IMAX 3D GT and IMAX 3D SR theaters in operation as at December 31, 2009. The
decrease in the number of 3D GT and 3D SR systems is largely attributable to the conversion of
existing 3D GT and 3D SR systems to IMAX digital systems.
IMAX MPX. In 2003, the Company launched a large-format theater system designed specifically
for use in multiplex theaters. Known as IMAX MPX, this system had lower capital and operating costs
than other IMAX systems and was intended to improve a multiplex owners financial returns and to
allow for the installation of IMAX theater systems in markets that might previously not have been
able to support one. As at December 31, 2010, there were 19 MPX systems in operation compared to 37
MPX systems as at December 31, 2009. The IMAX digital system has supplanted the MPX system as the
Companys multiplex product. The decrease in the number of MPX systems is largely attributable to
the upgrade of existing MPX systems to IMAX digital systems.
IMAX Digital. In July 2008, the Company introduced a proprietary IMAX digital projection
system operating on a digital platform that it believes delivers higher quality imagery compared
with other digital systems and that is consistent with the Companys brand. As at December 31,
2010, the Company had installed 276 digital theater systems, including 59 digital upgrades, and has
an additional 217 digital systems in its backlog. Digital theater systems represent 97% of the
total backlog and 53% of the total theater network, and the Company expects a majority of its
future theater system arrangements to be for digital systems. Moreover, the Company believes that
some of the film-based systems currently in its backlog, particularly uninstalled MPX systems, will
ultimately become digital installations.
Films
Film Production and Digital Re-mastering (IMAX DMR)
Films produced by the Company are typically financed through third parties, whereby the
Company will generally receive a film production fee in exchange for producing the film and a
distribution fee for distributing the film. The ownership rights to such films may be held by the
film sponsors, the film investors and/or the Company.
In 2002, the Company developed technology that makes it possible for live-action film footage
to be digitally transformed into IMAXs large-format at a cost of roughly $1.0 million $1.5 million per
film. This proprietary system, known as IMAX DMR, has opened up the IMAX theater network to film
releases from Hollywoods broad library of films. In a typical IMAX DMR film arrangement, the
Company will receive a percentage of box-office receipts of the film, which generally range from
10-15%, from a film studio for the conversion of the film to the IMAX DMR format. In 2010, gross
box office from IMAX DMR films was $545.9 million, compared to $270.8 million in 2009, an increase
of 102%. The Company may also have certain distribution rights to the films produced using its IMAX
DMR technology.
The IMAX DMR process involves the following:
|
|
|
in certain instances, scanning, at the highest possible resolution, each individual frame
of the movie and converting it into a digital image; |
|
|
|
optimizing the image using proprietary image enhancement tools; |
|
|
|
enhancing the digital image using techniques such as sharpening, color correction, grain
and noise removal and the elimination of unsteadiness and removal of unwanted artifacts; |
|
|
|
recording the enhanced digital image onto IMAX 15/70-format film or IMAX digital cinema
package (DCP) format; |
|
|
|
specially re-mastering the sound track to take full advantage of the IMAX theaters
unique sound system; and |
|
|
|
in certain instances, performing the Companys proprietary live-action 2D to 3D
conversion. |
9
The first IMAX DMR film, Apollo 13: The IMAX Experience, produced in conjunction with
Universal Pictures and Imagine Entertainment, was released in September 2002 to 48 IMAX theaters.
One of the more recent IMAX DMR films at December 31, 2010, Tron Legacy, was released to 366 IMAX theaters.
Since the release of Apollo 13: The IMAX Experience, an additional 59 IMAX DMR films have been
released to the IMAX theater network as at January 31, 2011.
The highly automated IMAX DMR process typically allows the re-mastering process to meet
aggressive film production schedules. The Company is continuing to decrease the length of time it
takes to reformat a film with its IMAX DMR technology. Apollo 13: The IMAX Experience, was
re-mastered in 16 weeks, while Iron Man 2: The IMAX Experience, released in May 2010, was
re-mastered in approximately 7 days. The IMAX DMR conversion of simultaneous, or day-and-date
releases are done in parallel with the movies filming and editing, which is necessary for the
simultaneous release of an IMAX DMR film with the domestic release to conventional theaters.
The Company demonstrated its ability to convert computer-generated animation to IMAX 3D with
the 1999 release of Cyberworld, the 2004 release of the full length computer generated imagery
(CGI) feature, The Polar Express: The IMAX 3D Experience and the release of four CGI 3D features
in 2005-2007, including Beowulf: An IMAX 3D Experience released in November 2007. In addition, the
Company has developed proprietary technology to convert live action 2D films to IMAX 3D films,
which the Company believes can offer potential benefits to the Company, studios and the IMAX
theater network. This technology was used to convert scenes from 2D to 3D in the film Superman
Returns: An IMAX 3D Experience in 2006. In July 2007, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix: An
IMAX 3D Experience, was released with approximately 20 minutes of the film converted from 2D to 3D
using such technology. In addition, the 2009 release of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince: An
IMAX 3D Experience included certain scenes of the film converted to IMAX 3D.
For IMAX DMR releases, the original soundtrack of the movie is re-mastered for the IMAX five
or six-channel digital sound systems. Unlike the soundtracks played in conventional theaters, IMAX
re-mastered soundtracks are uncompressed and full fidelity. IMAX sound systems use proprietary
loudspeaker systems and proprietary surround sound configurations that ensure every theater seat is
in a good listening position.
In 2010, 15 films were converted through the IMAX DMR process and released to IMAX theaters by
film studios as compared to 12 films in 2009. These 15 films were:
|
|
|
Alice In Wonderland: An IMAX 3D Experience (Disney, March 2010); |
|
|
|
|
How To Train Your Dragon: An IMAX 3D Experience (Dreamworks Animation Paramount, March
2010); |
|
|
|
|
Iron Man 2: The IMAX Experience (Marvel and Paramount, May 2010); |
|
|
|
|
Shrek Forever After: An IMAX 3D Experience (Dreamworks Animation Paramount, May 2010); |
|
|
|
|
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time: The IMAX Experience (Disney, May 2010); |
|
|
|
|
Toy Story 3: An IMAX 3D Experience (Disney, June 2010); |
|
|
|
|
The Twilight Saga: Eclipse: The IMAX Experience (Summit Entertainment, June 2010); |
|
|
|
|
Inception: The IMAX Experience (Warner Bros. Pictures (WB)), July 2010); |
|
|
|
|
Aftershock: The IMAX Experience (Huayi Brothers Group, July 2010, primarily distributed
in China and other parts of Asia); |
|
|
|
|
Resident Evil: Afterlife: An IMAX 3D Experience (Sony, September 2010); |
|
|
|
|
Legends of the Guardian: The Owls of GaHoole: An IMAX 3D Experience (WB, September
2010); |
|
|
|
|
Paranormal Activity 2: The IMAX Experience (Paramount, October 2010); |
|
|
|
|
Megamind: An IMAX 3D Experience (Dreamworks Animation Paramount, November 2010); |
|
|
|
|
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part I: The IMAX Experience (WB, November 2010);
and |
|
|
|
|
Tron Legacy: An IMAX 3D Experience (Disney, December 2010). |
The Company believes that the box-office performance of IMAX DMR releases has positioned IMAX
theaters as a key premium distribution platform for Hollywood films, which is separate and distinct
from their wider theatrical release. IMAX theaters therefore serve as an additional distribution
platform for Hollywood films, just as home video and pay-per-view are ancillary distribution
platforms.
In addition, the Company, in conjunction with WB and with the cooperation of National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), released the original film Hubble 3D: An IMAX 3D Experience in March 2010.
To date, the Company has signed contracts for 21 DMR films that will play in the IMAX theater
network in 2011:
10
|
|
|
TRON: Legacy: An IMAX 3D Experience (Walt Disney Studios, continued from 2010); |
|
|
|
|
The Green Hornet: An IMAX 3D Experience (Sony, January 2011); |
|
|
|
|
Tangled: An IMAX 3D Experience (Disney, February 2011, released in select Asian markets
on respective regional release dates); |
|
|
|
|
Sanctum: An IMAX 3D Experience (Universal, February 2011); |
|
|
|
|
I Am Number Four: The IMAX Experience (Dreamworks Studios Disney, February 2011); |
|
|
|
|
Mars Needs Moms: An IMAX 3D Experience (Disney, March 2011); |
|
|
|
|
Sucker Punch: The IMAX Experience (WB, March 2011); |
|
|
|
|
Fast Five: The IMAX Experience (Universal, April 2011); |
|
|
|
|
Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides: An IMAX 3D Experience (Disney, May 2011); |
|
|
|
|
Kung Fu Panda 2: An IMAX 3D Experience (Paramount, May 2011, to be released in select
international markets); |
|
|
|
|
Super 8: The IMAX Experience (Paramount, June 2011); |
|
|
|
|
The Founding of a Party: The IMAX Experience (China Film Group, June 2011, to be released
in the Peoples Republic of China) |
|
|
|
|
Cars 2: An IMAX 3D Experience (Disney, June 2011); |
|
|
|
|
Transformers: Dark of the Moon: An IMAX 3D Experience (Paramount, July 2011); |
|
|
|
|
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part II: An IMAX 3D Experience (WB, July 2011); |
|
|
|
|
Real Steel: The IMAX Experience (Dreamworks Studios Disney, October 2011); |
|
|
|
|
Contagion: The IMAX Experience (WB, October 2011); |
|
|
|
|
Puss in Boots: An IMAX 3D Experience (Paramount, November 2011); |
|
|
|
|
Happy Feet 2: An IMAX 3D Experience (WB, November 2011); |
|
|
|
|
Mission: Impossible Ghost Protocol: The IMAX Experience (Paramount, December 2011);
and |
|
|
|
|
The Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn: An IMAX 3D Experience (Paramount,
December 2011). |
The Company remains in active negotiations with all of Hollywoods studios for additional
films to fill out its short and long-term film slate.
In addition, the Company, in conjunction with WB, will release the original film Born to be
Wild 3D: An IMAX 3D Experience to its network in April 2011.
Film Distribution
The Company is a significant distributor of large-format films. The Company distributes films
which it has produced or for which it has acquired distribution rights from independent producers.
As a distributor, the Company receives a fixed fee and/or a percentage of the theater box-office
receipts.
As at December 31, 2010, IMAXs film library consisted of 274 IMAX original films, which cover
such subjects as space, wildlife, music, history and natural wonders. The Company currently has
distribution rights with respect to 44 of such films. Large-format films that have been
successfully distributed by the Company include: Hubble 3D: An IMAX 3D Experience, which was released by the Company and
WB in March 2010 and has grossed over $25.6 million as at the end of 2010; Under the Sea 3D: An IMAX 3D Experience,which
was released by the Company and WB in March 2009 and has grossed over $36.8 million as at the end
of 2010; Deep Sea 3D: An IMAX 3D Experience, which was released by the Company and WB in March 2006 and has grossed more
than $89.8 million as at the end of 2010; SPACE STATION, which was released in April 2002 and has
grossed over $116.2 million as at the end of 2010 and T-REX: Back to the Cretaceous, which was
released by the Company in 1998 and has grossed over $103.8 million as at the end of 2010.
Large-format films have significantly longer exhibition periods than conventional commercial 35mm
films and many of the films in the large-format library have remained popular for many decades,
including the films To Fly! (1976), Grand Canyon The Hidden Secrets (1984) and The Dream Is
Alive (1985).
Film Post-Production
David Keighley Productions 70MM Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, provides film
post-production and quality control services for large-format films (whether produced internally or
externally), and digital post-production services.
11
Theater Operations
As at December 31, 2010, the Company had four owned and operated theaters on leased premises
as compared to four owned and operated theaters as at December 31, 2009. In addition, the Company
has a commercial arrangement with one theater resulting in the sharing of profits and losses. The
Company also provides management services to two theaters.
Other
Cameras
The Company rents its proprietary 2D and 3D large-format film and digital cameras to third
party production companies. The company also provides production technical support and
post-production services for a fee. All IMAX 2D and 3D film cameras run 65mm negative film,
exposing 15 perforations per frame and resulting in an image area nearly 10x larger than standard
35mm film. The Companys film-based 3D camera, which is a patented, state-of-the-art dual and
single filmstrip 3D camera, is among the most advanced motion picture cameras in the world and is
the only 3D camera of its kind. The IMAX 3D camera simultaneously shoots left-eye and right-eye
images and enables filmmakers to access a variety of locations, such as underwater or aboard
aircraft. The Company has also recently developed a high speed 3D digital camera which utilizes a
pair of the worlds largest digital sensors.
The Company maintains cameras and other film equipment and also offers production advice and
technical assistance to both documentary and Hollywood filmmakers.
MARKETING AND CUSTOMERS
The Company markets its theater systems through a direct sales force and marketing staff
located in offices in Canada, the United States, Europe, and Asia. In addition, the Company has
agreements with consultants, business brokers and real estate professionals to locate potential
customers and theater sites for the Company on a commission basis.
The commercial multiplex theater segment of the Companys theater network is now its largest
segment, comprising 373 theaters, or 72.0%, of the 518 theaters open as at December 31, 2010. The
Companys institutional customers include science and natural history museums, zoos, aquaria and
other educational and cultural centers. The Company also sells or leases its theater systems to
theme parks, tourist destination sites, fairs and expositions (the Commercial Destination segment).
At December 31, 2010, approximately 38.8% of all opened IMAX theaters were in locations outside of
the United States and Canada. The following table outlines the breakdown
of the theater network by type and geographic location as at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Theater Network Base |
|
2009 Theater Network Base |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiplex |
|
Destination |
|
Institutional |
|
Total |
|
Multiplex |
|
Destination |
|
Institutional |
|
Total |
United States |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
Canada |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Russia & the CIS |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Western Europe |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Rest of Europe |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Japan |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Greater China(1) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Rest of World |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Greater China includes China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macau. |
For information on revenue breakdown by geographic area, see note 20 to the accompanying
audited consolidated financial statements in Item 8. The Companys foreign operations are subject
to certain risks. See Risk Factors The company conducts business internationally which exposes
it to uncertainties and risks that could negatively affect its operations and sales in Item 1A.
12
The Companys two largest customers as at December 31, 2010, collectively represent 24.7% of
the Companys network base of theaters and 16.9% of revenues.
INDUSTRY AND COMPETITION
In recent years, as the motion picture industry has transitioned from film projection to
digital projection, a number of companies have introduced digital 3D projection technology and,
since 2008, an increasingly large number of Hollywood features have been exhibited using these
technologies. According to the National Association of Theater Owners, as at December 31, 2010,
there were approximately 8,000 conventional-sized screens in U.S. multiplexes equipped with such
digital 3D systems. In 2008, the Company introduced its proprietary digitally-based projector which
is capable of 2D and 3D presentations on large screens and which comprises the majority of its
current (and, the Company expects, future) theater system sales. For the films released to both
IMAX 3D theaters and conventional 3D theaters, the IMAX theaters have significantly outperformed
the conventional theaters on a per-screen revenue basis. Over the last several years, a number of
commercial exhibitors have introduced their own large screen branded theaters. IMAX theaters in the
same markets have continually outperformed these theaters as well. In addition, the Company has
historically competed with manufacturers of large-format film projectors. The Company believes that
all of these alternative film formats deliver images and experiences that are inferior to The IMAX
Experience.
The Company may also face competition in the future from companies in the entertainment
industry with new technologies and/or substantially greater capital resources to develop and
support them. The Company also faces in-home competition from a number of alternative motion
picture distribution channels such as home video, pay-per-view, video-on-demand, DVD, Internet and
syndicated and broadcast television. The Company further competes for the publics leisure time and
disposable income with other forms of entertainment, including gaming, sporting events, concerts,
live theater and restaurants.
The Company believes that its competitive strengths include the value of the IMAX brand name,
the design, quality and historic reliability rate of IMAX theater systems, the return on investment
of an IMAX theater, the number and quality of IMAX films that it distributes, the quality of the
sound system components included with the IMAX theater, the availability of Hollywood event films
to IMAX theaters through IMAX DMR technology, consumer loyalty and the level of the Companys
service and maintenance and extended warranty efforts. The Company believes that all of the best
performing premium theaters in the world are IMAX theaters.
THE IMAX BRAND
The world-famous IMAX brand stands for the highest-quality, most immersive motion picture
entertainment. Consumer research conducted for the Company in the U.S. by a third-party research
firm shows that the IMAX brand is known for cutting-edge technology and an experience that immerses
audiences in the movie. The research also shows that the brand inspires strong consumer loyalty and
that consumers place a premium on it, often willing to travel significantly farther and pay more
for The IMAX Experience than for a conventional movie. The Company believes that its significant
brand loyalty among consumers provides it with a strong, sustainable position in the exhibition
industry. Recognition of the IMAX brand name cuts across geographic and demographic boundaries. To
date, IMAX DMR films have significantly outperformed other formats on a per screen basis.
As the IMAX theater network and film slate grow, so does the visibility of the IMAX brand. In
recent years, IMAX has built on its heritage of immersive, high-quality educational movies
presented in prestigious institutions and destination centers by increasingly expanding its network
into commercial multiplexes. With a growing number of IMAX theaters based in commercial multiplexes
and with a recent history of commercially successful films such as: Avatar: An IMAX 3D Experience,
Alice in Wonderland, Inception: The IMAX Experience, The Dark Knight: The IMAX Experience,
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen: The IMAX Experience, Beowulf: An IMAX 3D Experience, 300: The
IMAX Experience, Spider-Man 3: The IMAX Experience, Superman Returns: An IMAX 3D Experience and the
Harry Potter series, the Company continues to increase its presence in commercial settings. The
Company believes the strength of the IMAX brand is an asset that has helped to establish the IMAX
theater network as a unique and desirable release window for Hollywood movies.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Company believes that it is one of the worlds leading entertainment technology companies
with significant proprietary expertise in digital and film-based projection and sound system
component design, engineering and imaging technology, particularly in 3D. The Company plans to
continue to fund research and development activity in areas considered important to the Companys
continued commercial success, including further improving the reliability of its projectors,
enhancing the Companys 2D and 3D
13
image quality, developing IMAX theater systems capabilities in live entertainment, developing
its portable theater initiative, and further enhancing the IMAX theater and sound system design.
The motion picture industry has been and will continue to be affected by the development of
digital technologies, particularly in the areas of content creation (image capture),
post-production, digital re-mastering (such as IMAX DMR), distribution and display (projection). As
such, the Company has made significant investments in digital technologies, including the
development of a proprietary technology to digitally enhance image resolution and quality of motion
picture films, the conversion of monoscopic (2D) to stereoscopic (3D) images and the creation of an
IMAX digital projector. Accordingly, the Company holds a number of patents, patents pending and
other intellectual property rights in these areas. In addition, the Company holds numerous digital
patents and relationships with key manufacturers and suppliers in digital technology. In July 2008,
the Company introduced its proprietary, digitally-based projector which operates without the need
for analog film prints. In 2009, the Company developed its first digital 3D camera, the prototype
of which was used to film portions of Born to be Wild 3D: An IMAX 3D Experience, which is scheduled for release to
theaters in April 2011.
In 2010, the Company introduced IMAX nXos, a patent-pending technology designed to tune and
automatically monitor IMAX audio systems. The new technology applies the equivalent of thousands of
bands of equalization to perform a highly detailed tuning of the IMAX audio system. The IMAX nXos
Calibrator is designed to significantly exceed the capability of manual equalization processes.
IMAXs audio systems feature proprietary loudspeaker technology and uncompressed digital sound,
with much greater dynamic range than conventional systems. The system is designed to provide a more
immersive audio environment. The IMAX nXos Calibrator works to ensure that the audience is provided
an optimum audio experience in the IMAX theater. In September 2010, the Company made a $1.5 million
preferred share investment in Laser Light Engines, Inc. (LLE), a developer and manufacturer of
laser-driven light sources. The Company also entered into a development agreement with LLE to
develop a custom laser engine for use in the IMAX digital projection system. The purpose for the
laser engine is to enable the Company to achieve sufficient brightness in its digital projection
system to enable digital projection on the Companys largest screens.
The Companys participation in 3net, operated by a Limited Liability Corporation owned by the
Company, Discovery Communications and Sony Corporation that premiered on February 13, 2011, is an
example of its strategic entry into the field of in-home entertainment technology. The Company has
deployed its proprietary expertise in image technology and 3D technology to help set broadcast and
presentation standards for the new channel. The Company expects to continue to deploy its
proprietary expertise in image technology and 3D technology, as well as the IMAX brand, for further
applications in in-home entertainment technology.
For the years ended 2010, 2009, and 2008, the Company recorded research and development
expenses of $6.2 million, $3.8 million and $7.5 million, respectively. Over the past three years,
the Company has invested significantly in research and development relating to the development,
introduction and enhancement of its IMAX digital projector system. As at December 31, 2010, 37 of
the Companys employees were connected with research and development projects.
MANUFACTURING AND SERVICE
Projector Component Manufacturing
The Company assembles the projector of its theater systems at its Corporate Headquarters and
Technology Center in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada (near Toronto). A majority of the parts and
sub-assemblies for this component are purchased from outside vendors. The Company develops and
designs all of the key elements for the proprietary technology involved in this component.
Fabrication of parts and sub-assemblies is subcontracted to a group of carefully pre-qualified
suppliers. Manufacture and supply contracts are signed for the delivery of the component on an
order-by-order basis. The Company has developed long-term relationships with a number of
significant suppliers, and the Company believes its existing suppliers will continue to supply
quality products in quantities sufficient to satisfy its needs. The Company inspects all parts and
sub-assemblies, completes the final assembly and then subjects the projector to comprehensive
testing individually and as a system prior to shipment. In 2010, these projectors, including the
Companys digital projection system, had reliability rates based on scheduled shows of
approximately 99.8%.
Sound System Component Manufacturing
The Company develops, designs and assembles the key elements of its theater sound system
component. The standard IMAX theater sound system component comprises parts from a variety of
sources, with approximately 50% of the materials of each sound system attributable to proprietary
parts provided under original equipment manufacturers agreements with outside vendors. These
proprietary parts include custom loudspeaker enclosures and horns, specialized amplifiers, and
signal processing and control
14
equipment. The Company inspects all parts and sub-assemblies, completes the final assembly and
then subjects the sound system component to comprehensive testing individually and as a system
prior to shipment.
Screen and Other Components
The Company purchases its screen component and glasses cleaning equipment from third parties.
The standard screen system component is comprised of a projection screen manufactured to IMAX
specifications and a frame to hang the projection screen. The proprietary glasses cleaning machine
is a stand-alone unit that is connected to the theaters water and electrical supply to automate
the cleaning of 3D glasses.
Maintenance and Extended Warranty Services
The Company also provides ongoing maintenance and extended warranty services to IMAX theater
systems. These arrangements are usually for a separate fee, although the Company often includes
free service in the initial year of an arrangement. The maintenance and extended warranty
arrangements include service, maintenance and replacement parts for theater systems.
To support the IMAX theater network, the Company has personnel stationed in major markets
throughout the world, who provide periodic and emergency maintenance and extended warranty services
on existing theater systems. The Company provides various levels of maintenance and warranty
services, which are priced accordingly. Under full service programs, Company personnel typically
visit each theater every six months to provide preventative maintenance, cleaning and inspection
services and emergency visits to resolve problems and issues with the theater system. Under some
arrangements, customers can elect to participate in a service partnership program whereby the
Company trains a customers technician to carry out certain aspects of maintenance. Under such
shared maintenance arrangements, the Company participates in certain of the customers maintenance
checks each year, provides a specified number of emergency visits and provides spare parts, as
necessary. For digital systems, the Company provides pre-emptive maintenance through minor bug
fixes, and also provides remote system monitoring and a network operations centre that provides
continuous access to product experts.
PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS
The Companys inventions cover various aspects of its proprietary technology and many of these
inventions are protected by Letters of Patent or applications filed throughout the world, most
significantly in the United States, Canada, Belgium, Japan, France, Germany and the United Kingdom.
The subject matter covered by these patents, applications and other licenses encompasses theater
design and geometry, electronic circuitry and mechanisms employed in projectors and projection
equipment (including 3D projection equipment), a method for synchronizing digital data, a method of
generating stereoscopic (3D) imaging data from a monoscopic (2D) source, a process for digitally
re-mastering 35mm films into large-format, a method for increasing the dynamic range and contrast
of projectors, a method for visibly seaming or superimposing images from multiple projectors and
other inventions relating to digital projectors. The Company has been and will continue to be
diligent in the protection of its proprietary interests.
The Company currently holds or licenses 39 patents, has 16 patents pending in the United
States and has corresponding patents or filed applications in many countries throughout the world.
While the Company considers its patents to be important to the overall conduct of its business, it
does not consider any particular patent essential to its operations. Certain of the Companys
patents in the United States, Canada and Japan for improvements to the IMAX projection system
components expire between 2016 and 2024.
The Company owns or otherwise has rights to trademarks and trade names used in conjunction
with the sale of its products, systems and services. The following trademarks are considered
significant in terms of the current and contemplated operations of the Company: IMAX®,
Experience It In IMAX®, The IMAX Experience®, An IMAX Experience®,
An IMAX 3D Experience®, IMAX DMR®, IMAX® 3D, IMAX®
Dome, IMAX MPX®, IMAX think big® and think big®. These trademarks
are widely protected by registration or common law throughout the world. The Company also owns the
service mark IMAX THEATREtm.
EMPLOYEES
The Company had 361 employees as at December 31, 2010 compared to 325 employees as at December
31, 2009. Both employee counts exclude hourly employees at the Companys owned and operated
theaters.
15
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The Company makes available, free of charge, its Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K as soon as reasonably practicable after such
filings have been made with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Reports may be obtained through the Companys website at www.imax.com or by calling the Companys
Investor Relations Department at 212-821-0100.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
If any of the risks described below occurs, the Companys business, operating results and
financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
The risks described below are not the only ones the Company faces. Additional risks not
presently known to the Company or that it deems immaterial, may also impair its business or
operations.
RISKS RELATED TO THE COMPANYS FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OR CONDITION
The Company depends principally on commercial movie exhibitors to purchase or lease IMAX
theater systems, to supply box office revenue under joint revenue sharing arrangements and under
its sales and sales-type lease agreements and to supply venues in which to exhibit IMAX DMR films
and the Company can make no assurances that exhibitors will continue to do any of these things.
The Companys primary customers are commercial multiplex exhibitors, who represent 95% of the
224 systems in the Companys backlog as at December 31, 2010. The Company is unable to predict if,
or when, they or other exhibitors will purchase or lease IMAX theater systems or enter into joint
revenue sharing arrangements with the Company, or whether any of the Companys existing customers
will continue to do any of the foregoing. If exhibitors choose to reduce their levels of expansion
or decide not to purchase or lease IMAX theater systems or enter into joint revenue sharing
arrangements with the Company, the Companys revenues would not increase at an anticipated rate and
motion picture studios may be less willing to reformat their films into the Companys format for
exhibition in commercial IMAX theaters. As a result, the Companys future revenues and cash flows
could be adversely affected.
The success of the IMAX theater network is directly related to the availability and success of
IMAX DMR films for which there can be no guarantee.
An important factor affecting the growth and success of the IMAX theater network is the
availability of films for IMAX theaters and the box office success of such films. The Company
produces only a small number of such films and, as a result, the Company relies principally on
films produced by third party filmmakers and studios, particularly Hollywood features converted
into the Companys large format using the Companys IMAX DMR technology. The Companys first IMAX
DMR film, Apollo 13: The IMAX Experience, was released to 48 IMAX theaters, and the Companys most
recent IMAX DMR film at December 31, 2010, Tron: Legacy: An IMAX 3D Experience, was released to 366 IMAX theaters. There
is no guarantee that filmmakers and studios will continue to release IMAX films, or that the films
they produce will be commercially successful. The steady flow and successful box office performance
of IMAX DMR releases have become increasingly important to the Companys financial performance as
the number of joint revenue sharing arrangements included in the overall IMAX network has grown
considerably. Not only is the Company increasingly directly impacted by box-office results for the
films released to the IMAX network through its joint revenue sharing arrangements, as well as a
percentage of the box-office receipts from the studios releasing IMAX DMR films, but the Companys
continued ability to sell and lease IMAX theater systems also depends on the number and commercial
success of films released to its network. The commercial success of films released to IMAX theaters
depends on a number of factors outside of the Companys control, including whether the film
receives critical acclaim, the timing of its release and the success of the marketing efforts of
the studio releasing the film. Moreover, films can be subject to delays in production or changes in
release schedule, which can negatively impact the number, timing and quality of IMAX DMR and IMAX
original films released to the IMAX theater network.
The introduction of new products and technologies could harm the Companys business.
The out-of-home entertainment industry is very competitive, and the Company faces a number of
competitive challenges. According to the National Association of Theater Owners, as at December 31,
2010, there were approximately 8,000 conventional-sized screens in U.S. multiplexes equipped with
digital 3D systems. In addition, some commercial exhibitors have recently introduced or announced
an intention to introduce their own large-screen 3D auditoriums. The Company may also face
competition in the future from companies in the entertainment industry with new technologies and/or
substantially greater capital resources to develop and support them. If the Company is unable to
continue to remain a premium movie-going experience, or if other technologies surpass
16
those of the Company, the Company may be unable to continue to produce theater systems which
are premium to, or differentiated from, other theater systems. If the Company is unable to produce
a premium theater experience, consumers may be unwilling to pay the price premiums associated with
the cost of IMAX movie theater tickets and box office performance of IMAX films may decline.
Declining box office performance of IMAX films would materially and adversely harm the Companys
business and prospects. The Company also faces in-home competition from a number of alternative
motion picture distribution channels such as home video, pay-per-view, video-on-demand, DVD,
Internet and syndicated and broadcast television. The Company further competes for the publics
leisure time and disposable income with other forms of entertainment, including gaming, sporting
events, concerts, live theater and restaurants.
The Company is undertaking new lines of business and these new business initiatives may not be
successful.
The Company is actively exploring new areas of brand extension as well as opportunities in
alternative theater content. These initiatives represent new areas of growth for the Company, which
may not prove to be successful. Some of these initiatives could include the offering of new
products and services that may not be accepted by the market. For instance, the Company cannot
provide assurance that 3net, a 3D television channel operated by a Limited Liability Corporation
owned by the Company, Discovery Communications and Sony Corporation which debuted on February 13,
2011, will be a commercial success. Some areas of potential growth, including 3net, are in the
field of in-home entertainment technology, which is an intensively competitive business and which
is dependent on consumer demand, over which the Company has no control. If any new business in
which the Company invests or attempts to develop does not progress as planned, the Company may be
adversely affected by investment expenses that have not led to the anticipated results, by the
distraction of management from its core business or by damage to its brand or reputation.
In addition, these initiatives may involve the formation of joint ventures and business
alliances. While the Company seeks to employ the optimal structure for each such business alliance,
there is a possibility that the Company may have disagreements with its relevant partner in a joint
venture or business with respect to financing, technological management, product development,
management strategies or otherwise. Any such disagreement may cause the joint venture or business
alliance to be terminated.
The Company may not be able to adequately protect its intellectual property, and competitors
could misappropriate its technology, which could weaken its competitive position.
The Company depends on its proprietary knowledge regarding IMAX theater systems and digital
and film technology. The Company relies principally upon a combination of copyright, trademark,
patent and trade secret laws, restrictions on disclosures and contractual provisions to protect its
proprietary and intellectual property rights. These laws and procedures may not be adequate to
prevent unauthorized parties from attempting to copy or otherwise obtain the Companys processes
and technology or deter others from developing similar processes or technology, which could weaken
the Companys competitive position and require the Company to incur costs to secure enforcement of
its intellectual property rights. The protection provided to the Companys proprietary technology
by the laws of foreign jurisdictions may not protect it as fully as the laws of Canada or the
United States. Finally, some of the underlying technologies of the Companys products and system
components are not covered by patents or patent applications.
The Company has patents issued and patent applications pending, including those covering its
digital projector and digital conversion technology. The Companys patents are filed in the United
States, often with corresponding patents or filed applications in other jurisdictions, such as
Canada, Belgium, Japan, France, Germany and the United Kingdom. The patent applications pending may
not be issued or the patents may not provide the Company with any competitive advantages. The
patent applications may also be challenged by third parties. Several of the Companys issued
patents in the United States, Canada and Japan for improvements to IMAX projectors, IMAX 3D Dome
and sound system components expire between 2016 and 2024. Any claims or litigation initiated by the
Company to protect its proprietary technology could be time consuming, costly and divert the
attention of its technical and management resources.
Current economic conditions beyond the Companys control could materially affect the Companys
business by reducing both revenue generated from existing IMAX theater systems and the demand for
new IMAX theater systems.
The macro-economic outlook for 2011 remains negative in many markets and the U.S. and global
economies could remain significantly challenged for an indeterminate period of time. While
historically the movie industry has proved to be somewhat resistant to economic downturns, present
economic conditions, which are beyond the Companys control, could lead to a decrease in
discretionary consumer spending. It is difficult to predict the severity and the duration of any
decrease in discretionary consumer spending resulting from the economic downturn and what affect it
may have on the movie industry, in general, and box office results of the Companys films in
particular. In recent years, the majority of the Companys revenue has been directly derived from
the box-
17
office revenues of its films. Accordingly, any decline in attendance at commercial IMAX
theaters could materially and adversely affect several sources of key revenue streams for the
Company.
The Company also depends on the sale and lease of IMAX theater systems to commercial movie
exhibitors to generate revenue. Commercial movie exhibitors generate revenues from consumer
attendance at their theaters, which depends on the willingness of consumers to spend discretionary
income at movie theaters. While in the past, the movie industry has proven to be somewhat resistant
to economic downturns, in the event of declining box office and concession revenues, commercial
exhibitors may be less willing to invest capital in new IMAX theaters. In addition, as a result of
continuing tight credit conditions that may limit exhibitors access to capital, exhibitors may be
unable to invest capital in new IMAX theaters. A decline in demand for new IMAX theater systems
could materially and adversely affect the Companys results of operations.
The issuance of the Companys common shares and the accumulation of shares by certain
shareholders could result in the loss of the Companys ability to use certain of the Companys net
operating losses.
As at December 31, 2010, the Company had approximately $21.7 million of U.S. consolidated
federal tax and state tax net operating loss carryforwards. Realization of some or all of the
benefit from these U.S. net tax operating losses is dependent on the absence of certain ownership
changes of the Companys common shares. An ownership change, as defined in the applicable
federal income tax rules, would place possible limitations, on an annual basis, on the use of such
net operating losses to offset any future taxable income that the Company may generate. Such
limitations, in conjunction with the net operating loss expiration provisions, could significantly
reduce or effectively eliminate the Companys ability to use its U.S. net operating losses to
offset any future taxable income.
There is collection risk associated with payments to be received over the terms of the
Companys theater system agreements.
The Company is dependent in part on the viability of its exhibitors for collections under
long-term leases, sales financing agreements and joint revenue sharing arrangements. Exhibitors or
other operators may experience financial difficulties that could cause them to be unable to fulfill
their contractual payment obligations to the Company. As a result, the Companys future revenues
and cash flows could be adversely affected.
The Company may not convert all of its backlog into revenue and cash flows.
At December 31, 2010, the Companys sales backlog included 224 theater systems, consisting of
arrangements for 165 sales and lease systems and 59 theater systems under joint revenue sharing
arrangements. The Company lists signed contracts for theater systems for which revenue has not been
recognized as sales backlog prior to the time of revenue recognition. The total value of the sales
backlog represents all signed theater system sale or lease agreements that are expected to be
recognized as revenue in the future (other than those under joint revenue sharing arrangements) and
includes initial fees along with the present value of fixed minimum ongoing fees due over the term,
but excludes contingent fees in excess of fixed minimum ongoing fees that might be received in the
future and maintenance and extended warranty fees. Notwithstanding the legal obligation to do so,
not all of the Companys customers with which it has signed contracts may accept delivery of
theater systems that are included in the Companys backlog. This could adversely affect the
Companys future revenues and cash flows. In addition, customers with theater system obligations in
backlog sometimes request that the Company agree to modify or reduce such obligations, which the
Company has agreed to in the past under certain circumstances. Customer requested delays in the
installation of theater systems in backlog remain a recurring and unpredictable part of the
Companys business.
The Company conducts business internationally, which exposes it to uncertainties and risks
that could negatively affect its operations and sales.
A significant portion of the Companys revenues are generated by customers located outside the
United States and Canada. Approximately 30%, 35% and 32% of its revenues were derived outside of
the United States and Canada in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As at December 31, 2010,
approximately 66.1% of IMAX theater systems arrangements in backlog are scheduled to be installed
in international markets. Accordingly, the Company expects to expand its international operations
to account for an increasingly significant portion of its revenues in the future and plans to
expand into new markets in the future. The Company does not have significant experience in
operating in certain foreign countries and is subject to the risks associated with doing business
in those countries. The Company currently has theater system installations projected in countries
where economies have been unstable in recent years. In addition, the Company anticipates expanding
into new markets in which the Company has no operational experience. The economies of other foreign
countries important to the Companys operations could also suffer slower economic growth or
18
instability in the future. The following are among the risks that could negatively affect the
Companys operations and sales in foreign markets:
|
|
|
new restrictions on access to markets, both for theater systems and films; |
|
|
|
unusual or burdensome foreign laws or regulatory requirements or unexpected changes to
those laws or requirements; |
|
|
|
fluctuations in the value of foreign currency versus the U.S. dollar and potential
currency devaluations; |
|
|
|
new tariffs, trade protection measures, import or export licensing requirements, trade
embargoes and other trade barriers; |
|
|
|
imposition of foreign exchange controls in such foreign jurisdictions; |
|
|
|
dependence on foreign distributors and their sales channels; |
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations; |
|
|
|
adverse changes in monetary and/or tax policies; |
|
|
|
poor recognition of intellectual property rights; |
|
|
|
requirements to provide performance bonds and letters of credit to international
customers to secure system component deliveries; and |
|
|
|
political, economic and social instability. |
As the Company begins to expand the number of its theaters under joint revenue sharing
arrangements in international markets, the Companys revenues from its international operations
will become increasingly dependent on the box office performance of its films. The Company may be
unable to select films which will be successful in international markets. Also, conflicts in
international release schedules may make it difficult to release every IMAX film in certain
markets. Finally, box office reporting in certain countries may be less accurate and therefore less
reliable than in the United States and Canada.
The Company faces risks in connection with the continued expansion of its business in Greater
China and other parts of Asia.
The
first IMAX theater system in a theater in Greater China was installed in December 2001. As at
December 31, 2010, the Company had 40 theaters operating in Greater China with an additional 56
theaters in backlog that are scheduled to be installed in Greater China by 2015, and the Company plans to
further expand its business in the Greater China region. However, the geopolitical instability of
the region comprising Greater China, North Korea and South Korea could result in economic
embargoes, disruptions in shipping or even military hostilities, which could interfere with both
the fulfillment of the Companys existing contracts and its pursuit of additional contracts in
Greater China. Also, if the Company is unable to navigate Greater Chinas heavily-regulated film and cinema
business, the Companys growth prospects in Greater China may be hampered.
The Companys theater system revenue can vary significantly from its cash flows under theater
system sales or lease agreements.
The Companys theater systems revenue can vary significantly from the associated cash flows.
The Company generally provides financing to customers for theater systems on a long-term basis
through long-term leases or notes receivables. The terms of leases or notes receivable are
typically 10 to 20 years. The Companys sale and lease-type agreements typically provide for three
major sources of cash flow related to theater systems:
|
|
|
initial fees, which are paid in installments generally commencing upon the signing of the
agreement until installation of the theater systems; |
|
|
|
ongoing fees, which are paid monthly after all theater systems have been installed and
are generally equal to the greater of a fixed minimum amount per annum and a percentage of
box-office receipts; and |
19
|
|
|
ongoing annual maintenance and extended warranty fees, which are generally payable
commencing in the second year of theater operations. |
Initial fees generally make up a majority of cash received for a theater arrangement.
For sales and sales-type leases, the revenue recorded is generally equal to the sum of initial
fees and the present value of minimum ongoing fees due under the agreement. Cash received from
initial fees in advance of meeting the revenue recognition criteria for the theater systems is
recorded as deferred revenue. Contingent fees are recognized as they are reported by the theaters
after annual minimum fixed fees are exceeded.
Leases that do not transfer substantially all of the benefits and risks of ownership to the
customer are classified as operating leases. For these leases, initial fees and minimum fixed
ongoing fees are recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Contingent
fees are recognized as they are reported by the theaters after annual minimum fixed fees are
exceeded.
As a result of the above, the revenue set forth in the Companys financial statements does not
necessarily correlate with the Companys cash flow or cash position. Revenues include the present
value of future contracted cash payments and there is no guarantee that the Company will receive
such payments under its lease and sale agreements if its customers default on their payment
obligations.
The Companys operating results and cash flow can vary substantially from quarter to quarter
and could increase the volatility of its share price.
The Companys operating results and cash flow can fluctuate substantially from quarter to
quarter. In particular, fluctuations in theater system installations can materially affect
operating results. Factors that have affected the Companys operating results and cash flow in the
past, and are likely to affect its operating results and cash flow in the future, include, among
other things:
|
|
|
the timing of signing and installation of new theater systems; |
|
|
|
the demand for, and acceptance of, its products and services; |
|
|
|
the recognition of revenue of sales and sales-type leases; |
|
|
|
the classification of leases as sales-type versus operating leases; |
|
|
|
the timing and commercial success of films produced and distributed by the Company and
others; |
|
|
|
the volume of orders received and that can be filled in the quarter; |
|
|
|
the level of its sales backlog; |
|
|
|
the signing of film distribution agreements; |
|
|
|
the financial performance of IMAX theaters operated by the Companys customers and by the
Company; |
|
|
|
financial difficulties faced by customers, particularly customers in the commercial
exhibition industry; |
|
|
|
the magnitude and timing of spending in relation to the Companys research and
development efforts; and |
|
|
|
the number and timing of joint revenue sharing arrangement installations, related capital
expenditures and timing of related cash receipts. |
Most of the Companys operating expenses are fixed in the short term. The Company may be
unable to rapidly adjust its spending to compensate for any unexpected sales shortfall, which would
harm quarterly operating results, although the results of any quarterly period are not necessarily
indicative of its results for any other quarter or for a full fiscal year.
The Companys revenues from existing customers are derived in part from financial reporting
provided by its customers, which may be inaccurate or incomplete, resulting in lost or delayed
revenues.
20
The Companys revenue under its joint revenue sharing arrangements, a portion of the Companys
payments under lease or sales arrangements and its film license fees are based upon financial
reporting provided by its customers. If such reporting is inaccurate, incomplete or withheld, the
Companys ability to receive the appropriate payments in a timely fashion that are due to it may be
impaired. The Companys contractual ability to audit IMAX theaters may not rectify payments lost or
delayed as a result of customers not fulfilling their contractual obligations with respect to
financial reporting.
The Companys stock price has historically been volatile and declines in market price,
including as a result a market downturn, may negatively affect its ability to raise capital, issue
debt, secure customer business and retain employees.
The Companys publicly traded shares have in the past experienced, and may continue to
experience, significant price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility could reduce the
market price of its common stock, regardless of the Companys operating performance. A decline in
the capital markets generally, or an adjustment in the market price or trading volumes of the
Companys publicly traded securities, may negatively affect its ability to raise capital, issue
debt, secure customer business or retain employees. These factors, as well as general economic and
geopolitical conditions, may have a material adverse effect on the market price of the Companys
publicly traded securities.
The credit agreement governing the Companys senior secured credit facility contains
significant restrictions that limit its operating and financial flexibility.
The credit agreement governing the Companys senior secured credit facility contains certain
restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit its ability to:
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness; |
|
|
|
pay dividends and make distributions; |
|
|
|
make certain investments; |
|
|
|
transfer or sell assets; |
|
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
issue or sell stock of subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
create dividend or other payment restrictions affecting restricted subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
merge, consolidate, amalgamate or sell all or substantially all of its assets to another
person. |
These restrictive covenants impose operating and financial restrictions on the Company that
limit the Companys ability to engage in acts that may be in the Companys long-term best
interests.
The Company may experience adverse effects due to exchange rate fluctuations.
A substantial portion of the Companys revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars, while a
substantial portion of its expenses are denominated in Canadian dollars. The Company also generates
revenues in Euros and Japanese Yen. While the Company periodically enters into forward contracts to
hedge its exposure to exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. and the Canadian dollar, the
Company may not be successful in reducing its exposure to these fluctuations. The use of derivative
contracts is intended to mitigate or reduce transactional level volatility in the results of
foreign operations, but does not completely eliminate volatility.
21
The Company is subject to impairment losses on its film assets.
The Company amortizes its film assets, including IMAX DMR costs capitalized using the
individual film forecast method, whereby the costs of film assets are amortized and participation
costs are accrued for each film in the ratio of revenues earned in the current period to
managements estimate of total revenues ultimately expected to be received for that title.
Management regularly reviews, and revises when necessary, its estimates of ultimate revenues on a
title-by-title basis, which may result in a change in the rate of amortization of the film assets
and write-downs or impairments of film assets. Results of operations in future years include the
amortization of the Companys film assets and may be significantly affected by periodic adjustments
in amortization rates.
The Company is subject to impairment losses on its inventories.
The Company records provisions for excess and obsolete inventory based upon current estimates
of future events and conditions, including the anticipated installation dates for the current
backlog of theater system contracts, technological developments, signings in negotiation and
anticipated market acceptance of the Companys current and pending theater systems. Since the
Company introduced a proprietary digitally-based IMAX projection system, increased customer
acceptance and preference for the Companys digital projection system may subject existing
film-based inventories to further write-downs (resulting in lower margins) as these theater systems
become less desirable in the future.
If the Companys goodwill or long lived assets become impaired the Company may be required to
record a significant charge to earnings.
Under United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP), the Company
reviews its long lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment annually or
when events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment test is required. Factors that may
be considered a change in circumstances include (but are not limited to) a decline in stock price
and market capitalization, declines in future cash flows, and slower growth rates in the Companys
industry. The Company may be required to record a significant charge to earnings in its financial
statements during the period in which any impairment of its goodwill or long lived assets is
determined.
Changes in accounting and changes in managements estimates may affect the Companys reported
earnings and operating income.
U.S. GAAP and accompanying accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and
interpretations for many aspects of the Companys business, such as revenue recognition, film
accounting, accounting for pensions, accounting for income taxes, and treatment of goodwill or long
lived assets, are highly complex and involve many subjective judgments. Changes in these rules,
their interpretation, managements estimates, or changes in the Companys products or business
could significantly change its reported future earnings and operating income and could add
significant volatility to those measures, without a comparable underlying change in cash flow from
operations. See Critical Accounting Policies in Item 7.
The Company relies on its key personnel, and the loss of one or more of those personnel could
harm its ability to carry out its business strategy.
The Companys operations and prospects depend in large part on the performance and continued
service of its senior management team. The Company may not find qualified replacements for any of
these individuals if their services are no longer available. The loss of the services of one or
more members of the Companys senior management team could adversely affect its ability to
effectively pursue its business strategy.
Because the Company is incorporated in Canada, it may be difficult for plaintiffs to enforce
against the Company liabilities based solely upon U.S. federal securities laws.
The Company is incorporated under the federal laws of Canada, some of its directors and
officers are residents of Canada and a substantial portion of its assets and the assets of such
directors and officers are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for
U.S. plaintiffs to effect service within the United States upon those directors or officers who are
not residents of the United States, or to realize against them or the Company in the United States
upon judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil liability under the U.S.
federal securities laws. In addition, it may be difficult for plaintiffs to bring an original
action outside of the United States against the Company to enforce liabilities based solely on U.S.
federal securities laws.
22
RISKS RELATED TO THE COMPANYS PRIOR RESTATEMENTS AND RELATED MATTERS
The Company is subject to ongoing informal inquiries and a formal investigation by regulatory
authorities in the U.S. and Canada, and it cannot predict the timing of developments and outcomes
in these matters.
The Company is the subject of a formal investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC) and an informal inquiry by the Ontario Securities Commission (the OSC) which relate
to the Companys accounting policies and related matters. The Company cannot predict when the
investigation and inquiry will be completed or the further timing of any other developments in
connection with the inquiries. The Company also cannot predict their results or outcomes.
Expenses incurred in connection with these informal inquiries (which include substantial fees
for lawyers and other professional advisors) continue to adversely affect the Companys cash
position and profitability. The Company may also have potential obligations to indemnify officers
and directors who could, at a future date, be parties to such inquiries.
The formal investigation and the informal inquiry may adversely affect the course of the
pending litigation against the Company. The Company is currently defending a consolidated
class-action lawsuit in the U.S. and a class-action lawsuit in Ontario (see Item 3. Legal
Proceedings). Negative developments or outcomes in the formal investigation or the informal
inquiries could have an adverse effect on the Companys defense of lawsuits. Also, the SEC and/or
OSC could impose sanctions and/or fines on the Company in connection with the aforementioned
investigation and inquiry. Finally, this investigation and inquiry could divert the attention of
the Companys management and other personnel for significant periods of time.
The Company is subject to lawsuits that could divert its resources and result in the payment
of significant damages and other remedies.
The Companys industry is characterized by frequent claims and related litigation regarding
breach of contract and related issues. The Company is subject to a number of legal proceedings and
claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. In addition, the Company is engaged as a
defendant in several class action lawsuits filed by certain shareholders of the Company. The
Company cannot assure that it will succeed in defending any claims, that judgments will not be
entered against it with respect to any litigation or that reserves the Company may set aside will
be adequate to cover any such judgments. If any of these actions or proceedings against the Company
is successful, it may be subject to significant damages awards. In addition, the Company is the
plaintiff in a number of lawsuits in which it seeks the recovery of substantial payments. The
Company is incurring legal fees in prosecuting and defending its lawsuits, and it may not
ultimately prevail in such lawsuits or be able to collect on such judgments if it does.
Although the Companys directors and officers liability insurance provides coverage for the
class-action, the defense of these claims (as with the defense or prosecution of all of the
Companys litigation) could divert the attention of the Companys management and other personnel
for significant periods of time.
The Company has been the subject of anti-trust complaints and investigations in the past and
may be sued or investigated on similar grounds in the future.
The outcome of informal inquiries and a formal investigation by regulatory authorities in the
U.S. and Canada may affect the Companys business and the market price of its publicly traded
common shares.
The Company has been the subject of continuing negative publicity in part as a result of the
ongoing SEC investigation and OSC inquiry and its prior delay in filing financial statements and
restatements of prior results. Continuing negative publicity could have an adverse effect on the
Companys business and the market price of the Companys publicly traded securities.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
The Companys principal executive offices are located in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, New
York, New York, and Santa Monica, California. The Companys principal facilities are as follows:
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation |
|
Own/Lease |
|
Expiration |
Mississauga, Ontario(1) |
|
Headquarters, Administrative, Assembly and Research and Development |
|
Own |
|
N/A |
New York, New York |
|
Executive |
|
Lease |
|
2014 |
Santa Monica, California |
|
Sales, Marketing, Film Production and Post-Production |
|
Lease |
|
2013 |
Shanghai, China |
|
Sales, Marketing and Maintenance |
|
Lease |
|
2012 |
London, United Kingdom |
|
Sales, Marketing and Maintenance |
|
Lease |
|
2011 |
Tokyo, Japan |
|
Sales, Marketing and Maintenance |
|
Lease |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This facility is subject to a charge in favor of Wells Fargo Capital Finance Corporation Canada (formerly
Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Canada)) in connection with a secured term and revolving credit
facility (see note 12 to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 8). |
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In March 2005, the Company, together with Three-Dimensional Media Group, Ltd. (3DMG), filed
a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division,
against In-Three, Inc. (In-Three) alleging patent infringement. On March 10, 2006, the Company
and In-Three entered into a settlement agreement settling the dispute between the Company and
In-Three. Despite the settlement reached between the Company and In-Three, co-plaintiff 3DMG
refused to dismiss its claims against In-Three. Accordingly, the Company and In-Three moved jointly
for a motion to dismiss the Companys and In-Threes claims. On August 24, 2010, the Court
dismissed all of the claims pending between the Company and In-Three, thus dismissing the Company
from the litigation.
On May 15, 2006, the Company initiated arbitration against 3DMG before the International
Centre for Dispute Resolution in New York (the ICDR), alleging breaches of the license and
consulting agreements between the Company and 3DMG. On June 15, 2006, 3DMG filed an answer denying
any breaches and asserting counterclaims that the Company breached the parties license agreement.
On June 21, 2007, the Arbitration Panel unanimously denied 3DMGs Motion for Summary Judgment filed
on April 11, 2007 concerning the Companys claims and 3DMGs counterclaims. The proceeding was
suspended on May 4, 2009 due to failure of 3DMG to pay fees associated with the proceeding. The
proceeding was further suspended on October 11, 2010 pending resolution of reexamination
proceedings currently pending involving one of 3DMGs patents. The Company will continue to pursue
its claims vigorously and believes that all allegations made by 3DMG are without merit. The Company
further believes that the amount of loss, if any, suffered in connection with the counterclaims
would not have a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company,
although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of the arbitration.
In January 2004, the Company and IMAX Theatre Services Ltd., a subsidiary of the Company,
commenced an arbitration seeking damages before the International Court of Arbitration of the
International Chambers of Commerce (the ICC) with respect to the breach by Electronic Media
Limited (EML) of its December 2000 agreement with the Company. In June 2004, the Company
commenced a related arbitration before the ICC against EMLs affiliate, E-CITI Entertainment (I)
PVT Limited (E-Citi), seeking damages as a result of E-Citis breach of a September 2000 lease
agreement. An arbitration hearing took place in November 2005 against E-Citi which considered all
claims by the Company. On February 1, 2006, the ICC issued an award on liability finding
unanimously in the Companys favor on all claims. Further hearings took place in July 2006 and
December 2006. On August 24, 2007, the ICC issued an award unanimously in favor of the Company in
the amount of $9.4 million, consisting of past and future rents owed to the Company under its lease
agreements, plus interest and costs. In the award, the ICC upheld the validity and enforceability
of the Companys theater system contract. The Company thereafter submitted its application to the
arbitration panel for interest and costs. On March 27, 2008, the Panel issued a final award in
favor of the Company in the amount of $11,309,496, plus an additional $2,512 each day in interest
from October 1, 2007 until the date the award is paid, which the Company is seeking to enforce and
collect in full.
In June 2004, Robots of Mars, Inc. (Robots) initiated an arbitration proceeding against the
Company in California with the American Arbitration Association pursuant to arbitration provisions
in two film production agreements between Robots predecessor-in-interest and a subsidiary of the
Company (Ridefilm), asserting claims for breach of contract, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and
intentional interference with the contract. Robots is seeking an award of contingent compensation
that it claims is owed under two production agreements, damages for tort claims, and punitive
damages. The arbitration hearing of this matter occurred in June and October 2009. The parties are
currently awaiting a final award from the arbitrator. The Company believes the amount of loss, if
any, that may be suffered in connection with this proceeding, will not have a material impact on
the financial position or results of operations of the Company, although no assurance can be given
with respect to the ultimate outcome of such arbitration.
The Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in eight
purported class action lawsuits filed between August 11, 2006 and September 18, 2006, alleging
violations of U.S. federal securities laws. These eight actions were filed in
24
the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. On January 18, 2007, the Court
consolidated all eight class action lawsuits and appointed Westchester Capital Management, Inc. as
the lead plaintiff and Abbey Spanier Rodd & Abrams, LLP as lead plaintiffs counsel. On October 2,
2007, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended class action complaint. The amended complaint,
brought on behalf of shareholders who purchased the Companys common stock between February 27,
2003 and July 20, 2007, alleges primarily that the defendants engaged in securities fraud by
disseminating materially false and misleading statements during the class period regarding the
Companys revenue recognition of theater system installations, and failing to disclose material
information concerning the Companys revenue recognition practices. The amended complaint also
added PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Companys auditors, as a defendant. The lawsuit seeks
unspecified compensatory damages, costs, and expenses. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the
amended complaint on December 10, 2007. On September 16, 2008, the Court issued a memorandum
opinion and order, denying the motion. On October 6, 2008, the defendants filed an answer to the
amended complaint. On October 31, 2008, the plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. Fact
discovery on the merits commenced on November 14, 2008. On March 13, 2009, the Court granted a
second prospective lead plaintiffs request to file a motion for reconsideration of the Courts
order naming Westchester Capital Management, Inc. as the lead plaintiff and issued an order denying
without prejudice plaintiffs class certification motion pending resolution of the motion for
reconsideration. On June 29, 2009, the Court granted the motion for reconsideration and appointed
Snow Capital Investment Partners, L.P. as the lead plaintiff and Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman &
Robbins LLP as lead plaintiffs counsel. Westchester Capital Management, Inc. appealed this
decision, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied its petition on October 1,
2009. On April 22, 2010, the new lead plaintiff filed its motion for class certification,
defendants filed their oppositions to the motion on June 10, 2010, and plaintiff filed its reply on
July 30, 2010. On December 20, 2010, the Court denied Snow Capital Investment Partners motion and
ordered that all applications to be appointed lead plaintiff must be filed within 20 days of the
decision. Two applications for lead plaintiff were filed, on January 10, 2011 and January 12, 2011,
respectively. The lawsuit is at an early stage and as a result the Company is not able to estimate
a potential loss exposure at this time. The Company will vigorously defend the matter, although no
assurances can be given with respect to the outcome of such proceedings. The Companys directors
and officers insurance policy provides for reimbursement of costs and expenses incurred in
connection with this lawsuit as well as potential damages awarded, if any, subject to certain
policy limits and deductibles.
A class action lawsuit was filed on September 20, 2006 in the Ontario Superior Court of
Justice against the Company and certain of its officers and directors, alleging violations of
Canadian securities laws. This lawsuit was brought on behalf of shareholders who acquired the
Companys securities between February 17, 2006 and August 9, 2006. The lawsuit is in an early
procedural stage and seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, as well as costs and
expenses. As a result, the Company is unable to estimate a potential loss exposure at this time.
For reasons released December 14, 2009, the Court granted leave to the Plaintiffs to amend their
statement of claim to plead certain claims pursuant to the Securities Act (Ontario) against the
Company and certain individuals and granted certification of the action as a class proceeding.
These are procedural decisions, and do not contain any binding conclusions on the factual or legal
merits of the claim. The Company has brought a motion seeking Court approval to appeal those
decisions and it is not known when the Ontario court will release a decision on that motion. The
Company believes the allegations made against it in the statement of claim are meritless and will
vigorously defend the matter, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate
outcome of such proceedings. The Companys directors and officers insurance policy provides for
reimbursement of costs and expenses incurred in connection with this lawsuit as well as potential
damages awarded, if any, subject to certain policy limits and deductibles.
On September 7, 2007, Catalyst Fund Limited Partnership II (Catalyst), a holder of the
Companys Senior Notes, commenced an application against the Company in the Ontario Superior Court
of Justice for a declaration of oppression pursuant to sections 229 and 241 of the Canada Business
Corporations Act (the CBCA) and for a declaration that the Company is in default of the indenture
governing its now retired Senior Notes (the Indenture). In its application against the Company,
Catalyst challenged the validity of the consent solicitation through which the Company requested
and obtained a waiver of any and all defaults arising from a failure to comply with the reporting
covenant under the Indenture and alleged common law fraud. On September 26, 2008, on the Companys
motion, the Ontario Superior Court stayed Catalysts application in Canada on the basis of Catalyst
having brought similar claims against the Company in the State of New York, and ordered Catalyst to
pay the Companys costs associated with the motion. On April 27, 2009, the Supreme Court of the
State of New York disposed of Catalysts claims against the Company in the State of New York (see
note 10(g) for additional information). The time for Catalyst to appeal the dismissal of its claim
by the New York court expired on February 8, 2010, without Catalyst perfecting an appeal.
In a related matter, on December 21, 2007, U.S. Bank National Association, trustee under the
Indenture, filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York against the Company and
Catalyst, requesting a declaration that the theory of default asserted by Catalyst before the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice is without merit and further that Catalyst has failed to satisfy
certain prerequisites to bondholder action, which are contained in the Indenture (the U.S. Bank
Action). On February 22, 2008, Catalyst served a Verified Answer to the U.S. Bank Action and filed
several cross-claims (the Cross-Claims) against the Company in the
25
same proceeding. On January
16, 2009, the Company moved for summary judgment, seeking a ruling
that the Company satisfied the terms of the declaratory relief requested by the Trustee and the dismissal of the
Cross-Claims. On April 27, 2009, the Court granted the Companys motion for summary judgment,
disposing of the Cross-Claims. On May 7, 2009, Catalyst filed a notice preserving for a period of
nine months its right to appeal the Courts ruling on summary judgment. The time for Catalyst to
perfect its appeal has now expired.
On November 4, 2009, Cinemark USA, Inc. (Cinemark) filed a complaint in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against the Company seeking a declaratory judgment
that Cinemark is not infringing certain of the Companys patents related to theater geometry and
that such patents are invalid. On December 22, 2010, the Company and Cinemark entered into a
Settlement Agreement in which they agreed to dismiss the Texas action with prejudice. As part of
the settlement, the Company and Cinemark also agreed to enter into a purchase agreement pursuant to
which Cinemark agreed to purchase two IMAX digital theater systems and to upgrade six of its IMAX
film-based theaters to IMAX digital theaters. On January 13, 2011, the Court granted the parties
joint motion to dismiss with prejudice.
On November 12, 2009, the Company filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of New York against
Cinemark alleging breach of contract, fraud, tortious interference with existing and prospective
economic relations, breach of the implied warranty of good faith and fair dealing, misappropriation
of trade secrets, unjust enrichment and deliberate acts of bad faith in connection with the
introduction and operation of a new Cinemark theater prototype. The lawsuit was removed to federal
court in New York and the tort claims were dismissed without prejudice to the Companys right to
replead those claims. On December 22, 2010, the Company and Cinemark entered into a Settlement
Agreement in which they agreed to dismiss the New York action with prejudice. As part of the
settlement, the Company and Cinemark also agreed to enter into a purchase agreement pursuant to
which Cinemark agreed to purchase two IMAX digital theater systems and to upgrade six of its IMAX
film-based theaters to IMAX digital theaters. On January 4, 2011, the Company filed a voluntary
stipulation of dismissal. The matter is now closed.
In November 2009, the Company filed suit against Sanborn Theatres (Sanborn) in the United
States District Court for the Central District of California alleging breach of Sanborns agreement
to make payments for the purchase of two IMAX theater systems from the Company and seeking $1.7
million in compensatory damages. After granting Sanborn notice of default in connection with the
failure to make required payments under the agreement and upon Sanborns failure to cure, the
Company terminated its agreement with Sanborn. On May 11, 2010, Sanborn filed suit against the
Company and AMC Entertainment Inc. (AMC Entertainment) and Regal Cinemas, Inc. (Regal) in the
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California alleging breach of contract, fraud and
unfair competition against the Company and alleging intentional interference with contractual
relations against AMC Entertainment and Regal. The lawsuits are at early stages and as a result the
Company is not able to estimate a potential loss exposure, if any, at this time. The Company will
vigorously prosecute its claims and defenses in both matters, although no assurances can be given
with respect to the outcome of such proceedings.
Since June 2006, the Company has been subject to ongoing informal inquiries by the SEC and the
OSC. On or about September 3, 2010, the SEC issued a formal order of investigation in connection
with its inquiry. The Company has been cooperating with these inquiries and will continue
to cooperate with the SECs investigation. The Company believes that the inquiry and investigation
principally relate to the timing of recognition of the Companys theater system installation
revenue in 2005 and related matters. Although the Company cannot predict the timing of developments
and outcomes in these inquiries, they could result at any time in developments (including charges
or settlement of charges) that could have material adverse effects on the Company. These effects
could include payments of fines or disgorgement or other relief with respect to the Company or its
officers or employees that could be material to the Company. Such developments could also have an
adverse effect on the Companys defense of the class action lawsuits referred to above.
In addition to the matters described above, the Company is currently involved in other legal
proceedings which, in the opinion of the Companys management, will not materially affect the
Companys financial position or future operating results, although no assurance can be given with
respect to the ultimate outcome of any such proceedings.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the security holders during the quarter ended
December 31, 2010.
26
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities
The Companys common shares are listed for trading under the trading symbol IMAX on the New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Prior to February 11, 2011, the Companys common shares were listed
for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (NASDAQ). The common shares are also listed on the
Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) under the trading symbol IMX. The following table sets forth the
range of high and low sales prices per share for the common shares on NASDAQ and the TSX.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
High |
|
Low |
NASDAQ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter |
|
$ |
32.30 |
|
|
$ |
16.93 |
|
Third quarter |
|
$ |
17.25 |
|
|
$ |
12.10 |
|
Second quarter |
|
$ |
21.30 |
|
|
$ |
14.28 |
|
First quarter |
|
$ |
18.26 |
|
|
$ |
11.50 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter |
|
$ |
13.87 |
|
|
$ |
9.00 |
|
Third quarter |
|
$ |
10.14 |
|
|
$ |
7.14 |
|
Second quarter |
|
$ |
8.49 |
|
|
$ |
4.28 |
|
First quarter |
|
$ |
5.49 |
|
|
$ |
3.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollars |
|
|
High |
|
Low |
TSX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter |
|
$ |
32.56 |
|
|
$ |
17.20 |
|
Third quarter |
|
$ |
17.69 |
|
|
$ |
12.78 |
|
Second quarter |
|
$ |
21.45 |
|
|
$ |
15.02 |
|
First quarter |
|
$ |
18.56 |
|
|
$ |
12.34 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter |
|
$ |
14.56 |
|
|
$ |
9.68 |
|
Third quarter |
|
$ |
10.82 |
|
|
$ |
8.39 |
|
Second quarter |
|
$ |
9.77 |
|
|
$ |
5.45 |
|
First quarter |
|
$ |
6.66 |
|
|
$ |
4.89 |
|
As at January 31, 2011, the Company had approximately 266 registered holders of record of the
Companys common shares.
Within the last three years, the Company has not paid and has no current plans to pay, cash
dividends on its common shares. The payment of dividends by the Company is subject to certain
restrictions under the terms of the Companys indebtedness (see notes 11 and 12 to the accompanying
audited consolidated financial statements in Item 8 and Liquidity and Capital Resources in Item
7). The payment of any future dividends will be determined by the Board of Directors in light of
conditions then existing, including the Companys financial condition and requirements, future
prospects, restrictions in financing agreements, business conditions and other factors deemed
relevant by the Board of Directors.
Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth information regarding the Companys Equity Compensation Plan as at
December 31, 2010:
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for |
|
|
|
Number of Securities to be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under |
|
|
|
Issued Upon Exercise of |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans |
|
|
|
Outstanding Options, |
|
|
Exercise Price of |
|
|
(Excluding Securities |
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights |
|
|
Outstanding Options |
|
|
Reflected in Column (a)) |
|
Plan Category |
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
|
6,743,272 |
|
|
$ |
10.79 |
|
|
|
6,085,843 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
nil |
|
|
nil |
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
6,743,272 |
|
|
$ |
10.79 |
|
|
|
6,085,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the total cumulative shareholder return for $100 invested
(assumes that all dividends were reinvested) in common shares of the Company against the cumulative
total return of the NASDAQ Composite Index, the S&P/TSX Composite Index and the Bloomberg Hollywood
Reporter Index on December 31, 2005 to the end of the most recently completed fiscal year.
CERTAIN INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following discussion is a general summary of the material U.S. federal income tax
consequences of the ownership and disposition of the common shares by a holder of common shares
that is an individual resident of the United States or a United States corporation (a U.S.
Holder). This discussion does not discuss all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be
relevant to investors subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax law (including,
for example, owners of 10.0% or more of the voting shares of the Company).
Distributions on Common Shares
In general, distributions (without reduction for Canadian withholding taxes) paid by the
Company with respect to the common shares will be taxed to a U.S. Holder as dividend income to the
extent that such distributions do not exceed the current and accumulated earnings and profits of
the Company (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes). Subject to certain limitations,
under current law dividends paid to non-corporate U.S. Holders in taxable years beginning before
January 1, 2013 may be eligible for a reduced rate of taxation as long as the Company is considered
to be a qualified foreign corporation. A qualified foreign
28
corporation includes a foreign corporation that is eligible for the benefits of an income tax
treaty with the United States. The amount of a distribution that exceeds the earnings and profits
of the Company will be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S.
Holders tax basis in the common shares and thereafter as taxable capital gain. Corporate holders
generally will not be allowed a deduction for dividends received in respect of distributions on
common shares. Subject to the limitations set forth in the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, as modified
by the U.S.-Canada Income Tax Treaty, U.S. Holders may elect to claim a foreign tax credit against
their U.S. federal income tax liability for Canadian income tax withheld from dividends.
Alternatively, U.S. Holders may claim a deduction for such amounts of Canadian tax withheld.
Disposition of Common Shares
Upon the sale or other disposition of common shares, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize
capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale and such
holders tax basis in the common shares. Gain or loss upon the disposition of the common shares
will be long-term if, at the time of the disposition, the common shares have been held for more
than one year. Long-term capital gains of non-corporate U.S. Holders may be eligible for a reduced
rate of taxation. The deduction of capital losses is subject to limitations for U.S. federal income
tax purposes.
Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations
This summary is applicable to a holder or prospective purchaser of common shares who, for the
purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) and any applicable treaty and at all relevant times, is not
(and is not deemed to be) resident in Canada, does not (and is not deemed to) use or hold the
common shares in, or in the course of, carrying on a business in Canada, and is not an insurer that
carries on an insurance business in Canada and elsewhere.
This summary is based on the current provisions of the Income Tax Act (Canada), the
regulations thereunder, all specific proposals to amend such Act and regulations publicly announced
by or on behalf of the Minister of Finance (Canada) prior to the date hereof and the Companys
understanding of the administrative and assessing practices published in writing by the Canada
Revenue Agency. This summary does not otherwise take into account any change in law or
administrative practice, whether by judicial, governmental, legislative or administrative action,
nor does it take into account provincial, territorial or foreign income tax consequences, which may
vary from the Canadian federal income tax considerations described herein.
This summary is of a general nature only and it is not intended to be, nor should it be
construed to be, legal or tax advice to any holder of the common shares and no representation with
respect to Canadian federal income tax consequences to any holder of common shares is made herein.
Accordingly, prospective purchasers and holders of the common shares should consult their own tax
advisers with respect to their individual circumstances.
Dividends on Common Shares
Canadian withholding tax at a rate of 25.0% (subject to reduction under the provisions of any
relevant tax treaty) will be payable on dividends paid or credited to a holder of common shares
outside of Canada. Under the Canada U.S. Income Tax Convention (1980), as amended (the Canada -
U.S. Income Tax Treaty) the withholding tax rate is generally reduced to 15.0% for a holder
entitled to the benefits of the Canada U.S. Income Tax Treaty who is the beneficial owner of the
dividends (or 5.0% if the holder is a corporation that owns at least 10.0% of the common shares).
Capital Gains and Losses
Subject to the provisions of any relevant tax treaty, capital gains realized by a holder on
the disposition or deemed disposition of common shares held as capital property will not be subject
to Canadian tax unless the common shares are taxable Canadian property (as defined in the Income
Tax Act (Canada)), in which case the capital gains will be subject to Canadian tax at rates which
will approximate those payable by a Canadian resident. Common shares generally will not be taxable
Canadian property to a holder provided that, at the time of the disposition or deemed disposition,
the common shares are listed on a designated stock exchange (which currently includes the TSX)
unless such holder, persons with whom such holder did not deal at arms length or such holder
together with all such persons, owned 25.0% or more of the issued shares of any class or series of
shares of the Company at any time within the 60 month period immediately preceding such time and
more than 50% of the fair market value of the common shares was derived directly or indirectly from
one or any combination of (i) real or immovable property situated in Canada, (ii) Canadian resource
properties, (iii) timber resource properties, and (iv) options in respect of, or interests in, or
for civil law rights in, property described in any of paragraphs (i) to (iii), whether or not the
property exists. In certain circumstances set out in the Income Tax Act (Canada), the common shares
may be deemed to be taxable Canadian property. Under the Canada-U.S. Income Tax Treaty, a holder
entitled to the
29
benefits of the Canada U.S. Income Tax Treaty and to whom the common shares are taxable
Canadian property will not be subject to Canadian tax on the disposition or deemed disposition of
the common shares unless at the time of disposition or deemed disposition, the value of the common
shares is derived principally from real property situated in Canada.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The selected financial data set forth below is derived from the consolidated financial
information of the Company. The financial information has been prepared in accordance with U.S.
GAAP. All financial information referred to herein is expressed in U.S. dollars unless otherwise
noted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Statements of Operations Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and product sales |
|
$ |
72,578 |
|
|
$ |
57,304 |
|
|
$ |
27,853 |
|
|
$ |
32,500 |
|
|
$ |
49,322 |
|
Services |
|
|
123,911 |
|
|
|
82,052 |
|
|
|
61,477 |
|
|
|
64,972 |
|
|
|
62,927 |
|
Rentals |
|
|
46,936 |
|
|
|
25,758 |
|
|
|
8,207 |
|
|
|
7,107 |
|
|
|
5,622 |
|
Finance income |
|
|
4,789 |
|
|
|
4,235 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
4,649 |
|
|
|
5,242 |
|
Other revenues(2) |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
1,862 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,614 |
|
|
|
171,211 |
|
|
|
102,718 |
|
|
|
111,655 |
|
|
|
123,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses applicable to revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and product sales(3)(4) |
|
|
36,394 |
|
|
|
29,040 |
|
|
|
17,182 |
|
|
|
21,546 |
|
|
|
26,008 |
|
Services(3)(4) |
|
|
63,425 |
|
|
|
49,891 |
|
|
|
40,771 |
|
|
|
46,254 |
|
|
|
43,679 |
|
Rentals(4) |
|
|
11,111 |
|
|
|
10,093 |
|
|
|
7,043 |
|
|
|
2,987 |
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
Other |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,962 |
|
|
|
89,659 |
|
|
|
65,165 |
|
|
|
70,837 |
|
|
|
71,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
137,652 |
|
|
|
81,552 |
|
|
|
37,553 |
|
|
|
40,818 |
|
|
|
51,867 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses(5) |
|
|
78,428 |
|
|
|
56,207 |
|
|
|
43,681 |
|
|
|
44,716 |
|
|
|
42,543 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
6,249 |
|
|
|
3,755 |
|
|
|
7,461 |
|
|
|
5,789 |
|
|
|
3,615 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
Receivable provisions, net of recoveries |
|
|
1,443 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
1,977 |
|
|
|
1,795 |
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
Restructuring costs and asset impairments(6) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
|
50,974 |
|
|
|
19,797 |
|
|
|
(16,092 |
) |
|
|
(12,514 |
) |
|
|
3,012 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,885 |
) |
|
|
(13,845 |
) |
|
|
(17,707 |
) |
|
|
(17,093 |
) |
|
|
(16,759 |
) |
Loss on repurchase of Senior Notes due December 2010(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
49,488 |
|
|
|
5,471 |
|
|
|
(33,418 |
) |
|
|
(28,745 |
) |
|
|
(12,711 |
) |
Recovery of (provision for) income taxes(8) |
|
|
51,784 |
|
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(472 |
) |
|
|
(6,218 |
) |
Loss from equity-accounted investments |
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
100,779 |
|
|
|
5,197 |
|
|
|
(33,510 |
) |
|
|
(29,217 |
) |
|
|
(18,929 |
) |
Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
2,277 |
|
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
100,779 |
|
|
$ |
5,021 |
|
|
$ |
(33,602 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,940 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,849 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.72 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.47 |
) |
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.72 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.47 |
) |
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In 2009, the Company closed its owned and operated Vancouver and Tempe
IMAX theaters. The net (loss) earnings from the operation of the
theaters are reflected as discontinued operations and disclosed in
note 23(c) to the accompanying audited consolidated financial
statements in Item 8, as there are no continuing cash flows from
either a migration or a continuation of activities. The remaining
assets and liabilities of the owned and operated Vancouver and Tempe
IMAX theaters are included in the Companys consolidated balance sheet
as at December 31, 2010 and are disclosed in note 23(d) to the
accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 8. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company enters into theater system arrangements with customers
that typically contain customer payment obligations prior to the
scheduled installation of the theater systems. The Companys joint
revenue sharing arrangements are not included in these arrangements as
the Company receives a portion of a theaters box-office and
concession revenue in exchange for contributing a theater system at
theater operators venues with no upfront payment obligations
required. During the period of time between signing and theater system
installation, certain customers each year are unable to, or elect not
to, proceed with the theater system installation for a number of
reasons, including business considerations, or the inability to obtain
certain consents, approvals or financing. Once the determination is
made that the customer will not proceed with installation, the
customer and/or the Company may terminate the arrangement by default
or by entering into a consensual buyout. In these situations the
parties are released from their future obligations under the
arrangement, and the initial payments that the customer previously
made to the Company and recognized as revenue are typically not
refunded. In addition, the Company enters into agreements with
customers to terminate their obligations for a theater system
configuration and enter into a new arrangement for a different
configuration. Included in Other Revenues for the periods 2006 through
2010 are the following types of settlement arrangements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Theater system configuration conversions |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
Consensual buyouts |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
$ |
1,862 |
|
|
$ |
881 |
|
|
$ |
2,247 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
In recent years, the Company has recorded a charge to costs and
expenses to revenues, primarily for its film-based projector
inventories, due to a reduction in the net realizable value resulting
from the Company development of a digital projection system. Included
for the periods 2006 through 2010 are the following inventory
write-downs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Equipment and product sales |
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
2,397 |
|
|
$ |
3,284 |
|
|
$ |
1,322 |
|
Services |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
999 |
|
|
$ |
897 |
|
|
$ |
2,490 |
|
|
$ |
3,848 |
|
|
$ |
1,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The Company recorded advertising, marketing, and commission costs for
the periods 2006 through 2010 as listed below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Equipment and product sales |
|
$ |
1,925 |
|
|
$ |
2,041 |
|
|
$ |
1,035 |
|
|
$ |
810 |
|
|
$ |
1,630 |
|
Services |
|
|
2,793 |
|
|
|
2,381 |
|
|
|
1,622 |
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
2,142 |
|
Rentals |
|
|
4,236 |
|
|
|
3,405 |
|
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising, marketing, and commission costs |
|
$ |
8,954 |
|
|
$ |
7,827 |
|
|
$ |
4,445 |
|
|
$ |
2,742 |
|
|
$ |
3,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Includes share-based compensation expense of $26.0 million, $17.5
million, $1.0 million, $2.9 million and $0.6 million for 2010, 2009,
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
|
(6) |
|
In 2010, the Company recorded asset impairment charges of less than
$0.1 million related to the impairment of assets of certain theater
operations. Asset impairment charges amounted to $0.2 million, $nil,
$0.5 million and $1.0 million in 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, after the Company assessed the carrying value of certain
assets. |
31
|
|
|
(7) |
|
In 2009, the Company repurchased all of its outstanding $160.0 million
aggregate principal amount of the Companys 9.625% Senior Notes. The
Company paid cash to reacquire its bonds, thereby releasing the
Company from further obligations to various holders under the
Indenture governing the Senior Notes. The Company accounted for the
bond repurchase in accordance with the Debt Topic of the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification whereby the net carrying amount of
the debt extinguished was the face value of the bonds adjusted for any
unamortized premium, discount and costs of issuance, which resulted in
a loss of $0.6 million. |
|
(8) |
|
The recovery for income taxes in the year ended December 31, 2010
includes a net non-cash income tax benefit of $54.8 million related to
a decrease in the valuation allowance for the Companys deferred tax
assets and other tax adjustments. This release of the valuation
allowance was recorded after it was determined that realization of
this deferred income tax benefit is now more likely than not based on
current and anticipated future earnings trends. In 2006, the Company recorded an increase
to the deferred tax valuation allowance of $6.2 million based on the
Companys recoverability assessments of deferred tax balances carried
forward from the prior year. As at December 31, 2006, and continuing
through to the third quarter of the current year, the Company
determined that based on the weight of available evidence, positive
and negative, a full valuation allowance for the net deferred tax
assets was required. |
BALANCE SHEETS DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
$ |
30,390 |
|
|
$ |
20,081 |
|
|
$ |
27,017 |
|
|
$ |
16,901 |
|
|
$ |
27,238 |
|
Total assets(1)
|
|
$ |
349,088 |
|
|
$ |
247,545 |
|
|
$ |
228,667 |
|
|
$ |
207,982 |
|
|
$ |
227,291 |
|
Total indebtedness
|
|
$ |
17,500 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
180,000 |
|
|
$ |
160,000 |
|
|
$ |
160,000 |
|
Total shareholders equity (deficiency)
|
|
$ |
158,458 |
|
|
$ |
45,010 |
|
|
$ |
(96,774 |
) |
|
$ |
(85,370 |
) |
|
$ |
(58,232 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the assets of discontinued operations. |
32
QUARTERLY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts) |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q3 |
|
|
Q4(2) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
72,784 |
|
|
$ |
55,598 |
|
|
$ |
51,069 |
|
|
$ |
69,163 |
|
Costs and expenses applicable to revenues |
|
|
24,484 |
|
|
|
28,558 |
|
|
|
25,140 |
|
|
|
32,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
$ |
48,300 |
|
|
$ |
27,040 |
|
|
$ |
25,929 |
|
|
$ |
36,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
26,580 |
|
|
$ |
13,302 |
|
|
$ |
6,736 |
|
|
$ |
54,161 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
26,580 |
|
|
$ |
13,302 |
|
|
$ |
6,736 |
|
|
$ |
54,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Q1(1) |
|
|
Q2(1) |
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
Q4(1) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
33,136 |
|
|
$ |
40,362 |
|
|
$ |
43,476 |
|
|
$ |
54,237 |
|
Costs and expenses applicable to revenues |
|
|
18,928 |
|
|
|
19,679 |
|
|
|
24,697 |
|
|
|
26,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
$ |
14,208 |
|
|
$ |
20,683 |
|
|
$ |
18,779 |
|
|
$ |
27,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(2,565 |
) |
|
$ |
2,723 |
|
|
$ |
1,157 |
|
|
$ |
3,882 |
|
Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
(2,642 |
) |
|
$ |
2,562 |
|
|
$ |
1,062 |
|
|
$ |
4,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share basic |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
Net earnings (loss) per share diluted |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company reclassified the owned and operated Vancouver and Tempe
IMAX theaters operations from continuing operations to discontinued
operations as it does not anticipate having significant future cash
flows from these theaters or any involvement in the day to day
operations of these theaters. As a result, the respective prior
periods figures have been reclassified to conform to the current
years presentation. |
|
(2) |
|
Net earnings from continuing operations for the fourth quarter
includes a release of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
of $54.8 million. See note 9 to the financial statements for further
details. |
33
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
GENERAL
IMAX Corporation, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the Company), is one of the
worlds leading entertainment technology companies, specializing in motion picture technologies and
presentations. The Companys principal business is the design and manufacture of premium digital
and film-based theater systems (IMAX theater systems) and the sale or lease of IMAX theater
systems or the contribution of IMAX theater systems under revenue-sharing arrangements to its
customers. The IMAX theater systems are based on proprietary and patented technology developed over
the course of the Companys 43-year history. The Companys customers who purchase, lease or
otherwise acquire the IMAX theater systems are theater exhibitors that operate commercial theaters
(particularly multiplexes), museums, science centers, or destination entertainment sites. The
Company generally does not own IMAX theaters, but licenses the use of its trademarks along with the
sale, lease or contribution of its equipment. The Company refers to all theaters using the IMAX
theater system as IMAX theaters.
The Company derives revenue principally from the sale or long-term lease of its theater
systems and associated maintenance and extended warranty services, the installation of IMAX theater
systems under joint revenue sharing arrangements, the provision of film production and digital
re-mastering services, the distribution of certain films, and the provision of post-production
services, including the conversion of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) Hollywood
feature films for exhibition on IMAX theater systems around the world. The Company also derives
revenue from the operation of its own theaters, camera rentals and the provision of aftermarket
parts for its system components.
The Company believes the IMAX theater network is the most extensive premium theater network in
the world with 518 theater systems (396 commercial, 122 institutional) operating in 46 countries as
at December 31, 2010. This compares to 430 theater systems (309 commercial, 121 institutional)
operating in 48 countries as at December 31, 2009.
Important factors that the Companys Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Richard L. Gelfond uses
in assessing the Companys business and prospects include revenue, gross margins from the Companys
operating segments, film performance, earnings from operations as adjusted for unusual items that
the Company views as non-recurring, the signing and financial performance of theater system
arrangements (particularly its joint revenue sharing arrangements), the success of strategic
initiatives such as the securing of new film projects (particularly IMAX DMR films) and the
viability of new businesses, the overall execution, reliability and consumer acceptance of The IMAX
Experience and related technologies and short- and long-term cash flow projections.
IMAX Systems, Theater System Maintenance and Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangements
The Company provides IMAX theater systems to customers on a sales or long-term lease basis,
typically with initial terms of approximately 10 years. These agreements typically provide for
three major sources of cash flows: initial fees, ongoing fees (which include a fixed minimum amount
per annum and contingent fees in excess of the minimum payments) and maintenance and extended
warranty fees. The initial fees vary depending on the system configuration and location of the
theater and generally are paid to the Company in installments commencing upon the signing of the
agreement. Finance income is derived over the term of the sales or sales-type lease arrangement as
the unearned income on financed sales or sales-type leases is earned. Ongoing fees are paid monthly
over the term of the contract, commencing after the theater system has been installed and are
generally equal to the greater of a fixed minimum amount per annum or a percentage of box-office
receipts. Both ongoing fees and maintenance and extended warranty fees are typically indexed to a
local consumer price index.
The revenue earned from customers under the Companys theater system lease or sales agreements
can vary from quarter to quarter and year to year based on a number of factors including the mix of
theater system configurations sold or leased, the timing of installation of the theater systems,
the nature of the arrangement and other factors specific to individual contracts, although the
typical rent or sales price for its various theater system configurations does not generally vary
significantly from region to region. The Company has taken steps in recent years to accelerate the
growth of the global IMAX theater network and the sale or lease of its products by developing a
lower-cost theater system and a new digitally-based theater system, both designed to appeal to
broader customer bases, particularly in commercial multiplex markets. Although these theater
systems are lower-cost, the Company has endeavored to successfully maintain its per unit margins on
a percentage basis and to maintain the aggregate revenues and gross margins through increased
volume. Recently, the Company has signed a number of deals for digital upgrades to its commercial
customers and intends to continue to sell these digital upgrades in the future at lower margins
than its traditional deals for strategic reasons.
34
Revenues on theater system sales and sales-type leases are recognized at different times than
when cash is collected.
Over the last several years, the Company has entered into joint revenue sharing arrangements
with customers pursuant to which the Company provides the projection system, sound system, screen
system and, if applicable, 3D glasses cleaning machine, theater design support, supervision of
installation, projectionist training and the use of the IMAX brand (the System Deliverable) in
return for a portion of the customers IMAX box-office receipts and concession revenue. Pursuant to
these revenue sharing arrangements, the Company retains title to the theater system (including the
projector, the sound system and the projection screen) and rent payments are contingent, instead of
fixed or determinable. The Company has the right to remove the equipment for non-payment or other
defaults by the customer. The contracts are generally not cancelable by the customer unless the
Company fails to perform its obligations. In certain cases, the contract provides certain
thresholds that, if not met by either party, allow the other party to terminate the agreement.
Joint revenue sharing arrangements generally have a 7 to 10-year initial term and may be renewed by
the customer for an additional term. The introduction of joint revenue sharing arrangements has
been an important factor in the expansion of the Companys commercial theatre network which has
grown by approximately 71% since 2008. Joint revenue sharing arrangements allow commercial theatre
exhibitors to install IMAX theatre systems without the initial capital investment required in a
lease or sale arrangement. Since customers under joint revenue sharing arrangements pay the
Company a portion of their ongoing box office and concession revenue, joint revenue sharing
arrangements also drive recurring cash flows and earnings for the Company. As the Company
continues to expand its number of theaters under joint revenue sharing arrangements, the Company
anticipates cash flows and earnings from joint revenue sharing arrangements will be an important
driver of recurring revenue for the Company. The retirement of a significant portion of the
Companys debt during 2009 and increased cash flows from operations during 2009 and 2010 has
allowed the Company the financial flexibility to fund the expansion of its joint revenue sharing
strategy. As at January 31, 2011, the Company has entered into joint revenue sharing arrangements
for 230 systems, 171 of which were in operation as at December 31, 2010, a 46.2% increase as
compared to the 117 joint revenue sharing arrangements opened as at December 31, 2009.
The revenue earned from customers under the Companys joint revenue sharing arrangements can
vary from quarter to quarter and year to year based on a number of factors including film
performance, the mix of theater system configurations, the timing of installation of the theater
systems, the nature of the arrangement, the location, size and management of the theater and other
factors specific to individual arrangements. Revenue on theater systems under joint revenue sharing
arrangements is recognized when box-office and concession revenues are reported by the theater
operator, provided collection is reasonably assured.
An annual maintenance and extended warranty fee is generally payable, except for theater
systems under joint revenue sharing arrangements, commencing in the second year of theater
operations. Both ongoing fees and maintenance and extended warranty fees are typically indexed to a
local consumer price index.
See Critical Accounting Policies below for further discussion on the Companys revenue
recognition policies.
Theater Network
The following chart shows the number of the Companys theater systems by configuration in the
theater network as at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
Theater |
|
Theater |
|
|
Network |
|
Network |
|
|
Base |
|
Base |
Flat Screen (2D) |
|
|
30 |
(1) |
|
|
36 |
|
Dome Screen (2D) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
IMAX 3D Dome (3D) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
IMAX 3D GT (3D) |
|
|
80 |
(1) |
|
|
88 |
|
IMAX 3D SR (3D) |
|
|
44 |
(1) |
|
|
51 |
|
IMAX MPX (3D) |
|
|
19 |
(1) |
|
|
37 |
(2) |
IMAX digital (3D) |
|
|
276 |
(1) |
|
|
151 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In 2010, the Company upgraded 32 film-based IMAX theater systems to
IMAX digital theater systems (30 sales arrangements and 2 joint
revenue sharing arrangements). |
|
(2) |
|
In 2009, the Company upgraded 25 film-based IMAX theater systems to
IMAX digital theater systems (14 sales arrangements, 2 treated
previously as operating lease arrangements and 9 systems under joint
revenue sharing arrangements). |
Approximately
61.2% of IMAX systems in operation are located in the United States and Canada compared to 63.0% last year. Approximately 33.9% of IMAX theater
systems arrangements in backlog are scheduled to be installed in the United States and Canada compared to
33.1% last year. The commercial exhibitor market in the United States and
Canada represents an important customer
base for the Company in terms of both collections under existing arrangements and potential future
theater system contracts. The Company has targeted these operators for the sale or
lease of its IMAX digital projection system, as well as for joint revenue sharing arrangements.
While the Company is pleased with its recent progress in the U.S. and Canadian commercial exhibitor
market, there is no assurance that the Companys progress in
those countries will continue,
particularly as a higher percentage of markets are penetrated, or that the Companys U.S. and Canadian
commercial exhibitors will not encounter future financial difficulties. To minimize the Companys
credit risk in this area, the Company retains title to the underlying theater systems leased,
performs initial and ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and makes ongoing provisions for
its estimates of potentially uncollectible amounts.
As at December 31, 2010, approximately 38.8% of IMAX systems in operation were located within
international markets (defined as all countries other than the United States and Canada), as
compared to 37.0% as at December 31, 2009. The Company expects growth in international markets to
be an increasingly significant part of its business. Of the Companys record 221 theatre signings
in 2010, 127 were signings for theatres in international markets. Consequently, approximately
66.1% of IMAX theatre system arrangements in backlog as at December 31, 2010 are scheduled to be
installed within international markets, compared with 66.9% as at December 31, 2009.
As at December 31, 2010, 145 (2009 106) of the 171 (2009 117) joint revenue sharing
arrangements in operation, or 84.8% (2009 90.6%) were located in the United States and Canada, with the
remaining 26 (2009 11) arrangements being located in international markets. The Company
continues to seek to expand its number of joint revenue sharing arrangements it has in select
international markets.
Sales Backlog
The Companys sales backlog fluctuates in both number of systems and dollar value from quarter
to quarter depending on the signing of new theater system arrangements, which adds to backlog, and
the installation and acceptance of theater systems and the settlement of contracts, both of which
reduce backlog. Sales backlog typically represents the fixed contracted revenue under signed
theater system sale and lease agreements that the Company believes will be recognized as revenue
upon installation and acceptance of the associated theater. Sales backlog includes initial fees
along with the estimated present value of contractual ongoing fees due over the lease term, but
excludes amounts allocated to maintenance and extended warranty revenues as well as fees in excess
of contractual ongoing fees that might be received in the future. The value of sales backlog does
not include revenue from theaters in which the Company has an equity interest, joint revenue
sharing arrangements, operating leases, letters of intent or long-term conditional theater
commitments. The Company believes that the contractual obligations for theater system installations
that are listed in sales backlog are valid and binding commitments.
The Companys sales backlog is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Dollar Value |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Dollar Value |
|
|
|
Systems |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Systems |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Sales and sale-type lease arrangements |
|
|
165 |
(1) |
|
$ |
184,588 |
|
|
|
94 |
(1) |
|
$ |
117,157 |
|
Joint revenue sharing arrangements |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
(2) |
|
$ |
184,588 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
$ |
117,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 25 upgrades from film-based IMAX theater systems to IMAX
digital theater systems as at December 31, 2010, and 1 upgrade from a
film-based IMAX theater system to an IMAX digital theater system as at
December 31, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects the minimum number of theaters arisings from signed
contracts in backlog. Up to an additional 25 theaters
(2009 1) may be installed pursuant to certain provisions
in signed contracts in backlog. |
36
The Companys theater signings are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Dollar Value |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Dollar Value |
|
|
|
Systems |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
Systems |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Full new sales and sale-type lease arrangements |
|
|
95 |
(1) |
|
$ |
112.6 |
|
|
|
20 |
(1) |
|
$ |
27.0 |
|
Digital upgrades under sales and sale-type lease arrangements |
|
|
55 |
(2) |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
12 |
(2) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
Joint revenue sharing arrangements |
|
|
71 |
(3) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
3 |
(3) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
$ |
136.6 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 24 installations in 2010 and 71 in backlog as at
December 31, 2010 (6 installations in 2009 and 14 in backlog as
at December 31, 2009). |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 28 installations in 2010 and 27 in backlog as at
December 31, 2010 (11 installations in 2009 and 1 in backlog as
at December 31, 2009). |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 20 installations in 2010 and 51 in backlog as at
December 31, 2010 (2 installations and 1 in backlog as at
December 31, 2009). |
The Companys backlog of sales and sale-type lease arrangements can be segregated both by
territory of future installation and by customer type. The percentage of backlog relevant to each
territory (based on installed dollar value of anticipated theater system revenue as at December 31,
2010) is as follows: Central and South America 27.2%, Asia
43.0%, North America (excluding Mexico) 12.7%,
Europe 14.4%, Africa 1.0% and Middle East 1.7%. In addition, 97.6% of backlog represents
future installations to commercial theater customers and 2.4% to institutional customers.
The Companys backlog of theater systems under joint revenue sharing arrangements can be
segregated by both territory of future installation and by customer type. The percentage of backlog
relevant to each territory (based on the number of systems at December 31, 2010) is as follows:
North America (excluding Mexico) 72.9%, Europe 5.1%, Asia 11.9%, Japan 8.4% and Australia 1.7%. All 59
theater systems under joint revenue sharing arrangements in backlog are for commercial theater
customers.
The Company estimates that approximately 80-90 (excluding digital upgrades) of the 224 theater
systems arrangements currently in backlog will be installed in 2011, with the remainder being
installed in subsequent periods. In addition, the Company anticipates that it will install a number
of the 25 digital system upgrades in backlog in 2011. The Company also expects additional theater system arrangements
not currently in backlog to be signed and installed in 2011. The configuration of the Companys
backlog as at December 31, 2010, by product type has been disclosed on page 8 of the Companys 2010
Form 10-K.
In the normal course of its business, the Company will have customers who, for a number of
reasons, including the inability to obtain certain consents, approvals or financing, are unable to
proceed with a theater system installation. Once the determination is made that the customer will
not proceed with installation, the agreement with the customer is generally terminated or amended.
If the agreement is terminated, once the Company and the customer are released from all their
future obligations under the agreement, all or a portion of the initial rents or fees that the
customer previously made to the Company are recognized as revenue.
Film Production and Digital Re-Mastering (IMAX DMR)
Films produced by the Company are typically financed through third parties, whereby the
Company will generally receive a film production fee in exchange for producing the film and a
distribution fee for distributing the film. The ownership rights to such films may be held by the
film sponsors, the film investors and/or the Company. In the past, the Company frequently financed
film production internally, but has moved to a model utilizing a majority of third-party funding
for the original films it produces and distributes. In 2011, the Company, along with Warner Bros.
Pictures (WB), will release Born to be Wild 3D: An IMAX 3D Experience . In 2010, the Company, along with WB, released
Hubble 3D: An IMAX 3D Experience . In 2009, the Company, along with WB, released Under the Sea 3D: An IMAX 3D Experience.
37
The Company developed a proprietary technology to digitally re-master live-action films into
15/70-format film or IMAX digital cinema package (DCP) format at a modest cost for exhibition in
IMAX theaters. This system, known as IMAX DMR, digitally enhances the image resolution of motion
picture films for projection on IMAX screens while maintaining or enhancing the visual clarity and
sound quality to levels for which The IMAX Experience is known. This technology has opened the IMAX
theater network up to releases of Hollywood films, particularly new films which are released to
IMAX theaters simultaneously with their broader domestic release. The Company believes that the
development of this technology is key to helping it execute its strategy of expanding its
commercial theater network by establishing IMAX theaters as a key, premium distribution platform
for Hollywood films. In 2010, 15 films converted through the IMAX DMR process were released to IMAX
theaters (12 films converted through the IMAX DMR process were released in 2009). The Company has
announced the release of 21 IMAX DMR titles to IMAX theaters in 2011.
The Company remains in active discussions with every major Hollywood
studio regarding future titles.
Film Distribution
The Company is a significant distributor of large-format films. The Company generally
distributes films which it produced or for which it has acquired distribution rights from
independent producers. The Company generally receives a percentage of the theater box-office
receipts as a distribution fee.
Theater Operations
As at December 31, 2010, the Company has four owned and operated theaters, compared to four as
at December 31, 2009. The results from theaters that have been closed are presented as discontinued
operations in prior years as the continuing cash flows are not generated from either a migration or
a continuation of activities. In addition, the Company has a commercial arrangement with one
theater resulting in the sharing of profits and losses. The Company also provides management
services to two theaters.
INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES
A significant portion of the Companys sales are made to customers located outside the United
States and Canada. During 2010, 2009, and 2008, approximately 30%, 35% and 32%, respectively, of
the Companys revenue was derived outside the United States and Canada. As at December 31, 2010,
approximately 66.1% of IMAX theater systems arrangements in backlog were scheduled to be installed
in international markets. Accordingly, the Company expects that international operations will
continue to be a significant portion of the Companys revenue in the future. In order to minimize
exposure to exchange rate risk, the Company prices theater systems (the largest component of
revenue) in U.S. dollars except in Canada, Japan and parts of Europe, where they may be priced in
local currency. Annual ongoing fees and maintenance and extended warranty fees follow a similar
currency policy. To further minimize its exposure to foreign exchange risk related to operating
expenses denominated in Canadian dollars, the Company has entered into foreign currency derivative
contracts between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with United States
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP).
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, including those related to fair
values associated with the individual elements in multiple element arrangements; residual values of
leased theater systems; economic lives of leased assets; allowances for potential uncollectibility
of accounts receivable, financing receivables and net investment in leases; provisions for
inventory obsolescence; ultimate revenues for film assets; impairment provisions for film assets,
long-lived assets and goodwill; depreciable lives of property, plant and equipment; useful lives of
intangible assets; pension plan and post retirement assumptions; accruals for contingencies
including tax contingencies; valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets; and, estimates of
the fair value and expected exercise dates of stock-based payment awards. Management bases its
estimates on historic experience, future expectations and other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable at the date of the consolidated financial statements. Actual results may differ from
these estimates due to uncertainty involved in measuring, at a specific point in time, events which
are continuous in nature, and differences may be material. The Companys significant accounting
policies are discussed in note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of the
Companys 2010 Form 10-K.
The Company considers the following significant estimates, assumptions and judgments to have
the most significant effect on its results:
38
Revenue Recognition
The Company generates revenue from various sources as follows:
|
|
|
design, manufacture, sale and lease of proprietary theater systems for IMAX theaters
principally owned and operated by commercial and institutional customers located in 46
countries as at December 31, 2010; |
|
|
|
|
production, digital re-mastering, post-production and/or distribution of certain films
shown throughout the IMAX theater network; |
|
|
|
|
operation of certain IMAX theaters primarily in the United States; |
|
|
|
|
provision of other services to the IMAX theater network, including ongoing maintenance and
extended warranty services for IMAX theater systems; and |
|
|
|
|
other activities, which includes short-term rental of cameras and aftermarket sales of
projector system components. |
Multiple Element Arrangements
The Companys revenue arrangements with certain customers may involve multiple elements
consisting of a theater system (projector, sound system, screen system and, if applicable, 3D
glasses cleaning machine); services associated with the theater system including theater design
support, supervision of installation, and projectionist training; a license to use the IMAX brand;
3D glasses; maintenance and extended warranty services; and licensing of films. The Company
evaluates all elements in an arrangement to determine what are considered typical deliverables for
accounting purposes and which of the deliverables represent separate units of accounting based on
the applicable accounting standards in the Leases Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC or Codification); the Guarantees Topic of the
FASB ASC; the Entertainment Films Topic of the FASB ASC; and the Revenue Recognition Topic of
the FASB ASC. If separate units of accounting are either required under the relevant accounting
standards or determined to be applicable under the Revenue Recognition Topic, the total
consideration received or receivable in the arrangement is allocated based on the applicable
guidance in the above noted standards.
Theater Systems
The Company has identified the System Deliverable as a single deliverable and a single unit of
accounting. When an arrangement does not include all the elements of a System Deliverable, the
elements of the System Deliverable included in the arrangement are considered by the Company to be
a single deliverable and a single unit of accounting. The Company is not responsible for the
physical installation of the equipment in the customers facility; however, the Company supervises
the installation by the customer. The customer has the right to use the IMAX brand from the date
the Company and the customer enter into an arrangement.
The Companys System Deliverable arrangements involve either a lease or a sale of the theater
system. Consideration in the Companys arrangements that are not joint revenue sharing arrangements
consists of upfront or initial payments made before and after the final installation of the theater
system equipment and ongoing payments throughout the term of the lease or over a period of time, as
specified in the arrangement. The ongoing payments are the greater of an annual fixed minimum
amount or a certain percentage of the theater box-office. Amounts received in excess of the annual
fixed minimum amounts are considered contingent payments. The Companys arrangements are
non-cancellable, unless the Company fails to perform its obligations. In the absence of a material
default by the Company, there is no right to any remedy for the customer under the Companys
arrangements. If a material default by the Company exists, the customer has the right to terminate
the arrangement and seek a refund only if the customer provides notice to the Company of a material
default and only if the Company does not cure the default within a specified period. Recently, the
Company has entered into a number of joint revenue sharing arrangements, where the Company receives
a portion of a theaters box-office and concession revenue in exchange for placing a theater system
at theater operators venues. Under these arrangements, the Company receives no up-front fee, and
the Company retains title to the theater system. Joint revenue sharing arrangements typically have
7 to 10 year terms with renewal provisions. The Companys joint revenue sharing arrangements are
generally not cancelable by the customer unless the Company fails to perform its obligations. In
certain cases, the contract provides certain performance thresholds that, if not met by either
party, allows the other party to terminate the agreement.
39
Sales Arrangements
For arrangements qualifying as sales, the revenue allocated to the System Deliverable is
recognized in accordance with the Revenue Recognition Topic of the FASB ASC, when all of the
following conditions have been met: (i) the projector, sound system and screen system have been
installed and are in full working condition, (ii) the 3D glasses cleaning machine, if applicable,
has been delivered, (iii) projectionist training has been completed, and (iv) the earlier of (a)
receipt of written customer acceptance certifying the completion of installation and run-in testing
of the equipment and the completion of projectionist training or (b) public opening of the theater,
provided there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the price is fixed or determinable and
collectibility is reasonably assured.
The initial revenue recognized consists of the initial payments received and the present value
of any future initial payments and fixed minimum ongoing payments that have been attributed to this
unit of accounting. Contingent payments in excess of the fixed minimum ongoing payments are
recognized when reported by theater operators, provided collectibility is reasonably assured.
The Company has also agreed, on occasion, to sell equipment under lease or at the end of a
lease term. Consideration agreed to for these lease buyouts is included in revenues from equipment
and product sales, when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fees are fixed or
determinable, collectibility is reasonably assured and title to the theater system passes from the
Company to the customer.
In a limited number of sales arrangements for the theater systems designed for multiplex
owners (the MPX theater systems), the Company provided customers with a right to acquire, for a
specified period of time, digital upgrades (each upgrade consisting of a projector, certain sound
system components and screen enhancements) at a fixed or variable discount towards a future price
of such digital upgrades. Up to the end of the second quarter of 2009, the Company was not able to
determine the fair value of a digital upgrade. Accordingly, the Company deferred all consideration
received and receivable under such arrangements for the delivered MPX and the upgrade right, except
for the amount allocated to maintenance and extended warranty services provided to the customers
for the installed system. This revenue was deferred until the upgrade right expired, if applicable,
or a digital upgrade was delivered. In the third quarter of 2009, the Company determined the fair
value of digital upgrades and the upgrade rights. For any such sales arrangements where the upgrade
right has not expired and the digital upgrade has not yet been delivered, the Company has allocated
the consideration received and receivable (excluding the amount allocated to maintenance and
extended warranty services) to the upgrade right based on its fair value and to the delivered MPX
theater system based on the residual of the consideration received and receivable. The revenue
related to the digital upgrade continues to be deferred, until the digital upgrade is delivered
provided the other revenue recognition criteria are met. The revenue related to the MPX system is
recognized at the allocation date as the system was previously delivered provided the other revenue
recognition criteria are met. Costs related to the installed MPX systems for which revenue has not
been recognized are included in inventories until the conditions for revenue recognition are met.
The Company also provides customers, in certain cases, with sales arrangements for multiple systems
consisting of a combination of MPX theater systems and complete digital theater systems for a
specified price. The Company allocates the actual or implied discount between the delivered and
undelivered theater systems on a relative fair value basis, provided all of the other conditions
for recognition of a theater system are met.
Lease Arrangements
The Company uses the Leases Topic of the FASB ASC to evaluate whether an arrangement is a
lease and the classification of the lease. Arrangements not within the scope of the accounting
standard are accounted for either as a sales or services arrangement, as applicable.
A lease arrangement that transfers substantially all of the benefits and risks incident to
ownership of the equipment is classified as a sales-type lease based on the criteria established in
the accounting standard; otherwise the lease is classified as an operating lease. Prior to
commencement of the lease term for the equipment, the Company may modify certain payment terms or
make concessions. If these circumstances occur, the Company reassesses the classification of the
lease based on the modified terms and conditions.
For sales-type leases, the revenue allocated to the System Deliverable is recognized when the
lease term commences, which the Company deems to be when all of the following conditions have been
met: (i) the projector, sound system and screen system have been installed and are in full working
condition, (ii) the 3D glasses cleaning machine, if applicable, has been delivered, (iii)
projectionist training has been completed, and (iv) the earlier of (a) receipt of the written
customer acceptance certifying the completion of installation and run-in testing of the equipment
and the completion of projectionist training or (b) public opening of the theater, provided
collectibility is reasonably assured.
40
The initial revenue recognized for sales-type leases consists of the initial payments received
and the present value of future initial payments and fixed minimum ongoing payments computed at the
interest rate implicit in the lease. Contingent payments in excess of the fixed minimum payments
are recognized when reported by theater operators, provided collectibility is reasonably assured.
The determination of the fair value of the leased equipment requires judgment and can impact
the split between initial revenue and finance income over the lease term.
For operating leases, initial payments and fixed minimum ongoing payments are recognized as
revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For operating leases, the lease term is
considered to commence when all of the following conditions have been met: (i) the projector, sound
system and screen system have been installed and are in full working condition, (ii) the 3D glasses
cleaning machine, if applicable, has been delivered, (iii) projectionist training has been
completed, and (iv) the earlier of (a) receipt of the written customer acceptance certifying the
completion of installation and run-in testing of the equipment and the completion of projectionist
training or (b) public opening of the theater. Contingent payments in excess of fixed minimum
ongoing payments are recognized as revenue when reported by theater operators, provided
collectibility is reasonably assured.
For joint revenue sharing arrangements, where the Company receives a portion of a theaters
box-office and concession revenue in exchange for placing a theater system at the theater
operators venue, revenue is recognized when box-office and concession revenues are reported by the
theater operator, provided collectibility is reasonably assured.
Equipment and components allocated to be used in future joint revenue sharing arrangements, as
well as direct labor costs and an allocation of direct production costs, are included in assets
under construction until such equipment is installed and in working condition, at which time the
equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the term of the joint revenue
sharing arrangement and the equipments anticipated useful life.
Finance Income
Finance income is recognized over the term of the lease or over the period of time specified
in the sales arrangement, provided collectibility is reasonably assured. Finance income recognition
ceases when the Company determines that the associated receivable is not recoverable.
Terminations, Consensual Buyouts and Concessions
The Company enters into theater system arrangements with customers that provide for customer
payment obligations prior to the scheduled installation of the theater system. During the period of
time between signing and the installation of the theater system, which may extend several years,
certain customers may be unable to, or elect not to, proceed with the theater system installation
for a number of reasons including business considerations, or the inability to obtain certain
consents, approvals or financing. Once the determination is made that the customer will not proceed
with installation, the arrangement may be terminated under the default provisions of the
arrangement or by mutual agreement between the Company and the customer (a consensual buyout).
Terminations by default are situations when a customer does not meet the payment obligations under
an arrangement and the Company retains the amounts paid by the customer. Under a consensual buyout,
the Company and the customer agree, in writing, to a settlement and to release each other of any
further obligations under the arrangement or an arbitrated settlement is reached. Any initial
payments retained or additional payments received by the Company are recognized as revenue when the
settlement arrangements are executed and the cash is received, respectively. These termination and
consensual buyout amounts are recognized in Other revenues.
In addition, the Company could agree with customers to convert their obligations for other
theater system configurations that have not yet been installed to arrangements to acquire or lease
the IMAX digital theater system. The Company considers these situations to be a termination of the
previous arrangement and origination of a new arrangement for the IMAX digital theater system. The
Company continues to defer an amount of any initial fees received from the customer such that the
aggregate of the fees deferred and the net present value of the future fixed initial and ongoing
payments to be received from the customer equals the fair value of the IMAX digital theater system
to be leased or acquired by the customer. Any residual portion of the initial fees received from
the customer for the terminated theater system is recorded in Other revenues at the time when the
obligation for the original theater system is terminated and the new theater system arrangement is
signed.
The Company may offer certain incentives to customers to complete theater system transactions
including payment concessions or free services and products such as film licenses or 3D glasses.
Reductions in, and deferral of, payments are taken into account in determining the sales price
either by a direct reduction in the sales price or a reduction of payments to be discounted in
accordance with the Leases or Interest Topics of the FASB ASC. Free products and services are
accounted for as separate units of accounting.
41
Other consideration given by the Company to customers are accounted for in accordance with the
Revenue Recognition Topic of the FASB ASC.
Maintenance and Extended Warranty Services
Maintenance and extended warranty services may be provided under a multiple element
arrangement or as a separately priced contract. Revenues related to these services are deferred and
recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract period and are recognized in Services
revenues. Maintenance and extended warranty services includes maintenance of the customers
equipment and replacement parts. Under certain maintenance arrangements, maintenance services may
include additional training services to the customers technicians. All costs associated with this
maintenance and extended warranty program are expensed as incurred. A loss on maintenance and
extended warranty services is recognized if the expected cost of providing the services under the
contracts exceeds the related deferred revenue.
Film Production and IMAX DMR Services
In certain film arrangements, the Company produces a film financed by third parties, whereby
the third party retains the copyright and the Company obtains exclusive distribution rights. Under
these arrangements, the Company is entitled to receive a fixed fee or to retain as a fee the excess
of funding over cost of production (the production fee). The third parties receive a portion of
the revenues received by the Company from distributing the film, which is charged to costs and
expenses applicable to revenues-services. The production fees are deferred, and recognized as a
reduction in the cost of the film, based on the ratio of the Companys distribution revenues
recognized in the current period to the ultimate distribution revenues expected from the film.
Revenue from film production services where the Company does not hold the associated
distribution rights are recognized in Services revenue when performance of the contractual service
is complete, provided there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, the fee is fixed or
determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Revenues from digitally re-mastering (IMAX DMR) films where third parties own or hold the
copyrights and the rights to distribute the film are derived in the form of processing fees and
recoupments calculated as a percentage of box-office receipts generated from the re-mastered films.
Processing fees are recognized as Services revenue when the performance of the related re-mastering
service is completed, provided there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or
determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Recoupments, calculated as a percentage of
box-office receipts, are recognized as Services revenues when box-office receipts are reported by
the third party that owns or holds the related film right, provided collectibility is reasonably
assured.
Losses on film production and IMAX DMR services are recognized as costs and expenses
applicable to revenues-services in the period when it is determined that the Companys estimate of
total revenues to be realized by the Company will not exceed estimated total production costs to be
expended on the film production and the cost of IMAX DMR services.
Film Distribution
Revenue from the licensing of films is recognized in Services revenues when persuasive
evidence of a licensing arrangement exists, the film has been completed and delivered, the license
period has begun, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. When
license fees are based on a percentage of box-office receipts, revenue is recognized when
box-office receipts are reported by exhibitors, provided collectibility is reasonably assured.
Film Post-Production Services
Revenues from post-production film services are recognized in Services revenue when
performance of the contracted services is complete provided there is persuasive evidence of an
arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Theater Operations Revenue
The Company recognizes revenue in Services revenue from its owned and operated theaters
resulting from box-office ticket and concession sales as tickets are sold, films are shown and upon
the sale of various concessions. The sales are cash or credit card transactions with theatergoers
based on fixed prices per seat or per concession item.
42
In addition, the Company enters into commercial arrangements with third party theater owners
resulting in the sharing of profits and losses which are recognized in Services revenue when
reported by such theaters. The Company also provides management services to certain theaters and
recognizes revenue over the term of such services.
Other
Revenues on camera rentals are recognized in Rental revenue over the rental period.
Revenue from the sale of 3D glasses is recognized in Equipment and product sales revenue when
the 3D glasses have been delivered to the customer.
Other service revenues are recognized in Services revenues when the performance of contracted
services is complete.
Allowances for Accounts Receivable and Financing Receivables
Allowances for doubtful accounts receivable are based on the Companys assessment of the
collectibility of specific customer balances, which is based upon a review of the customers credit
worthiness, past collection history and the underlying asset value of the equipment, where
applicable. Interest on overdue accounts receivable is recognized as income as the amounts are
collected.
The Company monitors the performance of the theaters to which it has leased or sold theater
systems which are subject to ongoing payments. When facts and circumstances indicate that there is
a potential impairment in the accounts receivable, net investment in lease or a financing
receivable, the Company will evaluate the potential outcome of either renegotiations involving
changes in the terms of the receivable or defaults on the existing lease or financed sale
agreements. The Company will record a provision if it is considered probable that the Company will
be unable to collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the arrangement or a
renegotiated lease amount will cause a reclassification of the sales-type lease to an operating
lease.
When the net investment in lease or the financing receivable is impaired, the Company will
recognize a provision for the difference between the carrying value in the investment and the
present value of expected future cash flows discounted using the effective interest rate for the
net investment in the lease or the financing receivable. If the Company expects to recover the
theater system, the provision is equal to the excess of the carrying value of the investment over
the fair value of the equipment.
When the minimum lease payments are renegotiated and the lease continues to be classified as a
sales-type lease, the reduction in payments is applied to reduce unearned finance income.
These provisions are adjusted when there is a significant change in the amount or timing of
the expected future cash flows or when actual cash flows differ from cash flow previously expected.
Once a net investment in lease or financing receivable is considered impaired, the Company
does not recognize interest income until the collectibility issues are resolved. When finance
income is not recognized, any payments received are applied against outstanding gross minimum lease
amounts receivable or gross receivables from financed sales.
Inventories
Inventories are carried at the lower of cost, determined on an average cost basis, and net
realizable value except for raw materials, which are carried out at the lower of cost and
replacement cost. Finished goods and work-in-process include the cost of raw materials, direct
labor, theater design costs, and an applicable share of manufacturing overhead costs.
The costs related to theater systems under sales and sales-type lease arrangement are relieved
from inventory to costs and expenses applicable to revenues-equipment and product sales when
revenue recognition criteria are met. The costs related to theater systems under operating lease
arrangements and joint revenue sharing arrangements are transferred from inventory to assets under
construction in property, plant and equipment when allocated to a signed joint revenue sharing
arrangement or when the arrangement is first classified as an operating lease.
The Company records provisions for excess and obsolete inventory based upon current estimates
of future events and conditions, including the anticipated installation dates for the current
backlog of theater system contracts, technological developments, signings in negotiation, growth
prospects within the customers ultimate marketplace and anticipated market acceptance of the
Companys current and pending theater systems.
43
Finished goods inventories can contain theater systems for which title has passed to the
Companys customer, under the contract, but the revenue recognition criteria as discussed above
have not been met.
Asset Impairments
The Company performs an impairment test on its goodwill on an annual basis, coincident with
the year-end, as well as in quarters where events or changes in circumstances suggest that the
carrying amount may not be recoverable.
Goodwill impairment is assessed at the reporting unit level by comparing the units carrying
value, including goodwill, to the fair value of the unit. Significant estimates are involved in the
impairment test. The carrying values of each unit are subject to allocations of certain assets and
liabilities that the Company has applied in a systematic and rational manner. The fair value of the
Companys units is assessed using a discounted cash flow model. The model is constructed using the
Companys budget and long-range plan as a base.
Long-lived asset impairment testing is performed at the lowest level of an asset group at
which identifiable cash flows are largely independent. In performing its review for recoverability,
the Company estimates the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset or asset
group and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected future cash flows is less than the
carrying amount of the asset or asset group, an impairment loss is recognized in the consolidated
statement of operations. Measurement of the impairment loss is based on the excess of the carrying
amount of the asset or asset group over the fair value calculated using discounted expected future
cash flows.
The Companys estimates of future cash flows involve anticipating future revenue streams,
which contain many assumptions that are subject to variability, as well as estimates for future
cash outlays, the amounts of which, and the timing of which are both uncertain. Actual results that
differ from the Companys budget and long-range plan could result in a significantly different
result to an impairment test, which could impact earnings.
Foreign Currency Translation
Monetary assets and liabilities of the Companys operations which are denominated in
currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency at the
exchange rates prevailing at the end of the period. Non-monetary items are translated at historical
exchange rates. Revenue and expense transactions are translated at exchange rates prevalent at the
transaction date. Such exchange gains and losses are included in the determination of earnings in
the period in which they arise.
Foreign currency derivatives are recognized and measured on the balance sheet at fair value.
Changes in the fair value (gains or losses) are recognized in the consolidated statement of
operations except for derivatives designated and qualifying as foreign currency hedging
instruments. For foreign currency hedging instruments, the effective portion of the gain or loss in
a hedge of a forecasted transaction is reported in other comprehensive income and reclassified to
the consolidated statement of operations when the forecasted transaction occurs. Any ineffective
portion is recognized immediately in the consolidated statement of operations.
Pension Plan and Postretirement Benefit Obligations Assumptions
The Companys pension plan and postretirement benefit obligations and related costs are
calculated using actuarial concepts, within the framework of the Compensation Retirement
Benefits Topic of the FASB ASC. A critical assumption to this accounting is the discount rate. The
Company evaluates this critical assumption annually or when otherwise required to by accounting
standards. Other assumptions include factors such as expected retirement date, mortality rate, rate
of compensation increase, and estimates of inflation.
The discount rate enables the Company to state expected future cash payments for benefits as a
present value on the measurement date. The guideline for setting this rate is a high-quality
long-term corporate bond rate. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit
obligations and increases pension expense. The Companys discount rate was determined by
considering the average of pension yield curves constructed from a large population of high-quality
corporate bonds. The resulting discount rate reflects the matching of plan liability cash flows to
the yield curves.
The discount rate used is a key assumption in the determination of the pension benefit
obligation and expense. At December 31, 2010, a 1.0% change in the discount rate used could result
in a $1.7 $2.0 million increase or decrease in the pension benefit obligation with a
corresponding benefit or charge recognized in other comprehensive income in the year. A one year
delay in Mr. Gelfonds retirement date would increase the discount rate by 0.3% and have a $0.4
million impact on the expected pension payment.
44
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation
As at December 31, 2010, the Company had net deferred income tax assets of $57.1 million. The
Companys management assesses realization of its deferred tax assets based on all available
evidence in order to conclude whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will
be realized. Available evidence considered by the Company includes, but is not limited to, the
Companys historic operating results, projected future operating results, reversing temporary
differences, contracted sales backlog at December 31, 2010, changing business circumstances, and
the ability to realize certain deferred tax assets through loss and tax credit carry-back and
carry-forward strategies. As at December 31, 2010, the Company has determined that based on the
Companys improved operating results in 2009 and 2010 and the Companys assessment of projected
future results of operations, realization of this deferred income tax benefit was more likely than
not. As a result, the judgment about the need for this valuation allowance has changed and a
reduction in the valuation allowance of $54.8 million has been recorded as a benefit within the
recovery for income taxes from continuing operations.
When there is a change in circumstances that causes a change in judgment about the
realizability of the deferred tax assets, the Company would adjust the applicable valuation
allowance in the period when such change occurs.
Tax Exposures
The Company is subject to ongoing tax exposures, examinations and assessments in various
jurisdictions. Accordingly, the Company may incur additional tax expense based upon the outcomes of
such matters. In addition, when applicable, the Company adjusts tax expense to reflect the
Companys ongoing assessments of such matters which require judgment and can materially increase or
decrease its effective rate as well as impact operating results. The Company provides for such
exposures in accordance with Income Taxes Topic of the FASB ASC.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company utilizes a lattice-binomial option-pricing model (the Binomial Model) to
determine the fair value of stock-based payment awards. The fair value determined by the Binomial
Model is affected by the Companys stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly
complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the Companys
expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee
stock option exercise behaviors. The Binomial Model also considers the expected exercise multiple
which is the multiple of exercise price to grant price at which exercises are expected to occur on
average. Option-pricing models were developed for use in estimating the value of traded options
that have no vesting or hedging restrictions and are fully transferable. Because the Companys
employee stock options and stock appreciation rights (SARs) have certain characteristics that are
significantly different from traded options, and because changes in the subjective assumptions can
materially affect the estimated value, in managements opinion, the Binomial Model best provides an
accurate measure of the fair value of the Companys employee stock options and SARs. Although the
fair value of employee stock options and SARs are determined in accordance with the Equity topic of
the FASB ASC using an option-pricing model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value
observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction. See note 15(c) for the assumptions
used to determine the fair value of stock-based payment awards.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of the Companys 2010 Form 10-K
for information regarding the Companys recent changes in accounting policies and the impact of
recently issued accounting pronouncements impacting the Company.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On December 11, 2009, the Company closed its owned and operated Tempe IMAX theater. The
Company recognized lease termination and guarantee obligations of $0.5 million to the landlord,
which were offset by derecognition of other liabilities of $0.9 million, for a net gain of $0.4
million. In a related transaction, the Company leased the projection system and inventory of the
Tempe IMAX theater to a third party theater exhibitor. Revenue from this operating lease
transaction will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. In the year
ended December 31, 2009, revenues for the Tempe IMAX theater were $0.8 million (2008 $1.5
million) and the Company recognized a loss of $0.5 million in 2009 (2008 loss of $0.3 million)
from the operation of the theater. The above transactions are reflected as discontinued operations
as there are no significant continuing cash flows from either a migration or a continuation of
activities. The remaining assets and liabilities of the owned and operated Tempe
45
IMAX theater are included in the Companys consolidated balance sheet as at December 31, 2010 and are disclosed
in note 23(d) to the audited consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of the Companys 2010 Form
10-K.
On September 30, 2009, the Company closed its owned and operated Vancouver IMAX theater. The
amount of loss to the Company pertaining to lease and guarantee obligations owing to the landlord
was estimated at $0.3 million, which the Company recognized at September 30, 2009. In 2009,
revenues for the Vancouver IMAX theater were $1.1 million (2008 $2.0 million) and the Company
recognized a loss of $0.1 million in 2009 (2008 income of $0.2 million) from the operation of
the theater. The above transactions are reflected as discontinued operations as there are no
continuing cash flows from either a migration or a continuation of activities. The remaining assets
and liabilities of the Vancouver owned and operated theater are included in the Companys
consolidated balance sheet as at December 31, 2010 and are disclosed in note 23(d) to the audited
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of the Companys 2010 Form 10-K.
As a result of the closure of the Tempe and Vancouver IMAX theaters in 2009, the Company
currently operates 4 theaters.
ASSET IMPAIRMENTS AND OTHER SIGNIFICANT CHARGES
The following table identifies the Companys charges relating to the impairment of assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Asset impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment (1) |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other significant charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
Financing receivables |
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
2,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset impairments and other significant charges |
|
$ |
2,551 |
|
|
$ |
2,581 |
|
|
$ |
4,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company reclassified the owned and operated Vancouver and Tempe
IMAX theaters operations from continuing operations to discontinued
operations as it does not anticipate having significant future cash
flows from these theaters or any involvement in the day to day
operations of these theaters. |
Asset Impairments
The Company recorded an asset impairment charge of less than $0.1 million against fixed assets
after the Company assessed the carrying value of certain asset groups in light of their future
expected cash flows. The Company recognized that the carrying values for the assets exceeded the
expected undiscounted future cash flows. During 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded total asset
impairment charges of $0.2 million and $nil, respectively.
Other Significant Charges
The Company recorded a net provision of $0.5 million in 2010 (2009 $0.1 million, 2008
$0.4 million) in accounts receivable.
In 2010, the Company also recorded a net provision of $0.9 million in financing receivables
(2009 $1.4 million, 2008 $1.6 million) as the collectibility associated with certain
financing receivables was uncertain.
In 2010, the Company recorded a charge of $1.0 million (2009 $0.9 million, 2008 $2.5
million) in costs and expenses applicable to revenues, primarily due to a reduction in the net
realizable value of its GT and SR film-based projector inventories and associated parts due to a
further market shift away from film-based projector systems. In 2009, the charge primarily resulted
from a reduction in the net realizable value resulting from the Companys development of a
proprietary digital projection system in July 2008, and its supplanting of the IMAX MPX projection
system.
46
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
As identified in note 20 to the audited consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of the
Companys 2010 Form 10-K, the Company has eight reportable segments identified by category of
product sold or service provided: IMAX systems; theater system maintenance; joint revenue sharing
arrangements; film production and IMAX DMR; film distribution; film post-production; theater
operations; and other. The IMAX systems segment designs, manufactures, sells or leases IMAX theater
projection system equipment. The theater system maintenance segment maintains IMAX theater
projection system equipment in the IMAX theater network. The joint revenue sharing arrangements
segment installs IMAX theater projection system equipment to an exhibitor in exchange for a certain
percentage of box-office and concession revenue. The film production and IMAX DMR segment produces
films and performs film re-mastering services. The film distribution segment distributes films for
which the Company has distribution rights. The film post-production segment provides film
post-production and film print services. The theater operations segment owns and operates certain
IMAX theaters. The other segment includes camera rentals and other miscellaneous items. The
accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in note 2 to the audited
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of the Companys 2010 Form 10-K.
The Companys Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations have been organized and discussed with respect to the above stated segments. Management
feels that a discussion and analysis based on its segments is significantly more relevant as the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations captions combine results from several segments.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of revenue and gross margin by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
(In thousands of U.S. dollars) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
IMAX Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and sales-type leases(1) |
|
$ |
63,023 |
|
|
$ |
53,923 |
|
|
$ |
24,476 |
|
|
$ |
31,452 |
|
|
$ |
26,441 |
|
|
$ |
9,284 |
|
Ongoing rent, fees, and finance
income(2) |
|
|
12,981 |
|
|
|
10,581 |
|
|
|
10,307 |
|
|
|
12,531 |
|
|
|
9,075 |
|
|
|
9,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,004 |
|
|
|
64,504 |
|
|
|
34,783 |
|
|
|
43,983 |
|
|
|
35,516 |
|
|
|
18,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theater System Maintenance |
|
|
21,444 |
|
|
|
18,246 |
|
|
|
16,331 |
|
|
|
10,084 |
|
|
|
8,361 |
|
|
|
7,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangements |
|
|
41,757 |
|
|
|
21,598 |
|
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
31,703 |
|
|
|
13,261 |
|
|
|
(1,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Film |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and IMAX DMR |
|
|
63,462 |
|
|
|
35,648 |
|
|
|
17,944 |
|
|
|
41,159 |
|
|
|
19,979 |
|
|
|
6,992 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
17,937 |
|
|
|
12,365 |
|
|
|
9,559 |
|
|
|
5,205 |
|
|
|
2,147 |
|
|
|
3,120 |
|
Post-production |
|
|
7,702 |
|
|
|
3,604 |
|
|
|
6,929 |
|
|
|
2,891 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
3,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,101 |
|
|
|
51,617 |
|
|
|
34,432 |
|
|
|
49,255 |
|
|
|
23,065 |
|
|
|
13,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theater Operations(3) |
|
|
13,366 |
|
|
|
11,810 |
|
|
|
10,532 |
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
6,942 |
|
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
|
3,205 |
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
248,614 |
|
|
$ |
171,211 |
|
|
$ |
102,718 |
|
|
$ |
137,652 |
|
|
$ |
81,552 |
|
|
$ |
37,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes initial payments and the present value of fixed minimum
payments from equipment, sales and sales-type lease transactions. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes rental income from operating leases, contingent rents from
operating and sales-type leases, contingent fees from sales
arrangements and finance income. |
|
(3) |
|
Excludes the impact of discontinued operations. |
47
Year Ended December 31, 2010 versus Year Ended December 31, 2009
The Company reported net income of $100.8 million or $1.59 per basic share and $1.51 per
diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to net income of $5.0 million or
$0.10 per basic share and $0.09 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2009. Net income
for the year ended December 31, 2010 includes a $21.9 million pre-tax charge (2009 $15.4
million) or $0.33 per diluted share for variable share-based compensation expense largely due to
the increase in the Companys stock price during the year (from $13.31 per share at year-end 2009
to $28.07 per share at year-end 2010) and its impact on SARs and restricted common shares, which
was offset by a non-cash tax recovery of $54.8 million ($0.82 per diluted share) resulting from the
release of a tax valuation allowance, relating to the expected reversal of future temporary
differences (2009 $nil). Excluding the net impact of variable share-based compensation expense
from both 2010 and 2009 and the non-cash tax benefit, net income
would have been $67.8 million or
$1.02 per diluted share in 2010, as compared to net income of $20.5 million or $0.38 per diluted
share in 2009.
Revenues and Gross Margin
The Companys revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010, increased by 45.2% to $248.6
million from $171.2 million in 2009 due to increases in revenue across all business segments. The
gross margin across all segments in 2010 was $137.7 million, or 55.4% of total revenue, compared to
$81.6 million, or 47.6% of total revenue in 2009. Improvements in margin occurred across all
business lines.
IMAX Systems
IMAX systems revenue increased 17.8% to $76.0 million in 2010 as compared to $64.5 million in
2009, resulting primarily from a 55.8% increase in systems installed and recognized as compared to
the prior year.
Revenue from sales and sales-type leases increased 16.9% to $63.0 million in 2010 from $53.9
million in 2009. The Company recognized revenue on 35 full, new theater systems which qualified as
either sales or sales-type leases in 2010, with a total value of $48.0 million, as compared to 24
in 2009 with a total value of $37.0 million. Additionally, the Company recognized revenue on 2 used
systems in 2010 with a value of $1.5 million, versus 3 used systems with a value of $2.6 million
that were recognized in 2009. The Company also recognized revenue on 30 digital upgrades in 2010,
with a total value of $12.5 million, as compared to 16 in 2009 with a total value of $12.0 million.
Included in 2009 are revenues associated with the installation of 4 MPX projection systems and
their subsequent digital upgrades. The Companys policy was to defer revenue recognition until such
time as the fair value of the digital upgrade became known or the digital upgrade was delivered.
Digital upgrades also have lower sales prices and gross margin than a full theater installation.
The Company has decided to offer digital upgrades at lower selling prices for strategic reasons
since the Company believes that digital systems increase flexibility and profitability for the
Companys existing exhibition customers.
Average revenue per full, new sales and sales-type lease system was $1.4 million in 2010,
which is comparable to the $1.5 million experienced in 2009. Average revenue per digital upgrade
was $0.4 million in 2010, as compared to $0.8 million for 2009. Average revenue per digital upgrade
was higher during 2009 due to revenue associated with the installation of 4 MPX projection systems
and their subsequent digital upgrades. Revenues associated with the installation of a projection
system and its digital upgrade are typically higher than a single digital upgrade installation.
The breakdown in mix and value of sales and sales-type lease installations, in 2010 and 2009,
is outlined in the table below:
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Sales and Sales-type lease systems installed and recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2D SR Dome |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
IMAX 3D GT |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
IMAX 3D SR |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
IMAX digital |
|
|
63 |
(1) |
|
|
35 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Operating lease installed and operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX 3D MPX(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Joint revenue sharing arrangements installed and operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX digital |
|
|
56 |
(1) |
|
|
74 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the digital upgrade of 32 systems (30 sales arrangements and
2 systems under joint revenue sharing arrangements) from film-based to
digital. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the digital upgrade of 25 systems (14 sales arrangements, 2
treated previously as operating lease arrangements and 9 systems under
joint revenue sharing arrangements) from film-based to digital. |
Up to the end of the second quarter of 2009, the Company was not able to determine the fair
value of a digital upgrade. Accordingly, the Company deferred all consideration received and
receivable under such arrangements for the delivered MPX and the upgrade right, except for the
amount allocated to maintenance and extended warranty services provided to the customers for the
installed system. This revenue was deferred until the upgrade right expired, if applicable, or a
digital upgrade was delivered. In the third quarter of 2009, the Company determined the fair value
of digital upgrades and the upgrade rights. It is the Companys policy that once a digital upgrade
is provided or the fair value for the upgrade is established, the Company allocates total contract
consideration, including any upgrade revenues, between the delivered and undelivered elements on a
residual basis and recognizes the revenue allocated to the delivered elements with their associated
costs. The Company did not recognize revenue on any theater systems under a sales arrangement that
was previously deferred during 2010. During 2009, 4 of the digital upgrades recognized related to a
sales arrangement that had been previously deferred. At December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009,
there were no systems deferred under the Companys digital upgrade policy.
Settlement revenue was $0.4 million in 2010 as compared to $2.0 million in 2009, which related
primarily to consensual buyouts for uninstalled theater systems.
Sound systems revenue remained consistent at $0.5 million in 2010 as compared to 2009.
IMAX theater systems gross margin from full, new sales and sales-type leases, excluding the
impact of settlements and asset impairment charges, increased to 65.7% in 2010 from 62.7% in 2009.
The gross margin on digital upgrades, excluding the impact of settlements and asset impairment
charges, was $2.6 million in 2010 in comparison with $5.1 million in 2009. The gross margin on used
systems was $0.3 million in 2010 in comparison with $0.4 million in 2009.
Ongoing rent revenue and finance income increased to $13.0 million in 2010 from $10.6 million
in 2009. Gross margin from ongoing rent and finance income increased to $12.5 million in 2010 from
$9.1 million in 2009. The change in revenue and gross margin is a function of finance income on new
systems under sales or lease agreements that began operations in 2010 and additional contingent
fees resulting from strong film performance experienced during the year. Contingent fees included
in this caption amounted to $5.2 million and $3.6 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively.
In 2010, the Company did not install and recognize revenue for any new theater systems that
qualified as operating leases (excluding joint revenue sharing arrangements), as compared to one in
2009. In 2009, this theater system under an operating lease arrangement was upgraded to a digital
theater system under a sales arrangement. The Company recognizes revenue on operating leases
ratably over the term of the leases.
49
Theater System Maintenance
Theater system maintenance revenue increased 17.5% to $21.4 million in 2010 as compared to
$18.2 million in 2009. Theater system maintenance gross margin increased to $10.1 million in 2010
from $8.4 million in 2009. In 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded a write-down of its film-based
service parts inventories of $0.2 million, and $0.8 million, respectively, due to the accelerated
installation of the MPX system upgrades to digital based systems. Absent this write-down, the
margin would have been $10.3 million and $9.2 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively. Maintenance
revenue continues to grow as the number of theaters in the IMAX network grows. Maintenance margins
vary depending on the mix of theater system configurations in the theater network and the timing
and nature of service visits in the period.
Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangements
Revenue from joint revenue sharing arrangements increased 93.3% to $41.8 million in 2010
compared to $21.6 million in 2009. The Company ended the year with 171 theaters operating under
joint revenue sharing arrangements as compared to 117 theaters at the end of 2009, an increase of
46.2%. The increase in revenues from joint revenue sharing arrangements was due to the greater
number of theaters operating in the current year as compared to the prior year, and stronger
performance of the films exhibited in 2010 versus 2009, including Avatar: An IMAX 3D Experience,
which is the highest grossing IMAX film of all time, as discussed in the film section below.
The gross margin from joint revenue sharing arrangements in 2010 increased to $31.7 million
compared to $13.3 million in 2009. The increase was largely due to an increase in the number of
joint revenue sharing theaters operating in the current year as compared to the prior year, and
strong film performance. Included in the 2010 gross margin were certain advertising, marketing, and
selling expenses of $4.2 million associated with the initial launch of 54 new joint revenue sharing
theaters opened during the year, as compared to $3.4 million associated with the initial launch of
65 new theaters in 2009. Excluding these launch expenses, the gross margin would have been $35.9
million in 2010, compared to $16.7 million in 2009.
Film
The Companys revenues from its film segments increased 72.6% to $89.1 million in 2010 from
$51.6 million in 2009.
Film production and IMAX DMR revenues increased 78.0% to $63.5 million in 2010 from $35.6
million in 2009. The increase in film production and IMAX DMR revenues was due primarily to the
overall growth of the IMAX theater network and stronger film performance for the films exhibited,
including Avatar: An IMAX 3D Experience. Gross box office generated by IMAX DMR films increased
101.6% to $545.9 million in 2010 versus $270.8 million in 2009. In 2010, gross-box office was
generated by the exhibition of 16 films listed below, as compared to 14 films exhibited in 2009:
|
|
|
2010 Films Exhibited |
|
2009 Films Exhibited |
Avatar: An IMAX 3D Experience
Alice in Wonderland: An IMAX 3D Experience
How To Train Your Dragon: An IMAX 3D Experience
Iron Man 2: The IMAX Experience
Shrek Forever After: An IMAX 3D Experience
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time: The IMAX Experience
Toy Story 3: An IMAX 3D Experience
The Twilight Saga: Eclipse: The IMAX Experience
Inception: The IMAX Experience
Aftershock: The IMAX Experience
Resident Evil: Afterlife: An IMAX 3D Experience
Legends of the Guardian: The Owls of GaHoole: An IMAX 3D
Experience
Paranormal Activity 2: The IMAX Experience
Megamind: An IMAX 3D Experience
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part I: The IMAX Experience
Tron Legacy: An IMAX 3D Experience
|
|
The Day the Earth Stood Still: The IMAX Experience
The Dark Knight: The IMAX Experience
Jonas Bros: The 3D Concert Experience
Watchmen: The IMAX Experience
Monsters vs. Aliens: An IMAX 3D Experience
Star Trek: The IMAX Experience
Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian: The IMAX Experience
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen: The IMAX Experience
Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince: An IMAX 3D Experience
Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs: An IMAX 3D Experience
Where the Wild Things Are: The IMAX Experience
Michael Jacksons This Is It: The IMAX Experience
Disneys A Christmas Carol: An IMAX 3D Experience
Avatar: An IMAX 3D Experience |
50
Avatar: An IMAX 3D Experience has broken all performance records for an IMAX DMR film.
Through December 31, 2010, Avatar has generated total IMAX DMR gross box office revenue of over
$242.0 million, with $187.9 million generated in 2010.
Film distribution revenues increased 45.1% to $17.9 million in 2010 from $12.4 million in 2009
due to the introduction and continuing performance of Hubble 3D:
An IMAX 3D Experience, a movie
co-produced by the Company and WB, which was released in March of 2010, and the licensing of
certain library titles in ancillary markets.
Film post-production revenues increased 113.7% to $7.7 million in 2010 from $3.6 million in
2009 primarily due to an increase in third party business.
The Companys gross margin from its film segments increased 113.6% in 2010 to $49.3 million
from $23.1 million in 2009. Film production and IMAX DMR gross margins increased to $41.2 million
from $20.0 million in 2009 largely due to an increase in IMAX DMR revenue resulting from a larger
commercial IMAX network and stronger film performance, including Avatar: An IMAX 3D Experience. The
film distribution margin of $5.2 million in 2010 was higher than the $2.1 million experienced in
2009, primarily due to the increase in film distribution revenues. Film post-production gross
margin increased by $2.0 million due to an increase in third party business as compared to the
prior year.
Theater Operations
Theater operations revenue in 2010 increased 13.2% to $13.4 million from $11.8 million in
2009. This increase was attributable to increases in average ticket prices and attendance at
certain of the Companys owned and operated theaters primarily due to the stronger performance of
the films exhibited in 2010 as compared to 2009.
Theater operations margin increased $0.5 million from 2009 primarily due to an increase in
revenues largely associated with the stronger performance of IMAX DMR films exhibited during 2010.
Other
Other revenue increased to $6.9 million in 2010 compared to $3.4 million in 2009. Other
revenue primarily includes revenue generated from the Companys camera and rental business and
after market sales of projection system parts and 3D glasses.
The gross margin on other revenue was $0.8 million higher in 2010 as compared to 2009.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $78.4 million in 2010, as compared
to $56.2 million in 2009. The $22.2 million increase experienced from the prior year comparative
period was largely the result of the following:
|
|
|
an $8.5 million increase in the Companys stock-based compensation expense (including a
$6.4 million increase in charges for variable share-based awards) primarily due to an
increase in the Companys stock price during the period (an increase from $13.31 at year-end
2009 to $28.07 per share at year-end 2010, as compared to an increase from $4.46 per share
at year-end 2008 to $13.31 per share at year-end 2009) and its impact on variable awards
such as SARs. The Company has no present intention to issue such variable awards in the
future; |
|
|
|
|
an $8.7 million increase in staff-related costs and compensation costs including (i) an
increase in salaries and benefits of $6.3 million including a higher average Canadian dollar
denominated salary expense ($1.9 million), increased staffing and normal merit increase
partially offset by lower pension plan costs and (ii) a $2.4 million increase in travel and
entertainment costs commensurate with business activity; |
|
|
|
|
a $3.1 million increase in legal and professional fees and other expenses, including a
multi-jurisdictional patent and contract lawsuit settled at year-end, and work performed
relating to new business initiatives, such as 3net, a 3D television channel operated by a
Limited Liability Corporation owned by the Company, Discovery Communications and Sony
Corporation; |
|
|
|
|
a $1.4 million decrease in gains due to foreign exchange. During the year ended December
31, 2010, the Company recorded a foreign exchange gain of $1.5 million due to the impact of
a decrease in exchange rates on foreign currency denominated working capital balances and
unmatured and un-hedged foreign currency forward contracts as compared to a gain of $2.9
million
|
51
|
|
|
recorded in 2009. See note 16(b) of the audited consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of
the Companys 2010 Form 10-K for more information; and |
|
|
|
|
a $0.5 million increase in other general corporate expenditures, which resulted from an
expansion of the Companys overall business. |
Research and Development
Research and development expenses increased to $6.2 million in 2010 compared to $3.8 million
in 2009. The increased research and development expenses for 2010 compared to 2009 are primarily
attributable to ongoing enhancements to the Companys digital projection technology and the
commencement of a portable theater initiative.
Receivable Provisions, Net of Recoveries
Receivable provisions, net of recoveries for accounts receivable and financing receivables,
amounted to a net provision of $1.4 million in 2010, as compared to $1.1 million in 2009.
The Companys accounts receivables and financing receivables are subject to credit risk. These
receivables are concentrated with the leading theater exhibitors and studios in the film
entertainment industry. To minimize the Companys credit risk, the Company retains title to
underlying theater systems that are leased, performs initial and ongoing credit evaluations of its
customers and makes ongoing provisions for its estimate of potentially uncollectible amounts.
Accordingly, the Company believes it has adequately protected itself against exposures relating to
receivables and contractual commitments.
Asset Impairments and Other Significant Charges
The Company recorded an asset impairment charge of less than $0.1 million against fixed assets
after the Company assessed the carrying value of certain assets in its theater operations segment
in light of their future expected cash flows. During 2009, the Company recorded total asset
impairment charges of $0.2 million.
The Company recorded a net provision of $0.5 million in 2010 (2009 $0.1 million) in
accounts receivable.
In 2010, the Company also recorded a net provision of $0.9 million in financing receivables
(2009 $0.9 million) as the collectibility associated with certain leases was uncertain.
In 2010, the Company recorded a charge of $1.0 million (2009 $0.9 million) in costs and
expenses applicable to revenues, primarily due to a reduction in the net realizable value of its GT
and SR film-based projector inventories and associated parts due to a further market shift away
from film-based projector systems. In 2009, the charge primarily resulted from a reduction in the
net realizable value resulting from the Companys introduction of a proprietary digital projection
system in July 2008, and its supplanting of the IMAX MPX projection system.
Interest Income and Expense
Interest income increased to $0.4 million in 2010, as compared to less than $0.1 million in
2009. The increase was largely due to interest recorded during 2010 related to tax refunds.
Interest expense decreased to $1.9 million in 2010 as compared to $13.8 million in 2009. In
2009, the Company repurchased all $160.0 million aggregate principal amount of its outstanding
9.625% Senior Notes which resulted in a decrease in the Companys interest expense for the year
ended December 31, 2010. Included in interest expense is the amortization of deferred finance costs
in the amount of $0.3 million and $1.0 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Companys policy
is to defer and amortize all the costs relating to a debt financing which are paid directly to the
debt provider, over the life of the debt instrument.
Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate differs from the statutory tax rate and varies from year to
year primarily as a result of numerous permanent differences, investment and other tax credits, the
provision for income taxes at different rates in foreign and other provincial jurisdictions,
enacted statutory tax rate increases or reductions in the year, changes due to foreign exchange,
changes in the
52
Companys valuation allowance based on the Companys recoverability assessments of deferred
tax assets, and favorable or unfavorable resolution of various tax examinations.
Based on the improvement of the Companys operating results in 2009 and 2010 and the Companys
assessment of projected future results of operations, it was determined that realization of a
deferred income tax benefit is now more likely than not. As a result, the judgment about the need
for a full valuation allowance against deferred tax assets has changed, and a reduction in the
valuation allowance has been recorded as a benefit within the recovery for income taxes from
continuing operations. The recovery for income taxes in the year ended December 31, 2010 includes a
net non-cash income tax benefit of $54.8 million in continuing operations related to a decrease in
the valuation allowance for the Companys deferred tax assets and other tax adjustments. The net
income tax benefit during the year ended December 31, 2010 is primarily attributable to the
estimated realization of deferred tax assets resulting from the utilization of deductible temporary
differences and certain net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits against future years
taxable income. During the year ended December 31, 2010, after considering all available evidence,
both positive (including recent profits, projected future profitability, backlog, carryforward
periods for utilization of net operating loss carryovers and tax credits, discretionary deductions
and other factors) and negative (including cumulative losses in past years and other factors), it
was concluded that the valuation allowance against the Companys deferred tax assets should be
further reduced by approximately $54.8 million. The remaining $7.9 million balance in the valuation
allowance as at December 31, 2010 is primarily attributable to certain U.S. federal and state net
operating loss carryovers and federal tax credits that likely will expire without being utilized.
The Company anticipates that it will become a cash tax payer in late 2012 or 2013.
Discontinued Operations
On December 11, 2009, the Company closed its owned and operated Tempe IMAX theater. The
Company recognized lease termination and guarantee obligations of $0.5 million to the landlord,
which were offset by derecognition of other liabilities of $0.9 million, for a net gain of $0.4
million. In a related transaction, the Company leased the projection system and inventory of the
Tempe IMAX theater to a third party theater exhibitor. Revenue from this operating lease
transaction will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. For the year
ended December 31, 2009, revenues for the Tempe IMAX theater were $0.8 million and the Company
recognized a loss of $0.5 million in 2009 from the operation of the theater. This transaction is
reflected as discontinued operations as there are no significant continuing cash flows from either
a migration or a continuation of activities. The remaining assets and liabilities of the owned and
operated Tempe IMAX theater are included in the Companys consolidated balance sheet as at December
31, 2010 and are disclosed in note 23(d) to the audited consolidated financial statements in Item 8
of the Companys 2010 Form 10-K.
On September 30, 2009, the Company closed its owned and operated Vancouver IMAX theater. The
amount of loss to the Company pertaining to lease and guarantee obligations owing to the landlord
was estimated at $0.3 million which the Company recognized at December 31, 2009. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, revenues for the Vancouver IMAX theater were $1.1 million and the Company
recognized a loss of $0.1 million in 2009 from the operation of the theater. This transaction is
reflected as discontinued operations as there are no continuing cash flows from either a migration
or a continuation of activities. The remaining assets and liabilities of the Vancouver owned and
operated theater are included in the Companys consolidated balance sheet as at December 31, 2010
and are disclosed in note 23(d) to the audited consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of the
Companys 2010 Form 10-K.
Pension Plan
The Company has an unfunded defined benefit pension plan, the Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan (the SERP), covering Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler. As at December 31, 2010, the
Company had an unfunded and accrued projected benefit obligation of approximately $18.1 million
(December 31, 2009 $29.9 million) in respect of the SERP. At the time the Company established
the SERP, it also took out life insurance policies on Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler with coverage
amounts of $21.5 million in aggregate. During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Company obtained
$3.2 million representing the cash surrender value of Mr. Gelfonds policy. The proceeds were used
to pay down the term loan under the Companys senior secured credit facility. During the quarter
ended September 30, 2010, the Company obtained $4.6 million representing the cash surrender value
of Mr. Wechslers policy. The amount was used as an offset against the $14.7 million lump sum
payment made to Mr. Wechsler on August 1, 2010 under the SERP. As at December 31, 2009, the cash
surrender value of these policies was $7.3 million.
The net periodic benefit cost was $0.4 million and $1.4 million in 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The components of net periodic benefit cost were as follows:
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
447 |
|
|
$ |
643 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
Amortization of prior service credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
Amortization of actuarial gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(681 |
) |
Realized actuarial gain on settlement of pension liability |
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension expense |
|
$ |
413 |
|
|
$ |
1,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pension obligation decreased from $29.9 at December 31, 2009, to $18.1 million at December
31, 2010, resulting primarily from Mr. Wechsler receiving a lump sum payment of $14.7 million on
August 1, 2010.
The plan experienced an actuarial loss of $2.6 million during 2010, resulting primarily from a
decrease in the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) published annuity interest rates used
to determine the lump sum payment under the plan.
Under the terms of the SERP, if Mr. Gelfonds employment had terminated other than for cause
prior to August 1, 2010, he would have been entitled to receive SERP benefits in the form of
monthly annuity payments until the earlier of a change in control or August 1, 2010, at which time
he would have become entitled to receive remaining benefits in the form of a lump sum payment. If
Mr. Gelfonds employment is, or would have been, terminated other than for cause on or after August
1, 2010, he is, or would have been, entitled to receive SERP benefits in the form of a lump sum
payment. SERP benefit payments to Mr. Gelfond are subject to a deferral for six months after the
termination of his employment, at which time Mr. Gelfond will be entitled to receive interest on
the deferred amount credited at the applicable federal rate for short-term obligations. The terms
of Mr. Gelfonds current employment agreement have been extended to the beginning of 2013.
Under the terms of the SERP, monthly annuity payments payable to Mr. Wechsler, whose
employment as Co-CEO terminated effective April 1, 2009, were deferred for six months and were paid
in the form of a lump sum plus interest on the deferred amount on October 1, 2009. Thereafter, in
accordance with the terms of the SERP, Mr. Wechsler was entitled to receive monthly annuity
payments until the earlier of a change in control or August 1, 2010, at which time he was entitled
to receive remaining benefits in the form of a lump sum payment. On August 1, 2010, the Company
made a lump sum payment of $14.7 million to Mr. Wechsler in accordance with the terms of the plan,
representing a settlement in full of Mr. Wechslers entitlement under the SERP.
In July 2000, the Company agreed to maintain health benefits for Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler
upon retirement. As at December 31, 2010, the Company had an unfunded benefit obligation recorded
of $0.5 million (December 31, 2009 $0.5 million).
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company utilizes the Binomial Model to determine the fair value of stock-based payment
awards. The fair value determined by the Binomial Model is affected by the Companys stock price as
well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables
include, but are not limited to, the Companys expected stock price volatility over the term of the
awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. The Binomial Model also
considers the expected exercise multiple which is the multiple of exercise price to grant price at
which exercises are expected to occur on average. Option-pricing models were developed for use in
estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting or hedging restrictions and are fully
transferable. Because the Companys employee stock options and SARs have certain characteristics
that are significantly different from traded options, and because changes in the subjective
assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, in managements opinion, the Binomial Model
best provides an accurate measure of the fair value of the Companys employee stock options and
SARs. Although the fair value of employee stock options and SARs are determined in accordance with
the Equity topic of the FASB ASC using an option-pricing model, that value may not be indicative of
the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized under ASC 718 Compensation Stock Compensation
for 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $27.7 million, $17.7 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
54
Years Ended December 31, 2009 versus Years Ended December 31, 2008
The Company reported net income of $5.0 million or $0.10 per basic share and $0.09 per diluted
share for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to a net loss of $33.6 million or $0.79 per
share on a basic and diluted basis for the year ended December 31, 2008. Net income for the year
includes a $15.4 million charge (2008 less than $0.1 million) or $0.28 per share for variable
share-based compensation expense largely due to the increase in the Companys stock price during
the year (from $4.46 per share to $13.31 per share) and its impact on SARs and restricted common
shares. Excluding the impact of variable share-based compensation expense, net income would have
been $20.5 million or $0.38 per share in 2009, as compared to a net loss of $33.6 million or $0.79
per share in 2008.
Revenues and Gross Margin
The Companys revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009 increased by 66.7% to $171.2
million from $102.7 million in 2008 due in large part to increases in revenue from IMAX systems,
joint revenue sharing arrangements and film segments. The gross margin across all segments in 2009
was $81.6 million, or 47.6% of total revenue, compared to $37.6 million, or 36.6% of total revenue
in 2008.
IMAX Systems
IMAX systems revenue increased 85.4% to $64.5 million in 2009 as compared to $34.8 million in
2008, resulting primarily from an increase in systems installed and recognized as compared to the
prior year.
Revenue from sales and sales-type leases increased 120.3% to $53.9 million in 2009 from $24.5
million in 2008. The Company recognized revenue on 43 theater systems which qualified as either
sales or sales-type leases in 2009 versus 15 in 2008. There were 40 new theater systems with a
value of $49.0 million and 3 used theater systems with an aggregate value of $2.6 million
recognized into revenue in 2009, as compared to 15 new theater systems with a total value of $22.4
million recognized in 2008. The Companys introduction of the digital projection system in 2008 is
the primary reason for the increase in the number of theater system unit sales and leases, as the
digital projection system changes the economics favorably for the Companys clients by providing
increased programming flexibility and lower print costs totaling $200 per movie per system.
Average revenue per sales and sales-type lease systems was $1.3 million in 2009 as compared to
$1.5 million in 2008. The lower average revenue per sales and sales-type lease systems experienced
reflects the digital upgrade of 16 theater systems which were sold at a lower selling price as
compared to a full digital system for strategic reasons. Excluding digital upgrades, average
revenue per sales and sales-type lease systems was $1.5 million in 2009, which is consistent with
the average of $1.5 million experienced in 2008. The breakdown in mix of sales and sales-type
lease, operating lease and joint revenue sharing arrangement (see discussion below) installations
by theater system configuration in 2009 and 2008 is outlined in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Sales and Sales-type lease systems installed and recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2D SR Dome |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX 3D GT |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
IMAX 3D SR |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
IMAX 3D MPX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
IMAX digital |
|
|
35 |
(1) |
|
|
5 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
IMAX 3D MPX installed and deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Operating lease installed and operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX 3D MPX(1) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Joint revenue sharing arrangements installed and operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX digital |
|
|
74 |
(1) |
|
|
41 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the digital upgrade of 25 systems (14 sales arrangements, 2
treated previously as operating lease arrangements and 9 systems under
joint revenue sharing arrangements) from film-based to digital. |
55
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes the digital upgrade of 2 systems (one sales arrangement and
one system under a joint revenue sharing arrangement) from film-based
to digital. |
As noted in the table above, 3 theater systems installed in 2008 were pursuant to sales
arrangements that provided the customer with an upgrade to a digital system at a discounted price
when available. These discounted upgrades were provided for strategic reasons. Had the transactions
not included this digital upgrade clause, the Company would have recognized $3.8 million in revenue
and $2.0 million in gross margin related to these sales in 2008. The Companys policy is such that
once the digital upgrade is provided or the fair value for the upgrade is established, the Company
allocates total contract consideration, including any upgrade revenues, between the delivered and
undelivered elements on a residual basis and recognizes the revenue allocated to the delivered
elements with their associated costs. In 2009, the Company installed 3 digital upgrades, as
compared to 1 in 2008, where recognition was previously deferred under the Companys digital
upgrade policy.
Settlement revenue was $2.0 million in 2009 as compared to $0.9 million in 2008 which related
primarily to consensual buyouts for uninstalled theater systems.
IMAX systems margin fluctuates as a result of the mix of theater system configurations
recognized in each respective year. IMAX theater systems gross margin from sales and sales-type
leases, excluding the impact of settlements and asset impairment charges, decreased to 54.1% in
2009, from 59.4% in 2008. The lower gross margin experienced in 2009 reflects the digital upgrade
of 16 locations under sales arrangements sold at lower margins for strategic reasons, and lower
margins from the sale of 3 used systems. Gross margin on new sales and sales-type leases systems
increased to 57.0% in 2009 from 55.3% in 2008 which is a direct result of the theater system
configurations recognized in each respective period. Excluded from the IMAX systems margin
calculation in 2008 is a $2.4 million charge as the Company recorded a write-down of its film-based
projector inventories primarily due to the introduction of its digital projection system in July
2008.
Ongoing rent revenue and finance income increased to $10.6 million in 2009 from $10.3 million
in 2008. Gross margin for ongoing rent and finance income was consistent at $9.1 million in 2009
and 2008. The change in revenue is a function of new systems under sales or lease agreements that
began operations in 2009. Contingent fees included in this caption amounted to $3.6 million and
$3.7 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively.
In 2009, the Company installed and recognized revenue for 1 new theater system that qualified
as an operating lease, which is consistent with 2008. In 2009, these two theater systems under
operating lease arrangements were upgraded to digital theater systems under sales arrangements. The
Company recognizes revenue on operating leases over the term of the leases.
Theater System Maintenance
Theater system maintenance revenue increased 11.7% to $18.2 million in 2009 as compared to
$16.3 million in 2008. Theater system maintenance gross margin increased to $8.4 million in 2009
from $7.1 million in 2008. In 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded a write-down of its film-based
service parts inventories of $0.8 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Absent this write-down,
the margin would have been $9.2 million and $7.2 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Maintenance revenue continues to grow as the number of theaters in the IMAX network grows.
Maintenance margins vary depending on the mix of theater system configurations in the theater
network and the date of installation.
Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangements
Revenue from joint revenue sharing arrangements increased 528.8% to $21.6 million in 2009
compared to $3.4 million in 2008. The Company ended 2009 with 117 theaters operating under joint
revenue sharing arrangements as compared to 52 theaters at the end of 2008. In 2008, 40 of the 52
theaters were installed in the third and fourth quarters, resulting in less than a full year of
revenues being recorded. The increase in revenues from joint revenue sharing arrangements was due
to the greater number of theaters operating in 2009 as compared to 2008, and stronger performance
of the films exhibited in 2009 versus 2008, as discussed below.
The gross margin from joint revenue sharing arrangements in 2009 increased to $13.3 million
compared to a loss of $1.9 million in 2008. The increase was largely due to the increase in the
number of joint revenue sharing theaters operating in 2009 as compared to 2008. Included in the
2009 gross margin were certain advertising, marketing and selling expenses of $3.4 million
associated with the initial launch of 65 new theaters opened during the year, similar to the $1.8
million associated with the initial launch of 40 new theaters in 2008. In addition, accelerated
depreciation on existing film-based systems of $1.5 million was recorded in 2008. Excluding these
launch expenses and accelerated depreciation charges, the gross margin would have been $16.7
million in 2009, compared to $1.4 million in 2008.
56
Film
The Companys revenues from its film segments increased 49.9% to $51.6 million in 2009 from
$34.4 million in 2008.
Film production and IMAX DMR revenues increased 98.7% to $35.6 million in 2009 from $17.9
million in 2008. The increase in film production and IMAX DMR revenues was due primarily to the
overall growth of the IMAX theater network and stronger film performance for the films exhibited.
Gross box office generated by IMAX DMR films increased 107.8% to $270.8 million in 2009 versus
$130.3 million in 2008. In 2009, a significant portion of the gross-box office was generated by the
exhibition of 14 films which included The Day The Earth Stood Still: The IMAX Experience, the
re-release of The Dark Knight: The IMAX Experience, Jonas Bros: The 3D Concert Experience,
Watchmen: The IMAX Experience, Monsters vs. Aliens: An IMAX 3D Experience, Star Trek: The IMAX
Experience, Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian: The IMAX Experience, Transformers:
Revenge of the Fallen: The IMAX Experience, Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince: An IMAX 3D
Experience, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs: An IMAX 3D Experience, Where the Wild Things Are:
The IMAX Experience, Michael Jacksons This Is It: The IMAX Experience, Disneys A Christmas Carol:
An IMAX 3D Experience and Avatar: An IMAX 3D Experience as compared to 8 primary films exhibited
in 2008, which included The Spiderwick Chronicles: The IMAX Experience, Shine A Light: The IMAX
Experience, Speed Racer: The IMAX Experience, Kung Fu Panda: The IMAX Experience, The Dark Knight:
The IMAX Experience, Eagle Eye: The IMAX Experience, Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa: The IMAX
Experience and The Day the Earth Stood Still: The IMAX Experience.
Film distribution revenues increased 29.4% to $12.4 million in 2009 from $9.6 million in 2008
due to the introduction and strong performance of Under the Sea 3D: An IMAX 3D Experience, a movie co-produced by the
Company and WB and which was released on February 13, 2009. The Company did not distribute any
original titles in 2008.
Film post-production revenues decreased 48.0% to $3.6 million in 2009 from $6.9 million in
2008 primarily due to a decrease in third party business.
The Companys gross margin from its film segments increased 70.0% in 2009 to $23.1 million
from $13.6 million in 2008. Film production and IMAX DMR gross margins increased to $20.0 million
from $7.0 million in 2008 largely due to an increase in IMAX DMR revenue resulting from the
exhibition of 14 films in 2009 as compared to 8 in 2008. The increase was partially offset by lower
film distribution and film post-production margins. The film distribution margin of $2.1 million in
2009 was lower than the $3.1 million experienced in 2008. Film post-production gross margin
decreased by $2.5 million due to a decrease in third party business as compared to the prior year.
Theater Operations
Theater operations revenue in 2009 increased 12.1% to $11.8 million compared to $10.5 million
in 2008. This increase was attributable to increases in average ticket prices and attendance at
certain of the Companys owned theaters primarily due to the stronger performance of the films
exhibited in 2009 as compared to 2008.
Theater operations margin increased $0.7 million from 2008 primarily due to an increase in
revenues largely associated with IMAX DMR films exhibited.
Other
Other revenue increased to $3.4 million in 2009 compared to $3.2 million in 2008. Other
revenue primarily includes revenue generated from the Companys camera and rental business and
after market sales of projection system parts and 3D glasses.
The gross margin on other revenue was $0.3 million higher in 2009 as compared to 2008.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $56.2 million in 2009, as compared
to $43.7 million in 2008. The $12.5 million increase experienced from the prior year comparative
period was largely the result of the following:
|
|
|
a $16.5 million increase in the Companys stock-based compensation expense (including
$15.4 million for variable share-based awards) primarily due to an increase in the Companys
stock price during the period (an increase from $4.46 to $13.31 per share in 2009 as
compared to a decrease from $6.82 per share to $4.46 per share in the prior year) and its
impact on variable awards such as SARs. The Company has no present intention to issue such
variable awards in the future; and |
57
|
|
|
a $2.1 million increase in legal and professional fees, including professional fees of
approximately $1.0 million in connection with the termination of a service arrangement. |
These increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $1.4 million decrease in staff-related costs and compensation costs, which was the
result of a decrease in salaries and benefits primarily due to a lower average Canadian
dollar denominated salary expense (including a $0.9 million benefit from hedged forward
contracts) and a $0.6 million decrease in travel and entertainment costs; |
|
|
|
|
a $3.6 million decrease due to a gain from unhedged forward contracts and foreign
exchange translation adjustments. In 2009, the Company recorded a foreign exchange gain of
$2.9 million due to an increase in the exchange rates of foreign currency denominated
receivables, other working capital balances and foreign currency unhedged forward contracts,
as compared to a loss of $0.7 million recorded in 2008; and |
|
|
|
|
a $1.1 million decrease in other general corporate expenditures. |
Receivable Provisions, Net of Recoveries
Receivable provisions, net of recoveries for accounts receivable and financing receivables,
amounted to a net provision of $1.1 million in 2009, as compared to $2.0 million in 2008.
The Companys accounts receivables and financing receivables are subject to credit risk. The
Companys accounts receivable and financing receivables are concentrated with the theater
exhibition industry and film entertainment industry. To minimize the Companys credit risk, the
Company retains title to underlying theater systems leased, performs initial and ongoing credit
evaluations of its customers and makes ongoing provisions for its estimate of potentially
uncollectible amounts. Accordingly, the Company believes it has adequately protected itself against
exposures relating to receivables and contractual commitments.
Asset Impairments and Other Significant Charges
The Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $0.2 million against fixed assets after the
Company assessed the carrying value of certain assets in light of their future expected cash flows.
The Company recognized that the carrying values for the assets exceeded the expected undiscounted
future cash flows. During 2008, the Company recorded total asset impairment charges of $nil.
The Company recorded a net provision of $0.1 million in 2009 (2008 $0.4 million) in
accounts receivable.
In 2009, the Company also recorded a net provision of $1.4 million in financing receivables
(2008 $1.6 million) as the collectibility associated with certain leases was uncertain.
In 2009, the Company recorded a charge of $0.9 million (2008 $2.5 million) in costs and
expenses applicable to revenues, primarily for its film-based projector inventories due to a
reduction in the net realizable value resulting from the Companys development of a proprietary
digital projection system in July 2008.
Interest Income and Expenses
Interest income decreased to less than $0.1 million in 2009, as compared to $0.4 million in
2008.
Interest expense decreased to $13.8 million in 2009 as compared to $17.7 million in 2008.
During the year, the Company repurchased all $160.0 million aggregate principal amount of the its
outstanding 9.625% Senior Notes which resulted in a decrease in the Companys interest expense for
the year ended December 31, 2009. Included in interest expense is the amortization of deferred
finance costs in the amount of $1.0 million and $1.3 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively,
relating to the Companys Senior Notes. The Companys policy is to defer and amortize, over the
life of the debt instrument, all the costs relating to a debt financing which are paid directly to
the debt provider.
Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate differs from the statutory tax rate and varies from year to
year primarily as a result of numerous permanent differences, investment and other tax credits, the
provision for income taxes at different rates in foreign and other provincial jurisdictions,
enacted statutory tax rate increases or reductions in the year, changes due to foreign exchange,
changes in the Companys valuation allowance based on the Companys recoverability assessments of
deferred tax assets, and favorable or unfavorable resolution of various tax examinations. There was
no change in the Companys estimates of the recoverability of its deferred tax assets based on an
analysis of both positive and negative evidence including projected future earnings.
58
On March 12, 2009, the Government of Canada enacted Bill C-10, which included legislation
allowing corporations to elect to file their Canadian corporate tax returns in the corporations
functional currency. The Company has submitted an election to file the 2008 and subsequent Canadian
corporate tax returns in U.S. dollars. As a result of the election and its impact on the Companys
opening 2008 tax return balances in Canada, the Company has recorded an increase in the gross
deferred tax asset of $14.1 million, which has been fully offset by a corresponding valuation
allowance. Other significant changes in the effective rate include the effects of legislative
changes regarding enacted rate reductions and extensions of carryforward periods relating to
investment tax credits in Canada. In addition, the Company redeemed its Senior Notes in the year
resulting in foreign exchange gains and other capital gains, against which the Company has applied
its available capital and net operating losses
As at December 31, 2009, the Company had net deferred income tax assets after valuation
allowance of $nil (December 31, 2008 $nil). As at December 31, 2009, the Company had a net
deferred income tax asset before valuation allowance of $71.6 million, against which the Company is
carrying a $71.6 million valuation allowance.
Research and Development
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 research and development expenses amounted to
$3.8 million and $7.5 million, respectively. The expenses primarily reflect significant research
and development activities pertaining to the development of the Companys new proprietary
digitally-based theater projector which the Company introduced in July of 2008. As at December 31,
2009, the Company had installed 151 IMAX digital theater projection systems and had signed
contracts to install an additional 115 digital systems.
Discontinued Operations
On December 11, 2009, the Company closed its owned and operated Tempe IMAX theater. The
Company recognized lease termination and guarantee obligations of $0.5 million to the landlord,
which were offset by derecognition of other liabilities of $0.9 million, for a net gain of $0.4
million. In a related transaction, the Company leased the projection system and inventory of the
Tempe IMAX theater to a third party theater exhibitor. Revenue from this operating lease
transaction will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. For the year
ended December 31, 2009, revenues for the Tempe IMAX theater were $0.8 million (2008 $1.5
million) and the Company recognized a loss of $0.5 million in 2009 (2008 loss of $0.3 million)
from the operation of the theater. The above transactions are reflected as discontinued operations
as there are no significant continuing cash flows from either a migration or a continuation of
activities.
On September 30, 2009, the Company closed its owned and operated Vancouver IMAX theater. The
amount of loss to the Company pertaining to lease and guarantee obligations owing to the landlord
was estimated at $0.3 million which the Company recognized at December 31, 2009. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, revenues for the Vancouver IMAX theater were $1.1 million (2008 $2.0 million)
and the Company recognized a loss of $0.1 million in 2009 (2008 income of $0.2 million) from the
operation of the theater. The above transactions are reflected as discontinued operations as there
are no continuing cash flows from either a migration or a continuation of activities.
Pension Plan
The Company has an unfunded defined benefit pension plan, the Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan (the SERP), covering Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler. As at December 31, 2009, the
Company had an unfunded and accrued projected benefit obligation of approximately $29.9 million
(December 31, 2008 $26.4 million) in respect of the SERP. At the time the Company established
the SERP, it also took out life insurance policies on Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler with coverage
amounts of $21.5 million in aggregate. As at December 31, 2009, the cash surrender value of the
insurance policies is $7.3 million (December 31, 2008 $6.2 million).
The net periodic benefit cost was $1.4 million and $1.8 million in 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The components of net periodic benefit cost were as follows:
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
$ |
793 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
Amortization of prior service credit |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
(248 |
) |
Amortization of actuarial gain |
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension expense |
|
$ |
1,448 |
|
|
$ |
1,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The plan experienced an actuarial loss of $2.4 million during 2009, resulting in an increase
in the pension obligation from $26.4 million at December 31, 2008, to $29.9 million at December 31,
2009. The primary factor contributing to this loss is a decrease in the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation (PBGC) published annuity interest rates used to determine the lump sum payment under
the plan, as well as a decrease in the Citigroup Pension Discount Curve discount rate from 5.11% in
the prior year to 1.50%.
As at December 31, 2009, Mr. Wechslers benefits were 100% vested while the benefits of Mr.
Gelfond were approximately 95.9% vested. The vesting percentage of a member whose employment
terminates other than by voluntary retirement or upon a change in control is 100%. Upon a
termination for cause, prior to a change of control, the executive will forfeit any and all
benefits to which such executive may have been entitled, whether or not vested.
On October 1, 2009, the Company paid benefits of $0.9 million to Mr. Wechsler in accordance
with the terms of the SERP.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company utilizes the Binomial Model to determine the fair value of stock-based payment
awards. The fair value determined by the Binomial Model is affected by the Companys stock price as
well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables
include, but are not limited to, the Companys expected stock price volatility over the term of the
awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. The Binomial Model also
considers the expected exercise multiple which is the multiple of exercise price to grant price at
which exercises are expected to occur on average. Option-pricing models were developed for use in
estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting or hedging restrictions and are fully
transferable. Because the Companys employee stock options and stock appreciation rights have
certain characteristics that are significantly different from traded options, and because changes
in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, in managements opinion,
the Binomial Model best provides an accurate measure of the fair value of the Companys employee
stock options and stock appreciation rights. Although the fair value of employee stock options and
stock appreciation rights are determined in accordance with the Equity topic of the FASB ASC using
an option-pricing model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing
buyer/willing seller market transaction.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized under ASC 718 Compensation Stock Compensation
for 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $17.7 million, $1.5 million and $3.4 million, respectively.
60
Outlook
The
Company achieved record revenues and earnings in 2010. The Company anticipates even higher revenues in
2011, based primarily on the recent and expected future growth of the Companys commercial theater
network, which drives revenue in several of the Companys
segments and the anticipated performance
of the 2011 film slate. The recent and expected future growth in the theatre network is being driven in
part by the record number of theater signings the Company achieved in 2010.
The Company installed 91 IMAX theater systems, not including digital upgrades, in 2010. At
year-end, this reflected an increase of 20.5% for the overall IMAX theater network and 28.2% for
the IMAX commercial theater network over the prior year. In addition, the Company entered into new
theater arrangements for a record number of new theater systems in 2010. Of the theater system
arrangements in backlog as at December 31, 2010, the Company currently estimates that approximately
80-90 theater systems (excluding digital upgrades) will be installed
in 2011. As a result, by the end of 2011,
the Companys total theater network is expected to have increased by approximately 15% over the
prior year and its commercial theater network by approximately 20% over the prior year as the
majority of the new 2011 systems are to be installed in commercial settings. In addition, each year
the Company installs a number of systems that are signed in that same calendar year. However, the
Company cautions that theater system installations slip from period to period in the course of the
Companys business and such slippages remain a recurring and unpredictable part of its business.
A substantial portion of the recent
commercial theater network growth has come from theaters
under joint revenue sharing arrangements both in the United States
and in Canada and, increasingly, in certain
international markets. Revenue sharing arrangements allow the Company to capitalize on its theater
network growth by providing the Company with higher recurring revenue than under most sales or
sales-type lease arrangements. The Company believes that the strategy of increasing the number of
IMAX theaters under joint revenue sharing arrangements has driven increased profitability in recent years and the Company
believes that it will continue to drive profitability in the future. The retirement of a
significant portion of the Companys debt during 2009 and increased cash flows from operations
during 2009 and 2010 has allowed the Company the financial flexibility to fund the expansion of its
joint revenue sharing strategy.
In recent years, the number of IMAX
DMR films released to the IMAX theater network has also
increased. The increased number of IMAX DMR films can minimize the impact of an individual films
relatively weak performance. In addition, the increased number of titles with shorter release windows can
mean a greater opportunity to capitalize on the early weeks of a movies release, when over half of
a given titles gross box office is typically generated. The increased number of films also permits
the Company to select a diverse mix of titles to maximize the networks box office potential. In
2010, 16 IMAX DMR titles were shown in the IMAX theater network, compared to 14 titles in 2009. To
date, the Company has contracted for the release of 21 IMAX DMR titles to IMAX theaters in 2011. In
addition, the Company, in conjunction with WB, will release Born to be Wild 3D:
An IMAX 3D Experience
to its network in April 2011. The Company remains in active discussions with every major Hollywood
studio regarding future titles. However, the Company cautions that films can be
subject to delays in production or changes in release schedule, which can negatively impact the
number, timing and type of IMAX DMR and IMAX original films released to the IMAX theater network.
The Company intends to continue to try to achieve the optimal film slate, with the appropriate
number and mix of titles.
The Company believes that its
international expansion is an important driver of future growth
for the Company. During 2010, 39% of the Companys gross box office from DMR films was generated
from IMAX theaters in international markets, as compared with 25% in 2009. In 2010, 127 of the
Companys record 221 theater signings were for theatres in international markets. Included among
these signings were several multi-theater sales transactions, including for theaters in Russia,
China, Thailand, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Philippines, and Israel. The Company also entered into
several significant joint revenue sharing arrangements in international markets in 2010, including
in South Korea, France, Germany, Italy and Spain, as well as expansions of existing joint revenue sharing
arrangements in Japan. In 2011, the Company intends to continue to expand its international
presence, including by expanding its number of theaters under international joint revenue sharing
arrangements.
To support its growth in international markets, the Company has begun, and expects to
continue, to evaluate DMR opportunities in international markets. In July 2010, the Company exhibited
its first DMR title outside of North America, Aftershock: The IMAX Experience, across IMAX theaters
in China, other parts of Asia and key North American markets pursuant
to an agreement between the
Company and Huayi Bros. Media Corporation Ltd., Chinas largest media group. On August 30, 2010,
the Company announced that internationally acclaimed director John Woo and producer Terence Changs
next film, the action epic Flying Tigers, is intended to be released to select IMAX theaters in
early 2012. The film is the second announced Chinese film to be released to IMAX theaters. In
December 2010, the Company also announced the release of The Founding of a Party: The IMAX Experience
in China in June 2011. The Company is also committed to maximizing the
productivity of its international theaters through international-only releases. The Companys first
international-only release Prince of Persia: Sands of Time: The IMAX Experience was released in May
2010 and the Companys second international-only release, Tangled: An IMAX 3D Experience, is being
released in select Asian markets beginning in February 2011. The Company anticipates additional
international-only releases in the future. Finally, in order to
61
further strengthen the Companys film slate internationally, the Company has recently
announced certain IMAX-only early releases. For instance, Tron Legacy: An IMAX 3D Experience was
released in IMAX theaters in France four days prior to its wide release in that country. The
Company and its studio partners also employed this IMAX-only early release strategy with Harry Potter and the Deathly
Hallows: Part I: The IMAX Experience in France in November and with Tron Legacy: An IMAX 3D
Experience in Russia in December.
In 2011, the Company also intends
to continue to explore new areas of brand extension such as:
3D in-home entertainment technology, including 3net, a 3D television channel operated by a Limited
Liability Corporation owned by the Company, Discovery Communications and Sony Corporation;
increased post-production opportunities; alternative theater content, and partnering with
technology, studio, programming, content and consumer electronics companies.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Credit Facility
On November 16, 2009, the Company amended and restated the terms of its senior secured credit
facility, which had been scheduled to mature on October 31, 2010. The amended and restated
facility, as further amended by the parties on January 21, 2011, (the Credit Facility) with a
scheduled maturity of October 31, 2013, has a maximum borrowing capacity of $75.0 million,
consisting of a revolving loan facility of $40.0 million, subject to a borrowing base calculation
(as described below) and including a sublimit of $20.0 million for letters of credit and a term
loan of $35.0 million. Certain of the Companys subsidiaries serve as guarantors (the Guarantors)
of the Companys obligations under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility is collateralized by a
first priority security interest in all of the present and future assets of the Company and the
Guarantors.
The Companys indebtedness under the Credit Facility includes the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Term Loan |
|
$ |
17,500 |
|
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
Revolving Credit Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,500 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2010, the Companys current borrowing capacity under the revolving portion
of the Credit Facility was $40.0 million after deduction for the minimum Excess Availability
reserve of $5.0 million. Outstanding borrowings and letters of credit and advance payment
guarantees were $nil as at December 31, 2010. As at December 31, 2009, the borrowing capacity was
$24.8 million after deduction for outstanding borrowings of $15.0 million, letters of credit and
advance payment guarantees of $0.3 million and the minimum Excess Availability reserve of $5.0
million.
The terms of the Credit Facility are set forth in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
(the Credit Agreement), dated November 16, 2009, between the Company, Wells Fargo Capital Finance
Corporation Canada (formerly Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Canada)), as agent, lender, sole
lead arranger and sole bookrunner, (Wells Fargo); and Export Development Canada, as lender
(EDC, together with Wells Fargo, the Lenders) and in various collateral and security documents
entered into by the Company and the Guarantors. Each of the Guarantors has also entered into a
guarantee in respect of the Companys obligations under the Credit Facility.
The revolving portion of the Credit Facility permits maximum aggregate borrowings equal to the
lesser of:
(i) $40.0 million, and
(ii) a collateral calculation based on the percentages of the book values of the Companys net
investment in sales-type leases, financing receivables, certain trade accounts receivable, finished
goods inventory allocated to backlog contracts and the appraised values of the expected future cash
flows related to operating leases and the Companys owned real property, reduced by certain
accruals and accounts payable and subject to other conditions, limitations and reserve right
requirements. It is also reduced by the settlement risk on its foreign currency forward contracts
when the notional value exceeds the fair value of the forward contracts.
The revolving portion of the Credit Facility bears interest, at the Companys option, at
either (i) LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75% per annum, or (ii) Wells Fargos prime rate plus a margin
of 1.25% per annum. The term loan portion of the Credit Facility bears interest at the Companys
option, at either (i) LIBOR plus a margin of 3.75% per annum, or (ii) Wells Fargos prime rate plus
a
62
margin of 2.25% per annum. Under the Credit Facility, the effective interest rate for the year
ended December 31, 2010, for the term loan portion was 4.06% (2009 4.09%) and 3.56% for the
revolving portion (2009 2.29%).
The Credit Facility provides that so long as the term loan remains outstanding, the Company
will be required to maintain: (i) a ratio of funded debt (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to
EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of not more than 2:1 through December 31, 2010, and
(ii) a ratio of funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 1.75:1 thereafter. If the Company repays the
term loan in full, it will remain subject to such ratio requirements only if Excess Availability
(as defined in the Credit Agreement) is less than $10.0 million or Cash and Excess Availability (as
defined in the Credit Agreement) is less than $15.0 million. The ratio of funded debt to EBITDA was
0.17:1 as at December 31, 2010, where Funded Debt (as defined in the Credit Agreement) is the sum
of all obligations evidenced by notes, bonds, debentures or similar instruments and was $17.5
million. EBITDA is calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA per Credit Facility: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars) |
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
100,779 |
|
Add (subtract): |
|
|
|
|
Loss from equity accounted investments |
|
|
493 |
|
Recovery of income taxes |
|
|
(51,784 |
) |
Interest expense net of interest income |
|
|
1,486 |
|
Depreciation and amortization including film asset amortization(1) |
|
|
20,195 |
|
Write-downs net of recoveries including asset impairments and receivable provisions(1) |
|
|
2,551 |
|
Stock and other non-cash compensation |
|
|
28,195 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See note 19 to the accompanying audited consolidated financial
statements in Item 8. |
If Cash and Excess Availability is less than $25.0 million, the Company will also be required
to maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of not less than
1.1:1.0; provided, however, that if the Company repays the term loan in full, it will remain
subject to such ratio requirement only if Excess Availability is less than $10.0 million or Cash
and Excess Availability is less than $15.0 million At all times, under the terms of the Credit
Facility, the Company is required to maintain minimum Excess Availability of not less than $5.0
million and minimum Cash and Excess Availability of not less than $15.0 million. These amounts were
$45.0 million and $75.4 million, respectively at December 31, 2010. The Company was in compliance
with all of these requirements as at December 31, 2010.
The Credit Facility contains typical affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants
that limit or restrict the ability of the Company and the Guarantors to: incur certain additional
indebtedness; make certain loans, investments or guarantees; pay dividends; make certain asset
sales; incur certain liens or other encumbrances; conduct certain transactions with affiliates and
enter into certain corporate transactions.
The Credit Facility also contains customary events of default, including upon an acquisition
or change of control or upon a change in the business and assets of the Company or a Guarantor that
in each case is reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company or Guarantor.
If an event of default occurs and is continuing under the Credit Facility, the Lenders may, among
other things, terminate their commitments and require immediate repayment of all amounts owed by
the Company.
Letters of Credit and Other Commitments
As at December 31, 2010, the Company has letters of credit and advance payment guarantees of
$nil outstanding (December 31, 2009 $0.3 million), under the Credit Facility.
The Company also has a $10.0 million facility for advance payment guarantees and letters of
credit through the Bank of Montreal for use solely in conjunction with guarantees fully insured by
EDC (the Bank of Montreal Facility). The Bank of Montreal Facility is unsecured and includes
typical affirmative and negative covenants, including delivery of annual consolidated financial
statements within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year. The Bank of Montreal Facility is subject
to periodic annual reviews. As at December 31,
63
2010, the Company had letters of credit outstanding of $2.4 million under the Bank of Montreal
facility as compared to $3.6 million as at December 31, 2009.
Senior Notes due December 2010
In 2009, the Company repurchased all $160.0 million aggregate principal amount of its
outstanding 9.625% Senior Notes due December 1, 2010, which represented the aggregate principal
amount outstanding. The Company paid cash of $159.1 million to reacquire its bonds, thereby
releasing the Company from further obligations to various holders under the indenture governing the
Senior Notes (the Indenture). The Company accounted for the bond repurchase in accordance with
the Debt Topic of the FASB ASC, whereby the net carrying amount of the debt extinguished was the
face value of the bonds adjusted for any unamortized premium, discount and costs of issuance, which
resulted in a loss of $0.6 million in 2009.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
As at December 31, 2010, the Companys principal sources of liquidity included cash and cash
equivalents of $30.4 million, the Credit Facility, anticipated collection from trade accounts
receivable of $39.6 million, anticipated collection from financing receivables due in the next 12
months of $12.8 million, payments expected in the next 12 months on existing backlog deals and cash
receipts from theaters under joint revenue sharing arrangements. As at December 31, 2010, the
Company had drawn down $nil on the revolving portion of the Credit Facility, and had letters of
credit of $nil outstanding under the Credit Facility and $2.4 million under the Bank of Montreal
Facility.
During
the year ended December 31, 2010, the Companys operations
provided cash of $58.5
million and the Company used cash of $36.8 million to fund capital expenditures, principally to
build equipment for use in joint revenue sharing arrangements and to fund its investment in film
assets. Based on managements current operating plan for 2011, the Company expects to continue to
use cash to deploy additional theater systems under joint revenue sharing arrangements. Cash flows
from joint revenue sharing arrangements are derived from the theater box office and concession
revenues and the Company invested directly in the roll out of 54 new theater systems and 2 digital
upgrades under joint revenue sharing arrangements in 2010.
The Company believes that cash flow from operations together with existing cash and borrowing
available under the Credit Facility will be sufficient to fund the Companys business operations,
including its strategic initiatives relating to existing joint revenue sharing arrangements for the
next 12 months.
The Companys operating cash flow will be adversely affected if managements projections of
future signings for theater systems and film productions, installations and film performance are
not realized. The Company forecasts its short-term liquidity requirements on a quarterly and annual
basis. Since the Companys future cash flows are based on estimates and there may be factors that
are outside of the Companys control (see Risk Factors in Item 1A in the Companys 2010 Form
10-K), there is no guarantee that the Company will continue to be able to fund its operations
through cash flows from operations. Under the terms of the Companys typical sale and sales-type
lease agreement, the Company receives substantial cash payments before the Company completes the
performance of its obligations. Similarly, the Company receives cash payments for some of its film
productions in advance of related cash expenditures.
Operating Activities
The Companys net cash provided by operating activities is affected by a number of factors,
including the proceeds associated with new signings of theater system lease and sale agreements in
the year, costs associated with contributing systems under joint revenue sharing arrangements, the
box-office performance of films distributed by the Company and/or exhibited in the Companys
theaters, increases or decreases in the Companys operating expenses, including research and
development, and the level of cash collections received from its customers.
Cash
provided by operating activities amounted to $58.5 million in 2010. Changes in other
non-cash operating assets as compared to 2009 include: an increase of $11.9 million in financing
receivables; an increase of $2.4 million in accounts receivable; an increase of $3.8 million in
inventories; an increase of $0.2 million in prepaid expenses;
and an increase of $0.3 million in other
assets which includes a $0.4 million increase in commissions and other deferred selling expenses
and a $0.1 million decrease in insurance recoveries receivable. Changes in other non-cash operating liabilities as compared to December 31, 2009
include: an increase in deferred revenue of $15.7 million related to amounts added to deferred
revenue for backlog payments received offset by theater system installations in the current period;
an increase in accounts payable of $0.1 million and a
64
decrease of $25.8 million in accrued liabilities largely due to a payment of pension benefits
in the amount of $14.7 million and payments of $14.5 million in variable stock-based compensation
expense.
Included in accrued liabilities at December 31, 2010, was $18.1 million in respect of accrued
pension obligations.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities amounted to $23.8 million in 2010 compared to $27.6
million in 2009, which includes an investment in joint revenue sharing equipment of $21.3 million,
purchases of $5.3 million in property, plant and equipment, an investment in other assets of $0.7
million, investments in new business ventures of $3.6 million, and an increase in other intangible
assets of $0.7 million offset by a receipt of $7.8 million representing the cash surrender value of
a life insurance policy.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities in 2010, amounted to $24.2 million due to repayment of
bank indebtedness of $32.5 million, offset by the proceeds from the issuance of common shares from
stock option exercises.
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures, including the Companys investment in joint revenue sharing equipment,
purchase of property, plant and equipment, net of sales proceeds, and investments in film assets
were $36.8 million in 2010 as compared to $35.7 million in 2009. The Company anticipates a
consistent level of capital expenditures in 2011 as compared to 2010 related, in part, to the
anticipated roll-out of approximately 40 theaters pursuant to joint revenue sharing arrangements in
2011, all of which the Company currently intends to fund through cash on hand, cash from operations
and availability under the Credit Facility.
Prior Year Cash Flow Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities amounted to $13.8 million in the year ended December
31, 2009. Changes in other non-cash operating assets and liabilities included a $7.2 million
increase in financing receivables, an increase of $13.4 million in accounts receivable, a decrease
in inventories of $10.1 million, a $0.7 million increase in prepaid expenses, a $1.4 million
decrease in other assets which includes a $0.7 million decrease in commissions and other deferred
selling expenses and a $0.7 million decrease in insurance recoveries receivable, an increase in
accounts payable of $1.5 million, a decrease in deferred revenue of $13.5 million, related to
amounts relieved from deferred revenue related to theater system installations in 2009 offset by
backlog payments received and a decrease of less than $0.1 million in accrued liabilities. Net cash
used in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2009 amounted to $27.6 million, which
includes an investment in joint revenue sharing equipment of $25.1 million, purchases of $1.4
million in property, plant and equipment, an increase in other assets of $0.7 million and an
increase in other intangible assets of $0.3 million. Net cash provided by financing activities in
2009 amounted to $7.2 million due to the issuance of common shares in 2009, net of common share
issuance costs, offset by the proceeds to repurchase Senior Note indebtedness.
Capital expenditures including the Companys investment in joint revenue sharing equipment,
purchase of property, plant and equipment net of sales proceeds and investments in film assets were
$35.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2009.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following summarizes the Companys contractual obligations and commercial commitments at
December 31, 2010 that will be settled in future periods:
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars) |
|
Obligations |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Pension obligations (1) |
|
$ |
18,813 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,813 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Credit Facility(2) |
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
11,667 |
|
|
|
5,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations (3) |
|
|
16,253 |
|
|
|
5,673 |
|
|
|
5,390 |
|
|
|
2,064 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
Purchase obligations (4) |
|
|
13,561 |
|
|
|
13,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits obligations |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations (5) |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
66,328 |
|
|
$ |
30,941 |
|
|
$ |
11,261 |
|
|
$ |
20,928 |
|
|
$ |
913 |
|
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
$ |
1,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The SERP assumptions are that Mr. Gelfond will receive a lump sum
payment at the beginning of 2013 upon retirement at the end of
the current term of his employment agreement, although Mr.
Gelfond has not informed the Company that he intends to retire at
that time. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest on the Credit Facility is payable monthly in arrears
based on the applicable variable rate and is not included above. |
|
(3) |
|
The Companys total minimum annual rental payments to be made
under operating leases, mostly consisting of rent at the
Companys properties in New York and Santa Monica, and at the
various owned and operated theaters. |
|
(4) |
|
The Companys total payments to be made under binding commitments
with suppliers and outstanding payments to be made for supplies
ordered but yet to be invoiced. |
|
(5) |
|
The Companys total minimum annual payments to be made under
capital leases, mostly consisting of payments for IT hardware and
various other fixed assets. |
Pension and Postretirement Obligations
The Company has an unfunded defined benefit pension plan, the SERP, covering Messrs. Gelfond
and Wechsler. As at December 31, 2010, the Company had an unfunded and accrued projected benefit
obligation of approximately $18.1 million (December 31, 2009 $29.9 million) in respect of the
SERP. At the time the Company established the SERP, it also took out life insurance policies on
Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler with coverage amounts of $21.5 million in aggregate. During the
quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Company obtained $3.2 million representing the cash surrender
value of Mr. Gelfonds policy. The proceeds were used to pay down the term loan under the Credit
Facility. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Company obtained $4.6 million
representing the cash surrender value of Mr. Wechslers policy. The amount was used as a part of
the $14.7 million lump sum payment made to Mr. Wechsler on August 1, 2010 under the SERP which
settled in full Mr. Wechslers entitlement under the SERP. At December 31, 2010, the cash surrender
value of these policies was $nil.
Under the terms of the SERP, if Mr. Gelfonds employment had been terminated other than for
cause prior to August 1, 2010, he would have been entitled to receive SERP benefits in the form of
monthly annuity payments until the earlier of a change of control or August 1, 2010, at which time
he would have become entitled to receive remaining benefits in the form of a lump sum payment. If
Mr. Gelfonds employment is, or would have been, terminated other than for cause on or after August
1, 2010, he is, or would have been, entitled to receive SERP benefits in the form of a lump sum
payment. SERP benefit payments to Mr. Gelfond are subject to a deferral for six months after the
termination of his employment, at which time Mr. Gelfond will be entitled to receive interest on
the deferred amount credited at the applicable federal rate for short-term obligations.
The terms of Mr. Gelfonds current employment agreement has been extended to the
beginning of 2013.
Under the terms of the SERP, monthly annuity payments payable to Mr. Wechsler, whose
employment as Co-CEO terminated effective April 1, 2009, were deferred for six months and were paid
in the form of a lump sum plus interest on the deferred amount on October 1, 2009. These monthly
annuity payments continued through to August 1, 2010. On August 1, 2010, the Company made a
66
lump sum payment of $14.7 million to Mr. Wechsler in accordance with the terms of the plan,
representing a settlement in full of Mr. Wechslers entitlement under the SERP.
In July 2000, the Company agreed to maintain health benefits for Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler
upon retirement. As at December 31, 2010, the Company had an unfunded benefit obligation of $0.5
million (December 31, 2009 $0.5 million).
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
There are currently no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to
have a current or future material effect on the Companys financial condition.
|
|
|
Item 7A. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
The Company is exposed to market risk from foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates,
which could affect operating results, financial position and cash flows. Market risk is the
potential change in an instruments value caused by, for example, fluctuations in interest and
currency exchange rates. The Companys primary market risk exposure is the risk of unfavorable
movements in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar. The Company does not
use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk
A majority of the Companys revenue is denominated in U.S. dollars while a significant portion
of its costs and expenses is denominated in Canadian dollars. A portion of the Companys net U.S.
dollar cash flows is converted to Canadian dollars to fund Canadian dollar expenses through the
spot market. In Japan, the Company has ongoing operating expenses related to its operations. Net
Japanese yen cash flows are converted to U.S. dollars through the spot market. The Company also has
cash receipts under leases denominated in Japanese yen, Euros and Canadian dollars.
The Company manages its exposure to foreign exchange rate risks through its regular operating
and financing activities and, when appropriate, through the use of derivative financial
instruments. These derivative financial instruments are utilized to hedge economic exposures as
well as reduce earnings and cash flow volatility resulting from shifts in market rates.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded a foreign exchange gain on
translation of foreign currency working capital balances and unhedged foreign currency forward
contracts of $1.5 million as compared with a foreign exchange
gain of $2.9 million in 2009.
During 2010, the Company entered into a series of foreign currency forward contracts to manage
the Companys risks associated with the volatility of foreign currencies with settlement dates
throughout 2011. In addition, at December 31, 2010, the Company held foreign currency forward
contracts to manage foreign currency risk on future anticipated Canadian dollar expenditures that
were not considered foreign currency hedges by the Company. Foreign currency derivatives are
recognized and measured in the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value (gains or
losses) are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations except for derivatives
designated and qualifying as foreign currency hedging instruments. For foreign currency hedging
instruments, the effective portion of the gain or loss in a hedge of a forecasted transaction is
reported in other comprehensive income and reclassified to the consolidated statement of operations
when the forecasted transaction occurs. Any ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the
consolidated statement of operations. The notional value of these contracts at December 31, 2010
was $12.7 million (December 31, 2009 $2.8 million). A gain of $0.8 million was recorded to Other
Comprehensive Income with respect to the appreciation in the value of these contracts in 2010 (2009
$1.7 million). A gain of $0.7 million was reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income to selling, general and administrative expenses in 2010 (2009 $1.3 million). Appreciation
or depreciation on forward contracts not meeting the requirements for hedge accounting in the
Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB ASC are recorded to selling, general and administrative
expenses. The notional value of forward contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting at
December 31, 2010 was $28.8 million (December 31, 2009 $4.5 million).
For all derivative instruments, the Company is subject to counterparty credit risk to the
extent that the counterparty may not meet its obligations to the Company. To manage this risk, the
Company enters into derivative transactions only with major financial institutions.
67
At December 31, 2010, the Companys net investment in leases and working capital items
denominated in Canadian dollars, Japanese Yen and Euros aggregated to
$2.1 million. Assuming a 10%
appreciation or depreciation in foreign currency exchange rates from the quoted foreign currency
exchange rates at December 31, 2010, the potential change in the fair value of foreign
currency-denominated net investment in leases and working capital
items would be $0.2 million.
Interest Rate Risk Management
The Companys earnings are also affected by changes in interest rates due to the impact those
changes have on its interest income from cash, and its interest expense from variable-rate
borrowings under the Credit Facility.
As at December 31, 2010, the Companys borrowings under the Credit Facility were $17.5 million
(December 31, 2009 $50.0 million).
The Companys largest exposure with respect to variable rate debt comes from changes in the
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The Company had variable rate debt instruments representing
approximately 9.2% and 24.7% of its total liabilities at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
If the Companys interest rates average 10 percent more in 2011 than they did at December 31, 2010,
the Companys interest expense would increase by approximately $0.1 million and interest income
from cash would increase by approximately less than $0.1 million. These amounts are determined by
considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on the Companys variable rate debt and
cash balances at December 31, 2010.
At December 31, 2010, the Company is not exposed to any market risk for fixed rate debt as the
Company repurchased all of the remaining $160.0 million of its Senior Notes due December 2010 in
2009.
68
|
|
|
|
|
Item 8. |
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
************
69
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders of IMAX Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of IMAX Corporation and its
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, cash flows and shareholders equity (deficiency) for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2010. In addition, we have audited the financial statement schedule listed in the index under Item 15(a)(2). We also have audited IMAX Corporations internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control
- - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Imax Corporations management is responsible for these financial statements, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Managements Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting under Item 9A of its 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion
on the corporations internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material
misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all
material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the
risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of
the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material
effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of IMAX Corporation and its subsidiaries as of December
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index under
Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjuction with the related consolidated financial statements.
Also in our opinion, IMAX Corporation
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Ontario
February 24, 2011
70
IMAX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
30,390 |
|
|
$ |
20,081 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,988 (December 31,
2009 $2,770) |
|
|
39,570 |
|
|
|
37,652 |
|
Financing receivables (note 4, note 21(c)) |
|
|
73,601 |
|
|
|
62,585 |
|
Inventories (note 5) |
|
|
15,275 |
|
|
|
10,271 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
2,832 |
|
|
|
2,609 |
|
Film assets (note 6) |
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
3,218 |
|
Property, plant and equipment (note 7) |
|
|
74,035 |
|
|
|
54,820 |
|
Other assets (note 8) |
|
|
12,350 |
|
|
|
15,140 |
|
Deferred income taxes (note 9) |
|
|
57,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
39,027 |
|
|
|
39,027 |
|
Other intangible assets (note 10) |
|
|
2,437 |
|
|
|
2,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
349,088 |
|
|
$ |
247,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank indebtedness (note 12) |
|
$ |
17,500 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
20,384 |
|
|
|
16,803 |
|
Accrued
liabilities (notes 6, 9(g), 13(a), 13(c), 15(c), 22, 23(d) and 24) |
|
|
78,994 |
|
|
|
77,853 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
73,752 |
|
|
|
57,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
190,630 |
|
|
|
202,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (notes 13 and 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock (note 15) common shares no par value. Authorized unlimited number.
Issued and outstanding 64,145,573 (December 31, 2009 62,831,974) |
|
|
292,977 |
|
|
|
280,048 |
|
Other equity |
|
|
7,687 |
|
|
|
6,044 |
|
Deficit |
|
|
(141,209 |
) |
|
|
(241,988 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (note 25) |
|
|
(997 |
) |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
158,458 |
|
|
|
45,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
349,088 |
|
|
$ |
247,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(the accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)
71
IMAX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
In accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and product sales |
|
$ |
72,578 |
|
|
$ |
57,304 |
|
|
$ |
27,853 |
|
Services (note 16(c)) |
|
|
123,911 |
|
|
|
82,052 |
|
|
|
61,477 |
|
Rentals (note 16(c)) |
|
|
46,936 |
|
|
|
25,758 |
|
|
|
8,207 |
|
Finance income |
|
|
4,789 |
|
|
|
4,235 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
Other (note 16(a)) |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
1,862 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,614 |
|
|
|
171,211 |
|
|
|
102,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses applicable to revenues (note 2(n)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and product sales |
|
|
36,394 |
|
|
|
29,040 |
|
|
|
17,182 |
|
Services (note 16(c)) |
|
|
63,425 |
|
|
|
49,891 |
|
|
|
40,771 |
|
Rentals |
|
|
11,111 |
|
|
|
10,093 |
|
|
|
7,043 |
|
Other |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,962 |
|
|
|
89,659 |
|
|
|
65,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
137,652 |
|
|
|
81,552 |
|
|
|
37,553 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (note 16(b))
(including share-based
compensation expense of $26.0
million, $17.5 million and
$1.0 million for 2010, 2009,
2008, respectively) |
|
|
78,428 |
|
|
|
56,207 |
|
|
|
43,681 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
6,249 |
|
|
|
3,755 |
|
|
|
7,461 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
Receivable provisions, net of recoveries (note 17) |
|
|
1,443 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
1,977 |
|
Asset impairments (note 18) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
|
50,974 |
|
|
|
19,797 |
|
|
|
(16,092 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,885 |
) |
|
|
(13,845 |
) |
|
|
(17,707 |
) |
Loss on repurchase of Senior Notes due December 2010 (note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
49,488 |
|
|
|
5,471 |
|
|
|
(33,418 |
) |
Recovery of (provision for) income taxes |
|
|
51,784 |
|
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
Loss from equity-accounted investments |
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
100,779 |
|
|
|
5,197 |
|
|
|
(33,510 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations (note 23(c)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
100,779 |
|
|
$ |
5,021 |
|
|
$ |
(33,602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share: (note 15(d)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
Net loss per share from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
Net loss per share from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(the accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)
72
IMAX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
In accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
100,779 |
|
|
$ |
5,021 |
|
|
$ |
(33,602 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations (note 23(c)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Items not involving cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (notes 19(c) and 20(a)) |
|
|
20,536 |
|
|
|
19,051 |
|
|
|
18,018 |
|
Write-downs, net of recoveries (notes 19(d) and 20(a)) |
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
4,466 |
|
Change in deferred income taxes |
|
|
(54,275 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(749 |
) |
Stock and other non-cash compensation |
|
|
28,195 |
|
|
|
19,183 |
|
|
|
3,320 |
|
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss |
|
|
(865 |
) |
|
|
(974 |
) |
|
|
480 |
|
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
Loss on repurchase of Senior Notes due December 2010 (note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from equity-accounted investments |
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash surrender value of life insurance |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
(270 |
) |
Investment in film assets |
|
|
(10,139 |
) |
|
|
(9,235 |
) |
|
|
(10,145 |
) |
Changes in other non-cash operating assets and liabilities (note 19(a)) |
|
|
(28,682 |
) |
|
|
(21,885 |
) |
|
|
11,925 |
|
Net cash used in operating activities from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
58,486 |
|
|
|
13,782 |
|
|
|
(6,548 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(5,338 |
) |
|
|
(1,426 |
) |
|
|
(2,805 |
) |
Investment in joint revenue sharing equipment |
|
|
(21,275 |
) |
|
|
(25,072 |
) |
|
|
(18,478 |
) |
Investment in new business ventures |
|
|
(3,636 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance |
|
|
7,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
Acquisition of other assets |
|
|
(691 |
) |
|
|
(748 |
) |
|
|
(748 |
) |
Acquisition of other intangible assets |
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(23,824 |
) |
|
|
(27,566 |
) |
|
|
(22,418 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in bank indebtedness (note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Repayment of bank indebtedness (note 12) |
|
|
(32,500 |
) |
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of Senior Notes due December 2010 (note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159,104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued public offerings, net of offering expenses paid (note 15(b)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued private offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,931 |
|
Common shares issued stock options exercised (note 15(b)) |
|
|
8,276 |
|
|
|
6,332 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
Shelf registration fees paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Debt modification fees paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
Fees paid pertaining to amended Credit Facility agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(671 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(24,224 |
) |
|
|
7,181 |
|
|
|
39,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents during year |
|
|
10,309 |
|
|
|
(6,936 |
) |
|
|
10,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
20,081 |
|
|
|
27,017 |
|
|
|
16,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
30,390 |
|
|
$ |
20,081 |
|
|
$ |
27,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(the accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)
73
IMAX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
In accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
(note 25) |
|
|
(Deficiency) |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Balance as at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
40,423,074 |
|
|
$ |
122,455 |
|
|
$ |
4,088 |
|
|
$ |
(213,407 |
) |
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
|
$ |
(85,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued for private
offering |
|
|
2,726,447 |
|
|
|
17,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,602 |
) |
|
$ |
(33,602 |
) |
Paid-in capital for non-employee
stock options granted (note 15(c)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options exercised |
|
|
238,745 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-employee stock options exercised |
|
|
102,365 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital for employee stock
options granted (note 15(c)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service costs
(net of income tax recovery of $66)
(note 22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
Unrecognized actuarial gain (net of
income tax provision of $770)(note 22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
2,029 |
|
Unrealized net gain on derivative
instruments (net of income tax
provision of $46) (note 21) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(31,628 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
43,490,631 |
|
|
$ |
141,584 |
|
|
$ |
5,183 |
|
|
$ |
(247,009 |
) |
|
$ |
3,468 |
|
|
$ |
(96,774 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued for public
offering |
|
|
18,034,706 |
|
|
|
130,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,021 |
|
|
|
5,021 |
|
Paid-in capital for non-employee
stock options granted (note 15(c)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options exercised |
|
|
1,103,091 |
|
|
|
6,391 |
|
|
|
(962 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-employee stock options exercised |
|
|
203,546 |
|
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital for employee stock
options granted (note 15(c)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service costs
(net of income tax provision of
$38) (note 22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Unrecognized actuarial loss (net of
income tax recovery of $nil) (note 22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,075 |
) |
|
|
(3,075 |
) |
|
|
(3,075 |
) |
Unrealized net gain on derivative
instruments (net of income tax
recovery of $46) (note 21) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
62,831,974 |
|
|
$ |
280,048 |
|
|
$ |
6,044 |
|
|
$ |
(241,988 |
) |
|
$ |
906 |
|
|
$ |
45,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,779 |
|
|
|
100,779 |
|
Paid-in capital for non-employee
stock options granted (note 15(c)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options exercised |
|
|
1,090,782 |
|
|
|
8,063 |
|
|
|
(1,696 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-employee stock options exercised |
|
|
222,817 |
|
|
|
3,016 |
|
|
|
(1,102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital for employee stock
options granted (note 15(c)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized actuarial loss (net of
income tax recovery of $662) (note 22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,985 |
) |
|
|
(1,985 |
) |
|
|
(1,985 |
) |
Unrealized net gain on derivative
instruments (net of income tax
provision of $182)(note 21) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
Tax recovery related to share
issuance expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
Realized actuarial gain on
settlement of pension liability
(net of income tax provision of
$517)(note 22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
98,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
64,145,573 |
|
|
$ |
292,977 |
|
|
$ |
7,687 |
|
|
$ |
(141,209 |
) |
|
$ |
(997 |
) |
|
$ |
158,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)
74
IMAX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
1. Description of the Business
IMAX Corporation together with its consolidated wholly-owned subsidiaries (the Company) is
an entertainment technology company specializing in digital and film-based motion picture
technologies, whose principal activities are the:
|
|
|
design, manufacture, sale and lease of proprietary theater systems for IMAX
theaters principally owned and operated by commercial and institutional customers located
in 46 countries as at December 31, 2010; |
|
|
|
|
production, digital re-mastering, post-production and/or distribution of certain
films shown throughout the IMAX theater network; |
|
|
|
|
provision of other services to the IMAX theater network, including ongoing
maintenance and extended warranty services for IMAX theater systems; |
|
|
|
|
operation of certain theaters primarily in the United States; and |
|
|
|
|
other activities, which includes short-term rental of cameras and aftermarket sales
of projector system components. |
The Company refers to all theaters using the IMAX theater system as IMAX theaters.
The Companys revenues from equipment and product sales include the sale and sales-type
leasing of its theater systems and sales of their associated parts and accessories, contingent
rentals on sales-type leases and contingent additional payments on sales transactions.
The Companys revenues from services include the provision of maintenance and extended
warranty services, digital re-mastering services, film production and film post-production
services, film distribution, and the operation of certain theaters.
The Companys rentals include revenues from the leasing of its theater systems that are
operating leases, contingent rentals on operating leases, joint revenue sharing arrangements and
the rental of the Companys cameras and camera equipment.
The Companys finance income represents interest income arising from the sales-type leasing
and financed sale of the Companys theater systems.
The Companys other revenues include the settlement of contractual obligations with customers.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Significant accounting policies are summarized as follows:
The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
(a) Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company together with its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, except for subsidiaries which the Company has identified as variable
interest entities (VIEs) where the Company is not the primary beneficiary.
The Company has evaluated its various variable interests to determine whether they are VIEs as
required by the Consolidation Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC or Codification). The Company has 8 film production companies that
are VIEs. As the Company has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly
impact the VIEs economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could
potentially be
75
significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be
significant to the VIE for 2 of the film production companies, the Company has determined that it
is the primary beneficiary of these entities. The Company continues to consolidate these entities,
with no material impact on the operating results or financial condition of the Company, as these
production companies have total assets and total liabilities of $nil as at December 31, 2010
(December 31, 2009 less than $0.1 million). For the other 6 film production companies which are
VIEs, the Company did not consolidate these film entities since it does not have the power to
direct activities and does not absorb the majority of the expected losses or expected residual
returns. The Company equity accounts for these entities. As at December 31, 2010, these 6 VIEs have
total assets of $11.1 million (December 31, 2009 $3.8 million) and total liabilities of $11.1
million (December 31, 2009 $3.8 million). Earnings of the investees included in the Companys
consolidated statement of operations amounted to $nil in 2010 (2009 $nil). The carrying value
of these investments in VIEs that are not consolidated is $nil at December 31, 2010 (December 31,
2009 $nil). A loss in value of an investment other than a temporary decline is recognized as a
charge to the consolidated statement of operations.
The Company accounts for investments in new business ventures using the guidance of ASC 323
Investments Equity Method and Joint Ventures (ASC 323) and ASC 320 Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities (ASC 320), as appropriate. At December 31, 2010, the equity method of
accounting is being utilized for an investment with a carrying value of $1.6 million. The Company
has determined it is not the primary beneficiary of this VIE, and therefore it has not been
consolidated. In addition, during the year, the Company made an investment in preferred stock of
another business venture of $1.5 million which meets the criteria for classification as a debt
security under ASC 320 and is recorded at its fair value of $1.5 million at December 31, 2010
(December 31, 2009 $nil). This investment is classified as an available-for-sale investment.
The total carrying value of investments in new business ventures at December 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009 is $3.1 million and $nil, respectively, and is recorded in Other Assets.
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions, including all unrealized intercompany
profits on transactions with equity-accounted investees, have been eliminated.
(b) Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires
management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of consolidated
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could be materially different from these estimates. Significant estimates made by
management include, but are not limited to: fair values associated with the individual elements in
multiple element arrangements; residual values of leased theater systems; economic lives of leased
assets; allowances for potential uncollectibility of accounts receivable, financing receivables and
net investment in leases; provisions for inventory obsolescence; ultimate revenues for film assets;
impairment provisions for film assets, long-lived assets and goodwill; depreciable lives of
property, plant and equipment; useful lives of intangible assets; pension plan assumptions;
accruals for contingencies including tax contingencies; valuation allowances for deferred income
tax assets; and, estimates of the fair value of stock-based payment awards.
(c) Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months
or less to be cash equivalents.
(d) Short-Term Investments
Short-term investments have maturities of more than three months and less than one year from
the date of purchase.
As at December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company did not hold any short-term investments.
(e) Accounts Receivable and Financing Receivables
Allowances for doubtful accounts receivable are based on the Companys assessment of the
collectibility of specific customer balances, which is based upon a review of the customers credit
worthiness, past collection history and the underlying asset value of the equipment, where
applicable. Interest on overdue accounts receivable is recognized as income as the amounts are
collected.
For trade accounts receivable that have characteristics of both a contractual maturity of one
year or less, and arose from the sale of goods or services, the Company charges off the balance
against the allowance for doubtful accounts when it is known that a provided amount will not be
collected.
76
The Company monitors the performance of the theaters to which it has leased or sold theater
systems which are subject to ongoing payments. When facts and circumstances indicate that there is
a potential impairment in the net investment in lease or a financing receivable, the Company will
evaluate the potential outcome of either renegotiations involving changes in the terms of the
receivable or defaults on the existing lease or financed sale agreements. The Company will record a
provision if it is considered probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due
under the contractual terms of the arrangement or a renegotiated lease amount will cause a
reclassification of the sales-type lease to an operating lease.
When the net investment in lease or the financing receivable is impaired, the Company will
recognize a provision for the difference between the carrying value in the investment and the
present value of expected future cash flows discounted using the effective interest rate for the
net investment in the lease or the financing receivable. If the Company expects to recover the
theater system, the provision is equal to the excess of the carrying value of the investment over
the fair value of the equipment.
When the minimum lease payments are renegotiated and the lease continues to be classified as a
sales-type lease, the reduction in payments is applied to reduce unearned finance income.
These provisions are adjusted when there is a significant change in the amount or timing of
the expected future cash flows or when actual cash flows differ from cash flow previously expected.
Once a net investment in lease or financing receivable is considered impaired, the Company
does not recognize interest income until the collectibility issues are resolved. When finance
income is not recognized, any payments received are applied against outstanding gross minimum lease
amounts receivable or gross receivables from financed sales. Once the collectability issues are
resolved, the Company will once again commence the recognition of interest income.
(f) Inventories
Inventories are carried at the lower of cost, determined on an average cost basis, and net
realizable value except for raw materials, which are carried at the lower of cost and replacement
cost. Finished goods and work-in-process include the cost of raw materials, direct labor, theater
design costs, and an applicable share of manufacturing overhead costs.
The costs related to theater systems under sales and sales-type lease arrangement are relieved
from inventory to costs and expenses applicable to revenues-equipment and product sales when
revenue recognition criteria are met. The costs related to theater systems under operating lease
arrangements and joint revenue sharing arrangements are transferred from inventory to assets under
construction in property, plant and equipment when allocated to a signed joint revenue sharing
arrangement or when the arrangement is first classified as an operating lease.
The Company records provisions for excess and obsolete inventory based upon current estimates
of future events and conditions, including the anticipated installation dates for the current
backlog of theater system contracts, technological developments, signings in negotiation, growth
prospects within the customers ultimate marketplace and anticipated market acceptance of the
Companys current and pending theater systems.
Finished goods inventories can contain theater systems for which title has passed to the
Companys customer (as the theater system has been delivered to the customer) but the revenue
recognition criteria as discussed in note 2(n) have not been met.
(g) Film Assets
Costs of producing films, including labor, allocated overhead, capitalized interest, and costs
of acquiring film rights are recorded as film assets and accounted for in accordance with
Entertainment-Films Topic of the FASB ASC. Production financing provided by third parties that
acquire substantive rights in the film is recorded as a reduction of the cost of the production.
Film assets are amortized and participation costs are accrued using the individual-film-forecast
method in the same ratio that current gross revenues bear to current and anticipated future
ultimate revenues. Estimates of ultimate revenues are prepared on a title-by-title basis and
reviewed regularly by management and revised where necessary to reflect the most current
information. Ultimate revenues for films include estimates of revenue over a period not to exceed
ten years following the date of initial release.
Film exploitation costs, including advertising costs, are expensed as incurred.
Costs, including labor and allocated overhead, of digitally re-mastering films where the
copyright is owned by a third party and the Company shares in the revenue of the third party are
included in film assets. These costs are amortized using the individual-film-
77
forecast method in the same ratio that current gross revenues bear to current and anticipated
future ultimate revenues from the re-mastered film.
The recoverability of film assets is dependent upon commercial acceptance of the films. If
events or circumstances indicate that the recoverable amount of a film asset is less than the
unamortized film costs, the film asset is written down to its fair value. The Company determines
the fair value of its film assets using a discounted cash flow model.
(h) Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated on a straight-line
basis over their estimated useful lives as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Theater system components (1)
|
|
|
|
Over the equipments anticipated useful life (7 to 20 years) |
Camera equipment
|
|
|
|
5 to 10 years |
Buildings
|
|
|
|
20 to 25 years |
Office and production equipment
|
|
|
|
3 to 5 years |
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
|
over the shorter of the initial term of the underlying
leases plus any reasonably assured renewal terms, and the
useful life of the asset |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
includes equipment under joint revenue sharing arrangements. |
Equipment and components allocated to be used in future operating leases and joint revenue sharing
arrangements, as well as direct labor costs and an allocation of direct production costs, are
included in assets under construction until such equipment is installed and in working condition,
at which time the equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the term of
the joint revenue sharing arrangement and the equipments anticipated useful life. During 2010, the
Company signed certain amending agreements which increased the length of the term for all
applicable existing and future theaters under joint revenue sharing arrangement from 7 to 10 years.
As a result, the Company adjusted the estimated useful life of its IMAX digital projection systems
in use for those joint revenue sharing theaters, on a prospective basis, to reflect the change in
term from 7 years to 10 years. This resulted in decreased depreciation expense of $1.0 million in
2010 and $1.8 million in each of the next 5 years since the Systems will now be depreciated over a
longer useful life.
The Company reviews the carrying values of its property, plant and equipment for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset
group might not be recoverable. Assets are grouped at the lowest level for which identifiable cash
flows are largely independent when testing for, and measuring for, impairment. In performing its
review of recoverability, the Company estimates the future cash flows expected to result from the
use of the asset or asset group and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected
undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset or asset group, an
impairment loss is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. Measurement of the
impairment loss is based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset or asset group over the
fair value calculated using discounted expected future cash flows.
A liability for the fair value of an asset retirement obligation associated with the
retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs are recognized
in the period in which the liability and costs are incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value
can be made using a discounted cash flow model. The associated asset retirement costs are
capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset and subsequently amortized over
the assets useful life. The liability is accreted over the period to expected cash outflows.
(i) Other Assets
Other assets include insurance recoveries, the cash surrender value of life insurance
policies, deferred charges on debt financing, deferred selling costs that are direct and
incremental to the acquisition of sales contracts, foreign currency derivatives and investments in
new business ventures.
Costs of debt financing are deferred and amortized over the term of the debt.
Selling costs related to an arrangement incurred prior to recognition of the related revenue
are deferred and expensed to costs and expenses applicable to revenues upon (i) recognition of the
contracts theater system revenue or (ii) abandonment of the sale arrangement.
78
Foreign currency derivatives are accounted for at fair value using quoted prices in closed
exchanges (Level 2 input in accordance with the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB ASC
hierarchy).
Investments in new business ventures are accounted for using ASC 32X Investments. The
Company currently accounts for one investment using the equity method of accounting and accounts
for another investment at fair value.
(j) Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net identifiable
assets acquired in a purchase business combination. Goodwill is not subject to amortization and is
tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the
asset might be impaired. Impairment of goodwill is tested at the reporting unit level by comparing
the reporting units carrying amount, including goodwill, to the fair value of the reporting unit.
The fair value of the reporting unit is estimated using a discounted cash flow approach. If the
carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then a second step is performed to
measure the amount of impairment loss, if any, by comparing the fair value of each identifiable
asset and liability in the reporting unit to the total fair value of the reporting unit. Any
impairment loss is expensed in the consolidated statement of operations and is not reversed if the
fair value subsequently increases.
(k) Other Intangible Assets
Patents, trademarks and other intangibles are recorded at cost and are amortized on a
straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from 4 to 10 years.
The Company reviews the carrying values of its other intangible assets for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group
might not be recoverable. Assets are grouped at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows
are largely independent when testing for, and measuring for, impairment. In performing its review
for recoverability, the Company estimates the future cash flows expected to result from the use of
the asset or asset group and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected undiscounted
future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset or asset group, an impairment loss
is recognized in the consolidated statement of operations. Measurement of the impairment loss is
based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset or asset group over the fair value
calculated using discounted expected future cash flows.
(l) Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue represents cash received prior to revenue recognition criteria being met for
theater system sales or leases, film contracts, maintenance and extended warranty services, film
related services and film distribution.
(m) Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method whereby deferred income tax assets
and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences
between the accounting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years
in which temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred
income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates or laws is recognized in the
consolidated statement of operations in the period in which the change is enacted. Investment tax
credits are recognized as a reduction of income tax expense.
The Company assesses realization of deferred income tax assets and, based on all available
evidence, concludes whether it is more likely than not that the net deferred income tax assets will
be realized. A valuation allowance is provided for the amount of deferred income tax assets not
considered to be realizable.
The Company is subject to ongoing tax exposures, examinations and assessments in various
jurisdictions. Accordingly, the Company may incur additional tax expense based upon the outcomes of
such matters. In addition, when applicable, the Company adjusts tax expense to reflect the
Companys ongoing assessments of such matters which require judgment and can materially increase or
decrease its effective rate as well as impact operating results. The Company provides for such
exposures in accordance with the Income Taxes Topic of the FASB ASC.
79
(n) Revenue Recognition
Multiple Element Arrangements
The Companys revenue arrangements with certain customers may involve multiple elements
consisting of a theater system (projector, sound system, screen system and, if applicable, 3D
glasses cleaning machine); services associated with the theater system including theater design
support, supervision of installation, and projectionist training; a license to use of the IMAX
brand; 3D glasses; maintenance and extended warranty services; and licensing of films. The Company
evaluates all elements in an arrangement to determine what are considered typical deliverables for
accounting purposes and which of the deliverables represent separate units of accounting based on
the applicable accounting guidance in the Leases Topic of the FASB ASC; the Guarantees Topic of the
FASB; the Entertainment-Film Topic of FASB ASC; and the Revenue
Recognition Topic of the FASB. If separate units of accounting are either required under the
relevant accounting standards or determined to be applicable under the Revenue Recognition Topic,
the total consideration received or receivable in the arrangement is allocated based on the
applicable guidance in the above noted standards.
Theater Systems
The Company has identified the projection system, sound system, screen system and, if
applicable, 3D glasses cleaning machine, theater design support, supervision of installation,
projectionist training and the use of the IMAX brand to be a single deliverable and a single unit
of accounting (the System Deliverable). When an arrangement does not include all the elements of
a System Deliverable, the elements of the System Deliverable included in the arrangement are
considered by the Company to be a single deliverable and a single unit of accounting. The Company
is not responsible for the physical installation of the equipment in the customers facility;
however, the Company supervises the installation by the customer. The customer has the right to use
the IMAX brand from the date the Company and the customer enter into an arrangement.
The Companys System Deliverable arrangements involve either a lease or a sale of the theater
system. Consideration in the Companys arrangements, that are not joint revenue sharing
arrangements, consist of upfront or initial payments made before and after the final installation
of the theater system equipment and ongoing payments throughout the term of the lease or over a
period of time, as specified in the arrangement. The ongoing payments are the greater of an annual
fixed minimum amount or a certain percentage of the theater box-office. Amounts received in excess
of the annual fixed minimum amounts are considered contingent payments. The Companys arrangements
are non-cancellable, unless the Company fails to perform its obligations. In the absence of a
material default by the Company, there is no right to any remedy for the customer under the
Companys arrangements. If a material default by the Company exists, the customer has the right to
terminate the arrangement and seek a refund only if the customer provides notice to the Company of
a material default and only if the Company does not cure the default within a specified period.
Sales Arrangements
For arrangements qualifying as sales, the revenue allocated to the System Deliverable is
recognized in accordance with the Revenue Recognition Topic of the FASB ASC, when all of the
following conditions have been met: (i) the projector, sound system and screen system have been
installed and are in full working condition, (ii) the 3D glasses cleaning machine, if applicable,
has been delivered, (iii) projectionist training has been completed and (iv) the earlier of (a)
receipt of written customer acceptance certifying the completion of installation and run-in testing
of the equipment and the completion of projectionist training or (b) public opening of the theater,
provided there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the price is fixed or determinable and
collectibility is reasonably assured.
The initial revenue recognized consists of the initial payments received and the present value
of any future initial payments and fixed minimum ongoing payments that have been attributed to this
unit of accounting. Contingent payments in excess of the fixed minimum ongoing payments are
recognized when reported by theater operators, provided collectibility is reasonably assured.
The Company has also agreed, on occasion, to sell equipment under lease or at the end of a
lease term. Consideration agreed to for these lease buyouts is included in revenues from equipment
and product sales, when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fees are fixed or
determinable, collectibility is reasonably assured and title to the theater system passes from the
Company to the customer.
In a limited number of sales arrangements for MPX theater systems, the Company provided
customers with a right to acquire, for a specified period of time, digital upgrades (each upgrade
consisting of a projector, certain sound system components and screen enhancements) at a fixed or
variable discount towards a future price of such digital upgrades. Up to the end of the second
quarter of
80
2009, the Company was not able to determine the fair value of a digital upgrade. Accordingly,
the Company deferred all consideration received and receivable under such arrangements for the
delivered MPX and the upgrade right, except for the amount allocated to maintenance and extended
warranty services provided to the customers for the installed system. This revenue was deferred
until the upgrade right expired, if applicable, or a digital upgrade was delivered. In the third
quarter of 2009, the Company determined the fair value of digital upgrades and the upgrades rights.
For any such sales arrangements where the upgrade right has not expired and the digital upgrade has
not yet been delivered, the Company has allocated the consideration received and receivable
(excluding the amount allocated to maintenance and extended warranty services) to the upgrade right
based on its fair value and to the delivered MPX theater system based on the residual of the
consideration received and receivable. The revenue related to the digital upgrade continues to be
deferred, until the digital upgrade is delivered provided the other revenue recognition criteria
are met. The revenue related to the MPX system is recognized at the allocation date as the system
was previously delivered provided the other revenue recognition criteria are met. Costs related to
the installed MPX systems for which revenue has not been recognized are included in inventories
until the conditions for revenue recognition are met. The Company also provides customers, in
certain cases, with sales arrangements for multiple systems consisting of a combination of MPX
theater systems and complete digital theater systems for a specified price. The Company allocates
the actual or implied discount between the delivered and undelivered theater systems on a relative
fair value basis, provided all of the other conditions for recognition of a theater system are met.
Lease Arrangements
The Company uses the Leases Topic of FASB ASC to evaluate whether an arrangement is a lease
within the scope of the accounting standard. Arrangements not within the scope of the accounting
standard are accounted for either as a sales or services arrangement, as applicable.
For lease arrangements, the Company determines the classification of the lease in accordance
with the Lease Topic of FASB ASC. A lease arrangement that transfers substantially all of the
benefits and risks incident to ownership of the equipment is classified as a sales-type lease based
on the criteria established by the accounting standard; otherwise the lease is classified as an
operating lease. Prior to commencement of the lease term for the equipment, the Company may modify
certain payment terms or make concessions. If these circumstances occur, the Company reassesses the
classification of the lease based on the modified terms and conditions.
For sales-type leases, the revenue allocated to the System Deliverable is recognized when the
lease term commences, which the Company deems to be when all of the following conditions have been
met: (i) the projector, sound system and screen system have been installed and are in full working
condition, (ii) the 3D glasses cleaning machine, if applicable, has been delivered, (iii)
projectionist training has been completed and (iv) the earlier of (a) receipt of the written
customer acceptance certifying the completion of installation and run-in testing of the equipment
and the completion of projectionist training or (b) public opening of the theater, provided
collectibility is reasonably assured.
The initial revenue recognized for sales-type leases consists of the initial payments received
and the present value of future initial payments and fixed minimum ongoing payments computed at the
interest rate implicit in the lease. Contingent payments in excess of the fixed minimum payments
are recognized when reported by theater operators, provided collectibility is reasonably assured.
For operating leases, initial payments and fixed minimum ongoing payments are recognized as
revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For operating leases, the lease term is
considered to commence when all of the following conditions have been met: (i) the projector, sound
system and screen system have been installed and in full working condition, (ii) the 3D glasses
cleaning machine, if applicable, has been delivered, (iii) projectionist training has been
completed and (iv) the earlier of (a) receipt of written customer acceptance certifying the
completion of installation and run-in testing of the equipment and the completion of projectionist
training or (b) public opening of the theater. Contingent payments in excess of fixed minimum
ongoing payments are recognized as revenue when reported by theater operators, provided
collectibility is reasonably assured.
For joint revenue sharing arrangements, where the Company receives a portion of a theaters
box-office and concession revenues, in exchange for placing a theater system at the theater
operators venue, revenue is recognized when box-office and concession revenues are reported by the
theater operator, provided collectibility is reasonably assured.
Finance Income
Finance income is recognized over the term of the sales-type lease or financed sales
receivable, provided collectibility is reasonably assured. Finance income recognition ceases when
the Company determines that the associated receivable is not recoverable.
81
Improvements and Modifications
Improvements and modifications to the theater system after installation are treated as
separate revenue transactions, if and when the Company is requested to perform these services.
Revenue is recognized for these services when the performance of the services has been completed,
provided there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable and
collectibility is reasonably assured.
Cost of Equipment and Product Sales
Theater systems and other equipment subject to sales-type leases or sales arrangements
includes the cost of the equipment and costs related to project management, design, delivery and
installation supervision services as applicable. The costs related to theater systems under sales
and sales-type lease arrangements are relieved from inventory to costs and expenses applicable to
revenues-equipment and product sales when revenue recognition criteria are met. In addition, the
Company defers direct selling costs such as sales commissions and other amounts related to these
contracts until the related revenue is recognized. These costs included in costs and expenses
applicable to revenues-equipment and product sales, totaled $1.9 million in 2010 (2009 $2.0
million, 2008 $1.0 million). The cost of equipment and product sales prior to direct selling
costs was $34.5 million in 2010 (2009 $27.0 million, 2008 $16.2 million). The Company may
have warranty obligations at or after the time revenue is recognized which require replacement of
certain parts that do not affect the functionality of the theater system or services. The costs for
warranty obligations for known issues are accrued as charges to costs and expenses applicable to
revenues-equipment and product sales at the time revenue is recognized based on the Companys past
historical experience and cost estimates.
Cost of Rentals
For theater systems and other equipment subject to an operating lease or placed in a theater
operators venue under a joint revenue sharing arrangement, the cost of equipment is included
within property, plant and equipment. Depreciation and impairment losses, if any, are included in
cost of rentals based on the accounting policy set out in note 2(h). Commissions are recognized as
costs and expenses applicable to revenues-rentals in the month they are earned. These costs totaled
$2.1 million in 2010 (2009 $1.6 million, 2008 $1.0 million). Direct advertising and marketing
costs for each theater are charged to costs and expenses applicable to revenues-rentals as
incurred. These costs totaled $2.1 million in 2010 (2009 $1.8 million, 2008 $0.8 million).
Terminations, Consensual Buyouts and Concessions
The Company enters into theater system arrangements with customers that contain customer
payment obligations prior to the scheduled installation of the theater system. During the period of
time between signing and the installation of the theater system, which may extend several years,
certain customers may be unable to, or elect not to, proceed with the theater system installation
for a number of reasons including business considerations, or the inability to obtain certain
consents, approvals or financing. Once the determination is made that the customer will not proceed
with installation, the arrangement may be terminated under the default provisions of the
arrangement or by mutual agreement between the Company and the customer (a consensual buyout).
Terminations by default are situations when a customer does not meet the payment obligations under
an arrangement and the Company retains the amounts paid by the customer. Under a consensual buyout,
the Company and the customer agree, in writing, to a settlement and to release each other of any
further obligations under the arrangement or an arbitrated settlement is reached. Any initial
payments retained or additional payments received by the Company are recognized as revenue when the
settlement arrangements are executed and the cash is received, respectively. These termination and
consensual buyout amounts are recognized in Other revenues.
In addition, the Company could agree with customers to convert their obligations for other
theater system configurations that have not yet been installed to arrangements to acquire or lease
the IMAX digital theater system. The Company considers these situations to be a termination of the
previous arrangement and origination of a new arrangement for the IMAX digital theater system. The
Company continues to defer an amount of any initial fees received from the customer such that the
aggregate of the fees deferred and the net present value of the future fixed initial and ongoing
payments to be received from the customer equals the fair value of the IMAX digital theater system
to be leased or acquired by the customer. Any residual portion of the initial fees received from
the customer for the terminated theater system is recorded in Other revenues at the time when the
obligation for the original theater system is terminated and the new theater system arrangement is
signed.
The Company may offer certain incentives to customers to complete theater system transactions
including payment concessions or free services and products such as film licenses or 3D glasses.
Reductions in, and deferral of, payments are taken into account in determining the sales price
either by a direct reduction in the sales price or a reduction of payments to be discounted in
accordance with the Leases Topic of the FASB ASC. Free products and services are accounted for as
separate units of accounting. Other
82
consideration given by the Company to customers are accounted for in accordance with the
Revenue Recognition Topic of the FASB ASC.
Maintenance and Extended Warranty Services
Maintenance and extended warranty services may be provided under a multiple element
arrangement or as a separately priced contract. Revenues related to these services are deferred and
recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract period and are recognized in Services
revenues. Maintenance and extended warranty services includes maintenance of the customers
equipment and replacement parts. Under certain maintenance arrangements, maintenance services may
include additional training services to the customers technicians. All costs associated with this
maintenance and extended warranty program are expensed as incurred. A loss on maintenance and
extended warranty services is recognized if the expected cost of providing the services under the
contracts exceeds the related deferred revenue.
Film Production and IMAX DMR Services
In certain film arrangements, the Company produces a film financed by third parties whereby
the third party retains the copyright and the Company obtains exclusive distribution rights. Under
these arrangements, the Company is entitled to receive a fixed fee or to retain as a fee the excess
of funding over cost of production (the production fee). The third parties receive a portion of
the revenues received by the Company from distributing the film, which is charged to costs and
expenses applicable to revenues-services. The production fees are deferred, and recognized as a
reduction in the cost of the film based on the ratio of the Companys distribution revenues
recognized in the current period to the ultimate distribution revenues expected from the film. Film
exploitation costs, including advertising and marketing totaled $2.1 million in 2010 (2009 $1.6
million, 2008 $0.9 million) and are recorded in costs and expenses applicable to
revenues-services as incurred.
Revenue from film production services where the Company does not hold the associated
distribution rights are recognized in Services revenues when performance of the contractual service
is complete, provided there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, the fee is fixed or
determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Revenues from digitally re-mastering (IMAX DMR) films where third parties own or hold the
copyrights and the rights to distribute the film are derived in the form of processing fees and
recoupments calculated as a percentage of box-office receipts generated from the re-mastered films.
Processing fees are recognized as Services revenues when the performance of the related
re-mastering service is completed provided there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee
is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Recoupments, calculated as a
percentage of box-office receipts, are recognized as Services revenue when box-office receipts are
reported by the third party that owns or holds the related film rights, provided collectibility is
reasonably assured.
Losses on film production and IMAX DMR services are recognized as costs and expenses
applicable to revenues-services in the period when it is determined that the Companys estimate of
total revenues to be realized by the Company will not exceed estimated total production costs to be
expended on the film production and the cost of IMAX DMR services.
Film Distribution
Revenue from the licensing of films is recognized in Services revenues when persuasive
evidence of a licensing arrangement exists, the film has been completed and delivered, the license
period has begun, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. When
license fees are based on a percentage of box-office receipts, revenue is recognized when
box-office receipts are reported by exhibitors, provided collectibility is reasonably assured. Film
exploitation costs, including advertising and marketing, totaled $0.7 million in 2010 (2009 $0.8
million, 2008 $0.7 million) and are recorded in costs and expenses applicable to
revenues-services as incurred.
Film Post-Production Services
Revenues from post-production film services are recognized in Services revenues when
performance of the contracted services is complete provided there is persuasive evidence of an
arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
83
Theater Operations Revenue
The Company recognizes revenue in Services revenues from its owned and operated theaters
resulting from box-office ticket and concession sales as tickets are sold, films are shown and upon
the sale of various concessions. The sales are cash or credit card transactions with theatergoers
based on fixed prices per seat or per concession item.
In addition, the Company enters into commercial arrangements with third party theater owners
resulting in the sharing of profits and losses which are recognized in Services revenues when
reported by such theaters. The Company also provides management services to certain theaters and
recognizes revenue over the term of such services.
Other
Revenues on camera rentals are recognized in Rental revenues over the rental period.
Revenue from the sale of 3D glasses is recognized in Equipment and product sales revenue when
the 3D glasses have been delivered to the customer.
Other service revenues are recognized in Service revenues when the performance of contracted
services is complete.
(o) Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and primarily include projector and
sound parts, labor, consulting fees, allocation of overheads and other related materials which
pertain to the Companys development of ongoing product and services.
(p) Foreign Currency Translation
Monetary assets and liabilities of the Companys operations which are denominated in
currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency at the
exchange rates prevailing at the end of the period. Non-monetary items are translated at historical
exchange rates. Revenue and expense transactions are translated at exchange rates prevalent at the
transaction date. Such exchange gains and losses are included in the determination of earnings in
the period in which they arise.
Foreign currency derivatives are recognized and measured in the balance sheet at fair value.
Changes in the fair value (gains or losses) are recognized in the consolidated statement of
operations except for derivatives designated and qualifying as foreign currency hedging
instruments. For foreign currency hedging instruments, the effective portion of the gain or loss in
a hedge of a forecasted transaction is reported in other comprehensive income and reclassified to
the consolidated statement of operations when the forecasted transaction occurs. Any ineffective
portion is recognized immediately in the consolidated statement of operations.
(q) Stock-Based Compensation
The Companys stock-based compensation is recognized in accordance with the FASB ASC Topic
505, Equity and Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation.
The Company estimates the fair value of employee stock-based payment awards on the date of
grant using fair value measurement techniques such as an option-pricing model. The value of the
portion of the employee award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the
requisite service periods in the Companys consolidated statement of operations.
The Company utilizes a lattice-binomial option-pricing model (Binomial Model) to determine
the fair value of stock-based payment awards. The fair value determined by the Binomial Model is
affected by the Companys stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex
and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the Companys expected
stock price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock option
exercise behaviors. The Binomial Model also considers the expected exercise multiple which is the
multiple of exercise price to grant price at which exercises are expected to occur on average.
Option-pricing models were developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no
vesting or hedging restrictions and are fully transferable. Because the Companys employee stock
options have certain characteristics that are significantly different from traded options, and
because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, in
managements opinion, the Binomial Model best provides a fair measure of the fair value of the
Companys employee stock options. See note 15(c) for the assumptions used to determine the fair
value of stock-based payment awards.
Stock-based compensation expense includes compensation cost for new employee stock-based
payment awards granted and employee awards modified, repurchased or cancelled. In addition,
compensation expense includes the compensation cost, based on the
84
grant-date fair value calculated for pro forma disclosures under Topic 718, for the portion of
awards for which required service had not been rendered that were outstanding. Compensation expense
for these employee awards is recognized using the straight-line single-option method. As
stock-based compensation expense recognized after January 1, 2006 is based on awards ultimately
expected to vest, it has been adjusted for estimated forfeitures. The Codification requires
forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if subsequent information indicates
that the actual forfeitures are likely to be different from previous estimates. The Company
utilizes the market yield on U.S. treasury securities (also known as nominal rate) over the
contractual term of the instrument being issued.
Stock Option Plan
As the Company stratifies its employees into homogeneous groups in order to calculate fair
value under the Binomial Model, ranges of assumptions used are presented for expected option life
and annual termination probability. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise
and employee termination within the valuation model; various groups of employees that have similar
historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. The expected
volatility rate is estimated based on a blended volatility method which takes into consideration
the Companys historical share price volatility, the Companys implied volatility which is implied
by the observed current market prices of the Companys traded options and the Companys peer group
volatility. The Company utilizes an expected term method to determine expected option life based on
such data as vesting periods of awards, historical data that includes past exercise and
post-vesting cancellations and stock price history.
The Companys policy is to issue new shares from treasury to satisfy stock options which are
exercised.
Restricted Common Shares and Stock Appreciation Rights
The Companys restricted common shares and SARs have been classified as liabilities in
accordance with Topic 505. The Company utilizes the Binomial Model to determine the value of these
instruments settleable in cash.
Awards to Non-Employees
Stock-based awards for services provided by non-employees are accounted for based on the fair
value of the services received or the stock-based award, whichever is more reliably determinable.
If the fair value of the stock-based award is used, the fair value is measured at the date of the
award and remeasured until the earlier of the date that the Company has a performance commitment
from the non-employees, the date performance is completed, or the date the awards vest.
(r) Pension Plans and Postretirement Benefits
The Company has a defined benefit pension plan, the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
(the SERP). As the Companys SERP is unfunded, as at December 31, 2010, a liability is recognized
for the projected benefit obligation.
Assumptions used in computing the defined benefit obligations are reviewed annually by
management in consultation with its actuaries and adjusted for current conditions. Actuarial gains
or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as
components of net periodic benefits cost are recognized as a component of other comprehensive
income. Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income including unrecognized
actuarial gains or losses and prior service costs are adjusted as they are subsequently recognized
in the consolidated statement of operations as components of net periodic benefit cost. Prior
service costs resulting from the pension plan inception or amendments are amortized over the
expected future service life of the employees, cumulative actuarial gains and losses in excess of
10% of the projected benefit obligation are amortized over the expected average remaining service
life of the employees, and current service costs are expensed when earned. The remaining weighted
average future service life of the employee for the year ended December 31, 2010 was 2.0 years.
For defined contribution pension plans, amounts contributed by the Company are recorded as an
expense.
A liability is recognized for the unfunded accumulated benefit obligation of the
postretirement benefits plan. Assumptions used in computing the accumulated benefit obligation are
reviewed by management in consultation with its actuaries and adjusted for current conditions.
Current service cost is recognized as earned and actuarial gains and losses are recognized in the
consolidated statement of operations immediately.
85
(s) Guarantees
The FASB ASC Guarantees Topic requires a guarantor to recognize, at the inception of a
guarantee, a liability for the fair value of certain guarantees. Disclosures as required under the
accounting guidance have been included in note 14(m).
3. New Accounting Standards and Accounting Changes
Changes in Accounting Standards
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 166, Accounting
for Transfers of Financial Assetsan amendment to FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166). SFAS 166
amends FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishments of Liabilities (SFAS 140) to improve the relevance, representational
faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its
financial reports about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferors continuing involvement in
transferred financial assets. It also removes the concept of qualifying special-purpose entities
(SPEs) from SFAS 140 and removes the exception from applying FIN 46R to VIEs that are qualifying
SPEs. SFAS 166 applies to all entities and is effective for the first annual reporting period
beginning after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period,
and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter, with earlier application prohibited. In
December 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-16, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets
(ASU 2009-16). The purpose of this ASU is to bring SFAS 166 into the Codification. The
application of ASU 2009-16 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial condition or
results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167, Amendments
to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167). SFAS 167 amends certain requirements of FIN 46R to
improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with VIEs and provides more relevant and
reliable information to users of financial statements. Specifically, SFAS 167 eliminates the
quantitative approach previously required under FIN 46R for determining the primary beneficiary of
a VIE. SFAS 167 has the same scope as FIN 46R, with the addition of entities previously considered
qualifying SPEs and is effective for the first annual reporting period beginning after November 15,
2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual
reporting periods thereafter, with earlier application prohibited. In December 2009, the FASB
issued ASU No. 2009-17, Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable
Interest Entities (ASU 2009-17). The purpose of this ASU is to bring SFAS 167 into the
Codification. The application of ASU 2009-17 did not have a material impact on the Companys
financial condition or results of operations.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements, (ASU 2010-06) to amend topic ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, by
improving disclosure requirements in order to increase transparency in financial reporting. ASU
2010-06 requires that an entity disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out
of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. Furthermore,
an entity should present information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements for Level 3
fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 also clarifies existing disclosures for the level of
disaggregation and disclosures about input and valuation techniques. The new disclosures and
clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances,
and settlements for the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those
fiscal years. On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the disclosure amendments in ASU 2010-06,
except for the amendments to Level 3 fair value measurements as described above, and has expanded
disclosures as presented in note 21.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the
Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (ASU 2010-20). The
objective of ASU 2010-20 is to provide financial statement users with greater transparency about an
entitys allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. Under ASU
2010-20, an entity is required to provide disclosures so that financial statement users can
evaluate the nature of the credit risk inherent in the entitys portfolio of financing receivables,
how that risk is analyzed and assessed to arrive at the allowance for credit losses, and the
changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. ASU 2010-20 is applicable
to all entities with financing receivables, excluding short-term trade accounts receivable or
receivables measured at fair value or lower of cost or fair value. It is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. Comparative disclosure for earlier
reporting periods that ended before initial adoption is encouraged but not required. However,
comparative disclosures are required to be disclosed for those reporting periods ending after
initial adoption. On December 31, 2010, the Company adopted the disclosure requirements in ASU
2010-20 and has expanded disclosures as presented in note 21(c).
86
Recently Issued FASB Accounting Standard Codification Updates
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605):
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)
(ASU 2009-13) which amends ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition: Multiple-Element Arrangements. ASU
2009-13 addresses how to determine whether an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains
more than one unit of accounting and how to allocate consideration to each unit of accounting in
the arrangement. This ASU replaces all references to fair value as the measurement criteria with
the term selling price and establishes a hierarchy for determining the selling price of a
deliverable. ASU No. 2009-13 also eliminates the use of the residual value method for determining
the allocation of arrangement consideration. Additionally, ASU 2009-13 requires expanded
disclosures and is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Earlier
application is permitted with required transition disclosures based on the period of adoption. The
Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of ASU 2009-13 on its consolidated financial
statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-14, Software (Topic 985): Certain Revenue
Arrangements That Include Software Elements (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)
(ASU 2009-14). ASU 2009-14 amends ASC 985-605, Software: Revenue Recognition, such that
tangible products, containing both software and non-software components that function together to
deliver the tangible products essential functionality, are no longer within the scope of ASC
985-605. It also amends the determination of how arrangement consideration should be allocated to
deliverables in a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement. The amendments in this update are
effective, on a prospective basis, for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in
fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Earlier application is permitted with required
transition disclosures based on the period of adoption. Both ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 must be
adopted in the same period and must use the same transition disclosures. This standard will have no
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic
350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or
Negative Carrying Amounts (ASU 2010-28). The objective of ASU 2010-28 is to address questions
about entities with reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. The amendments in ASU
2010-28 modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative
carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the
goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists by
considering whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may
exist. ASU 2010-28 is applicable to all entities that have recognized goodwill and have one or more
reporting units whose carrying amount for purposes of performing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment
test is zero or negative. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not
permitted. This standard will have no impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
During 2010, the FASB has issued several ASUs ASU No. 2010-01 through ASU No. 2010-29.
Except for ASU No. 2010-06, ASU No. 2010-20 and ASU No. 2010-28 discussed above, the ASUs entail
technical corrections to existing guidance or affect guidance related to specialized industries or
entities and therefore have minimal, if any, impact on the Company.
4. Lease Arrangements
(a) General Terms of Lease Arrangements
A number of the Companys leases are classified as sales-type leases. Certain arrangements
that are legal sales are also classified as sales-type leases as certain clauses within the
arrangements limit transfer of title or provide the Company with conditional rights to the system.
The customers rights under the Companys lease arrangements are described in note 2(n). The
Company classifies its lease arrangements at inception of the arrangement and, if required, after a
modification of the lease arrangement, to determine whether they are sales-type leases or operating
leases. Under the Companys lease arrangements, the customer has the ability and the right to
operate the hardware components or direct others to operate them in a manner determined by the
customer. The Companys lease terms are typically non-cancellable for 10 to 20 years with renewal
provisions. Except for those sales arrangements that are classified as sales-type leases, the
Companys leases generally do not contain an automatic transfer of title at the end of the lease
term. The Companys lease arrangements do not contain a guarantee of residual value at the end of
the lease term. The customer is required to pay for executory costs such as insurance and taxes and
is required to pay the Company for maintenance and extended warranty generally after the first year
of the lease until the end of the lease term. The customer is responsible for obtaining insurance
coverage for the theater systems commencing on the date specified in the arrangements shipping
terms and ending on the date the theater systems are delivered back to the Company.
87
The Company has assessed the nature of its joint revenue sharing arrangements and concluded
that, based on the guidance in the Revenue Recognition Topic of the ASC, the arrangements contain a
lease. Under joint revenue sharing arrangements, the customer has the ability and the right to
operate the hardware components or direct others to operate them in a manner determined by the
customer. The Companys joint revenue sharing arrangements are typically non-cancellable for 7 to
10 years with renewal provisions. Title to equipment under joint revenue sharing arrangements does
not transfer to the customer. The Companys joint revenue sharing arrangements do not contain a
guarantee of residual value at the end of the term. The customer is required to pay for executory
costs such as insurance and taxes and is required to pay the Company for maintenance and extended
warranty throughout the term. The customer is responsible for obtaining insurance coverage for the
theater systems commencing on the date specified in the arrangements shipping terms and ending on
the date the theater systems are delivered back to the Company.
(b) Financing Receivables
Financing receivables, consisting of net investment in sales-type leases and receivables from
financed sales of theater systems are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Gross minimum lease payments receivable |
|
$ |
49,977 |
|
|
$ |
64,779 |
|
Unearned finance income |
|
|
(15,158 |
) |
|
|
(18,939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum lease payments receivable |
|
|
34,819 |
|
|
|
45,840 |
|
Accumulated allowance for uncollectible amounts |
|
|
(4,838 |
) |
|
|
(5,734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in leases |
|
|
29,981 |
|
|
|
40,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross financed sales receivables |
|
|
62,127 |
|
|
|
32,526 |
|
Unearned finance income |
|
|
(18,441 |
) |
|
|
(9,869 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financed sales receivables |
|
|
43,686 |
|
|
|
22,657 |
|
Accumulated allowance for uncollectible amounts |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financed sales receivables |
|
|
43,620 |
|
|
|
22,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financing receivables |
|
$ |
73,601 |
|
|
$ |
62,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financed sales receivables due within one year |
|
$ |
6,166 |
|
|
$ |
4,304 |
|
Net financed sales receivables due after one year |
|
$ |
37,454 |
|
|
$ |
18,175 |
|
In 2010, the financed sales receivables had a weighted average effective interest rate of 8.8%
(2009 9.4%).
(c) Contingent Fees
Contingent fees that meet the Companys revenue recognition policy, from customers under
various arrangements, have been reported in revenue as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
1,629 |
|
|
$ |
406 |
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
Sales-type leases |
|
|
1,970 |
|
|
|
1,717 |
|
|
|
1,730 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
1,483 |
|
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal sales, sales-type leases and operating leases |
|
|
5,215 |
|
|
|
3,606 |
|
|
|
3,696 |
|
Joint revenue sharing arrangements |
|
|
41,646 |
|
|
|
21,598 |
|
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,861 |
|
|
$ |
25,204 |
|
|
$ |
7,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
(d) Future Minimum Rental Payments
Future minimum rental payments receivable from operating and sales-type leases at December 31,
2010, for each of the next five years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
Sales-Type Leases |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
2,041 |
|
|
$ |
6,597 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,962 |
|
|
|
5,565 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,834 |
|
|
|
5,316 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
4,965 |
|
2015 |
|
|
1,736 |
|
|
|
4,563 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
6,896 |
|
|
|
19,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,216 |
|
|
$ |
46,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future minimum rental payments receivable from sales-type leases at December 31, 2010
exclude $3.5 million which represents amounts billed but not yet received.
5. Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
4,693 |
|
|
$ |
4,045 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
2,293 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
8,289 |
|
|
|
5,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,275 |
|
|
$ |
10,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010, finished goods inventory for which title had passed to the customer and
revenue was deferred amounted to $3.2 million (December 31, 2009 $1.6 million).
Inventories at December 31, 2010 include provisions for excess and obsolete inventory based
upon current estimates of net realizable value considering future events and conditions of $4.4
million (December 31, 2009 $3.8 million).
6. Film Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Completed
and released films, net of accumulated amortization of $38,914 (2009 $28,015) |
|
$ |
1,704 |
|
|
$ |
1,897 |
|
Films in production |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
Films in development |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,449 |
|
|
$ |
3,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects to amortize film costs of $1.6 million for released films within three
years from December 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $1.7 million). The amount of participation
payments to third parties related to these films that the Company expects to pay during 2011 is
$7.4 million (2010 $5.0 million).
89
7. Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Value |
|
Equipment leased or held for use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theater system components(1)(2) |
|
$ |
86,249 |
|
|
$ |
33,775 |
|
|
$ |
52,474 |
|
Camera equipment(5) |
|
|
6,355 |
|
|
|
6,008 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,604 |
|
|
|
39,783 |
|
|
|
52,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under construction(3) |
|
|
8,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
14,723 |
|
|
|
8,906 |
|
|
|
5,817 |
|
Office and production equipment(4) |
|
|
27,172 |
|
|
|
23,454 |
|
|
|
3,718 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
8,603 |
|
|
|
6,822 |
|
|
|
1,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,091 |
|
|
|
39,182 |
|
|
|
12,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
153,000 |
|
|
$ |
78,965 |
|
|
$ |
74,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Value |
|
Equipment leased or held for use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theater system components(1)(2) |
|
$ |
68,349 |
|
|
$ |
30,240 |
|
|
$ |
38,109 |
|
Camera equipment(5) |
|
|
5,954 |
|
|
|
5,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,303 |
|
|
|
36,194 |
|
|
|
38,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under construction(3) |
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
14,723 |
|
|
|
8,404 |
|
|
|
6,319 |
|
Office and production equipment(4) |
|
|
27,145 |
|
|
|
24,347 |
|
|
|
2,798 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
8,421 |
|
|
|
6,120 |
|
|
|
2,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,882 |
|
|
|
38,871 |
|
|
|
13,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
129,885 |
|
|
$ |
75,065 |
|
|
$ |
54,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in theater system components are assets with costs of $19.9 million (2009 $21.3
million) and accumulated depreciation of $19.0 million (2009 $20.2 million) that are leased
to customers under operating leases. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in theater system components are assets with costs of $62.8 million (2009 $42.7
million) and accumulated depreciation of $12.0 million (2009 $6.7 million) that are used in
joint revenue sharing arrangements. |
|
(3) |
|
Included in assets under construction are components with costs of $6.2 million (2009 $3.1
million) that will be utilized to construct assets to be used in joint revenue sharing
arrangements. |
|
(4) |
|
Included in office and production equipment are assets under capital lease with costs of $1.5
million (2009 $1.5 million) and accumulated depreciation of $1.4 million (2009 $1.3
million). |
|
(5) |
|
Fully amortized camera equipment is still in use by the Company. |
90
8. Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,313 |
|
Commissions and other deferred selling expenses |
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
|
2,828 |
|
Deferred charges on debt financing |
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
1,489 |
|
Insurance recoveries |
|
|
1,896 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
Foreign currency derivatives |
|
|
1,913 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
Shelf registration fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
Investment in new business ventures |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-accounted investments |
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,350 |
|
|
$ |
15,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Income Taxes
(a) Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes by tax jurisdiction are
comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Canada |
|
$ |
47,954 |
|
|
$ |
4,833 |
|
|
$ |
(42,285 |
) |
United States |
|
|
2,088 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
7,723 |
|
Other |
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
49,488 |
|
|
$ |
5,471 |
|
|
$ |
(33,418 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) The (provision)
recovery for income taxes related to income (loss) from continuing
operations is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
$ |
(1,027 |
) |
|
$ |
(104 |
) |
|
$ |
(865 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
(1,465 |
) |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,492 |
) |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
(841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
49,612 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
749 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
4,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,276 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51,784 |
|
|
$ |
(274 |
) |
|
$ |
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2010 the Company has released a
valuation allowance of $54.8 million relating to the future
utilization of deductible temporary differences, tax credits, and
certain net operating loss carryforwards. Offsetting this recovery for
income taxes is the deferred tax provision related to a partial
pension settlement reclassed from other comprehensive income in the
year of $0.5 million. |
91
(c) The (provision for) recovery of income taxes from continuing operations differs from the
amount that would have resulted by applying the combined Canadian federal and provincial statutory
income tax rates to earnings (losses) due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 (1) |
|
|
2008 (1) |
|
Income tax (provision) recovery at combined statutory rates |
|
$ |
(15,343 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,806 |
) |
|
$ |
11,225 |
|
Adjustments resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-taxable portion of capital gains and losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible stock based compensation |
|
|
(1,713 |
) |
|
|
(704 |
) |
|
|
(467 |
) |
Other non-deductible/non-includable items |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in valuation allowance relating to current year temporary
differences |
|
|
12,708 |
|
|
|
(7,327 |
) |
|
|
(11,560 |
) |
Decrease in valuation allowance relating to reversal of future temporary
differences |
|
|
54,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect of pension settlement reclassed from other comprehensive income |
|
|
(517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Withholding and other taxes |
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
(490 |
) |
|
|
(455 |
) |
Changes to tax reserves |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
(323 |
) |
US federal and state taxes |
|
|
(1,465 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
88 |
|
Income tax at different rates in foreign and other provincial jurisdictions |
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(648 |
) |
Impact of changes in future enacted tax rates on current year temporary
differences |
|
|
4,444 |
|
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
(1,877 |
) |
Carryforward of investment and other tax credits (non-refundable) |
|
|
1,642 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
Effect of changes in legislation relating to enacted tax rate reductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,652 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in legislation relating to foreign currency election |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in legislation relating to tax credits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
Changes to deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from audit and other
tax return adjustments |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(2,216 |
) |
|
|
1,435 |
|
Expiration of losses and credits carried forward |
|
|
(1,558 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(549 |
) |
Changes to deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from foreign exchange |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,911 |
|
Tax effect of loss from equity-accounted investments |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recovery (provision) for income taxes, as reported |
|
$ |
51,784 |
|
|
$ |
(274 |
) |
|
$ |
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Prior years comparatives have been restated to conform to the current
years presentation. |
(d) The net deferred income tax asset is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net operating loss carryforwards |
|
$ |
16,245 |
|
|
$ |
19,404 |
|
Investment tax credit and other tax credit carryforwards |
|
|
4,837 |
|
|
|
5,186 |
|
Write-downs of other assets |
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
Excess tax over accounting basis in property, plant and equipment and inventories |
|
|
36,373 |
|
|
|
45,941 |
|
Accrued pension liability |
|
|
4,799 |
|
|
|
7,887 |
|
Other accrued reserves |
|
|
8,133 |
|
|
|
6,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax assets |
|
|
71,038 |
|
|
|
85,203 |
|
Income recognition on net investment in leases |
|
|
(6,167 |
) |
|
|
(7,639 |
) |
Other |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,051 |
|
|
|
77,280 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(7,929 |
) |
|
|
(77,280 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax asset |
|
$ |
57,122 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
The gross deferred tax assets include a liability of $0.1 million relating to the remaining
tax effect resulting from the Companys defined benefit pension plan, the related actuarial gains
and losses, and unrealized net gains on derivative instruments recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income.
The Company has not provided Canadian taxes on cumulative earnings of non-Canadian affiliates
and associated companies that have been reinvested indefinitely. Taxes are provided for earnings of
non-Canadian affiliates and associated companies when the Company determines that such earnings are
no longer indefinitely reinvested.
(e) Estimated net operating loss carryforwards and estimated tax credit carryforwards expire
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Net Operating |
|
|
|
Tax Credit |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
|
Carryforwards |
|
|
Carryforwards |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
5,742 |
|
|
|
53,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,135 |
|
|
$ |
53,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated net operating loss carryforwards can be carried forward to reduce taxable income
through to 2021. Investment tax credits and other tax credits can be carried forward to reduce
income taxes payable through to 2030.
As at December 31, 2010, the Company had approximately $21.7 million of U.S. consolidated
federal tax net operating loss carryforwards and certain state tax net loss carryforwards.
Realization of some or all of the benefit from these U.S. net tax operating losses is dependent on
the absence of certain ownership changes of the Companys common shares. An ownership change,
as defined in the applicable federal income tax rules, would place possible limitations, on an
annual basis, on the use of such net operating losses to offset any future taxable income that the
Company may generate. Such limitations, in conjunction with the net operating loss expiration
provisions, could significantly reduce or effectively eliminate the Companys ability to use its
U.S. net operating losses to offset any future taxable income.
(f) Valuation allowance
Based on the improvement of the Companys operating results in 2009 and 2010 and the Companys
assessment of projected future results of operations, it was determined that realization of a
deferred income tax benefit was more likely than not. As a result, the judgment about the need for
a full valuation allowance against deferred tax assets has changed, and a reduction in the
valuation allowance has been recorded as a benefit within the recovery for income taxes from
continuing operations. The recovery for income taxes in the year ended December 31, 2010 includes a
net income tax benefit of $54.8 million in continuing operations related to a decrease in the
valuation allowance for the Companys deferred tax assets and other tax adjustments. The net
deferred income tax benefit during the year ended December 31, 2010 is primarily attributable to
the estimated realization of deferred tax assets resulting from the utilization of future
deductible temporary differences and certain net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits
against future years taxable income. The Company also utilized an additional $12.7 million in tax
benefits against current year income. During the year ended December 31, 2010, after considering
all available evidence, both positive (including recent profits, projected future profitability,
backlog, carryforward periods for utilization of net operating loss carryovers and tax credits,
discretionary deductions and other factors) and negative (including cumulative losses in past years
and other factors), it was concluded that the valuation allowance against the Companys deferred
tax assets should be reduced by approximately $54.8 million. The remaining $7.9 million balance in
the valuation allowance as at December 31, 2010 is primarily attributable to certain U.S. federal
and state net operating loss carryovers and federal tax credits that are likely to expire
unutilized.
93
(g) Uncertain tax positions
In connection with the Companys adoption of FIN 48, as of January 1, 2007, the Company
recorded a net increase to its deficit of $2.1 million (including approximately $0.9 million
related to accrued interest and penalties) related to the measurement of potential international
withholding tax requirements and a decrease in reserves for income taxes. As at December 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, the Company had total unrecognized tax benefits (including interest and
penalties) of $4.4 million and $4.4 million, respectively, for international withholding taxes. All
of the unrecognized tax benefits could impact the Companys effective tax rate if recognized. While
the Company believes it has adequately provided for all tax positions, amounts asserted by taxing
authorities could differ from the Companys accrued position. Accordingly, additional provisions on
federal, provincial, state and foreign tax-related matters could be recorded in the future as
revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are settled or otherwise resolved.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits (excluding
interest and penalties) is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
3,237 |
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
|
410 |
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Settlements |
|
|
|
|
Reductions resulting from lapse of applicable statute of limitations |
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
3,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consistent with its historical financial reporting, the Company has classified interest and
penalties related to income tax liabilities, when applicable, as part of interest expense in its
consolidated statements of operations rather than income tax expense. The Company recognized
approximately $nil and $0.1 million in potential interest and penalties associated with
unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively.
The number of years with open tax audits varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. The
Companys major taxing jurisdictions include Canada, the province of Ontario and the United States
(including multiple states).
The Companys 2004 through 2010 tax years remain subject to examination by the IRS for U.S.
federal tax purposes, and the 2006 through 2010 tax years remain subject to examination by the
appropriate governmental agencies for Canadian federal tax purposes. There are other on-going
audits in various other jurisdictions that are not material to the financial statements.
10. Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
Patents and trademarks |
|
$ |
7,289 |
|
|
$ |
4,852 |
|
|
$ |
2,437 |
|
Other |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,539 |
|
|
$ |
5,102 |
|
|
$ |
2,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
Patents and trademarks |
|
$ |
6,543 |
|
|
$ |
4,452 |
|
|
$ |
2,091 |
|
Intellectual property rights |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Other |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,893 |
|
|
$ |
4,751 |
|
|
$ |
2,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects to amortize an average of $0.3 million for each of the next 5 years,
respectively. Fully amortized other intangible assets are still in use by the Company.
94
During 2010, the Company acquired $0.8 million in patents and trademarks. The net book value
of these patents and trademarks was $0.8 million as at December 31, 2010. The weighted average
amortization period for these additions was 10 years.
During 2010, the Company disposed of its remaining intellectual property rights. The net book
value of these intellectual property rights was $0.1 million as at December 31, 2009.
During 2010, the Company incurred costs of $0.1 million to renew or extend the term of
acquired other intangible assets which were recorded in selling, general and administrative
expenses.
11. Senior Notes due December 2010
In 2009, the Company repurchased all $160.0 million aggregate principal amount of its
outstanding 9.625% Senior Notes due December 1, 2010, which represented the aggregate principal
amount outstanding. The Company paid cash of $159.1 million to reacquire its bonds, thereby
releasing the Company from further obligations to various holders under the Indenture governing the
Senior Notes. The Company accounted for the bond repurchase in accordance with the Debt Topic of
the FASB ASC whereby the net carrying amount of the debt extinguished was the face value of the
bonds adjusted for any unamortized premium, discount and costs of issuance, which resulted in a
loss of $0.6 million in 2009.
12. Credit Facility
On November 16, 2009, the Company amended and restated the terms of its senior secured credit
facility, which had been scheduled to mature on October 31, 2010. The amended and restated
facility, as further amended by the parties on January 21, 2011 (the Credit Facility), with a
scheduled maturity of October 31, 2013, has a maximum borrowing capacity of $75.0 million,
consisting of a revolving loan facility subject to a borrowing base calculation (as described
below) and including a sublimit of $20.0 million for letters of credit and a term loan of $35.0
million. Certain of the Companys subsidiaries serve as guarantors (the Guarantors) of the
Companys obligations under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility is collateralized by a first
priority security interest in all of the present and future assets of the Company and the
Guarantors.
The terms of the Credit Facility are set forth in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
(the Credit Agreement), dated November 16, 2009, between the Company; Wells Fargo Capital Finance
Corporation Canada (formerly Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Canada)), as agent, lender, sole
lead arranger and sole bookrunner, (Wells Fargo); and Export Development Canada, as lender
(EDC, together with Wells Fargo, the Lenders) and in various collateral and security documents
entered into by the Company and the Guarantors. Each of the Guarantors has also entered into a
guarantee in respect of the Companys obligations under the Credit Facility.
The revolving portion of the Credit Facility permits maximum aggregate borrowings equal to the
lesser of:
(i) $40.0 million, and
(ii) a collateral calculation based on the percentages of the book values of the Companys net
investment in sales-type leases, financing receivables, certain trade accounts receivable, finished
goods inventory allocated to backlog contracts and the appraised values of the expected future cash
flows related to operating leases and the Companys owned real property, reduced by certain
accruals and accounts payable and subject to other conditions, limitations and reserve right
requirements. It is also reduced by the settlement risk on its foreign currency forward contracts
when the notional value exceeds the fair value of the forward contracts.
The revolving portion of the Credit Facility bears interest at either (i) LIBOR plus a margin
of 2.75% per annum, or (ii) Wells Fargos prime rate plus a margin of 1.25% per annum, at the
Companys option. The term loan portion of the Credit Facility bears interest at the Companys
option, at either (i) LIBOR plus a margin of 3.75% per annum, or (ii) Wells Fargos prime rate plus
a margin of 2.25% per annum. Under the Credit Facility, the effective interest rate for the year
ended December 31, 2010 for the term loan portion was 4.06% (2009 4.09%) and 3.56% for the
revolving portion (2009 2.29%).
The Credit Facility provides that so long as the term loan remains outstanding, the Company
will be required to maintain: (i) a ratio of funded debt (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to
EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of not more than 2:1 through December 31, 2010, and
(ii) a ratio of funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 1.75:1 thereafter. If the Company repays the
term loan in full, it will remain subject to such ratio requirements only if Excess Availability
(as defined in the Credit Agreement) is less than $10.0 million or Cash and Excess Availability (as
defined in the Credit Agreement) is less than $15.0 million. If Cash and Excess Availability is
less than $25.0 million,
95
the Company will also be required to maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage
Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of not less than 1.1:1.0; provided, however, that if the
Company repays the term loan in full, it will remain subject to such ratio requirement only if
Excess Availability is less than $10.0 million or Cash and Excess Availability is less than $15.0
million. At all times, under the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company is required to maintain
minimum Excess Availability of not less than $5.0 million and minimum Cash and Excess Availability
of not less than $15.0 million. These amounts were $45.0 million and $75.4 million at December 31,
2010, respectively. The Company was in compliance with all of these requirements at December 31,
2010.
The Credit Facility contains typical affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants
that limit or restrict the ability of the Company and the Guarantors to: incur certain additional
indebtedness; make certain loans, investments or guarantees; pay dividends; make certain asset
sales; incur certain liens or other encumbrances; conduct certain transactions with affiliates and
enter into certain corporate transactions.
The Credit Facility also contains customary events of default, including upon an acquisition
or change of control or upon a change in the business and assets of the Company or a Guarantor that
in each case is reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company or Guarantor.
If an event of default occurs and is continuing under the Credit Facility, the Lenders may, among
other things, terminate their commitments and require immediate repayment of all amounts owed by
the Company.
Bank indebtedness includes the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Term Loan |
|
$ |
17,500 |
|
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
Revolving Credit Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,500 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2010, the Company repaid $15.0 million of its remaining outstanding indebtedness under
the revolving portion of the Credit Facility and $17.5 million of its term loan. Total amounts
drawn and available under the Credit Facility at December 31, 2010, were $17.5 million and $40.0
million, respectively (December 31, 2009 $50.0 million and $24.8 million, respectively).
At December 31, 2010, the Companys current borrowing capacity under the revolving portion of
the Credit Facility was $40.0 million after deduction for the minimum Excess Availability reserve
of $5.0 million. Outstanding borrowings and letters of credit and advance payment guarantees were
$nil as at December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2009, the borrowing capacity was $24.8 million after
deduction for outstanding borrowings of $15.0 million, letters of credit and advanced payment
guarantees of $0.3 million and the minimum Excess Availability reserve of $5.0 million.
In accordance with the loan agreement, the Company is obligated to make payments on the
principal of the term loan as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
11,667 |
|
2012 |
|
|
5,833 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Wells Fargo Foreign Exchange Facility
Within the Credit Facility entered into on November 16, 2009, the Company has a $10.0 million
sublimit to cover the Companys settlement risk on its purchased foreign currency forward contracts
and/or other swap arrangements as defined in the Credit Facility. The settlement risk on its
foreign currency forward contracts was $nil as at December 31, 2010 as the fair value exceeded the
notional value of the forward contracts. The Company can enter into such arrangements up to a
notional amount of $50.0 million, of which $8.5 million is remaining.
96
Bank of Montreal Facilities
As at December 31, 2010, the Company has available a $10.0 million facility (December 31, 2009
$10.0 million) with the Bank of Montreal for use solely in conjunction with the issuance of
performance guarantees and letters of credit fully insured by EDC (the Bank of Montreal
Facility). As at December 31, 2010, the Company has letters of credit outstanding of $2.4 million
(2009 $3.6 million) under the Bank of Montreal Facility.
During 2009, the Company had available a $5.0 million facility solely used to cover the
Companys settlement risk on its purchased foreign currency forward contracts entered into prior to
December 2009. The facility was fully insured by EDC. As at December 31, 2010, all of the foreign
currency contracts subject to the $5.0 million facility have matured and the facility is no longer
available to the Company. The settlement risk on its foreign currency forward contracts was $nil on
December 31, 2009 as the fair value exceeded the notional value of the forward contracts.
13. Commitments
(a) The Companys lease commitments consist of rent and equipment under operating leases. The
Company accounts for any incentives provided over the term of the lease. Total minimum annual
rental payments to be made by the Company under operating leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
Capital Leases |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
5,673 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
2012 |
|
|
5,390 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
2013 |
|
|
2,064 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
2014 |
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,253 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense was $4.8 million for 2010 (2009 $4.9 million, 2008 $5.1 million) net of
sublease rental of $0.4 million (2009 $0.4 million, 2008 $0.2 million).
Recorded in the accrued liabilities balance as at December 31, 2010 is $4.2 million (December
31, 2009 $5.0 million) related to accrued rent and lease inducements being recognized as an
offset to rent expense over the term of the lease.
Purchase obligations under long-term supplier contracts as at December 31, 2010 were $13.6
million (December 31, 2009 $9.3 million).
(b) As at December 31, 2010 the Company has letters of credit and advance payment guarantees
secured by the Credit Facility of $nil (December 31, 2009 $0.3 million) outstanding. As at
December 31, 2010 the Company also has letters of credit outstanding of $2.4 million as compared to
$3.6 million as at December 31, 2009, under the Bank of Montreal Facility.
(c) The Company compensates its sales force with both fixed and variable compensation.
Commissions on the sale or lease of the Companys theater systems are payable in graduated amounts
from the time of collection of the customers first payment to the Company up to the collection of
the customers last initial payment. At December 31, 2010, $1.5 million (December 31, 2009$0.6
million) of commissions have been accrued and will be payable in future periods.
14. Contingencies and Guarantees
The Company is involved in lawsuits, claims, and proceedings, including those identified
below, which arise in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with the Contingencies Topic
of the FASB ASC, the Company will make a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a
loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company believes
it has adequate provisions for any such matters. The Company reviews these provisions in
conjunction with any related provisions on assets related to the claims at least quarterly and
adjusts these provisions to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of
legal counsel and other pertinent information related to the case. Should developments in any of
these matters outlined below cause a change in the Companys determination as to an unfavorable
outcome and result in the need to recognize a material provision, or, should any of these matters
result in a final adverse judgment or be settled for significant amounts, they could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations, cash flows, and financial position
in the period or periods in which such a change in determination, settlement or judgment occurs.
97
The Company expenses legal costs relating to its lawsuits, claims and proceedings as incurred.
(a) In March 2005, the Company, together with Three-Dimensional Media Group, Ltd. (3DMG),
filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western
Division, against In-Three, Inc. (In-Three) alleging patent infringement. On March 10, 2006, the
Company and In-Three entered into a settlement agreement settling the dispute between the Company
and In-Three. Despite the settlement reached between the Company and In-Three, co-plaintiff 3DMG
refused to dismiss its claims against In-Three. Accordingly, the Company and In-Three moved jointly
for a motion to dismiss the Companys and In-Threes claims. On August 24, 2010, the Court
dismissed all of the claims pending between the Company and In-Three, thus dismissing the Company
from the litigation.
On May 15, 2006, the Company initiated arbitration against 3DMG before the International
Centre for Dispute Resolution in New York (the ICDR), alleging breaches of the license and
consulting agreements between the Company and 3DMG. On June 15, 2006, 3DMG filed an answer denying
any breaches and asserting counterclaims that the Company breached the parties license agreement.
On June 21, 2007, the Arbitration Panel unanimously denied 3DMGs Motion for Summary Judgment filed
on April 11, 2007 concerning the Companys claims and 3DMGs counterclaims. The proceeding was
suspended on May 4, 2009 due to failure of
3DMG to pay fees associated with the proceeding. The proceeding was further suspended on
October 11, 2010 pending resolution of reexamination proceedings currently pending involving one of
3DMGs patents. The Company will continue to pursue its claims vigorously and believes that all
allegations made by 3DMG are without merit. The Company further believes that the amount of loss,
if any, suffered in connection with the counterclaims would not have a material impact on the
financial position or results of operations of the Company, although no assurance can be given with
respect to the ultimate outcome of the arbitration.
(b) In January 2004, the Company and IMAX Theatre Services Ltd., a subsidiary of the Company,
commenced an arbitration seeking damages before the International Court of Arbitration of the
International Chambers of Commerce (the ICC) with respect to the breach by Electronic Media
Limited (EML) of its December 2000 agreement with the Company. In June 2004, the Company
commenced a related arbitration before the ICC against EMLs affiliate, E-CITI Entertainment (I)
PVT Limited (E-Citi), seeking damages as a result of E-Citis breach of a September 2000 lease
agreement. An arbitration hearing took place in November 2005 against E-Citi which considered all
claims by the Company. On February 1, 2006, the ICC issued an award on liability finding
unanimously in the Companys favor on all claims. Further hearings took place in July 2006 and
December 2006. On August 24, 2007, the ICC issued an award unanimously in favor of the Company in
the amount of $9.4 million, consisting of past and future rents owed to the Company under its lease
agreements, plus interest and costs. In the award, the ICC upheld the validity and enforceability
of the Companys theater system contract. The Company thereafter submitted its application to the
arbitration panel for interest and costs. On March 27, 2008, the Panel issued a final award in
favor of the Company in the amount of $11,309,496, plus an additional $2,512 each day in interest
from October 1, 2007 until the date the award is paid, which the Company is seeking to enforce and
collect in full.
(c) In June 2004, Robots of Mars, Inc. (Robots) initiated an arbitration proceeding against
the Company in California with the American Arbitration Association pursuant to arbitration
provisions in two film production agreements between Robots predecessor-in-interest and a
subsidiary of the Company (Ridefilm), asserting claims for breach of contract, fraud, breach of
fiduciary duty and intentional interference with the contract. Robots is seeking an award of
contingent compensation that it claims is owed under two production agreements, damages for tort
claims, and punitive damages. The arbitration hearing of this matter occurred in June and October
2009. The parties are currently awaiting a final award from the arbitrator. The Company believes
the amount of loss, if any, that may be suffered in connection with this proceeding, will not have
a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company, although no
assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of such arbitration.
(d) The Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in eight
purported class action lawsuits filed between August 11, 2006 and September 18, 2006, alleging
violations of U.S. federal securities laws. These eight actions were filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York. On January 18, 2007, the Court consolidated all eight
class action lawsuits and appointed Westchester Capital Management, Inc. as the lead plaintiff and
Abbey Spanier Rodd & Abrams, LLP as lead plaintiffs counsel. On October 2, 2007, plaintiffs filed
a consolidated amended class action complaint. The amended complaint, brought on behalf of
shareholders who purchased the Companys common stock between February 27, 2003 and July 20, 2007,
alleges primarily that the defendants engaged in securities fraud by disseminating materially false
and misleading statements during the class period regarding the Companys revenue recognition of
theater system installations, and failing to disclose material information concerning the Companys
revenue recognition practices. The amended complaint also added PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the
Companys auditors, as a defendant. The lawsuit seeks
98
unspecified compensatory damages, costs, and
expenses. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on December 10, 2007. On
September 16, 2008, the Court issued a memorandum opinion and order, denying the motion. On October
6, 2008, the defendants filed an answer to the amended complaint. On October 31, 2008, the
plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. Fact discovery on the merits commenced on
November 14, 2008. On March 13, 2009, the Court granted a second prospective lead plaintiffs
request to file a motion for reconsideration of the Courts order naming Westchester Capital
Management, Inc. as the lead plaintiff and issued an order denying without prejudice plaintiffs
class certification motion pending resolution of the motion for reconsideration. On June 29, 2009,
the Court granted the motion for reconsideration and appointed Snow Capital Investment Partners,
L.P. as the lead plaintiff and Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP as lead plaintiffs
counsel. Westchester Capital Management, Inc. appealed this decision, but the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Second Circuit denied its petition on October 1, 2009. On April 22, 2010, the new lead
plaintiff filed its motion for class certification, defendants filed their oppositions to the
motion on June 10, 2010, and plaintiff filed its reply on July 30, 2010. On December 20, 2010, the
Court denied Snow Capital Investment Partners motion and ordered that all applications to be
appointed lead plaintiff must be filed within 20 days of the decision. Two applications for lead
plaintiff were filed, on January 10, 2011 and January 12, 2011, respectively. The lawsuit is at an
early stage and as a result the Company is not able to estimate a potential loss exposure at this
time. The Company will vigorously defend the matter, although no assurances can be given with
respect to the outcome of such proceedings. The Companys directors and officers insurance policy
provides for reimbursement of costs and expenses incurred in connection with this lawsuit as well
as potential damages awarded, if any, subject to certain policy limits and deductibles.
(e) A class action lawsuit was filed on September 20, 2006 in the Ontario Superior Court of
Justice against the Company and certain of its officers and directors, alleging violations of
Canadian securities laws. This lawsuit was brought on behalf of shareholders who acquired the
Companys securities between February 17, 2006 and August 9, 2006. The lawsuit is in an early
procedural stage and seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, as well as costs and
expenses. As a result, the Company is unable to estimate a potential loss exposure at this time.
For reasons released December 14, 2009, the Court granted leave to the Plaintiffs to amend their
statement of claim to plead certain claims pursuant to the Securities Act (Ontario) against the
Company and certain individuals and granted certification of the action as a class proceeding.
These are procedural decisions, and do not contain any binding conclusions on the factual or legal
merits of the claim. The Company has brought a motion seeking Court approval to appeal those
decisions and it is not known when the Ontario court will release a decision on that motion. The
Company believes the allegations made against it in the statement of claim are meritless and will
vigorously defend the matter, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate
outcome of such proceedings. The Companys directors and officers insurance policy provides for
reimbursement of costs and expenses incurred in connection with this lawsuit as well as potential
damages awarded, if any, subject to certain policy limits and deductibles.
(f) On September 7, 2007, Catalyst Fund Limited Partnership II (Catalyst), a holder of the
Companys Senior Notes, commenced an application against the Company in the Ontario Superior Court
of Justice for a declaration of oppression pursuant to sections 229 and 241 of the Canada Business
Corporations Act (the CBCA) and for a declaration that the Company is in default of the Indenture
governing its now retired Senior Notes. In its application against the Company, Catalyst challenged
the validity of the consent solicitation through which the Company requested and obtained a waiver
of any and all defaults arising from a failure to comply with the reporting covenant under the
Indenture and alleged common law fraud. On September 26, 2008, on the Companys motion, the Ontario
Superior Court stayed Catalysts application in Canada on the basis of Catalyst having brought
similar claims against the Company in the State of New York, and ordered Catalyst to pay the
Companys costs associated with the motion. On April 27, 2009, the Supreme Court of the State of
New York disposed of Catalysts claims against the Company in
the State of New York (see note 14(g)
for additional information). The time for Catalyst to appeal the dismissal of its claim by the New
York court expired on February 8, 2010, without Catalyst perfecting an appeal.
(g) In a related matter, on December 21, 2007, U.S. Bank National Association, trustee under
the Indenture, filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York against the Company
and Catalyst, requesting a declaration that the theory of default asserted by Catalyst before the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice is without merit and further that Catalyst has failed to satisfy
certain prerequisites to bondholder action, which are contained in the Indenture (the U.S. Bank
Action). On February 22, 2008, Catalyst served a Verified Answer to the U.S. Bank Action and filed
several cross-claims (the Cross-Claims) against the Company in the same proceeding. On January
16, 2009, the Company moved for summary judgment, seeking a ruling that the Company satisfied the
terms of the declaratory relief requested by the Trustee and the dismissal of the Cross-Claims. On
April 27, 2009, the Court granted the Companys motion for summary judgment, disposing of the
Cross-Claims. On May 7, 2009, Catalyst filed a notice preserving for a period of nine months its
right to appeal the Courts ruling on summary judgment. The time for Catalyst to perfect its appeal
has now expired.
99
(h) On November 4, 2009, Cinemark USA, Inc. (Cinemark) filed a complaint in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against the Company seeking a declaratory
judgment that Cinemark is not infringing certain of the Companys patents related to theater
geometry and that such patents are invalid. On December 22, 2010, the Company and Cinemark entered
into a Settlement Agreement in which they agreed to dismiss the Texas action with prejudice. As
part of the settlement, the Company and Cinemark also agreed to enter into a purchase agreement
pursuant to which Cinemark agreed to purchase two IMAX digital theater systems and to upgrade six
of its IMAX film-based theaters to IMAX digital theaters. On January 13, 2011, the Court granted
the parties joint motion to dismiss with prejudice.
(i) On November 12, 2009, the Company filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of New York
against Cinemark alleging breach of contract, fraud, tortious interference with existing and
prospective economic relations, breach of the implied warranty of good faith and fair dealing,
misappropriation of trade secrets, unjust enrichment and deliberate acts of bad faith in connection
with the introduction and operation of a new Cinemark theater prototype. The lawsuit was removed to
federal court in New York and the tort claims were dismissed without prejudice to the Companys
right to replead those claims. On December 22, 2010, the Company and Cinemark entered into a
Settlement Agreement in which they agreed to dismiss the New York action with prejudice. As part of
the settlement, the Company and Cinemark also agreed to enter into a purchase agreement pursuant to
which Cinemark agreed to purchase two IMAX digital theater systems and to upgrade six of its IMAX
film-based theaters to IMAX digital theaters. On January 4, 2011, the Company filed a voluntary
stipulation of dismissal. The matter is now closed.
(j) In November 2009, the Company filed suit against Sanborn Theatres (Sanborn) in the
United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging breach of Sanborns
agreement to make payments for the purchase of two IMAX theater systems
from the Company and seeking $1.7 million in compensatory damages. After granting Sanborn
notice of default in connection with the failure to make required payments under the agreement and
upon Sanborns failure to cure, the Company terminated its agreement with Sanborn. On May 11, 2010,
Sanborn filed suit against the Company and AMC Entertainment Inc. (AMC Entertainment) and Regal
Cinemas, Inc. (Regal) in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California alleging
breach of contract, fraud and unfair competition against the Company and alleging intentional
interference with contractual relations against AMC Entertainment and Regal. The lawsuits are at
early stages and as a result the Company is not able to estimate a potential loss exposure, if any,
at this time. The Company will vigorously prosecute its claims and defenses in both matters,
although no assurances can be given with respect to the outcome of such proceedings.
(k) Since June 2006, the Company has been subject to ongoing informal inquiries by the SEC and
the OSC. On or about September 3, 2010, the SEC issued a formal order of investigation in
connection with its inquiry. The Company has been cooperating with these inquiries and will
continue to cooperate with the SECs investigation. The Company believes that the inquiry and
investigation principally relate to the timing of recognition of the Companys theater system
installation revenue in 2005 and related matters. Although the Company cannot predict the timing of
developments and outcomes in these inquiries, they could result at any time in developments
(including charges or settlement of charges) that could have material adverse effects on the
Company. These effects could include payments of fines or disgorgement or other relief with respect
to the Company or its officers or employees that could be material to the Company. Such
developments could also have an adverse effect on the Companys defense of the class action
lawsuits referred to above.
(l) In addition to the matters described above, the Company is currently involved in other
legal proceedings which, in the opinion of the Companys management, will not materially affect the
Companys financial position or future operating results, although no assurance can be given with
respect to the ultimate outcome of any such proceedings.
(m) In the normal course of business, the Company enters into agreements that may contain
features that meet the definition of a guarantee. The Guarantees Topic of the FASB ASC defines a
guarantee to be a contract (including an indemnity) that contingently requires the Company to make
payments (either in cash, financial instruments, other assets, shares of its stock or provision of
services) to a third party based on (a) changes in an underlying interest rate, foreign exchange
rate, equity or commodity instrument, index or other variable, that is related to an asset, a
liability or an equity security of the counterparty, (b) failure of another party to perform under
an obligating agreement or (c) failure of another third party to pay its indebtedness when due.
Financial Guarantees
The Company has provided no significant financial guarantees to third parties.
Product Warranties
The following summarizes the accrual for product warranties that was recorded as part of
accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet:
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance at the beginning of the year |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
Warranty redemptions |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
Warranties issued |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Revisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of the year |
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director/Officer Indemnifications
The Companys General By-law contains an indemnification of its directors/officers, former
directors/officers and persons who have acted at its request to be a director/officer of an entity
in which the Company is a shareholder or creditor, to indemnify them, to the extent permitted by
the Canada Business Corporations Act, against expenses (including legal fees), judgments, fines and
any amount actually and reasonably incurred by them in connection with any action, suit or
proceeding in which the directors and/or officers are sued as a result of their service, if they
acted honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company. The nature of
the indemnification prevents the Company from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential
amount it could be required to pay to counterparties. The Company has purchased directors and
officers liability insurance. No amount has been accrued in the consolidated balance sheet as at
December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 with respect to this indemnity.
Other Indemnification Agreements
In the normal course of the Companys operations, the Company provides indemnifications to
counterparties in transactions such as: theater system lease and sale agreements and the
supervision of installation or servicing of the theater systems; film production, exhibition and
distribution agreements; real property lease agreements; and employment agreements. These
indemnification agreements require the Company to compensate the counterparties for costs incurred
as a result of litigation claims that may be suffered by the counterparty as a consequence of the
transaction or the Companys breach or non-performance under these agreements. While the terms of
these indemnification agreements vary based upon the contract, they normally extend for the life of
the agreements. A small number of agreements do not provide for any limit on the maximum potential
amount of indemnification; however, virtually all of the Companys system lease and sale agreements
limit such maximum potential liability to the purchase price of the system. The fact that the
maximum potential amount of indemnification required by the Company is not specified in some cases
prevents the Company from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount it could be
required to pay to counterparties. During the second quarter of 2009, the Company provided an
indemnity to a third party in connection with a terminated service arrangement. Historically, the
Company has not made any significant payments under such indemnifications and less than $0.1
million has been accrued in the consolidated financial statements with respect to the contingent
aspect of these indemnities.
15. Capital Stock
(a) Authorized
Common Shares
The authorized capital of the Company consists of an unlimited number of common shares. The
following is a summary of the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions of the common shares.
The holders of common shares are entitled to receive dividends if, as and when declared by the
directors of the Company, subject to the rights of the holders of any other class of shares of the
Company entitled to receive dividends in priority to the common shares.
The holders of the common shares are entitled to one vote for each common share held at all
meetings of the shareholders.
(b) Changes during the Year
In 2010, the Company issued 1,313,599 (2009 1,306,637, 2008 341,110) common shares
pursuant to the exercise of stock options for cash proceeds of $8.3 million (2009 $6.3 million,
2008 $1.2 million).
101
On June 5, 2009 and August 17, 2009, the Company completed public offerings of 9,800,000 and
5,882,353 common shares, respectively, pursuant to a registration statement declared effective by
the SEC. On June 26, 2009 and August 31, 2009, the Company completed the sale of an additional
1,470,000 and 882,353 common shares, respectively, pursuant to the over-allotment options exercised
in full by the underwriter of the offerings. The 11,270,000 common shares sold in the June
offerings were sold at a public offering price of $7.15. The 6,764,706 common shares sold in the
August offerings were sold at a public offering price of $8.50. The aggregate net proceeds of the
offerings in 2009 was $130.7 million. The Company used the proceeds of the offerings for the
repayment of debt, including a portion of the Senior Notes, and for general corporate purposes.
(c) Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has five stock-based compensation plans that are described below. The compensation
costs recorded in the consolidated statement of operations for these plans were $27.7 million in
2010 (2009 $17.7 million, 2008 $1.5 million). Total stock-based compensation expense related
to nonvested employee stock-based payment awards not yet recognized at December 31, 2010 and the
weighted average period over which the awards are expected to be recognized is $18.0 million and
2.7 years, respectively (2009 $6.8 million and 3.8 years, 2008 $4.5 million and 3.2 years).
Stock Option Plan
The Companys Stock Option Plan, which is shareholder approved, permits the grant of options
to employees, directors and consultants. The Company recorded an expense of $4.1 million in 2010
(2009 $2.1 million, 2008 $0.9 million), related to grants issued to employees and directors
in the plan. No income tax benefit is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations for
these costs.
The Companys policy is to issue new shares from treasury to satisfy stock options which are
exercised.
The Company utilizes the Binomial Model to determine the fair value of stock-based payment
awards. The fair value determined by the Binomial Model is affected by the Companys stock price as
well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables
include, but are not limited to, the Companys expected stock price volatility over the term of the
awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. The Binomial Model also
considers the expected exercise multiple which is the multiple of exercise price to grant price at
which exercises are expected to occur on average. Option-pricing models were developed for use in
estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting or hedging restrictions and are fully
transferable. Because the Companys employee stock options have certain characteristics that are
significantly different from traded options, and because changes in the subjective assumptions can
materially affect the estimated value, in managements opinion, the Binomial Model best provides a
fair measure of the fair value of the Companys employee stock options.
The weighted average fair value of all common share options, granted to employees and
directors in 2010 at the measurement date was $8.01 per share (2009 $4.45 per share, 2008
$1.72 per share). For the years ended December 31, the following assumptions were used:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Average risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.18 |
% |
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
2.68 |
% |
Expected option life (in years) |
|
|
2.82 - 5.41 |
|
|
|
4.94 - 5.85 |
|
|
|
3.49 - 5.85 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
50% - 61 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
61% - 62 |
% |
Annual termination probability |
|
|
0% - 9.69 |
% |
|
|
0% - 10.30 |
% |
|
|
9.52% - 11.20 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
As at December 31, 2010, the Company has reserved a total of 12,829,115 (December 31, 2009
12,566,395) common shares for future issuance under the Stock Option Plan, of which options in
respect of 6,743,272 common shares are outstanding December 31, 2010. All awards of stock options
are made at fair market value of the Companys common shares on the date of grant. The fair market
value of a Common Share on a given date means the higher of the closing price of a Common Share on
the grant date (or the most recent trading date if the grant date is not a trading date) on the
NYSE, the TSX and such national exchange, as may be designated by the Companys Board of Directors
(the Fair Market Value). The options generally vest between one and 5 years and expire 10 years
or less from the date granted. The Stock Option Plan provides that vesting will be accelerated if
there is a change of control, as defined in the plan and upon certain conditions. At December 31,
2010, options in respect of 3,090,755 common shares were vested and exercisable.
102
The following table summarizes certain information in respect of all option activity under the
Stock Option Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise |
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Price Per Share |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Options outstanding, beginning of year |
|
|
6,173,795 |
|
|
|
6,686,182 |
|
|
|
5,908,080 |
|
|
$ |
6.52 |
|
|
$ |
5.97 |
|
|
$ |
6.71 |
|
Granted |
|
|
2,001,703 |
|
|
|
1,051,217 |
|
|
|
1,472,038 |
|
|
|
21.72 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
4.47 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,313,599 |
) |
|
|
(1,306,637 |
) |
|
|
(341,110 |
) |
|
|
6.30 |
|
|
|
4.85 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(23,825 |
) |
|
|
(35,488 |
) |
|
|
(84,608 |
) |
|
|
8.35 |
|
|
|
6.48 |
|
|
|
5.83 |
|
Expired |
|
|
(94,802 |
) |
|
|
(212,229 |
) |
|
|
(158,000 |
) |
|
|
26.08 |
|
|
|
16.18 |
|
|
|
23.95 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,250 |
) |
|
|
(110,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.51 |
|
|
|
7.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, end of period |
|
|
6,743,272 |
|
|
|
6,173,795 |
|
|
|
6,686,182 |
|
|
|
10.79 |
|
|
|
6.52 |
|
|
|
5.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable, end of period |
|
|
3,090,755 |
|
|
|
3,618,618 |
|
|
|
4,451,715 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
|
|
|
6.22 |
|
|
|
6.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2010, the Company did not cancel any stock options from its Stock Option Plan (2009
9,250, 2008 110,218) surrendered by Company employees. Compensation cost which is fully
recognized at the cancellation date was not reversed for options cancelled in 2009 and 2008.
As at December 31, 2010, 6,325,114 options were fully vested or are expected to vest with a
weighted average exercise price of $10.83, aggregate intrinsic value of $109.2 million and weighted
average remaining contractual life of 4.9 years. As at December 31, 2010, options that are
exercisable have an intrinsic value of $69.3 million and a weighted average remaining contractual
life of 3.1 years. The intrinsic value of options exercised in 2010 was $15.0 million (2009 $5.8
million, 2008 $1.2 million).
Options to Non-Employees
During 2010, an aggregate of 135,217 (2009 100,000, 2008 119,875) common share options
to purchase the Companys common stock with an average exercise price of $15.92 (2009 $4.05,
2008 $4.50) were granted to certain advisors and strategic partners of the Company. Of these
grants, 20,000 common share options are subject to vesting based on a performance commitment which
has not been completed as at December 31, 2010 and no expense has been recorded. These options have
a maximum contractual life of 10 years or less. The option vesting ranges from immediately to five
years. These options were granted under the Stock Option Plan.
As at December 31, 2010 non-employee options outstanding amounted to 132,168 options (2009
219,768, 2008 323,314) with a weighted average exercise price of $13.53 (2009 $7.05, 2008
$6.33). 4,500 options (2009 154,434, 2008 296,584) were exercisable with an average weighted
exercise price of $14.60 (2009 $8.31, 2008 $6.49) and the vested options have an aggregate
intrinsic value of $0.1 million (2009 $0.8 million, 2008 $nil). The weighted average fair
value of options granted to non-employees during 2010 at the measurement date was $12.71 per share
(2009 $2.34 per share, 2008 $2.58 per share), utilizing a Binomial Model with the following
underlying assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31 |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2007 |
Average risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.09 |
% |
|
|
2.03 |
% |
|
|
1.71 |
% |
Contractual option life |
|
|
1.70 - 6.25 |
years |
|
|
6 |
years |
|
|
6 |
years |
Average expected volatility |
|
|
50% - 61 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
103
In 2010, the Company recorded a charge of $1.8 million, (2009 $0.2 million 2008 $0.6
million) to costs and expenses applicable to revenues services and selling, general and
administrative expenses related to the non-employee stock options. Included in accrued liabilities
is $1.5 million for non-employee stock options granted or to be granted.
Restricted Common Shares
Under the terms of certain employment agreements dated July 12, 2000, the Company was required
to issue either 160,000 restricted common shares or pay their cash equivalent upon request by the
employees at any time. The Company accounted for the obligation as a liability, which is classified
within accrued liabilities. In December 2010, upon request by the employees, the Company paid $4.2
million in cash to settle the equivalent of the remaining 160,000 restricted common shares under
these agreements. The Company recorded an expense of $2.0 million in 2010 (2009 $1.4 million
expense, 2008 $0.4 million recovery), due to the changes in the Companys stock price during the
period. The aggregate intrinsic value of the awards outstanding at December 31, 2010 is $nil
(December 31, 2009 $2.1 million).
Stock Appreciation Rights
There were no stock appreciation rights (SARs) granted during 2010 and 2009. During 2007,
2,280,000 SARs with a weighted average exercise price of $6.20 per right were granted to certain
Company executives. For the year ended December 31, 2010, 877,500 SARs were cash settled for $10.3
million. The average exercise price for the settled SARs for the year ended December 31, 2010 was
$5.91 per SAR. As at December 31, 2010, 1,132,500 SARs were outstanding, of which 1,099,500 SARs
were exercisable. None of the SARs were forfeited, cancelled, or expired for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009. The SARs vesting period ranges from immediately upon granting to 5
years, with a remaining contractual life ranging from 5.00 to 7.01 years as at December 31, 2010.
The outstanding SARs had an average fair value of $21.21 per right as at December 31, 2010
(December 31, 2009 $7.37). The Company accounts for the obligation of these SARs as a liability
(December 31, 2010 $23.7 million, December 31, 2009 $14.1 million), which is classified
within accrued liabilities. The Company has recorded a $19.8 million expense for 2010 (2009
$14.0 million, 2008 $0.4 million) to selling, general and administrative expenses related to
these SARs. The following assumptions were used for measuring the fair value of the SARs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Average risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
1.17 |
% |
Expected option life (in years) |
|
|
0.24 to 2.51 |
|
|
|
0.15 to 3.48 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
50% to 61 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
Annual termination probability |
|
|
0% - 8.31 |
% |
|
|
0% - 9.69 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Warrants
There were no warrants issued or outstanding during 2010 or 2009.
104
(d) Earnings (loss) per share
Reconciliations of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted per-share
computations are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations applicable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
100,779 |
|
|
$ |
5,197 |
|
|
$ |
(33,510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares (000s): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding, beginning of period |
|
|
62,831,974 |
|
|
|
43,490,631 |
|
|
|
40,423,074 |
|
Weighted average number of shares issued during the period |
|
|
743,499 |
|
|
|
9,330,152 |
|
|
|
1,970,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares used in computing basic earnings per
share |
|
|
63,575,473 |
|
|
|
52,820,783 |
|
|
|
42,393,085 |
|
Assumed exercise of stock options, net of shares assumed |
|
|
3,108,130 |
|
|
|
1,697,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares used in computing diluted earnings per
share |
|
|
66,683,603 |
|
|
|
54,518,141 |
|
|
|
42,393,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share for 2008 excludes 1,206,050 shares that
are issuable upon exercise of stock options, net of shares assumed as the impact of these exercises
would be antidilutive.
16. Consolidated Statements of Operations Supplemental Information
(a) Other Revenues
The Company enters into theater system arrangements with customers that typically contain
customer payment obligations prior to the scheduled installation of the theater systems. During the
period of time between signing and theater system installation, certain customers each year are
unable to, or elect not to, proceed with the theater system installation for a number of reasons,
including business considerations, or the inability to obtain certain consents, approvals or
financing. Once the determination is made that the customer will not proceed with installation, the
customer and/or the Company may terminate the arrangement by default or by entering into a
consensual buyout. In these situations the parties are released from their future obligations under
the arrangement, and the initial payments that the customer previously made to the Company are
typically not refunded and are recognized as Other Revenues. In addition, the Company enters into
agreements with customers to terminate their obligations for additional theater system
configurations, which were in the Companys backlog. Included in Other Revenues are the following
types of settlement arrangements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Theater system configuration conversions |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Consensual buyouts |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
$ |
1,862 |
|
|
$ |
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Foreign Exchange
Included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the December 31, 2010 is a $1.5
million gain, for net foreign exchange gains/losses related to the translation of foreign currency
denominated monetary assets and liabilities and unhedged foreign exchange contracts compared with a
gain of $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and a $0.7 million expense for the year
ended December 31, 2008, respectively. See note 21(d) for additional information.
(c) Collaborative Arrangements
105
Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangements
In a joint revenue sharing arrangement, the Company receives a portion of a theaters
box-office and concession revenues, in exchange for placing a theater system at the theater
operators venue. Under joint revenue sharing arrangements, the customer has the ability and the
right to operate the hardware components or direct others to operate them in a manner determined by
the customer. The Companys joint revenue sharing arrangements are typically non-cancellable for 7
to 10 years with renewal provisions. Title to equipment under joint revenue sharing arrangements
does not transfer to the customer. The Companys joint revenue sharing arrangements do not contain
a guarantee of residual value at the end of the term. The customer is required to pay for executory
costs such as insurance and taxes and is required to pay the Company for maintenance and extended
warranty throughout the term. The customer is responsible for obtaining insurance coverage for the
theater systems commencing on the date specified in the arrangements shipping terms and ending on
the date the theater systems are delivered back to the Company.
The Company has signed joint revenue sharing agreements with 14 exhibitors for a total of 230
theater systems, of which 171 theaters were operating as at December 31, 2010, the terms of which
are similar in nature, rights and obligations. The accounting policy for the Companys joint
revenue sharing arrangements is disclosed in note 2(n).
Amounts attributable to transactions arising between the Company and its customers under joint
revenue sharing arrangements are included in Rentals revenue and for the December 31, 2010 amounted
to $41.8 million (2009 $21.6 million, 2008 $3.4 million).
IMAX DMR
In an IMAX DMR arrangement, the Company transforms conventional motion pictures into the
Companys large screen format, allowing the release of Hollywood content to the IMAX theater
network. In a typical IMAX DMR film arrangement, the Company will absorb its costs for the digital
re-mastering and then recoup this cost from a percentage of the gross box-office receipts of the
film, which generally range from 10-15%. The Company does not typically hold distribution rights or
the copyright to these films.
In 2010, 16 IMAX DMR films were exhibited through the IMAX theater network.
Amounts attributable to transactions arising between the Company and its customers under IMAX
DMR arrangements are included in Services revenue and for December 31, 2010 amounted to $63.5
million (2009 $35.6 million, 2008 $17.9 million).
Co-Produced Film Arrangements
In certain film arrangements, the Company co-produces a film with a third party whereby the
third party retains the copyright and rights to the film, except that the Company obtains exclusive
theatrical distribution rights to the film. Under these arrangements, both parties contribute
funding to the Companys wholly-owned production company for the production of the film and for
associated exploitation costs. Clauses in the film arrangements generally provide for the third
party to take over the production of the film if the cost of the production exceeds its approved
budget or if it appears as though the film will not be delivered on a timely basis.
As at December 31, 2010, the Company has 2 significant co-produced film arrangements which
make up greater than 50% of the VIE total assets and liabilities balance of $11.1 million and 2
other co-produced film arrangements, the terms of which are similar.
In 2010, amounts totaling $7.7 million (2009 $6.4 million, 2008 $3.8 million) attributable
to transactions between the Company and other parties involved in the production of the films have
been included in cost and expenses applicable to revenues-services.
17. Receivable Provisions, Net of Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Accounts receivable provisions, net of recoveries |
|
$ |
499 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
382 |
|
Financing receivables, net of recoveries |
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable provisions, net of recoveries |
|
$ |
1,443 |
|
|
$ |
1,067 |
|
|
$ |
1,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
18. Asset Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded an asset impairment charge of less than $0.1 million against property, plant
and equipment after the Company assessed the carrying value of certain groups in light of their
future expected cash flows (2009 $0.2 million, 2008 $nil).
19. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Supplemental Information
(a) Changes in other non-cash operating assets and liabilities are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Decrease (increase) in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
(2,423 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,444 |
) |
|
$ |
1,944 |
|
Financing receivables |
|
|
(11,874 |
) |
|
|
(7,162 |
) |
|
|
(199 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(3,828 |
) |
|
|
10,082 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(686 |
) |
|
|
189 |
|
Commissions and other deferred selling expenses |
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
(749 |
) |
Insurance recoveries |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
Accrued and other liabilities (1) |
|
|
(25,823 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(2,487 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
15,690 |
|
|
|
(13,535 |
) |
|
|
12,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(28,682 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,885 |
) |
|
$ |
11,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Decrease in accruals largely due to a payment of pension benefits in the amount of
$14.7 million and payments of $14.5 million in variable stock-based
compensation. |
(b) Cash payments made on account of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
682 |
|
|
$ |
519 |
|
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
1,719 |
|
|
$ |
13,864 |
|
|
$ |
15,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
(c) Depreciation and amortization are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Film assets (1) |
|
$ |
10,900 |
|
|
$ |
8,592 |
|
|
$ |
8,305 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint revenue sharing arrangements |
|
|
5,315 |
|
|
|
4,625 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
Other property, plant and equipment |
|
|
3,525 |
|
|
|
4,156 |
|
|
|
4,255 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,536 |
|
|
$ |
19,051 |
|
|
$ |
18,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in film asset amortization is a charge of less than $0.1 million (2009 $0.2
million, 2008 $2.1 million) relating to changes in estimates based on the ultimate
recoverability of future films. |
(d) Write-downs, net of recoveries, are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Asset impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment(1) |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other significant charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivables |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
Financing receivables |
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
Inventories(2) |
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
2,489 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,551 |
|
|
$ |
2,581 |
|
|
$ |
4,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded in costs and expenses applicable to revenues product & equip. sales |
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
2,396 |
|
Recorded in costs and expenses applicable to revenues services |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
999 |
|
|
$ |
897 |
|
|
$ |
2,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company reclassified the owned and operated Vancouver and Tempe IMAX theaters operations
from continuing operations to discontinued operations as it does not anticipate having
significant future cash flows from these theaters or any involvement in the day to day
operations of these theaters. |
|
(2) |
|
In 2010, the Company recorded a charge of $1.0 million (2009 $0.9 million, 2008 $2.5
million, respectively) in costs and expenses applicable to revenues, primarily for its
film-based projector inventories due to lower net realizable values resulting from the
Companys development of a digital projection system. Specifically, IMAX systems includes
inventory write-downs of $0.8 million (2009 less than $0.1 million, 2008 $2.4 million).
Theater system maintenance includes inventory write-downs of $0.2 million (2009 $0.8
million, 2008 $0.1 million). |
108
20. Segmented Information
The Company has 8 reportable segments identified by category of product sold or service
provided: IMAX systems; theater system maintenance; joint revenue sharing arrangements; film
production and IMAX DMR; film distribution; film post-production; theater operations; and other.
The IMAX systems segment designs, manufactures, sells or leases IMAX theater projection system
equipment. The theater system maintenance segment maintains IMAX theater projection system
equipment in the IMAX theater network. The joint revenue sharing arrangements segment provides IMAX
theater projection system equipment to an exhibitor in exchange for a share of the box-office and
concession revenues. The film production and IMAX DMR segment produces films and performs film
re-mastering services. The film distribution segment distributes films for which the Company has
distribution rights. The film post-production segment provides film post-production and film print
services. The theater operations segment operates certain IMAX theaters. The other segment includes
camera rentals and other miscellaneous items. The accounting policies of the segments are the same
as those described in note 2.
The Companys Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM), as defined in the Segment Reporting
Topic of the FASB ASC, assesses segment performance based on segment revenues, gross margins and
film performance. Selling, general and administrative expenses, research and development costs,
amortization of intangibles, receivables provisions (recoveries), interest revenue, interest
expense and tax provision (recovery) are not allocated to the segments.
Transactions between the film production and IMAX DMR segment and the film post-production
segment are valued at exchange value. Inter-segment profits are eliminated upon consolidation, as
well as for the disclosures below.
Transactions between the other segments are not significant.
(a) Operating Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenue(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX systems |
|
$ |
76,004 |
|
|
$ |
64,504 |
|
|
$ |
34,783 |
|
Theater system maintenance |
|
|
21,444 |
|
|
|
18,246 |
|
|
|
16,331 |
|
Joint revenue sharing arrangements |
|
|
41,757 |
|
|
|
21,598 |
|
|
|
3,435 |
|
Films |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and IMAX DMR |
|
|
63,462 |
|
|
|
35,648 |
|
|
|
17,944 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
17,937 |
|
|
|
12,365 |
|
|
|
9,559 |
|
Post-production |
|
|
7,702 |
|
|
|
3,604 |
|
|
|
6,929 |
|
Theater operations(2) |
|
|
13,366 |
|
|
|
11,810 |
|
|
|
10,532 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,942 |
|
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
|
3,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
248,614 |
|
|
$ |
171,211 |
|
|
$ |
102,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX systems(3)(5) |
|
$ |
43,983 |
|
|
|
35,516 |
|
|
|
18,374 |
|
Theater system maintenance(3) |
|
|
10,084 |
|
|
|
8,361 |
|
|
|
7,117 |
|
Joint revenue sharing arrangements(4)(5) |
|
|
31,703 |
|
|
|
13,261 |
|
|
|
(1,865 |
) |
Films |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and IMAX DMR(5) |
|
|
41,159 |
|
|
|
19,979 |
|
|
|
6,992 |
|
Distribution(5) |
|
|
5,205 |
|
|
|
2,147 |
|
|
|
3,120 |
|
Post-production |
|
|
2,891 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
3,451 |
|
Theater operations(2) |
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
Other |
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
137,652 |
|
|
$ |
81,552 |
|
|
$ |
37,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX systems |
|
$ |
2,253 |
|
|
$ |
4,133 |
|
|
$ |
4,507 |
|
Theater systems maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Joint revenue sharing arrangements |
|
|
5,322 |
|
|
|
4,625 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
Films |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and IMAX DMR |
|
|
10,360 |
|
|
|
9,338 |
|
|
|
9,040 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
Post-production |
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
Theater operations(2) |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Other |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other non-segment specific assets |
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
20,536 |
|
|
$ |
19,051 |
|
|
$ |
18,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Asset Impairments and Write-Downs, Net of Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX systems |
|
$ |
2,271 |
|
|
$ |
1,734 |
|
|
$ |
4,373 |
|
Theater systems maintenance |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Films |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and IMAX DMR |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theater operations(2) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,551 |
|
|
$ |
2,581 |
|
|
$ |
4,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX systems |
|
$ |
3,441 |
|
|
$ |
862 |
|
|
$ |
1,575 |
|
Theater system maintenance |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Joint revenue sharing arrangements |
|
|
21,275 |
|
|
|
25,072 |
|
|
|
18,478 |
|
Films |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and IMAX DMR |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
Post-production |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
Theater operation |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
Other |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other non-segment specific assets |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
26,613 |
|
|
$ |
26,498 |
|
|
$ |
21,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX systems |
|
$ |
119,708 |
|
|
$ |
98,530 |
(6) |
Theater system maintenance |
|
|
13,548 |
|
|
|
12,415 |
(6) |
Joint revenue sharing arrangements |
|
|
81,376 |
|
|
|
62,812 |
(6) |
Films |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and IMAX DMR |
|
|
17,229 |
|
|
|
15,357 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
5,313 |
|
|
|
5,688 |
|
Post-production |
|
|
2,877 |
|
|
|
7,554 |
|
Theater operations |
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
1,864 |
|
Corporate and other non-segment specific assets |
|
|
106,670 |
|
|
|
42,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
349,088 |
|
|
$ |
247,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys two largest customers as at December 31, 2010
collectively represent 16.9% of total revenues (2009 14.5,
2008 4.9%). |
|
(2) |
|
In 2009, the Company closed its operated Vancouver and Tempe IMAX
theaters and reclassified the operations from continuing
operations to discontinued operations. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes a charge of $1.0 million in 2010 (2009 $0.9 million,
2008 $2.5 million), in costs and expenses applicable to
revenues, primarily for film-based projector inventories.
Specifically, IMAX systems includes inventory write-downs of $0.8
million in 2010 (2009 less than $0.1 million, 2008 $2.4
million). Theater system maintenance includes inventory
write-downs of $0.2 million in 2010 (2009 $0.8 million, 2008
$0.1 million). |
|
(4) |
|
The Company adjusted the estimated useful life of its IMAX
digital projection systems in use for those joint revenue sharing
theaters, on a prospective basis, to reflect the change in term
from 7 years to 10 years. This resulted in decreased depreciation
expense of $1.0 million in 2010. Previously, the Company adjusted
the estimated useful life of its film-based IMAX MPX projection
systems in use by existing joint revenue sharing theaters, on a
prospective basis, to reflect the Companys accelerated
transition to a digital projection system for these theaters
resulting in increased depreciation expense of less than $0.1
million and $1.5 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
|
(5) |
|
IMAX systems includes commission costs of $1.9 million, $2.0
million and $1.0 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Joint revenue sharing arrangements includes advertising,
marketing, and selling costs of $4.2 million, $3.4 million and
$1.8 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Production and
DMR includes marketing costs of $2.1 million, $1.6 million and
$0.9 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Distribution
includes marketing costs of $0.7 million, $0.8 million and $0.7
million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
|
(6) |
|
As a result of the classification of theater system maintenance
and joint revenue sharing arrangement segments in 2008, goodwill
was reallocated on a relative fair market value basis to the IMAX
systems segment, theater system maintenance segment and joint
revenue sharing arrangements segment. Goodwill had previously
been wholly allocated to the IMAX systems segment. |
111
(b) Geographic Information
Revenue by geographic area is based on the location of the theater.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
$ |
5,683 |
|
|
$ |
4,592 |
|
|
$ |
3,131 |
|
United States |
|
|
168,781 |
|
|
|
106,715 |
|
|
|
66,390 |
|
Russia and
the CIS |
|
|
14,640 |
|
|
|
3,771 |
|
|
|
3,830 |
|
Western Europe |
|
|
18,805 |
|
|
|
9,150 |
|
|
|
9,292 |
|
Rest of Europe |
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
3,063 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
Asia (excluding China) |
|
|
11,082 |
|
|
|
6,610 |
|
|
|
5,030 |
|
Greater China |
|
|
17,604 |
|
|
|
17,907 |
|
|
|
3,861 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
2,611 |
|
|
|
5,163 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Rest of World |
|
|
6,768 |
|
|
|
14,240 |
|
|
|
4,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
248,614 |
|
|
$ |
171,211 |
|
|
$ |
102,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No single country in the Rest of the World, Western Europe or Asia (excluding China) classifications
comprises more than 5% of total revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
$ |
22,881 |
|
|
$ |
14,931 |
|
United States |
|
|
42,756 |
|
|
|
35,358 |
|
Western Europe |
|
|
2,679 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
Rest of Europe |
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
Japan |
|
|
3,220 |
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
Rest of World |
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
74,035 |
|
|
$ |
54,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21. Financial Instruments
(a) Financial Instruments
The Company maintains cash with various major financial institutions. The Companys cash is
invested with highly rated financial institutions.
The Companys accounts receivables and financing receivables are subject to credit risk. The
Companys accounts receivable and financing receivables are concentrated with the theater
exhibition industry and film entertainment industry. To minimize the Companys credit risk, the
Company retains title to underlying theater systems leased, performs initial and ongoing credit
evaluations of its customers and makes ongoing provisions for its estimate of potentially
uncollectible amounts. The Company believes it has adequately provided for related exposures
surrounding receivables and contractual commitments.
(b) Fair Value Measurements
The carrying values of the Companys cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
payable and accrued liabilities due within one year approximate fair values due to the short-term
maturity of these instruments. The Companys other financial instruments at December 31, are
comprised of the following:
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
Borrowings under Credit Facility |
|
$ |
17,500 |
|
|
$ |
17,500 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
Financed sales receivable |
|
$ |
43,620 |
|
|
$ |
43,615 |
|
|
$ |
22,479 |
|
|
$ |
22,745 |
|
Net investment in sales-type leases |
|
$ |
29,981 |
|
|
$ |
32,613 |
|
|
$ |
40,106 |
|
|
$ |
40,910 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts designated forwards |
|
$ |
664 |
|
|
$ |
664 |
|
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
$ |
532 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts non-designated forwards |
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
$ |
857 |
|
|
$ |
857 |
|
The carrying value of borrowings under the Credit Facility approximates fair value as the
interest rates offered under the Credit Facility are close to December 31, 2010 and 2009 market
rates for the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities (Level 2 input in accordance with
the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB ASC hierarchy) as at December 31, 2010.
The estimated fair values of the Financed sales receivable and Net investment in sales-type
leases are estimated based on discounting future cash flows at currently available interest rates
with comparable terms (Level 2 input in accordance with the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the
FASB ASC hierarchy) as at December 31, 2010 and 2009.
The fair value of foreign currency derivatives are determined using quoted prices in active
markets (Level 2 input in accordance with the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB ASC
hierarchy) for identical instruments at the measurement date. These identical instruments are
traded on a closed exchange.
(c) Financing Receivables
The Companys net investment in leases and its financed sale receivables are subject to the
disclosure requirements of ASC 310 Receivables. Due to differing risk profiles of its net
investment in leases and its financed sales receivables, the Company views its net investment in
leases and its financed sale receivables as separate classes of financing receivables. The Company
does not aggregate financing receivables to assess impairment.
The Company monitors the credit quality of each customer on a frequent basis through
collections and aging analyses. The Company also holds meetings monthly in order to identify credit
concerns and whether a change in credit quality classification is required for the customer. A
customer may improve in their credit quality classification once a substantial payment is made on
overdue balances or the customer has agreed to a payment plan with the Company and payments have
commenced in accordance to the payment plan. The change in credit quality indicator is dependant
upon management approval.
The Company classifies its customers into three categories to indicate their credit quality
internally:
Good standing Theater continues to be in good standing with the Company as the clients
payments and reporting are up-to-date.
Pre-approved transactions only Theater operator has begun to demonstrate a delay in
payments with little or no communication with the Company. All service or shipments to the theater
must be reviewed and approved by management. These financing receivables are considered to be in
better condition than those receivables related to theaters in the All transactions suspended
category, but not in as good of condition as those receivables in Good standing. Depending on the
individual facts and circumstances of each customer, finance income recognition may be suspended if
management believes the receivable to be impaired.
All transactions suspended Theater is severely delinquent, non-responsive or not
negotiating in good faith with the Company. Once a theater is classified as All transactions
suspended, the theater is placed on nonaccrual status and all revenue recognitions related to the
theater are stopped.
The following table discloses the recorded investment in financing receivables by credit
quality indicator as at December 31, 2010:
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net Financed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Leases |
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
Total |
|
In good standing |
|
$ |
26,839 |
|
|
$ |
42,528 |
|
|
$ |
69,367 |
|
Pre-approved transactions |
|
|
2,939 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
3,588 |
|
Transactions suspended |
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
5,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,819 |
|
|
$ |
43,686 |
|
|
$ |
78,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While recognition of finance income is suspended, payments received by a customer are applied
against the outstanding balance owed. If payments are sufficient to cover any unreserved
receivables, a recovery of provision taken on the billed amount, if applicable, is recorded to the
extent of the residual cash received. Once the collectibility issues are resolved and the customer
has returned to being in good standing, the Company will resume recognition of finance income.
The Companys investment in financing receivables on nonaccrual status as at December 31, 2010
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Related |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Allowance |
|
Net investment in leases |
|
$ |
6,228 |
|
|
$ |
(4,505 |
) |
Net financed sales receivables |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,479 |
|
|
$ |
(4,571 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company considers financing receivables with aging between 60-89 days as indications of
theaters with potential collection concerns. The Company will begin to focus its review on these
financing receivables and increase its discussions internally and with the theater regarding
payment status. Once a theaters aging exceeds 90 days, the Companys policy is to review and
assess collectibility on theaters past due accounts. Over 90 days past due is used by the Company
as an indicator of potential impairment as invoices up to 90 days outstanding could be considered
reasonable due to the time required for dispute resolution or for the provision of further
information or supporting documentation to the customer.
The Companys aged financing receivables are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billed |
|
|
Unbilled |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Net of |
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
30-89 Days |
|
|
90+ Days |
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Allowances |
|
|
Allowances |
|
Net investment in leases |
|
$ |
602 |
|
|
$ |
287 |
|
|
$ |
2,012 |
|
|
$ |
2,901 |
|
|
$ |
31,918 |
|
|
$ |
34,819 |
|
|
$ |
(4,838 |
) |
|
$ |
29,981 |
|
Net financed sales
receivables |
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
42,325 |
|
|
|
43,686 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
43,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,248 |
|
|
$ |
636 |
|
|
$ |
2,378 |
|
|
$ |
4,262 |
|
|
$ |
74,243 |
|
|
$ |
78,505 |
|
|
$ |
(4,904 |
) |
|
$ |
73,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
The Companys recorded investment in past due financing receivables for which the Company
continues to accrue finance income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billed |
|
|
Unbilled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
30-89 Days |
|
|
90+ Days |
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
and Accruing |
|
Net investment in leases |
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
$ |
730 |
|
|
$ |
915 |
|
|
$ |
2,207 |
|
|
$ |
(333 |
) |
|
$ |
2,789 |
|
Net financed sales
receivables |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
6,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
927 |
|
|
$ |
1,373 |
|
|
$ |
8,301 |
|
|
$ |
(333 |
) |
|
$ |
9,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company considers financing receivables to be impaired when it believes it to be probable
that it will not recover the full amount of principal and interest owing under the arrangement. The
Company uses its knowledge of the industry and economic trends, as well as its prior experiences to
determine the amount recoverable for impaired financing receivables. The following table discloses
information regarding the Companys impaired financing receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Financing Receivables |
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Allowanced |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Recognized |
|
Recorded investment for which there is a related
allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financed sales receivables |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recorded investment in impaired loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financed sales receivables |
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Foreign Exchange Risk Management
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency rates. A majority
portion of the Companys revenues is denominated in U.S. dollars while a substantial portion of its
costs and expenses is denominated in Canadian dollars. A portion of the net U.S. dollar cash flows
of the Company is periodically converted to Canadian dollars to fund Canadian dollar expenses
through the spot market. In Japan, the Company has ongoing operating expenses related to its
operations in Japanese yen. Net Japanese yen cash flows are converted to U.S. dollars generally
through the spot market. The Company also has cash receipts under leases denominated in Japanese
yen, Canadian dollar and Euros which are converted to U.S. dollars generally through the spot
market. The Companys policy is to not use any financial instruments for trading or other
speculative purposes.
The Company entered into a series of foreign currency forward contracts to manage the
Companys risks associated with the volatility of foreign currencies. Certain of these foreign
currency forward contracts met the criteria required for hedge accounting under the Derivatives and
Hedging Topic of the FASB ASC at inception, and continue to meet hedge effectiveness tests at
December 31, 2010 (the Foreign Currency Hedges), with settlement dates throughout 2011. In
addition, at December 31, 2010, the Company held foreign currency forward contracts to manage
foreign currency risk on future anticipated Canadian dollar expenditures that were not considered
Foreign Currency Hedges by the Company. Foreign currency derivatives are recognized and measured in
the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value (gains or losses) are recognized in the
consolidated statement of operations except for derivatives designated and qualifying as foreign
currency hedging instruments. For foreign currency hedging instruments, the effective portion of
the gain or loss in a hedge of a forecasted transaction is reported in other comprehensive income
(OCI) and reclassified to the consolidated statement of operations when the forecasted
transaction occurs. Any ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the consolidated statement
of operations.
The following tabular disclosures reflect the impact that derivative instruments and hedging
activities have on the Companys consolidated financial statements:
115
Notional value of foreign exchange contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts Forwards |
|
$ |
12,671 |
|
|
$ |
2,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts Forwards |
|
|
28,842 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,513 |
|
|
$ |
7,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of foreign exchange contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts Forwards |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
664 |
|
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts Forwards |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,913 |
|
|
$ |
1,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in Foreign Currency Hedging relationships for the:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts Forwards |
|
Derivative Gain Recognized in OCI (Effective Portion) |
|
$ |
797 |
|
|
$ |
1,656 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
797 |
|
|
$ |
1,656 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Derivative Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AOCI into Income |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts Forwards |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
665 |
|
|
$ |
1,296 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
665 |
|
|
$ |
1,296 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non Designated Derivatives in Foreign Currency relationships for the:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
Location of Derivative Gain |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts Forwards |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
2,036 |
|
|
$ |
2,257 |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,036 |
|
|
$ |
2,257 |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
(e) Investments in New Business Ventures
The Company accounts for investments in new business ventures using the guidance of ASC 323
Investments Equity Method and Joint Ventures (ASC 323) and ASC 320 Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities (ASC 320), as appropriate. At December 31, 2010, the equity method of
accounting is being utilized for an investment with a carrying value of $1.6 million. The Company
has determined it is not the primary beneficiary of this VIE, and therefore it has not been
consolidated. In addition, during the year, the Company made an investment in preferred stock of
another business venture of $1.5 million which meets the criteria for classification as a debt
security under ASC 320 and is recorded at its fair value of $1.5 million at December 31, 2010
(December 31, 2009 $nil). This investment is classified as an available-for-sale investment.
The total carrying value of investments in new business ventures at December 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009 is $3.1 million and $nil, respectively, and is recorded in Other Assets.
22. Employees Pension and Postretirement Benefits
(a) Defined Benefit Plan
The Company has an unfunded U.S. defined benefit pension plan, the SERP, covering Richard L.
Gelfond, CEO of the Company and Bradley J. Wechsler, Chairman of the Companys Board of Directors.
The SERP provides for a lifetime retirement benefit from age 55 determined as 75% of the members
best average 60 consecutive months of earnings over the members employment history. The benefits
were 50% vested as at July 2000, the SERP initiation date. The vesting percentage increases on a
straight-line basis from inception until age 55. As at December 31, 2010, the benefits of Mr.
Gelfond were 100% vested. Upon a termination for cause, prior to a change of control, the executive
shall forfeit any and all benefits to which such executive may have been entitled, whether or not
vested.
Under the terms of the SERP, if Mr. Gelfonds employment terminated other than for cause prior
to August 1, 2010, he would have been entitled to receive SERP benefits in the form of monthly
annuity payments until the earlier of a change of control or August 1, 2010, at which time he would
have become entitled to receive remaining benefits in the form of a lump sum payment. If Mr.
Gelfonds employment is, or would have been, terminated other than for cause on or after August 1,
2010, he is, or would have been, entitled to receive SERP benefits in the form of a lump sum
payment. SERP benefit payments to Mr. Gelfond are subject to a deferral for six months after the
termination of his employment, at which time Mr. Gelfond will be entitled to receive interest on
the deferred amount credited at the applicable federal rate for short-term obligations. The terms
of Mr. Gelfonds current employment agreement has been extended to the beginning of 2013.
Under the terms of the SERP, monthly annuity payments payable to Mr. Wechsler, whose
employment as Co-CEO terminated effective April 1, 2009, were deferred for six months and were paid
in the form of a lump sum plus interest on the deferred amount on October 1, 2009. Thereafter, in
accordance with the terms of the SERP, Mr. Wechsler was entitled to receive monthly annuity
payments until the earlier of a change of control or August 1, 2010, at which time he was entitled
to receive remaining benefits in the form of a lump sum payment. On August 1, 2010, the Company
made a lump sum payment of $14.7 million to Mr. Wechsler in accordance with the terms of the plan,
representing a settlement in full of Mr. Wechslers entitlement under the SERP.
117
The following assumptions were used to determine the obligation and cost status of the
Companys SERP at the plan measurement dates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Discount rate |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
Lump sum interest rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First 25 years |
|
|
4.07 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
First 20 years |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
4.89 |
% |
Thereafter |
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
Cost of living adjustment on benefits |
|
|
1.20 |
% |
|
|
1.20 |
% |
Rate of increase in qualifying compensation levels |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
The amounts accrued for the SERP are determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Projected benefit obligation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation, beginning of year |
|
$ |
29,862 |
|
|
$ |
26,381 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(15,199 |
) |
|
|
(894 |
) |
Actuarial loss |
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
2,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation, end of year and unfunded status |
|
$ |
18,108 |
|
|
$ |
29,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides disclosure of the pension
benefit obligation recorded in the consolidated balance
sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Accrued benefits cost |
|
$ |
(18,108 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,862 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
(793 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets |
|
$ |
(15,869 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides disclosure of pension
expense for the SERP for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
448 |
|
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
$ |
793 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
Amortization of prior service credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
(248 |
) |
Amortization of actuarial gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Realized actuarial gain of settlement of pension liability |
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension expense |
|
$ |
414 |
|
|
$ |
1,448 |
|
|
$ |
1,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated benefit obligation for the SERP was $18.1 million at December 31, 2010 (2009
$29.9 million).
118
The following amounts were included in accumulated other comprehensive income and will be
recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost in future periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Prior service cost (credits) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
Unrecognized actuarial (gain) loss |
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
(793 |
) |
|
|
(3,868 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,239 |
|
|
$ |
(793 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No contributions are expected to be made for the SERP during 2011 except to meet benefit
payment obligations as they come due. The Company expects prior service costs of $nil, interest
costs of $0.3 million and actuarial losses of $0.2 million to be recognized as a component of net
periodic benefit cost in 2011.
The following benefit payments are expected to be made as per the current SERP assumptions and
the terms of the SERP in each of the next five years, and in the aggregate:
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
18,813 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
At the time the Company established the SERP, it also took out life insurance policies on
Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler with coverage amounts of $21.5 million in aggregate to which the
Company was the beneficiary. The value of these policies was $7.3 million at December 31, 2009.
During 2010, the Company obtained $3.2 million representing the cash surrender value of Mr.
Gelfonds policy and $4.6 million representing the cash surrender value of Mr. Wechslers policy.
(b) Defined Contribution Pension Plan
The Company also maintains defined contribution pension plans for its employees, including its
executive officers. The Company makes contributions to these plans on behalf of employees in an
amount up to 5% of their base salary subject to certain prescribed maximums. During 2010, the
Company contributed and expensed an aggregate of $0.9 million (2009 $0.8 million, 2008 $0.9
million) to its Canadian plan and an aggregate of $0.2 million (2009 $0.2 million, 2008 $0.1
million) to its defined contribution employee pension plan under Section 401(k) of the U.S.
Internal Revenue Code.
(c) Postretirement Benefits
The
Company has an unfunded postretirement plan for Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler. The plan
provides that the Company will maintain health benefits for Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler until they
become eligible for Medicare and, thereafter, the Company will provide Medicare supplemental
coverage as selected by Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler.
119
The amounts accrued for the plan are determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Obligation, beginning of year |
|
$ |
456 |
|
|
$ |
438 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Actuarial gain |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation, end of year |
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following details the net cost components, all related to continuing operations, and
underlying assumptions of postretirement benefits other than pensions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest cost |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
Actuarial (gain) loss |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Discount rate |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Weighted average
assumptions used to
determine the net
postretirement
benefit expense
are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31 |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Discount rate |
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
The following benefit payments are expected to be made as per the current plan assumptions in
each of the next five years:
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
13 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
15 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
31 |
|
2014 |
|
$ |
34 |
|
2015 |
|
$ |
38 |
|
Thereafter |
|
$ |
|
|
23. Discontinued Operations
(a) Tempe Theater
On December 11, 2009, the Company closed its owned and operated Tempe IMAX theater. The
Company recognized lease termination and guarantee obligations of $0.5 million to the landlord,
which were offset by derecognition of other liabilities of $0.9 million, for a net gain of $0.4
million. In a related transaction, the Company leased the projection system and inventory of the
Tempe IMAX theater to a third party theater exhibitor. Revenue from this operating lease
transaction will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. For the year
ended December 31, 2009, revenues for the Tempe IMAX theater were $0.8 million (2008 $1.5
million) and the Company recognized a loss of $0.5 million in 2009 (2008 loss of $0.3 million)
from the operation of the theater. This transaction is reflected as discontinued operations as
there are no significant continuing cash flows from
120
either a
migration or a continuation of activities. The remaining assets and liabilities of the owned
and operated Tempe IMAX theater are included in the Companys consolidated balance sheets are
disclosed in note 23(d).
In addition, the prior years amounts in the consolidated statements of operations and the
consolidated statements of cash flows have been adjusted to reflect the reclassification of the
owned and operated Tempe IMAX theater as a discontinued operation.
(b) Starboard Theater Ltd
On September 30, 2009, the Company closed its owned and operated Vancouver IMAX theater. The
amount of loss to the Company pertaining to lease and guarantee obligations owing to the landlord
was estimated at $0.3 million which the Company recognized as at September 30, 2009. In 2009,
revenues for the Vancouver IMAX theater were $1.1 million (2008 $2.0 million). The Company
recognized a loss of $0.1 million (net of income tax provision of $nil), and income of $0.2 million
(net of income tax recovery of $nil) in 2009 and 2008, respectively, from the operation of the
theater. This transaction is reflected as discontinued operations as there are no continuing cash
flows from either a migration or a continuation of activities. The remaining assets and liabilities
of the owned and operated Vancouver IMAX theater included in the Companys consolidated balance
sheets are disclosed in note 23(d).
In addition, the prior years amounts in the consolidated statements of operations and the
consolidated statements of cash flows have been adjusted to reflect the reclassification of the
owned and operated Vancouver IMAX theater as a discontinued operation.
(c) Operating Results for Discontinued Operations
The net earnings from discontinued operations summarized in the consolidated statements of
operations, were comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Gain on termination of Tempe theater lease (net of tax recovery of $nil) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
437 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Loss from Tempe Theater (net of tax recovery of $nil, respectively) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
(263 |
) |
(Loss) earnings from Vancouver Theater (net of tax recovery of $nil, respectively) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(176 |
) |
|
$ |
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
(d) Assets and Liabilities of Discontinued Operations
The assets and liabilities related to the Tempe and Vancouver theaters are included in the
consolidated balance sheet of IMAX Corporation and are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24. Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company has accrued costs related to obligations in respect of required reversion costs
for its owned and operated theaters under long-term real estate leases which will become due in the
future. The Company does not have any legal restrictions with respect to settling any of these
long-term leases. A reconciliation of the Companys liability in respect of required reversion
costs is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
$ |
301 |
|
Accretion expense |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Reduction in asset retirement obligation due to lease renegotiation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, December 31 |
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Supplemental Information
Components of accumulated other comprehensive income consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Unrecognized actuarial loss on defined benefit pension plan (net of
income tax recovery (provision) of $115, 2009 ($1,064)) |
|
$ |
(2,124 |
) |
|
$ |
(271 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
Unrealized hedging gain (net of income tax provision of $182, 2009 $nil) |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
$ |
(997 |
) |
|
$ |
906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the specified time periods and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, to allow
timely discussions regarding required disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the
effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of
human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even
effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving
their control objectives.
The Companys management, with the participation of its CEO and its CFO, has evaluated the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) as at December 31, 2010 and has concluded that,
as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures were adequate and effective. The Company will continue to periodically evaluate its
disclosure controls and procedures and will make modifications from time to time as deemed
necessary to ensure that information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
MANAGEMENTS ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting for the Company.
Management has used the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO) framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework to assess the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting, as at December 31, 2010, and has concluded that such internal control over financial
reporting was effective as at that date.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, which has audited the Companys consolidated financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2010 accompanying this Annual Report, has also audited the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2010 as
stated in their report on page 70.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting which
occurred during the year ended December 31, 2010, that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9 B. Other Information
None.
123
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference from the information under
the following captions in the Companys Proxy Statement: Item No. 1 Election of Directors;
Executive Officers; Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance; Code of Ethics;
and Audit Committee.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference from the information under
the following captions in the Companys Proxy Statement: Compensation Discussion and Analysis;
Summary Compensation Table; Grant of Plan-Based Awards; Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal
Year-End; Options Exercised; Pension Benefits; Employment Agreements and Potential Payments
upon Termination or Change-in-Control; Compensation of Directors; and Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Insider Participation.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference from the information under
the following captions in the Companys Proxy Statement: Equity Compensation Plans; Principal
Shareholders of Voting Shares; and Security Ownership of Directors and Management.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference from the information under
the following caption in the Companys Proxy Statement: Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions, Review, Approval and Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons, and
Director Independence.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference from the information under
the following captions in the Companys Proxy Statement: Audit Fees; Audit-Related Fees; Tax
Fees; All Other Fees; and Audit Committees Pre-Approved Policies and Procedures.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements filed as part of this Report are included under Item 8
in Part II.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, which covers both the financial
statements and financial statement schedule in (a)(2), is included under Item 8 in Part II.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Financial statement schedule for each year in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010.
II. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.
(a)(3) Exhibits
The items listed as Exhibits 10.1 to 10.32 relate to management contracts or compensatory
plans or arrangements.
124
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Amalgamation of IMAX Corporation, dated January 1, 2002, as amended by the Articles of Amendment of IMAX
Corporation, dated June 25, 2004. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to IMAX Corporations Registration statement
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-157300). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
By-Law No. 1 of IMAX Corporation enacted on June 3, 2004. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to IMAX
Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Shareholders Agreement, dated as of January 3, 1994, among WGIM Acquisition Corporation, the Selling Shareholders as
defined therein, Wasserstein Perella Partners, L.P., Wasserstein Perella Offshore Partners, L.P., Bradley J. Wechsler,
Richard L. Gelfond and Douglas Trumbull (the Selling Shareholders Agreement). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Amendment, dated as of March 1, 1994, to the Selling Shareholders Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2
to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 9, 1999, by and among IMAX Corporation, Wasserstein Perella
Partners, L.P., Wasserstein Perella Offshore Partners, L.P., WPPN Inc., the Michael J. Biondi Voting Trust, Bradley J.
Wechsler and Richard L. Gelfond. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
*10.1
|
|
Stock Option Plan of IMAX Corporation, dated June 18, 2008. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
IMAX Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2006. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated July 1, 1998, between IMAX Corporation and Bradley J. Wechsler. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.3 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement, dated July 12, 2000, between IMAX Corporation and Bradley J. Wechsler. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement, dated March 8, 2006, between IMAX Corporation and Bradley J. Wechsler. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement, dated February 15, 2007, between IMAX Corporation and Bradley, J. Wechsler. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to IMAX Corporations Form 8-K dated February 16, 2007 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement, dated December 31, 2007, between IMAX Corporation and Bradley J. Wechsler. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Services Agreement, dated December 11, 2008, between IMAX Corporation and Bradley J. Wechsler. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
*10.9
|
|
Services Agreement Amendment, dated February 14, 2011, between IMAX Corporation and Bradley J. Wechsler. |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated July 1, 1998, between IMAX Corporation and Richard L. Gelfond. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement, dated July 12, 2000, between IMAX Corporation and Richard L. Gelfond. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement, dated March 8, 2006, between IMAX Corporation and Richard L. Gelfond. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.14 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K dated December 31, 2005 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement, dated February 15, 2007, between IMAX Corporation and Richard L. Gelfond. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.30 to IMAX Corporations Form 8-K dated February 16, 2007 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement, dated December 31, 2007, between IMAX Corporation and Richard L. Gelfond. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.12 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement, dated December 11, 2008, between IMAX Corporation and Richard L. Gelfond. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.14 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 000-2416). |
|
|
|
*10.16
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement, dated December 20, 2010, between IMAX Corporation and Richard L. Gelfond. |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated March 9, 2006, between IMAX Corporation and Greg Foster. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.18 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 000-24216). |
125
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
First Amending Agreement, dated December 31, 2007, between IMAX Corporation and Greg Foster. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.14 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Second Amending Agreement, dated April 29, 2010, between IMAX Corporation and Greg Foster. Incorporated by reference to
IMAX Corporations Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated May 17, 1999, between IMAX Corporation and Robert D. Lister. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated August 21, 2000 between IMAX Corporation and Robert D. Lister. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement, dated April 4, 2001 between IMAX Corporation and Robert D. Lister. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.17 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2004, between IMAX Corporation and Robert D. Lister. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.17 to IMAX Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-113141). |
|
|
|
*10.24
|
|
Third Amending Agreement, dated February 14, 2006, between IMAX Corporation and Robert D. Lister. |
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Fourth Amending Agreement, dated October 5, 2006, between IMAX Corporation and Robert D. Lister. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.28 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (File No.
000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Fifth Amending Agreement, dated December 31, 2007, between IMAX Corporation and Robert D. Lister. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.21 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement, dated December 31, 2007, between IMAX Corporation and Robert D. Lister.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (File
No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Sixth Amending Agreement, dated December 31, 2009, between IMAX Corporation and Robert D. Lister. Incorporated by
reference to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated May 14, 2007, between IMAX Corporation and Joseph Sparacio. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.25 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
First Amending Agreement, dated May 14, 2009, between IMAX Corporation and Joseph Sparacio. Incorporated by reference
to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Second Amending Agreement, dated May 14, 2010, between IMAX Corporation and Joseph Sparacio. Incorporated by reference
to IMAX Corporations Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
*10.32
|
|
Statement of Directors Compensation, dated August 11, 2005. |
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 16, 2009 by and between IMAX Corporation and Wells Fargo Capital
Finance Corporation Canada (formerly Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Canada)) and Export Development Canada.
Incorporated by reference to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
*10.34
|
|
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated January 21, 2011 between IMAX Corporation and Wells
Fargo Capital Finance Corporation Canada (formerly known as Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Canada)). |
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 5, 2008, by and between IMAX Corporation, Douglas Family Trust, James
Douglas and Jean Douglas Irrevocable Descendants Trust, James E. Douglas, III, and K&M Douglas Trust. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.32 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Securities Purchase Agreement, dated December 1, 2008, by and between IMAX Corporation, Douglas
Family Trust, James Douglas and Jean Douglas Irrevocable Descendants Trust, James E. Douglas, III, and K&M Douglas
Trust. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to IMAX Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
(File No. 000-24216). |
|
|
|
*21
|
|
Subsidiaries of IMAX Corporation. |
|
|
|
*23
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. |
|
|
|
*24
|
|
Power of Attorney of certain directors. |
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, dated February 24, 2011, by Richard L.
Gelfond. |
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, dated February 24, 2011, by Joseph Sparacio. |
|
|
|
*32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, dated February 24, 2011, by Richard L.
Gelfond. |
|
|
|
*32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, dated February 24, 2011, by Joseph Sparacio. |
126
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX CORPORATION |
|
|
|
By |
|
/s/ JOSEPH SPARACIO
|
|
|
Joseph Sparacio |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Date: February 24, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated
on February 24, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ RICHARD L. GELFOND
|
|
/s/ JOSEPH SPARACIO
|
|
/s/ JEFFREY VANCE |
|
|
|
|
|
Richard L. Gelfond
Chief Executive Officer &
Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
Joseph Sparacio
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
Jeffrey Vance
Vice-President,
Finance & Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
*
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Bradley J. Wechsler
Chairman of the Board & Director
|
|
Neil S. Braun
Director
|
|
Kenneth G. Copland
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
*
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Eric A. Demirian
Director
|
|
Garth M. Girvan
Director
|
|
David W. Leebron
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marc A. Utay
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
|
* /s/ JOSEPH SPARACIO
|
|
|
Joseph Sparacio |
|
|
(as attorney-in-fact) |
|
127
IMAX CORPORATION
Schedule II
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
(recoveries) |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
beginning |
|
charged to |
|
additions/ |
|
Balance at |
|
|
of year |
|
expenses |
|
(deductions)(1) |
|
end of year |
Allowance for net investment in leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
4,152 |
|
|
$ |
1,595 |
|
|
$ |
(863 |
) |
|
$ |
4,884 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
4,884 |
|
|
$ |
761 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
5,734 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
5,734 |
|
|
$ |
1,056 |
|
|
$ |
(1,952 |
) |
|
$ |
4,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for financed sale receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
178 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
$ |
(112 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
3,045 |
|
|
$ |
382 |
|
|
$ |
(526 |
) |
|
$ |
2,901 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,901 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
(258 |
) |
|
$ |
2,770 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
2,770 |
|
|
$ |
499 |
|
|
$ |
(1,281 |
) |
|
$ |
1,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
4,287 |
|
|
$ |
2,489 |
|
|
$ |
(1,435 |
) |
|
$ |
5,341 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
5,341 |
|
|
$ |
897 |
|
|
$ |
(2,488 |
) |
|
$ |
3,750 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
3,750 |
|
|
$ |
665 |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
4,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
55,639 |
|
|
$ |
11,560 |
|
|
$ |
834 |
|
|
$ |
68,033 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
68,033 |
|
|
$ |
7,327 |
|
|
$ |
1,920 |
|
|
$ |
77,280 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
77,280 |
|
|
$ |
(67,501 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,850 |
) |
|
$ |
7,929 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Deductions represent write-offs of amounts previously charged to
the provision. |
128
exv10w1
IMAX Corporation
Exhibit 10.1
IMAX CORPORATION
Stock Option Plan
June 2008
IMAX CORPORATION
AMENDED & RESTATED STOCK OPTION PLAN
1. Purpose
The purposes of the IMAX Stock Option Plan (the Plan) are to attract, retain and motivate
directors, officers, key employees and consultants of the Company and its Subsidiaries and to
provide to such persons incentives and awards for superior performance.
2. Definitions
As used in this Plan the following terms have the following meanings:
Agreement has the meaning set forth in Section 6 below.
Award means an Option.
Blackout Period means any period during which a policy of the Company prevents an Insider
from trading in the Common Shares.
Board means the Board of Directors of the Company.
Cause means a termination of the Participants employment with the Company or one of its
Subsidiaries (a) for cause as defined in an employment agreement applicable to the Participant,
or (b) in the case of a Participant who does not have an employment agreement that defines cause,
because of: (i) any act or omission that constitutes a material breach by the Participant of any of
his obligations under his employment agreement with the Company or one of its Subsidiaries or the
applicable Agreement; (ii) the continued failure or refusal of the Participant to substantially
perform the duties reasonably required of him as an employee of the Company or one of its
Subsidiaries; (iii) any wilful and material violation by the Participant of any law or regulation
applicable to the business of the Company or one of its Subsidiaries, or the Participants
conviction of a felony, or any wilful perpetration by the Participant of a common law fraud; or
(iv) any other wilful misconduct by the Participant which is materially injurious to the financial
condition or business reputation of, or is otherwise materially injurious to, the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries.
Change of Control means an event or series of events where any person, or group of persons
acting in concert, not including Bradley J. Wechsler and Richard L. Gelfond, acquire greater than
fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding Common Shares of the Company whether by direct or indirect
acquisition or as a result of a merger, reorganization or sale of substantially all of the assets
of the Company.
Code means the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Committee means a committee of the Board comprised of at least two directors selected by the
Board to administer the Plan.
Common Share means a share of common stock, no par value, of the Company.
Company means IMAX Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of Canada.
Date of Grant means the date specified by the Board or the Committee on which an Award shall
become effective (which date shall not be earlier than the date on which the Board or the Committee
takes action with respect thereto).
The Exchange Act means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time.
Fair Market Value of a Common Share on a given date means the higher of the closing price of
a Common Share on such date (or the most recent trading date if such date is not a trading date) on
Stock Exchanges.
Insider means any person who is a director or an officer of the Company or any Subsidiary,
or who is directly or indirectly the beneficial owner of, or who exercises control or direction,
more than 10% of total Common Shares issued by the Company.
Option means the right to purchase a Common Share upon exercise of a stock option granted
pursuant to the Plan.
Option Price means the purchase price per Common Share payable on exercise of an Option, as
determined by the Committee in its sole discretion (subject to the terms of the Plan) and as set
forth in the applicable Agreement.
Participant means a person to whom an Award is to be made under the Plan and who is at the
time of such Award an employee or consultant of the Company, or any of its Subsidiaries, or a
person who is a director of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and who is not also an employee
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries at the Date of Grant, or a person who has agreed to
commence serving in any such capacity within 90 days of the Date of Grant, or any personal holding
corporation controlled by any such person, the shares of which are held directly or indirectly by
such person or such persons spouse, minor children or minor grandchildren, or any registered
retirement savings plan or registered educational savings plan for the sole benefit of any such
person.
Permanent Disability means a physical or mental disability or infirmity of the Participant
that prevents the normal performance of substantially all his duties as an employee of the Company
or any Subsidiary, which disability or infirmity shall exist for any continuous period of 180 days
within any twelve-month period.
Stock Exchanges means one or more, as the context requires, of the New York Stock Exchange,
the Toronto Stock Exchange and such securities exchange, if any, as may be designated by the Board,
from time to time.
Subsidiary means any corporation or other entity in which the Company owns or controls,
directly or indirectly, not less than 50% of the total combined voting power represented by all
voting securities or other voting interests in such entity.
Vested Options means, as of any date, Options which by their terms are exercisable on such
date.
3. Administration of the Plan
|
(a) |
|
The Plan shall be administered, and Awards shall be granted hereunder, by the
Board or by or under the authority of the Committee. A majority of the Committee shall
constitute a quorum, and the action of the members of the Committee present at any
meeting at which a quorum is present, or acts unanimously approved in writing, shall be
the acts of the Committee. |
|
|
(b) |
|
The interpretation and construction by the Committee of any provision of the Plan
or of any Agreement, and any determination by the Committee pursuant to any provision of
this Plan or of any Agreement shall be final and conclusive. No member of the Committee
shall be liable for any such action or determination made in good faith. |
4. Shares Available Under Plan
The maximum number of Common Shares which may be issued upon the exercise of Options granted
under the Plan is 20% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares, subject to adjustment as
provided in Section 10. Such Common Shares may be shares previously issued or treasury shares or a
combination of the foregoing. Any Common Shares which are subject to Options which have been
exercised, have expired or which have been surrendered without being exercised in full shall again
be available for issuance under this Plan, resulting in a reloading of the Plan up to this
maximum percentage of issued and outstanding Common Shares.
5. Limitations on Certain Grants
Section 162(m) of the Code requires that the Plan include a limitation on the number of
Options which may be granted to certain Participants. The Board or Committee may, from time to time
and upon such terms and conditions as it may determine, grant Options to Participants provided,
however, the maximum number of Options intended to qualify for exemption under Section 162(m) of
the Code that may be awarded to any Participant in any calendar year shall not exceed 4,000,000.
6. Agreement
The terms and conditions of each Option shall be embodied in a written agreement (the
Agreement) in a form approved by the Committee which shall contain terms and conditions not
inconsistent with the Plan and which shall incorporate the Plan by reference. Options granted under
the Plan shall comply with the following terms and conditions:
|
(a) |
|
Each Agreement shall specify the number of Common Shares for which Options have
been granted. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Each Agreement shall specify the Option Price, which shall not be less than 100%
of the Fair Market Value per Common Share on the Date of Grant. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Each Agreement shall specify that the Option Price shall be payable in cash or by
cheque acceptable to the Company or by a combination of such methods of payment. |
|
|
(d) |
|
Successive grants may be made to the same Participant whether or not any Options
previously granted to such Participant remain unexercised. |
|
|
(e) |
|
Each Agreement shall specify the applicable vesting schedule and the effective
term of the Option. In the event of a termination of a Participants employment by
reason of death or Permanent Disability, 50% of such Participants Options shall become
Vested Options if such Options were less than 50% vested at the time of such
termination. |
|
|
(f) |
|
Options granted under the Plan are not intended to qualify as incentive stock
options within the meaning of Section 422A of the Code. |
|
|
(g) |
|
No Option issued prior to June 18, 2008 shall be exercisable more than ten years
from the Date of Grant. No Options issued on or after June 18, 2008, subject to earlier
cancellation, shall be exercisable for the later of ten years from the Date of Grant, or
in the event the 10 year anniversary of the Date of Grant falls within a Blackout
Period, the date which is ten days after the date on which the Blackout Period has
ended. |
|
|
(h) |
|
Each Option granted under the Plan shall be subject to such additional terms and
conditions, not inconsistent with the Plan, which are prescribed by the Board or the
Committee and set forth in the applicable Agreement. |
|
(i) |
|
As soon as practicable following the exercise of any Options, the Common Shares
subject to the exercised Options shall be issued in the name of the Participant or as
the Participant shall otherwise, in writing, direct. |
7. Termination of Employment, Consulting Agreement or Term of Office
|
(a) |
|
In the event that a Participants employment, consulting arrangement or term of
office with the Company or one of its Subsidiaries terminates for any reason, unless the
Board or the Committee determines otherwise, any Options which have not become Vested
Options shall terminate and be cancelled without any consideration being paid therefor. |
|
|
(b) |
|
In the event that a Participants employment with the Company or one of its
Subsidiaries is terminated without Cause, or the Participants employment is terminated
by reason of the Participants voluntary resignation (including by reason of
retirement), death or Permanent Disability, or upon the termination of a Participants
consulting arrangement or term of office, the Participant (or the Participants estate)
shall be entitled to exercise the Participants Options which have become Vested Options
as of the date of termination for a period of 30 days, or such longer period as the
Board or the Committee determines, following the date of termination. |
|
|
(c) |
|
In the event that a Participants employment, consulting arrangement or term of
office with the Company or one of its Subsidiaries is terminated for Cause, such
Participants Vested Options shall terminate and be cancelled without any consideration
being paid therefor. |
8. Transferability
No Option shall be transferable by a Participant other than by will or the laws of descent and
distribution, provided, however, that Options may be transferred if approved by the Board or the
Committee and by any regulatory authority having jurisdiction or stock exchange on which the Common
Shares subject to Options are listed. Options shall be exercisable during the Participants
lifetime only by the Participant or by the Participants guardian or legal representative.
9. Change of Control
All Options granted under the Plan (or any predecessor of the Plan) shall immediately vest and
become fully exercisable upon the occurrence of (a) a Change of Control; and (b) the occurrence of
one or more of the following: (i) the Participants employment or term of office with the Company,
or one of its Subsidiaries, is terminated without Cause; (ii) the diminution of the Participants
title and/or responsibilities; and (iii) the Participant is asked to relocate more than twenty-five
(25) miles from his/her existing office.
10. Adjustments
The Committee shall make or provide for such adjustments in the maximum number of Common
Shares specified in Section 4, in the number of Common Shares or other securities or consideration
covered by outstanding Options granted hereunder, and/or in the Option Price applicable to such
Options as the Board or the Committee in their sole discretion may determine is equitably required
to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants that otherwise would result from
any stock dividend, stock split, combination of shares, recapitalization or other change in the
capital structure of the Company, merger, consolidation, spin-off, reorganization, partial or
complete liquidation, issuance of rights or warrants to purchase securities or any other corporate
transaction or event having an effect similar to any of the foregoing.
11. Fractional Shares
The Company shall not be required to issue any fractional Common Shares pursuant to the Plan.
The Committee may provide for the elimination of fractions or for the settlement of fractions in
cash.
12. Withholding Taxes
The Company and its Subsidiaries shall have the right to require any individual entitled to
receive Common Shares pursuant to an Option to remit to the Company, prior to the issuance of any
Common Share following the exercise of any Options, any amount sufficient to satisfy any Canadian
or United States federal, state, provincial or local tax withholding requirements. Prior to the
Companys determination of such withholding liability, such individual may make an irrevocable
election to satisfy, in whole or in part, such obligation to remit taxes by directing the Company
to withhold Common Shares that would otherwise be received by such individual. Such election may be
denied by the Company in its discretion, or may be made subject to certain conditions specified by
the Company, including, without limitation, conditions intended to avoid accounting charges and the
imposition of liability against the individual under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, as amended,
and the rules and regulations thereunder.
13. Registration Restrictions
An Option shall not be exercisable unless and until (i) a registration statement under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, has been duly filed and declared effective pertaining to the
Common Shares subject to such Option, or (ii) the Committee, in its sole discretion determines that
such registration, qualification and status is not required as a result of the availability of an
exemption from such registration, qualification, and status under such laws.
14. Shareholder Rights
A Participant shall have no rights as a shareholder with respect to any Common Shares issuable
upon exercise of an Option until the Participant has duly exercised the Option in accordance with
its terms and this Plan, and the Common Shares have been paid for in full and issued to the
Participant.
15. Breach of Restrictive Covenants
If (i) a Participant is a party to an employment agreement with the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or affiliates and (ii) such Participant materially breaches any of the restrictive
covenants set forth in such employment agreement (including, without limitation, any restrictive
covenants relating to non-competition, non-solicitation or confidentiality), then all of such
Participants Options (whether or not Vested Options) shall terminate and be cancelled without
consideration being paid therefor.
16. Section 409A of the Code
If any provision of the Plan or any Agreement contravenes any regulations or Treasury guidance
promulgated under Section 409A of the Code or would cause the Awards to be subject to the interest
and penalties under Section 409A of the Code, such provision of the Plan or any Agreement shall be
modified to maintain, to the maximum extent practicable, the original intent of the applicable
provision without violating the provisions of Section 409A of the Code.
17. Amendments
The Board or the Committee reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to amend, suspend or
terminate the Plan or any portion thereof at any time, and outstanding Options or Agreements
thereunder, in accordance with applicable legislation, without obtaining the approval of
shareholders; provided, however, that no termination or amendment of the Plan or any waiver of any
provision of any Option or Agreement may, without the consent of the Participant to whom any Award
shall have been granted, adversely affect the rights of such Participant in such Award; provided
further, however that amendments shall be subject to (i) the approval of a majority of the Common
Shares entitled to vote if the Committee determines that such approval is necessary in order for
the Company to rely on the exemptive relief provided under Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and
(ii) all other approvals, whether regulatory, shareholder or otherwise, which are required by
regulatory authority having jurisdiction or a Stock Exchange. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
Company will be required to obtain the approval of the shareholders of the Company for any
amendment related to:
a) reduces the Option Price of an Award held by an Insider;
b) extends the term of an Award held by an Insider, except as otherwise provided in Section
19; or
c) increases the number of Common Shares reserved under the Plan.
18. Miscellaneous
The Plan shall not confer upon a Participant any right with respect to continuance of
employment or other service with the Company or any Subsidiary, nor will it interfere in any way
with any right the Company or any Subsidiary would otherwise have to terminate such Participants
employment or other service at any time.
19. Black Out Periods
Except as otherwise provided in Section 6(g) or in any Option Agreement, if the date on which
an Option expires occurs during or within 10 days after the last day of a Blackout Period, the
expiry date for the Option will be 10 days after the date on which the Blackout Period has ended.
20. Effective Date
The Plan, as amended, shall be effective as of June 18, 2008.
21. Governing Law
The Plan and all rights hereunder shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the
laws of the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein.
June 2008
exv10w9
IMAX CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 10.9
AMENDING AGREEMENT
This Amendment to Services Agreement dated as of February 14, 2011 (the Amending Agreement) is
made between:
IMAX CORPORATION, a corporation incorporated under the laws of Canada (hereinafter referred to as
the Company),
and
BRAD WECHSLER (the Executive)
WHEREAS, the Company wishes to enter into this Amending Agreement to amend and extend the Services
Agreement dated as of December 11, 2008 (the Agreement).
NOWTHEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein
contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced with the following:
1. |
|
Term. The term of the Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and run through the
earlier of (i) such date that Chairman is not re-elected to the Board, and (ii) April 1, 2013
(the Term") provided, however, that the Board agrees to use its best efforts
to cause Chairman to be re-elected to the Board in 2013 provided the Agreement has been
renewed for an additional term, unless Chairman has engaged in activity that would have
constituted dismissal for Cause as that term is defined in the Employment Agreement. |
|
2. |
|
General. Except as amended herein, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and unamended. |
|
|
|
DATED as of February 14, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
|
|
|
/s/ Bradley J. Wechsler
|
|
|
Bradley J. Wechsler |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX CORPORATION
|
|
|
Per |
/s/ Garth M. Girvan
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Garth M. Girvan |
|
|
|
Title: |
Director |
|
|
exv10w16
IMAX CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 10.16
AMENDED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This agreement amends the amended employment agreement (the Agreement) between Richard L.
Gelfond (the Executive) and IMAX Corporation (the Company) dated July 1, 1998, as amended, on
the same terms and conditions except as set out below:
1. |
|
Term. The term of the Agreement (the Term) is extended until December 31, 2012 (the Term
End). |
|
2. |
|
Cash Compensation. Effective January 1, 2011 (the Renewal Commencement Date), the
Executive shall be paid a base salary at the rate of $750,000 per year. Executives bonus
shall continue to be up to two times salary. Such bonus shall be at the discretion of the
Board of Directors and shall be based upon the success of the Company in achieving the goals
and objectives set by the Board after consultation with the Executive. |
|
3. |
|
SERP. In connection with that July 2000 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as
amended (the SERP), the Executive and the Company agree that no compensation paid to
Executive between the Renewal Commencement Date and the Term End shall be included in the
calculation of benefits payable to Executive under the SERP (the Gelfond SERP Payout). The
Company agrees that it will investigate in good faith the notion of fixing the Gelfond SERP
Payout and will proceed to fix the Gelfond SERP Payout provided, and to the extent, (a) the
Companys Board of Directors concludes it is in the reasonable best interests of the Company
to do so and (b) Executive agrees. |
|
4. |
|
Incentive Compensation. On December 31, 2010, the Executive shall be granted, in
accordance with the terms of the IMAX Stock Option Plan (the Plan), stock options to
purchase 800,000 common shares of the Company (the Options) at an exercise price per
Common Share equal to the Fair Market Value, as defined in the Plan. The Options shall
have a 10-year term and vest as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Options |
|
Vesting Date |
|
160,000 |
|
May 1, 2011 |
160,000 |
|
September 1, 2011 |
160,000 |
|
January 1, 2012 |
160,000 |
|
May 1, 2012 |
160,000 |
|
September 1, 2012 |
The vesting of the Options shall be accelerated upon a change of control as defined in the
Agreement, and shall be governed, to the extent applicable, by the provisions in the Agreement
regarding change of control.
1
5. |
|
The entering into this agreement shall not prejudice any rights or waive any
obligations under any other agreement between the Executive and the Company. |
|
|
|
DATED as of December 20, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGREED AND ACCEPTED: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard L. Gelfond
Richard L. Gelfond
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per:
|
|
/s/ Garth M. Girvan
Name: Garth M. Girvan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: Director |
|
|
2
exv10w24
IMAX CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 10.24
THIRD AMENDING AGREEMENT
This Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of February 14, 2006 (the Amending Agreement) is
made between:
IMAX CORPORATION, a corporation incorporated under the laws of Canada (hereinafter referred to as
the Company),
and
ROBERT D. LISTER (the Executive)
WHEREAS, the Company wishes to enter into this Amending Agreement to amend and extend the
Employment Agreement dated as of May 17, 1999 between Imax Ltd, the Company and Executive, as
modified and amended by those Amending Agreements dated as of April 4, 2001 and January 1, 2004,
(together, the Agreement), whereunder the Executive provides services to the Company, and the
Executive wishes to so continue such engagement, as hereinafter set forth;
AND WHEREAS, on January 1, 2001 Imax Ltd. assigned all of its rights and obligations pursuant to
the Agreement to the Company, and the Executive has consented to such assignment;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Section 1.3 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced with the following:
Section 1.3 Term of Employment. The Employees employment under this Agreement
commenced on the 17th day of May, 1999 (the Commencement Date) and shall terminate on the earlier
of (i) January 1, 2008, or (ii) the termination of the Employees employment pursuant to this
Agreement. The period commencing as of the Commencement Date and ending on January 1, 2008 or such
later date to which the term of the Employees employment under this Agreement shall have been
extended is hereinafter referred to as the Employment Term.
2. Section 2.1 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced with the following:
Section 2.1 Base Salary. Effective January 1, 2006, the Executives Base Salary shall be
US$ 365,700. Effective January 1, 2007, the Executives
Base Salary shall be US$ 402,270.
3. Section 6 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced with the following:
Subject to Section 7.1 and 7.2, the Executive shall be required to mitigate the amount of any
payment provided for in Section 4.1.1 (other than the Termination Payment) by seeking other
employment or remunerative activity reasonably comparable to his duties hereunder, and, upon
Executives obtaining such other employment or remunerative activity any payment to be made by the
Company under Section 4.1.1 (other than the Termination Payment) will be reduced by a total of
one-quarter (1/4) of the amount of such payment prior to the Executives obtaining new employment
or remunerative activity. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in the event that there
is either (a) a change in control of the Company i.e. any person, or group of persons acting in
concert, other than Bradley J. Wechsler and Richard L. Gelfond, acquiring greater than fifty
percent (50%) of the outstanding common shares of the Company, whether by direct or indirect
acquisition or as a result of a merger or reorganization; or (b) a significant change in the
Executives reporting relationship (either, a Non-Mitigation Event), then, if at any time
subsequent to the occurrence of such Non-Mitigation Event the Executive is terminated from the
Company Without Cause, (i) Executive shall have no obligation to mitigate the amounts provided in
Section 4.1.1, and (ii) the Severance Period (as defined in Section 4.1.1) shall be a minimum of
eighteen (18) months in duration. For clarity, a termination of Executives employment Without
Cause shall include, but not be limited to, the events cited in Section 2.3(b)(iii) and (iv), and a
termination by virtue of the expiry of the Agreement.
4. The parties confirm that the August 21, 2000 letter agreement with regard to Executives
incentive payments and benefits remains in full force and effect and Executive shall be entitled to
US$ 107,500 thereunder from the Company upon a termination Without Cause within two (2) years of the
completion of a Transaction (as defined therein).
5. Effective as soon as is practicable after the date hereof, the Executive shall be granted
non-qualified
options (the Options) to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock of the Company (the Common
Shares), at an exercise price per Common Share equal to the Fair Market Value, as defined in the
Companys Stock Option Plan. The Options shall vest as to 10% on the first anniversary of the
grant date, 15% on the second anniversary of the grant date, 20% on the third anniversary of the
grant date, 25% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date and 30% on the fifth anniversary of the
grant date, and shall otherwise be treated in accordance with the terms of Section 2.3 of the
Agreement.
Except as amended herein, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force, unamended.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have duly executed and delivered this Amending
Agreement on this 14th day of February, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Richard L. Gelfond
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Richard L. Gelfond
Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Bradley J. Wechsler
Name: Bradley J. Wechsler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED
|
|
EXECUTIVE: |
|
|
in the presence of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen G. Abraham
Witness Stephen G. Abraham
|
|
Robert D. Lister
Robert D. Lister
|
|
|
exv10w32
IMAX CORPORATION
Exhibit 10.32
Summary of Directors Compensation
1. |
|
In respect of each year during which an Eligible Director serves as a Director of the
Corporation, he shall receive: |
|
a. |
|
$20,000 (Cdn.) per year payable quarterly in arrears provided that an
Eligible Director may elect, at the commencement of each year of office, or as soon as
practicable thereafter, to receive such number of options to purchase an equivalent
number of Common Shares of the Corporation under the terms of the IMAX Stock Option
Plan (the Plan). The options will be granted annually and will vest in equal amounts
quarterly, in arrears; |
|
|
b. |
|
$1,500 (Cdn.) for every Board meeting attended in which an Eligible Director
participates whether in person or by telephone; |
|
|
c. |
|
$1,200 (Cdn.) for any Committee of the Board meetings in which the Eligible
Director participates, whether in person or by telephone; |
|
|
d. |
|
at the commencement of each year of office or upon joining the Board, or as
soon as practicable thereafter, a grant of options to purchase 8,000 Common Shares of
the Corporation under the terms of the IMAX Stock Option Plan at an exercise price
equal to the Fair Market Value of the shares, as defined in the Plan; and |
|
|
e. |
|
reimbursement of any expenses incurred by the Eligible Director in connection
with participation in Board or Committee meetings. |
2. |
|
The Chair of the Audit Committee shall receive $8,000 (Cdn.) per year payable quarterly, in
arrears. |
|
3. |
|
The annual compensation for Directors, as set out above, shall remain in effect until it is
amended or revoked by further resolution. |
August 11, 2005
exv10w34
IMAX CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 10.34
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT is made as of the
21st day of January, 2011
BETWEEN:
IMAX CORPORATION
(Borrower)
- and -
WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION CANADA (formerly known as
WACHOVIA CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION (CANADA))
(Agent and a Lender)
- and
EXPORT DEVELOPMENT CANADA
(a Lender)
WHEREAS Borrower and Lenders entered into an amended and restated credit agreement dated
November 16, 2009 (as amended, amended and restated, modified, supplemented, extended, renewed,
restated or replaced, the Credit Agreement), pursuant to which certain credit facilities were
established in favour of Borrower;
AND WHEREAS the parties hereto wish to amend certain terms and conditions of the Credit
Agreement as provided herein;
NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES THAT in consideration of the covenants and agreements
contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree to amend
the Credit Agreement as provided herein:
1. |
|
General |
|
|
|
In this Agreement, unless otherwise defined or the context otherwise requires, all
capitalized terms shall have the respective meanings specified in the Credit Agreement. |
|
2. |
|
To be Read with Credit Agreement |
|
|
|
Unless the context of this Agreement otherwise requires, the Credit Agreement and this
Agreement shall be read together and shall have effect as if the provisions of the Credit
Agreement and this Agreement were contained in one agreement. The term Agreement when
used in the Credit Agreement means the Credit Agreement as |
- 2 -
|
|
amended by this Agreement, together with all amendments, amendments and restatements,
modifications, supplements, extensions, renewals, restatements and replacements thereto from
time to time. This Agreement is a Financing Agreement. |
3. |
|
No Novations |
|
|
|
Nothing in this Agreement, nor in the Credit Agreement when read together with this
Agreement, shall constitute a novation, payment, re-advance or reduction or termination in
respect of any Obligations. |
|
4. |
|
Amendments to the Credit Agreement |
|
|
|
Section 9.13 of the Credit Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following: |
9.13 Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
(a) Subject to Section 9.13(b) below, if, at any time prior to the indefeasible
payment in full of the Term Loan, the Cash and Excess Availability of Borrower is less than
$25,000,000, Borrower shall thereafter maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of not less
than 1.1:1.0 calculated at the end of each Fiscal Quarter (commencing with the December 31,
2009 Fiscal Quarter) on a quarterly cumulative basis until the December 31, 2010 Fiscal
Quarter and thereafter on a rolling four (4) Fiscal Quarter basis.
(b) Upon indefeasible payment in full of the Term Loan, Borrower shall only be required
to maintain the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio set out in Section 9.13(a) above if, at
any time, (i) Excess Availability is less than $10,000,000 or (ii) Cash and Excess
Availability of Borrower is less than $15,000,000.
5. |
|
Representations and Warranties |
|
|
|
In order to induce Agent and Lenders to enter into this Agreement, Borrower represents and
warrants to Agent and Lenders the following, which representations and warranties shall
survive the execution and delivery hereof: |
|
(a) |
|
the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereunder are all within Borrowers powers, have been duly authorized and
are not in contravention of law or the terms of Borrowers certificate of
incorporation, by-laws or other organizational documentation, or any indenture,
agreement or undertaking to which Borrower is a party or by which Borrowers property
is bound; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Borrower has duly executed and delivered this Agreement; |
|
|
(c) |
|
this Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation of Borrower,
enforceable against it by Agent and Lenders in accordance with its terms, except to the
extent that the enforceability thereof may be limited by applicable bankruptcy,
insolvency, moratorium, reorganization and other laws of general application |
- 3 -
|
|
|
limiting the enforcement of creditors rights generally and the fact that the courts
may deny the granting or enforcement of equitable remedies; |
|
(d) |
|
the representations and warranties set forth in Section 8 of the Credit
Agreement continue to be true and correct as of the date hereof; and |
|
|
(e) |
|
no Default or Event of Default exists. |
6. |
|
Fees and Expenses; Further Assurances |
|
|
|
Borrower shall pay to Agent and Lenders on demand all reasonable fees and expenses,
including, without limitation, legal fees, incurred by or payable to Agent and Lenders in
connection with the preparation, negotiation, completion, execution, delivery and review of
this Agreement and all other documents, registrations and instruments arising therefrom
and/or executed in connection therewith. Borrower shall execute and deliver such documents
and take such actions as may be necessary or desirable by Agent or any Lender to give effect
to the provisions and purposes of this Agreement, all at the expense of Borrower. |
|
7. |
|
Continuance of the Credit Agreement and Security |
|
|
|
The Credit Agreement, as amended this Agreement, shall be and continue in full force and
effect and is hereby confirmed and the rights and obligations of all parties thereunder
shall not be affected or prejudiced in any manner except as specifically provided for
herein. It is agreed and confirmed that after giving effect to this Agreement, all security
and guarantees delivered by Borrower and/or any Obligor secures the payment of all of the
Obligations including, without limitation, the obligations arising under the Credit
Agreement, as amended by the terms of this Agreement. |
|
8. |
|
Counterparts |
|
|
|
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, by original, pdf or facsimile
signature, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of such counterparts taken
together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument. |
|
9. |
|
Governing Law |
|
|
|
The validity, interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement and any dispute arising out
of the relationship between the parties hereto, whether in contract, tort, equity or
otherwise, shall be governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of
Canada applicable therein. |
(Signature Page Follows)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of and with effect
from the day and year first above written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE
CORPORATION CANADA |
|
|
|
EXPORT DEVELOPMENT CANADA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Sean M. Noonan
Sean M. Noonan
|
|
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Geoff Bleich
Geoff Bleich
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Relationship Manager
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Senior Asset Manager |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Samuel Asiedu , P.h.D., CFA, CMA
Samuel Asiedu, P.h.D., CFA, CMA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Loan Portfolio Manager |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Joseph Sparacio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Joseph Sparacio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Ed MacNeil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Ed MacNeil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each of the undersigned Obligors hereby:
|
(a) |
|
acknowledges, confirms, and agrees that such Obligors obligations under the
Credit Agreement and the other Financing Agreements remain in full force and effect as
of the date hereof; and |
|
|
(b) |
|
acknowledges and confirms that such Obligor has received a copy of the Credit
Agreement and this Agreement and understands and consents to the terms thereof and
hereof. |
Dated this 21st day of January 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX U.S.A INC. |
|
|
|
1329507 ONTARIO INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Joseph Sparacio
Joseph Sparacio
|
|
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Joseph Sparacio
Joseph Sparacio
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Vice President, Finance
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Vice President, Finance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Ed MacNeil
Ed MacNeil
|
|
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Ed MacNeil
Ed MacNeil
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Vice President
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Vice President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAX II U.S.A. INC. |
|
|
|
DAVID KEIGHLEY PRODUCTIONS
70 MM INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Joseph Sparacio
Joseph Sparacio
|
|
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Joseph Sparacio
Joseph Sparacio
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Vice President, Finance
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Vice President, Finance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Ed MacNeil
Ed MacNeil
|
|
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Ed MacNeil
Ed MacNeil
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Vice President
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Vice President |
|
|
exv21
IMAX Corporation
Exhibit 21
Subsidiaries of IMAX Corporation
Significant and other major subsidiary companies of the Company, as at December 31, 2010, comprise
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jurisdiction of |
|
Percentage held |
Name of Subsidiary |
|
Organization |
|
by the Company |
3183 Films Ltd.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
1329507 Ontario Inc.
|
|
Ontario
|
|
|
100 |
% |
4507592 Canada Ltd.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
6822967 Canada Ltd.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
7096267 Canada Ltd. (formerly 3D Sea II Ltd.)
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
7103077 Canada Ltd.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
7109857 Canada Ltd.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
7214316 Canada Ltd.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
7550324 Canada Inc.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Animal Orphans 3D Ltd.
|
|
Ontario
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Arizona Big Frame Theatres, L.L.C.
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Big Engine Films Inc.
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Coral Sea Films Ltd.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
David Keighley Productions 70 MM Inc.
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
IMAX Chicago Theatre LLC
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
IMAX 3D TV Ventures, LLC
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
IMAX II U.S.A. Inc.
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
IMAX Indianapolis LLC
|
|
Indiana
|
|
|
100 |
% |
IMAX International Sales Corporation
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
IMAX Japan Inc.
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
100 |
% |
IMAX Minnesota Holding Co.
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
IMAX Rhode Island Limited Partnership
|
|
Rhode Island
|
|
|
100 |
% |
IMAX Scribe Inc.
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
IMAX Space Ltd.
|
|
Ontario
|
|
|
100 |
% |
IMAX Space Productions Ltd.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
IMAX Theatre Holding Co.
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
IMAX Theatre Holdings (OEI), Inc.
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
IMAX Theatre Management Company
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
IMAX Theatre Services Ltd.
|
|
Ontario
|
|
|
100 |
% |
IMAX U.S.A. Inc.
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Magnitude II Productions Ltd.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Magnitude Productions Ltd.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Nyack Theatre LLC
|
|
New York
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Raining Arrows Productions Ltd.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Ridefilm Corporation
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Ruth Quentin Films Ltd. (formerly Acorn Rain
Productions Ltd.)
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Sacramento Theatre LLC
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Starboard Theatres Ltd.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Sonics Associates, Inc.
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Strategic Sponsorship Corporation
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Taurus-Littrow Productions Inc.
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
The Deep Magic Company Ltd.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Walking Bones Pictures Ltd.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
exv23
IMAX CORPORATION
Exhibit 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-2076; No. 333-5720; No. 333-30970; No. 333-44412; No. 333-155262, No. 333-165400),
(ii) the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8 (No. 333-5720) as amended, and (iii) the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-157300, No. 333-171823) of IMAX Corporation of our
report dated February 24, 2011, relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form
10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Ontario
February 24, 2011
exv24
IMAX CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 24
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Each of the persons whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Joseph
Sparacio and Robert D. Lister, and each of them severally, as his true and lawful attorney or
attorneys with power of substitution and re-substitution to sign in his name, place and stead in
any and all such capacities the 10-K, including the French language version thereof, and any and
all amendments thereto and documents in connection therewith, and to file the same with the United
States Securities Exchange Commission (the SEC) and such other regulatory authorities as may be
required, each of said attorneys to have power to act with and without the other, and to have full
power and authority to do and perform, in the name and on behalf of each of the directors of the
Corporation, every act whatsoever which such attorneys, or either of them, may deem necessary of
desirable to be done in connection therewith as fully and to all intent and purposes as such
directors of the Corporation might or could do in person.
Dated this 23rd day of February, 2011
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
/s/ Bradley J. Wechsler
|
|
Chairman of the Board & Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard L. Gelfond
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ Neil S. Braun
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kenneth G. Copland
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Eric A. Demirian
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Garth M. Girvan
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David W. Leebron
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Marc A. Utay
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph Sparacio
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal
Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey Vance
|
|
Controller |
|
|
(Principal
Accounting Officer) |
exv31w1
IMAX CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 31.1
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
I, Richard L. Gelfond, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of the
registrant, IMAX Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: February 24, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Richard L. Gelfond
|
|
|
|
Richard L. Gelfond |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
exv31w2
IMAX CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 31.2
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
I, Joseph Sparacio, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of the
registrant, IMAX Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: February 24, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Joseph Sparacio
|
|
|
|
Joseph Sparacio |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
exv32w1
IMAX CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATIONS
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (A) and (B) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Richard L. Gelfond, Chief Executive
Officer of IMAX Corporation, a Canadian corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that:
The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 10-K) of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: February 24, 2011 |
/s/ Richard L. Gelfond
|
|
|
Richard L. Gelfond |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
exv32w2
IMAX CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATIONS
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (A) and (B) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Joseph Sparacio, Chief Financial
Officer of IMAX Corporation, a Canadian corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that:
The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 10-K) of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: February 24, 2011 |
/s/ Joseph Sparacio
|
|
|
Joseph Sparacio |
|
|
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|