e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file Number 001-35066
IMAX Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Canada
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  98-0140269
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
     
2525 Speakman Drive,
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

(Address of principal executive offices)
  L5K 1B1
(Postal Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
(905) 403-6500
N/A
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer þ   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)   Smaller reporting Company o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
     Indicate the number of shares of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
     
Class   Outstanding as of April 4, 2011
Common stock, no par value   64,254,939
 
 

 


 

IMAX CORPORATION
Table of Contents
         
    Page  
       
    4  
    36  
    58  
    59  
 
       
       
    60  
    60  
    60  
    60  
    60  
    61  
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

2


Table of Contents

IMAX CORPORATION
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
     Certain statements included in this quarterly report may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, references to future capital expenditures (including the amount and nature thereof), business and technology strategies and measures to implement strategies, competitive strengths, goals, expansion and growth of business, operations and technology, plans and references to the future success of IMAX Corporation together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) and expectations regarding the Company’s future operating, financial and technological results. These forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by the Company in light of its experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors it believes are appropriate in the circumstances. However, whether actual results and developments will conform with the expectations and predictions of the Company is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, general economic, market or business conditions; including the length and severity of the current economic downturn, the opportunities (or lack thereof) that may be presented to and pursued by the Company; competitive actions by other companies; the performance of IMAX DMR films; conditions in the in-home and out-of-home entertainment industries; the signing of theater system agreements; changes in laws or regulations; conditions, changes and developments in the commercial exhibition industry; the failure to convert theater system backlog into revenue; risks related to new business initiatives; risks associated with investments and operations in foreign jurisdictions and any future international expansion, including those related to economic, political and regulatory policies of local governments and laws and policies of the United States and Canada; the potential impact of increased competition in the markets the Company operates within; risks related to foreign currency transactions; risks related to the Company’s prior restatements and the related litigation and investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the ongoing inquiry by the Ontario Securities Commission (the “OSC”); and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this quarterly report are qualified by these cautionary statements, and actual results or anticipated developments by the Company may not be realized, and even if substantially realized, may not have the expected consequences to, or effects on, the Company. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
 
IMAX®, IMAX® Dome, IMAX® 3D, IMAX ® 3D Dome, Experience It In IMAX®, The IMAX Experience®, An IMAX Experience®, An IMAX 3D Experience®, IMAX DMR®, DMR®, IMAX MPX®, IMAX think big® and think big® are trademarks and trade names of
the Company or its subsidiaries that are registered or otherwise protected under laws of various jurisdictions.

3


Table of Contents

IMAX CORPORATION
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
         
    Page  
The following Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are filed as part of this Report:
       
 
       
    5  
    6  
    7  
    8  

4


Table of Contents

IMAX CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
    (unaudited)        
Assets
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 17,379     $ 30,390  
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,495 (December 31, 2010 — $1,988)
    30,518       39,570  
Financing receivables (notes 3 and 16(c))
    75,944       73,601  
Inventories (note 4)
    17,146       15,275  
Prepaid expenses
    3,533       2,832  
Film assets
    2,105       2,449  
Property, plant and equipment (note 5)
    78,313       74,035  
Other assets (note 16(d))
    12,789       12,350  
Deferred income taxes (note 12(a))
    57,417       57,122  
Goodwill
    39,027       39,027  
Other intangible assets (note 6)
    2,403       2,437  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 336,574     $ 349,088  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities
               
Bank indebtedness (note 7)
  $ 17,500     $ 17,500  
Accounts payable
    21,902       20,384  
Accrued liabilities (notes 8(a), 8(c), 9, 12(a), 13(b), 15(a), and 15(c))
    63,961       78,994  
Deferred revenue
    71,319       73,752  
 
           
Total liabilities
    174,682       190,630  
 
           
 
               
Commitments and contingencies (notes 8 and 9)
               
 
               
Shareholders’ equity
               
Capital stock (note 13) common shares — no par value. Authorized — unlimited number. Issued and outstanding — 64,254,939 (December 31, 2010 — 64,145,573)
    294,179       292,977  
Other equity
    10,852       7,687  
Deficit
    (142,212 )     (141,209 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (927 )     (997 )
 
           
Total shareholders’ equity
    161,892       158,458  
 
           
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 336,574     $ 349,088  
 
           
(the accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements)

5


Table of Contents

IMAX CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
In accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
                 
    Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
    2011     2010  
Revenues
               
Equipment and product sales
  $ 20,231     $ 11,608  
Services (note 10(c))
    18,274       40,231  
Rentals (note 10(c))
    5,051       19,875  
Finance income
    1,354       1,070  
Other
    250        
 
           
 
    45,160       72,784  
 
           
Costs and expenses applicable to revenues
               
Equipment and product sales (note 10(a))
    10,851       8,134  
Services (notes 10(a) and 10(c))
    11,377       13,967  
Rentals (note 10(a))
    2,266       2,383  
Other
    20        
 
           
 
    24,514       24,484  
 
           
Gross margin
    20,646       48,300  
Selling, general and administrative expenses (note 10(b)) (including share-based compensation expense of $3.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 - $9.3 million))
    16,868       19,530  
Provision for arbitration award (note 9(c))
    2,055        
Research and development
    1,868       1,243  
Amortization of intangibles
    112       130  
Receivable provisions, net of recoveries (note 11(d))
    208       13  
 
           
(Loss) income from operations
    (465 )     27,384  
Interest income
    18       284  
Interest expense
    (443 )     (652 )
 
           
(Loss) income from operations before income taxes
    (890 )     27,016  
Recovery of (provision for) income taxes
    309       (436 )
Loss from equity-accounted investments
    (422 )      
 
           
Net (loss) income
  $ (1,003 )   $ 26,580  
 
           
 
               
Net (loss) income per share — basic and diluted: (note 13(c))
               
Net (loss) income per share from operations — basic
  $ (0.02 )   $ 0.42  
 
           
 
               
Net (loss) income per share from operations — diluted
  $ (0.02 )   $ 0.40  
 
           
Comprehensive (loss) income consists of:
               
Net (loss) income
  $ (1,003 )   $ 26,580  
Amortization of actuarial loss on defined benefit plan (note 15(a))
    54        
Unrealized hedging gain (note 16(d))
    302       208  
Realization of hedging gains upon settlement (note 16(d))
    (258 )     (550 )
Tax effect of movement in comprehensive income (note 12(b))
    (28 )      
 
           
Comprehensive (loss) income, net of income taxes
  $ (933 )   $ 26,238  
 
           
(the accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements)

6


Table of Contents

IMAX CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
In accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
(Unaudited)
                 
    Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
    2011     2010  
Cash (used in) provided by:
               
Operating Activities
               
Net (loss) income
  $ (1,003 )   $ 26,580  
Items not involving cash:
               
Depreciation and amortization (note 11(c))
    5,247       5,158  
Write-downs, net of recoveries (note 11(d))
    208       109  
Change in deferred income taxes
    (315 )      
Stock and other non-cash compensation
    4,107       9,579  
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss
    (1,084 )     621  
Loss on equity-accounted investments
    422        
Gain on non-cash contribution to equity-accounted investees
    (404 )      
Change in cash surrender value of life insurance
          (23 )
Investment in film assets
    (2,250 )     (2,149 )
Changes in other non-cash operating assets and liabilities (note 11(a))
    (14,494 )     (28,772 )
 
           
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
    (9,566 )     11,103  
 
           
 
               
Investing Activities
               
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
    (838 )     (685 )
Investment in joint revenue sharing equipment
    (3,136 )     (540 )
Acquisition of other assets
          (203 )
Acquisition of other intangible assets
    (232 )     (131 )
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (4,206 )     (1,559 )
 
           
 
               
Financing Activities
               
Repayment of bank indebtedness (note 7)
          (10,000 )
Common shares issued — stock options exercised (note 13(b))
    831       3,945  
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    831       (6,055 )
 
           
 
               
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash
    (70 )     (67 )
 
           
 
               
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents during the period
    (13,011 )     3,422  
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    30,390       20,081  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 17,379     $ 23,503  
 
           
(the accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements)

7


Table of Contents

IMAX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
     IMAX Corporation, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”), reports its results under United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”).
     The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, except for subsidiaries which the Company has identified as variable interest entities (“VIEs”) where the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The nature of the Company’s business is such that the results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the fiscal year. In the opinion of management, the information contained herein reflects all adjustments necessary to make the results of operations for the interim periods a fair statement of such operations.
     The Company has evaluated its various variable interests to determine whether they are VIEs as required by the Consolidation Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC” or “Codification”). The Company has 8 film production companies that are VIEs. As the Company has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE for 2 of the film production companies, the Company has determined that it is the primary beneficiary of these entities. The Company continues to consolidate these entities, with no material impact on the operating results or financial condition of the Company, as these production companies have total assets and total liabilities of $nil as at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 — $nil). For the other 6 film production companies which are VIEs, the Company did not consolidate these film entities since it does not have the power to direct activities and does not absorb the majority of the expected losses or expected residual returns. The Company equity accounts for these entities. As at March 31, 2011, these 6 VIEs have total assets of $12.0 million (December 31, 2010 — $11.1 million) and total liabilities of $12.0 million (December 31, 2010 — $11.1 million). Earnings of the investees included in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations amounted to $nil for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — $nil). The carrying value of these investments in VIEs that are not consolidated is $nil at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 — $nil). A loss in value of an investment other than a temporary decline is recognized as a charge to the condensed consolidated statement of operations.
     The Company accounts for investments in new business ventures using the guidance of ASC 323 Investments — Equity Method and Joint Ventures (“ASC 323”) and ASC 320 — Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (“ASC 320”), as appropriate. At March 31, 2011, the equity method of accounting is being utilized for an investment with a carrying value of $2.9 million (December 31, 2010 — $1.6 million). The Company has determined it is not the primary beneficiary of this VIE, and therefore it has not been consolidated. In addition, during 2010, the Company made an investment in preferred stock of another business venture of $1.5 million which meets the criteria for classification as a debt security under ASC 320 and is recorded at its fair value of $1.5 million at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 — $1.5 million). This investment is classified as an available-for-sale investment. The total carrying value of investments in new business ventures at March 31, 2011 is $4.4 million (December 31, 2010 — $3.1 million) and is recorded in Other Assets.
     All significant intercompany accounts and transactions, including all unrealized intercompany profits on transactions with equity-accounted investees, have been eliminated.
     The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP.
     These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (“the 2010 Form 10-K”) which should be consulted for a summary of the significant accounting policies utilized by the Company. These interim financial statements are prepared following accounting policies consistent with the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, except as noted below.

8


Table of Contents

2. New Accounting Standards and Accounting Changes
Changes in Accounting Standards
     In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU 2009-13”) which amends ASC 605-25, “Revenue Recognition: Multiple-Element Arrangements.” ASU 2009-13 addresses how to determine whether an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more than one unit of accounting and how to allocate consideration to each unit of accounting in the arrangement. This ASU removes the fair value criteria for determining separate units of accounting and replaces all references to fair value as the measurement criteria with the term selling price and establishes a hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. Consideration in a multiple-element arrangement is allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables on the basis of the relative selling price. When applying the relative selling price method, the selling price for each deliverable is determined using vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of the selling price, or third-party evidence (“TPE”) of the selling price. If neither VSOE nor TPE of the selling price exists for a deliverable, the Company will use its best estimate of the selling price (“BESP”) for that deliverable. ASU No. 2009-13 also eliminates the use of the residual value method for determining the allocation of arrangement consideration. Additionally, ASU 2009-13 requires expanded disclosures and is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Earlier application is permitted with required transition disclosures based on the period of adoption. On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted the accounting requirements in ASU 2009-13 prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after the date of adoption. As described below, the adoption of these updates did not have, nor are they expected to have, a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
     The amended standard with respect to multiple-element arrangements is not expected to materially change the allocation of arrangement consideration to the Company’s units of accounting. The pattern and timing of revenue recognition for those arrangements entered into or materially modified after the date of adoption may be affected as a result of the adoption of the amended ASC 605-25 requirements. The Company will be required to develop a selling price for each deliverable using VSOE, TPE or BESP and allocate consideration amongst deliverables and to recognize revenue using that allocated consideration for the delivered units of accounting in the current period. For arrangements entered into or modified prior to the adoption date, the Company defers all consideration received and receivable under arrangements for which the selling price of an undelivered item has not yet been established.
     In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-14, “Software (Topic 985): Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU 2009-14”). ASU 2009-14 amends ASC 985-605, “Software: Revenue Recognition,” such that tangible products, containing both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the tangible product’s essential functionality, are no longer within the scope of ASC 985-605. It also amends the determination of how arrangement consideration should be allocated to deliverables in a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement. The amendments in this update are effective, on a prospective basis, for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Earlier application is permitted with required transition disclosures based on the period of adoption. Both ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 must be adopted in the same period and must use the same transition disclosures. On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted the accounting requirements in ASU 2009-14. The application of this standard does not have any impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
     In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements,” (“ASU 2010-06”) to amend topic ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” by improving disclosure requirements in order to increase transparency in financial reporting. ASU 2010-06 requires that an entity disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. Furthermore, an entity should present information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 also clarifies existing disclosures for the level of disaggregation and disclosures about input and valuation techniques. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements for the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the disclosure amendments in ASU 2010-06, except for the amendments to Level 3 fair value measurements as described above, and has expanded disclosures as presented in note 16. On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted the disclosure amendments in ASU 2010-06 relating to Level 3 fair value measurements. No additional disclosures were required as a result.

9


Table of Contents

     In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, “Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses” (“ASU 2010-20”). The objective of ASU 2010-20 is to provide financial statement users with greater transparency about an entity’s allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. Under ASU 2010-20, an entity is required to provide disclosures so that financial statement users can evaluate the nature of the credit risk inherent in the entity’s portfolio of financing receivables, how that risk is analyzed and assessed to arrive at the allowance for credit losses, and the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. ASU 2010-20 is applicable to all entities with financing receivables, excluding short-term trade accounts receivable or receivables measured at fair value or lower of cost or fair value. It is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. Comparative disclosure for earlier reporting periods that ended before initial adoption is encouraged but not required. However, comparative disclosures are required to be disclosed for those reporting periods ending after initial adoption. On December 31, 2010, the Company adopted the disclosure requirements in ASU 2010-20 and has expanded disclosures as presented in note 16(c).
     In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts” (“ASU 2010-28”). The objective of ASU 2010-28 is to address questions about entities with reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. The amendments in ASU 2010-28 modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists by considering whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. ASU 2010-28 is applicable to all entities that have recognized goodwill and have one or more reporting units whose carrying amount for purposes of performing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test is zero or negative. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted the accounting requirements in ASU 2010-28. This standard is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements as the Company does not have any reporting units with zero or negative amounts for goodwill impairment testing purposes.
  Recently Issued FASB Accounting Standard Codification Updates
     During 2011, the FASB has issued one ASU — ASU No. 2011-01, “Receivables (Topic 310): Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20”. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this ASU on its condensed consolidated financial statements.
3. Financing Receivables
     Financing receivables, consisting of net investment in sales-type leases and receivables from financed sales of theater systems are as follows:
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Gross minimum lease payments receivable
  $ 40,747     $ 49,977  
Unearned finance income
    (13,241 )     (15,158 )
 
           
Minimum lease payments receivable
    27,506       34,819  
Accumulated allowance for uncollectible amounts
    (2,558 )     (4,838 )
 
           
Net investment in leases
    24,948       29,981  
 
           
Gross financed sales receivables
    72,562       62,127  
Unearned finance income
    (21,500 )     (18,441 )
 
           
Financed sales receivables
    51,062       43,686  
Accumulated allowance for uncollectible amounts
    (66 )     (66 )
 
           
Net financed sales receivables
    50,996       43,620  
 
           
Total financing receivables
  $ 75,944     $ 73,601  
 
           
 
               
Net financed sales receivables due within one year
  $ 6,670     $ 6,166  
Net financed sales receivables due after one year
  $ 44,326     $ 37,454  

10


Table of Contents

     As at March 31, 2011, the financed sale receivables had a weighted average effective interest rate of 8.7% (December 31, 2010 — 8.8%).
4. Inventories
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Raw materials
  $ 4,971     $ 4,693  
Work-in-process
    848       2,293  
Finished goods
    11,327       8,289  
 
           
 
  $ 17,146     $ 15,275  
 
           
     At March 31, 2011, finished goods inventory for which title had passed to the customer and revenue was deferred amounted to $3.1 million (December 31, 2010 — $3.2 million).
     Inventories at March 31, 2011 include provisions for excess and obsolete inventory based upon current estimates of net realizable value considering future events and conditions of $4.3 million (December 31, 2010 — $4.4 million).
5. Property, Plant and Equipment
                         
    As at March 31, 2011  
            Accumulated     Net Book  
    Cost     Depreciation     Value  
Equipment leased or held for use
                       
Theater system components(1)(2)
  $ 89,552     $ 33,997     $ 55,555  
Camera equipment(5)
    6,355       6,028       327  
 
                 
 
    95,907       40,025       55,882  
 
                 
Assets under construction(3)
    9,716             9,716  
 
                 
Other property, plant and equipment
                       
Land
    1,593             1,593  
Buildings
    14,723       9,031       5,692  
Office and production equipment(4)
    27,125       23,297       3,828  
Leasehold improvements
    8,603       7,001       1,602  
 
                 
 
    52,044       39,329       12,715  
 
                 
 
  $ 157,667     $ 79,354     $ 78,313  
 
                 
                         
    As at December 31, 2010  
            Accumulated     Net Book  
    Cost     Depreciation     Value  
Equipment leased or held for use
                       
Theater system components(1)(2)
  $ 86,249     $ 33,775     $ 52,474  
Camera equipment(5)
    6,355       6,008       347  
 
                 
 
    92,604       39,783       52,821  
 
                 
Assets under construction(3)
    8,305             8,305  
 
                 
Other property, plant and equipment
                       
Land
    1,593             1,593  
Buildings
    14,723       8,906       5,817  
Office and production equipment(4)
    27,172       23,454       3,718  
Leasehold improvements
    8,603       6,822       1,781  
 
                 
 
    52,091       39,182       12,909  
 
                 
 
  $ 153,000     $ 78,965     $ 74,035  
 
                 

11


Table of Contents

 
(1)   Included in theater system components are assets with costs of $18.6 million (December 31, 2010 — $19.9 million) and accumulated depreciation of $17.9 million (December 31, 2010 — $19.0 million) that are leased to customers under operating leases.
 
(2)   Included in theater system components are assets with costs of $67.2 million (December 31, 2010 — $62.8 million) and accumulated depreciation of $13.4 million (December 31, 2010 — $12.0 million) that are used in joint revenue sharing arrangements.
 
(3)   Included in assets under construction are components with costs of $7.8 million (December 31, 2010 — $6.2 million) that will be utilized to construct assets to be used in joint revenue sharing arrangements.
 
(4)   Included in office and production equipment are assets under capital lease with costs of $1.5 million (December 31, 2010 — $1.5 million) and accumulated depreciation of $1.4 million (December 31, 2010 — $1.4 million).
 
(5)   Included in camera equipment is fully amortized equipment still in use by the Company.
6. Other Intangible Assets
                         
    As at March 31, 2011  
            Accumulated     Net Book  
    Cost     Amortization     Value  
Patents and trademarks
  $ 7,366     $ 4,963     $ 2,403  
Other
    250       250        
 
                 
 
    7,616     $ 5,213     $ 2,403  
 
                 
                         
    As at December 31, 2010  
            Accumulated     Net Book  
    Cost     Amortization     Value  
Patents and trademarks
  $ 7,289     $ 4,852     $ 2,437  
Other
    250       250        
 
                 
 
  $ 7,539     $ 5,102     $ 2,437  
 
                 
     The Company expects to amortize approximately $0.3 million of other intangible assets for the remainder of 2011 and $0.3 million for each of the next 5 years, respectively. Fully amortized other intangible assets are still in use by the Company.
     During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company acquired $0.1 million in patents and trademarks. The net book value of these patents and trademarks was $0.1 million as at March 31, 2011. The weighted average amortization period for these additions was 10 years.
     During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company incurred costs of less than $0.1 million to renew or extend the term of acquired other intangible assets which were recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses.
7. Credit Facility
     On November 16, 2009, the Company amended and restated the terms of its senior secured credit facility, which had been scheduled to mature on October 31, 2010. The amended and restated facility, as further amended by the parties on January 21, 2011 (the “Credit Facility”), with a scheduled maturity of October 31, 2013, has a maximum borrowing capacity of $75.0 million, consisting of a revolving loan facility subject to a borrowing base calculation (as described below) and including a sublimit of $20.0 million for letters of credit and a term loan of $35.0 million. Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries serve as guarantors (the “Guarantors”) of the Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility is collateralized by a first priority security interest in all of the present and future assets of the Company and the Guarantors.

12


Table of Contents

     The terms of the Credit Facility are set forth in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”), dated November 16, 2009, between the Company; Wells Fargo Capital Finance Corporation Canada (formerly Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Canada)), as agent, lender, sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner, (“Wells Fargo”); and Export Development Canada, as lender (“EDC”, together with Wells Fargo, the “Lenders”) and in various collateral and security documents entered into by the Company and the Guarantors. Each of the Guarantors has also entered into a guarantee in respect of the Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility.
     The revolving portion of the Credit Facility permits maximum aggregate borrowings equal to the lesser of:
     (i) $40.0 million, and
     (ii) a collateral calculation based on the percentages of the book values of the Company’s net investment in sales-type leases, financing receivables, certain trade accounts receivable, finished goods inventory allocated to backlog contracts and the appraised values of the expected future cash flows related to operating leases and the Company’s owned real property, reduced by certain accruals and accounts payable and subject to other conditions, limitations and reserve right requirements. It is also reduced by the settlement risk on its foreign currency forward contracts when the notional value exceeds the fair value of the forward contracts.
     The revolving portion of the Credit Facility bears interest at either (i) LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75% per annum, or (ii) Wells Fargo’s prime rate plus a margin of 1.25% per annum, at the Company’s option. The term loan portion of the Credit Facility bears interest at the Company’s option, at either (i) LIBOR plus a margin of 3.75% per annum, or (ii) Wells Fargo’s prime rate plus a margin of 2.25% per annum. Under the Credit Facility, the effective interest rate for the three months ended March 31, 2011 for the term loan portion was 4.05% (2010 — 4.01%) and n/a for the revolving portion (2010 — 3.25%).
     The Credit Facility provides that so long as the term loan remains outstanding, the Company will be required to maintain: (i) a ratio of funded debt (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of not more than 2:1 through December 31, 2010, and (ii) a ratio of funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 1.75:1 thereafter. If the Company repays the term loan in full, it will remain subject to such ratio requirements only if Excess Availability (as defined in the Credit Agreement) is less than $10.0 million or Cash and Excess Availability (as defined in the Credit Agreement) is less than $15.0 million. If Cash and Excess Availability is less than $25.0 million, the Company will also be required to maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of not less than 1.1:1.0; provided, however, that if the Company repays the term loan in full, it will remain subject to such ratio requirement only if Excess Availability is less than $10.0 million or Cash and Excess Availability is less than $15.0 million. At all times, under the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company is required to maintain minimum Excess Availability of not less than $5.0 million and minimum Cash and Excess Availability of not less than $15.0 million. These amounts were $40.2 million and $57.5 million at March 31, 2011 respectively. The Company was in compliance with all of these requirements at March 31, 2011.
     The Credit Facility contains typical affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants that limit or restrict the ability of the Company and the Guarantors to: incur certain additional indebtedness; make certain loans, investments or guarantees; pay dividends; make certain asset sales; incur certain liens or other encumbrances; conduct certain transactions with affiliates and enter into certain corporate transactions.
     The Credit Facility also contains customary events of default, including upon an acquisition or change of control or upon a change in the business and assets of the Company or a Guarantor that in each case is reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company or Guarantor. If an event of default occurs and is continuing under the Credit Facility, the Lenders may, among other things, terminate their commitments and require immediate repayment of all amounts owed by the Company.
     Bank indebtedness includes the following:
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Term Loan
  $ 17,500     $ 17,500  
 
           
     Total amounts drawn and available under the Credit Facility at March 31, 2011 were $17.5 million and $35.2 million, respectively (December 31, 2010 — $17.5 million and $40.0 million, respectively).

13


Table of Contents

     At March 31, 2011, the Company’s current borrowing capacity under the revolving portion of the Credit Facility was $35.2 million after deduction for the minimum Excess Availability reserve of $5.0 million. Outstanding borrowings and letters of credit and advance payment guarantees were $nil as at March 31, 2011. At December 31, 2010, the borrowing capacity was $40.0 million after deduction of the minimum Excess Availability reserve of $5.0 million.
     In accordance with the loan agreement, the Company is obligated to make payments on the principal of the term loan as follows:
         
2011 (nine months remaining)
  $ 11,667  
2012
    5,833  
2013
     
2014
     
2015
     
Thereafter
     
 
     
 
  $ 17,500  
 
     
     On April 27, 2011, Wells Fargo entered into a commitment letter with the Company in which it, along with EDC, has committed to provide the Company with a senior secured revolving loan and revolving term loan facility in an amount up to $110.0 million (the “New Facility”). The New Facility would serve as an amendment and extension to the Credit Facility and would extend the maturity date of Credit Facility by two years to October 31, 2015. The New Facility would consist of up to $50.0 million in revolving loans and up to a $60.0 million revolving term loan with no scheduled repayments. Both the revolving loans and the revolving term loan will bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either (i) LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00% per annum, or (ii) Wells Fargo’s prime rate plus a margin of 0.50% per annum. This compares to the pre-amended interest rate under the Credit Facility, which was, at the Company’s option, either (i) LIBOR plus a margin of 3.75% or 2.75% per annum for the term loan and revolving loan, respectively, or (ii) Wells Fargo’s prime rate plus a margin of 2.25% or 1.25% per annum for the term loan and revolving loan, respectively. The Company anticipates entering into definitive documents with respect to the New Facility by the end of the second quarter of 2011.
Wells Fargo Foreign Exchange Facility
     Within the Credit Facility entered into on November 16, 2009, the Company has a $10.0 million sublimit to cover the Company’s settlement risk on its purchased foreign currency forward contracts and/or other swap arrangements as defined in the Credit Facility. The settlement risk on its foreign currency forward contracts was $nil as at March 31, 2011 as the fair value exceeded the notional value of the forward contracts. The Company can enter into such arrangements up to a notional amount of $50.0 million, of which $23.6 million is remaining.
Bank of Montreal Facilities
     As at March 31, 2011, the Company has available a $10.0 million facility (December 31, 2010 — $10.0 million) with the Bank of Montreal for use solely in conjunction with the issuance of performance guarantees and letters of credit fully insured by EDC (the “Bank of Montreal Facility”). As at March 31, 2011, the Company has letters of credit outstanding of $1.2 million (December 31, 2010 — $2.4 million) under the Bank of Montreal Facility.
8. Commitments
     (a) The Company’s lease commitments consist of rent and equipment under operating leases. The Company accounts for any incentives provided over the term of the lease. Total minimum annual rental payments to be made by the Company under operating leases as at March 31, 2011 for each of the years ended December 31, are as follows:

14


Table of Contents

                 
    Operating Leases     Capital Leases  
2011 (nine months remaining)
  $ 4,240     $ 19  
2012
    5,449       23  
2013
    2,088       21  
2014
    899        
2015
    510        
Thereafter
    1,812        
 
           
 
  $ 14,998     $ 63  
 
           
     Rent expense was $1.2 million for three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — $1.3 million) net of sublease rental of less than $0.1 million (2010 — $0.1 million).
     Recorded in the accrued liabilities balance as at March 31, 2011 is $4.0 million (December 31, 2010 — $4.2 million) related to accrued rent and lease inducements being recognized as an offset to rent expense over the term of the lease.
     Purchase obligations under long-term supplier contracts as at March 31, 2011 were $13.5 million (December 31, 2010 — $13.6 million).
     (b) As at March 31, 2011, the Company has letters of credit and advance payment guarantees secured by the Credit Facility of $nil (December 31, 2010 — $nil) outstanding. As at March 31, 2011 the Company also has letters of credit outstanding of $1.2 million as compared to $2.4 million as at December 31, 2010, under the Bank of Montreal Facility.
     (c) The Company compensates its sales force with both fixed and variable compensation. Commissions on the sale or lease of the Company’s theater systems are payable in graduated amounts from the time of collection of the customer’s first payment to the Company up to the collection of the customer’s last initial payment. At March 31, 2011, $1.4 million (December 31, 2010 —$1.5 million) of commissions have been accrued and will be payable in future periods.
9. Contingencies and Guarantees
     The Company is involved in lawsuits, claims, and proceedings, including those identified below, which arise in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with the Contingencies Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company will make a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company believes it has adequate provisions for any such matters. The Company reviews these provisions in conjunction with any related provisions on assets related to the claims at least quarterly and adjusts these provisions to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other pertinent information related to the case. Should developments in any of these matters outlined below cause a change in the Company’s determination as to an unfavorable outcome and result in the need to recognize a material provision, or, should any of these matters result in a final adverse judgment or be settled for significant amounts, they could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows, and financial position in the period or periods in which such a change in determination, settlement or judgment occurs.
     The Company expenses legal costs relating to its lawsuits, claims and proceedings as incurred.
     (a) In March 2005, the Company, together with Three-Dimensional Media Group, Ltd. (“3DMG”), filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division, against In-Three, Inc. (“In-Three”) alleging patent infringement. On March 10, 2006, the Company and In-Three entered into a settlement agreement settling the dispute between the Company and In-Three. Despite the settlement reached between the Company and In-Three, co-plaintiff 3DMG refused to dismiss its claims against In-Three. Accordingly, the Company and In-Three moved jointly for a motion to dismiss the Company’s and In-Three’s claims. On August 24, 2010, the Court dismissed all of the claims pending between the Company and In-Three, thus dismissing the Company from the litigation.
     On May 15, 2006, the Company initiated arbitration against 3DMG before the International Centre for Dispute Resolution in New York (the “ICDR”), alleging breaches of the license and consulting agreements between the Company and 3DMG. On June 15, 2006, 3DMG filed an answer denying any breaches and asserting counterclaims that the Company breached the parties’ license agreement. On June 21, 2007, the Arbitration Panel unanimously denied 3DMG’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed on April 11, 2007 concerning the Company’s claims and 3DMG’s counterclaims. The proceeding was suspended on May 4, 2009 due to failure of

15


Table of Contents

3DMG to pay fees associated with the proceeding. The proceeding was further suspended on October 11, 2010 pending resolution of reexamination proceedings currently pending involving one of 3DMG’s patents. The Company will continue to pursue its claims vigorously and believes that all allegations made by 3DMG are without merit. The Company further believes that the amount of loss, if any, suffered in connection with the counterclaims would not have a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of the arbitration.
     (b) In January 2004, the Company and IMAX Theatre Services Ltd., a subsidiary of the Company, commenced an arbitration seeking damages before the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chambers of Commerce (the “ICC”) with respect to the breach by Electronic Media Limited (“EML”) of its December 2000 agreement with the Company. In June 2004, the Company commenced a related arbitration before the ICC against EML’s affiliate, E-CITI Entertainment (I) PVT Limited (“E-Citi”), seeking damages as a result of E-Citi’s breach of a September 2000 lease agreement. An arbitration hearing took place in November 2005 against E-Citi which considered all claims by the Company. On February 1, 2006, the ICC issued an award on liability finding unanimously in the Company’s favor on all claims. Further hearings took place in July 2006 and December 2006. On August 24, 2007, the ICC issued an award unanimously in favor of the Company in the amount of $9.4 million, consisting of past and future rents owed to the Company under its lease agreements, plus interest and costs. In the award, the ICC upheld the validity and enforceability of the Company’s theater system contract. The Company thereafter submitted its application to the arbitration panel for interest and costs. On March 27, 2008, the Panel issued a final award in favor of the Company in the amount of $11,309,496, plus an additional $2,512 each day in interest from October 1, 2007 until the date the award is paid, which the Company is seeking to enforce and collect in full.
     (c) In June 2003, Robots of Mars, Inc. (“Robots”) initiated an arbitration proceeding against the Company in California with the American Arbitration Association pursuant to arbitration provisions in two film production agreements entered into in 1994 and 1995 between Robots’ predecessor-in-interest and a discontinued subsidiary of the Company (Ridefilm), asserting claims for breach of contract, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and intentional interference with the contract. The Company discontinued its Ridefilm business through a sale of the Ridefilm business and its assets to a third party in March 2001. Robots sought an award of over $5 million in damages including contingent compensation that it claims was owed under two production agreements, damages for tort claims, and punitive damages. The arbitration hearings of this matter occurred in June and October 2009. The arbitrator issued a final award on March 16, 2011, awarding Robots $409,000 in damages and $298,000 in pre-judgment interest to date on its claim for breach of one of the Ridefilm production agreements. The arbitrator found in the Company’s favor on Robots’ tort claims, and awarded Robots no damages on its claim for breach of the second production agreement. Despite finding in the Company’s favor on the vast majority of Robots’ claims, the arbitrator awarded Robots $1,214,999 in attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to the attorneys’ fee provision set forth in the production agreements. Robots has initiated two separate proceedings in California state court and in Ontario, Canada, to confirm the award. The Company will oppose confirmation of the award in both venues and will seek to have it vacated in the appropriate jurisdictions on the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his powers or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final, and definite award was not made. In addition, the Company will affirmatively seek a judgment awarding it its attorneys’ fees and costs in connection with the second production agreement, on which the arbitrator expressly found Robots to be the losing party. The Company has accrued a liability of $2.1 million in respect of the arbitration award in this action.
     (d) The Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in eight purported class action lawsuits filed between August 11, 2006 and September 18, 2006, alleging violations of U.S. federal securities laws. These eight actions were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. On January 18, 2007, the Court consolidated all eight class action lawsuits and appointed Westchester Capital Management, Inc. as the lead plaintiff and Abbey Spanier Rodd & Abrams, LLP as lead plaintiff’s counsel. On October 2, 2007, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended class action complaint. The amended complaint, brought on behalf of shareholders who purchased the Company’s common stock between February 27, 2003 and July 20, 2007, alleges primarily that the defendants engaged in securities fraud by disseminating materially false and misleading statements during the class period regarding the Company’s revenue recognition of theater system installations, and failing to disclose material information concerning the Company’s revenue recognition practices. The amended complaint also added PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company’s auditors, as a defendant. The lawsuit seeks unspecified compensatory damages, costs, and expenses. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on December 10, 2007. On September 16, 2008, the Court issued a memorandum opinion and order, denying the motion. On October 6, 2008, the defendants filed an answer to the amended complaint. On October 31, 2008, the plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. Fact discovery on the merits commenced on November 14, 2008. On March 13, 2009, the Court granted a second prospective lead plaintiff’s request to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order naming Westchester Capital Management, Inc. as the lead plaintiff and issued an order denying without prejudice plaintiff’s class certification motion pending resolution of the motion for reconsideration. On June 29, 2009, the Court granted the motion for reconsideration and appointed Snow Capital Investment Partners, L.P. as the lead plaintiff and Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP as lead plaintiff’s counsel. Westchester Capital Management, Inc. appealed this decision, but the U.S. Court

16


Table of Contents

of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied its petition on October 1, 2009. On April 22, 2010, the new lead plaintiff filed its motion for class certification, defendants filed their oppositions to the motion on June 10, 2010, and plaintiff filed its reply on July 30, 2010. On December 20, 2010, the Court denied Snow Capital Investment Partners’ motion and ordered that all applications to be appointed lead plaintiff must be filed within 20 days of the decision. Two applications for lead plaintiff were filed, on January 10, 2011 and January 12, 2011, respectively. On April 14, 2011, the Court issued an order appointing The Merger Fund as the lead plaintiff and Abbey Spanier Rodd & Abrams, LLP as lead plaintiff’s counsel. The Company is not able to estimate a potential loss exposure at this time. The Company will vigorously defend the matter, although no assurances can be given with respect to the outcome of such proceedings. The Company’s directors and officers insurance policy provides for reimbursement of costs and expenses incurred in connection with this lawsuit as well as potential damages awarded, if any, subject to certain policy limits and deductibles.
     (e) A class action lawsuit was filed on September 20, 2006 in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice against the Company and certain of its officers and directors, alleging violations of Canadian securities laws. This lawsuit was brought on behalf of shareholders who acquired the Company’s securities between February 17, 2006 and August 9, 2006. The lawsuit is in an early procedural stage and seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, as well as costs and expenses. As a result, the Company is unable to estimate a potential loss exposure at this time. For reasons released December 14, 2009, the Court granted leave to the Plaintiffs to amend their statement of claim to plead certain claims pursuant to the Securities Act (Ontario) against the Company and certain individuals and granted certification of the action as a class proceeding. These are procedural decisions, and do not contain any binding conclusions on the factual or legal merits of the claim. The Company has brought a motion seeking Court approval to appeal those decisions and it is not known when the Ontario court will release a decision on that motion. The Company believes the allegations made against it in the statement of claim are meritless and will vigorously defend the matter, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of such proceedings. The Company’s directors and officers insurance policy provides for reimbursement of costs and expenses incurred in connection with this lawsuit as well as potential damages awarded, if any, subject to certain policy limits and deductibles.
     (f) In November 2009, the Company filed suit against Sanborn Theatres (“Sanborn”) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging breach of Sanborn’s agreement to make payments for the purchase of two IMAX theater systems from the Company and seeking $1.7 million in compensatory damages. After granting Sanborn notice of default in connection with the failure to make required payments under the agreement and upon Sanborn’s failure to cure, the Company terminated its agreement with Sanborn. On May 11, 2010, Sanborn filed counterclaims against the Company and AMC Entertainment Inc. (“AMC Entertainment”) and Regal Cinemas, Inc. (“Regal”) in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California alleging breach of contract, fraud and unfair competition against the Company and alleging intentional interference with contractual relations against AMC Entertainment and Regal. The lawsuits are at early stages and, as a result the Company is not able to estimate a potential loss exposure, if any, at this time. The Company will vigorously prosecute its claims and defenses in both matters, although no assurances can be given with respect to the outcome of such proceedings.
     (g) Since June 2006, the Company has been subject to ongoing informal inquiries by the SEC and the OSC. On or about September 3, 2010, the SEC issued a formal order of investigation in connection with its inquiry. The Company has been cooperating with these inquiries. The Company believes that the inquiry and investigation principally relate to the timing of recognition of the Company’s theater system installation revenue in 2005 and related matters. Although the Company cannot predict the timing of developments and outcomes in these inquiries, they could result at any time in developments (including charges or settlement of charges) that could have material adverse effects on the Company. These effects could include payments of fines or disgorgement or other relief with respect to the Company or its officers or employees that could be material to the Company. Such developments could also have an adverse effect on the Company’s defense of the class action lawsuits referred to above.
     (h) In addition to the matters described above, the Company is currently involved in other legal proceedings which, in the opinion of the Company’s management, will not materially affect the Company’s financial position or future operating results, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of any such proceedings.
     (i) In the normal course of business, the Company enters into agreements that may contain features that meet the definition of a guarantee. The Guarantees Topic of the FASB ASC defines a guarantee to be a contract (including an indemnity) that contingently requires the Company to make payments (either in cash, financial instruments, other assets, shares of its stock or provision of services) to a third party based on (a) changes in an underlying interest rate, foreign exchange rate, equity or commodity instrument, index or other variable, that is related to an asset, a liability or an equity security of the counterparty, (b) failure of another party to perform under an obligating agreement or (c) failure of another third party to pay its indebtedness when due.

17


Table of Contents

  Financial Guarantees
     The Company has provided no significant financial guarantees to third parties.
  Product Warranties
     The following summarizes the accrual for product warranties that was recorded as part of accrued liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets:
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Balance at the beginning of period
  $ 160     $ 36  
Warranty redemptions
    (5 )     (87 )
Warranties issued
    15       211  
 
           
Balance at the end of period
  $ 170     $ 160  
 
           
  Director/Officer Indemnifications
     The Company’s General By-law contains an indemnification of its directors/officers, former directors/officers and persons who have acted at its request to be a director/officer of an entity in which the Company is a shareholder or creditor, to indemnify them, to the extent permitted by the Canada Business Corporations Act, against expenses (including legal fees), judgments, fines and any amount actually and reasonably incurred by them in connection with any action, suit or proceeding in which the directors and/or officers are sued as a result of their service, if they acted honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company. The nature of the indemnification prevents the Company from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount it could be required to pay to counterparties. The Company has purchased directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. No amount has been accrued in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 with respect to this indemnity.
  Other Indemnification Agreements
     In the normal course of the Company’s operations, the Company provides indemnifications to counterparties in transactions such as: theater system lease and sale agreements and the supervision of installation or servicing of the theater systems; film production, exhibition and distribution agreements; real property lease agreements; and employment agreements. These indemnification agreements require the Company to compensate the counterparties for costs incurred as a result of litigation claims that may be suffered by the counterparty as a consequence of the transaction or the Company’s breach or non-performance under these agreements. While the terms of these indemnification agreements vary based upon the contract, they normally extend for the life of the agreements. A small number of agreements do not provide for any limit on the maximum potential amount of indemnification; however, virtually all of the Company’s system lease and sale agreements limit such maximum potential liability to the purchase price of the system. The fact that the maximum potential amount of indemnification required by the Company is not specified in some cases prevents the Company from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount it could be required to pay to counterparties. During the second quarter of 2009, the Company provided an indemnity to a third party in connection with a terminated service arrangement. Historically, the Company has not made any significant payments under such indemnifications and less than $0.1 million has been accrued in the condensed consolidated financial statements with respect to the contingent aspect of these indemnities.
10. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Supplemental Information
  (a) Selling Expenses
     The Company defers direct selling costs such as sales commissions and other amounts related to its sale and sales-type lease arrangements until the related revenue is recognized. These costs, included in costs and expenses applicable to revenues-equipment and product sales, totaled $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — $0.2 million).
     Film exploitation costs, including advertising and marketing, totaled $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — $0.7 million) and are recorded in costs and expenses applicable to revenues-services as incurred.

18


Table of Contents

     Commissions are recognized as costs and expenses applicable to revenues-rentals in the month they are earned. These costs totaled $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — $0.4 million). Direct advertising and marketing costs for each theater are charged to costs and expenses applicable to revenues-rentals as incurred. These costs totaled $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — $0.2 million).
  (b) Foreign Exchange
     Included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 is a $0.6 million gain (2010 — gain of $0.3 million), for net foreign exchange gains/losses related to the translation of foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities and unhedged foreign exchange contracts. See note 16(d) for additional information.
  (c) Collaborative Arrangements
     Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangements
     In a joint revenue sharing arrangement, the Company receives a portion of a theater’s box-office and concession revenues, in exchange for placing a theater system at the theater operator’s venue. Under joint revenue sharing arrangements, the customer has the ability and the right to operate the hardware components or direct others to operate them in a manner determined by the customer. The Company’s joint revenue sharing arrangements are typically non-cancellable for 7 to 10 years with renewal provisions. Title to equipment under joint revenue sharing arrangements does not transfer to the customer. The Company’s joint revenue sharing arrangements do not contain a guarantee of residual value at the end of the term. The customer is required to pay for executory costs such as insurance and taxes and is required to pay the Company for maintenance and extended warranty throughout the term. The customer is responsible for obtaining insurance coverage for the theater systems commencing on the date specified in the arrangement’s shipping terms and ending on the date the theater systems are delivered back to the Company.
     The Company has signed joint revenue sharing agreements with 15 exhibitors for a total of 306 theater systems, of which 181 theaters were operating as at March 31, 2011, the terms of which are similar in nature, rights and obligations. The accounting policy for the Company’s joint revenue sharing arrangements is disclosed in note 2(n) of the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K.
     Amounts attributable to transactions arising between the Company and its customers under joint revenue sharing arrangements are included in Rentals revenue and for the three months ended March 31, 2011 amounted to $4.0 million (2010 — $18.9 million).
  IMAX DMR
     In an IMAX DMR arrangement, the Company transforms conventional motion pictures into the Company’s large screen format, allowing the release of Hollywood content to the IMAX theater network. In a typical IMAX DMR film arrangement, the Company will absorb its costs for the digital re-mastering and then recoup this cost from a percentage of the gross box-office receipts of the film, which generally range from 10-15%. The Company does not typically hold distribution rights or the copyright to these films.
     For the three months ended March 31, 2011, 7 IMAX DMR films were exhibited through the IMAX theater network. The Company has entered into arrangements with film producers to convert 15 additional films which are expected to be released during the remainder of 2011, the terms of which are similar in nature, rights and obligations. The accounting policy for the Company’s IMAX DMR arrangements is disclosed in note 2(n) of the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K.
     Amounts attributable to transactions arising between the Company and its customers under IMAX DMR arrangements are included in Services revenue and for the three months ended March 31, 2011 amounted to $7.3 million (2010 — $23.5 million).
     Co-Produced Film Arrangements
     In certain film arrangements, the Company co-produces a film with a third party whereby the third party retains the copyright and rights to the film, except that the Company obtains exclusive theatrical distribution rights to the film. Under these arrangements, both parties contribute funding to the Company’s wholly-owned production company for the production of the film and for associated exploitation costs. Clauses in the film arrangements generally provide for the third party to take over the production of the film if the cost of the production exceeds its approved budget or if it appears as though the film will not be delivered on a timely basis.

19


Table of Contents

     The accounting policies relating to co-produced film arrangements are disclosed in notes 2(a) and 2(n) of the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K.
     As at March 31, 2011, the Company has 1 significant co-produced film arrangement which makes up greater than 50% of the VIE total assets and liabilities balance of $12.0 million and 3 other co-produced film arrangements, the terms of which are similar.
     For the three months ended March 31, 2011, amounts totaling $1.1 million (2010 — $1.6 million) attributable to transactions between the Company and other parties involved in the production of the films have been included in cost and expenses applicable to revenues-services.
11. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Supplemental Information
     (a) Changes in other non-cash operating assets and liabilities are comprised of the following:
                 
    Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
    2011     2010  
Decrease (increase) in:
               
Accounts receivable
  $ 8,944     $ (22,725 )
Financing receivables
    (2,328 )     (820 )
Inventories
    (2,745 )     (2,260 )
Prepaid expenses
    (701 )     (329 )
Commissions and other deferred selling expenses
    88       56  
Insurance recoveries
    1,290       786  
Other assets
    612        
Increase (decrease) in:
               
Accounts payable
    (274 )     1,439  
Accrued and other liabilities(1)
    (16,948 )     (7,404 )
Deferred revenue
    (2,432 )     2,485  
 
           
  $ (14,494 )   $ (28,772 )
 
           
 
(1)   Decrease in accrued and other liabilities for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 includes payments of $10.7 million for variable stock-based compensation.
     (b) Cash payments made on account of:
                 
    Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
    2011     2010  
Income taxes
  $ 1,378     $ 143  
 
           
Interest
  $ 298     $ 643  
 
           

20


Table of Contents

     (c) Depreciation and amortization are comprised of the following:
                 
    Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
    2011     2010  
Film assets
  $ 2,696     $ 2,621  
Property, plant and equipment
               
Joint revenue sharing arrangements
    1,381       1,498  
Other property, plant and equipment
    947       842  
Other intangible assets
    112       114  
Other assets
    25        
Deferred financing costs
    86       83  
 
           
 
  $ 5,247     $ 5,158  
 
           
     (d) Write-downs, net of recoveries, are comprised of the following:
                 
    Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
    2011     2010  
Other significant charges
               
Accounts receivables
  $ 120     $ (5 )
Financing receivables
    88       18  
Intangibles
          16  
Inventories(1)
          80  
 
           
 
  $ 208     $ 109  
 
           
 
(1)   In the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded a charge of $nil (2010 — $0.1 million) in costs and expenses applicable to revenues — services, primarily for its film-based projector inventories due to lower net realizable values resulting from the Company’s development of a digital projection system.

21


Table of Contents

12. Income Taxes
     (a) Income Taxes
     The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the statutory tax rate and varies from year to year primarily as a result of numerous permanent differences, investment and other tax credits, the provision for income taxes at different rates in foreign and other provincial jurisdictions, enacted statutory tax rate increases or reductions in the year, changes due to foreign exchange, changes in the Company’s valuation allowance based on the Company’s recoverability assessments of deferred tax assets, and favorable or unfavorable resolution of various tax examinations. During 2010 the Company released a valuation allowance of $54.8 million relating to the future utilization of deductible temporary differences, tax credits, and certain net operating loss carryforwards. During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, there was no change in the Company’s estimates of the recoverability of its deferred tax assets based on an analysis of both positive and negative evidence including projected future earnings.
     As at March 31, 2011, the Company had net deferred income tax assets after valuation allowance of $57.4 million (December 31, 2010 — $57.1 million). As at March 31, 2011, the Company had a net deferred income tax asset before valuation allowance of $65.3 million (December 31, 2010 — $65.1 million), against which the Company is carrying a $7.9 million valuation allowance (December 31, 2010 — $7.9 million).
     As at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had total unrecognized tax benefits (including interest and penalties) of $4.5 million and $4.4 million, respectively, for international withholding taxes. All of the unrecognized tax benefits could impact the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. While the Company believes it has adequately provided for all tax positions, amounts asserted by taxing authorities could differ from the Company’s accrued position. Accordingly, additional provisions on federal, state, provincial and foreign tax-related matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are settled or otherwise resolved.
     Consistent with its historical financial reporting, the Company has elected to classify interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities, when applicable, as part of the interest expense in its condensed consolidated statement of operations rather than income tax expense. The Company recognized approximately less than $0.1 million in potential interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — $0.1 million).
     (b) Income Tax Effect on Comprehensive Income (Loss)
     The income tax expense (recovery) related to the following items included in other comprehensive income (loss) are:
                 
    Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
    2011     2010  
Amortization of actuarial loss on defined benefit plan
    (16 )      
Unrealized hedging gain
    (84 )      
Realization of hedging gains upon settlement
    72        
 
           
 
  $ (28 )   $  
 
           
13. Capital Stock
  (a) Authorized
  Common Shares
     The authorized capital of the Company consists of an unlimited number of common shares. The following is a summary of the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions of the common shares.
     The holders of common shares are entitled to receive dividends if, as and when declared by the directors of the Company, subject to the rights of the holders of any other class of shares of the Company entitled to receive dividends in priority to the common shares.

22


Table of Contents

     The holders of the common shares are entitled to one vote for each common share held at all meetings of the shareholders.
  (b) Stock-Based Compensation
     The Company has five stock-based compensation plans that are described below. The compensation costs recorded in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for these plans were $4.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — $9.4 million).
     Stock Option Plan
     The Company’s Stock Option Plan, which is shareholder approved, permits the grant of options to employees, directors and consultants. The Company recorded an expense of $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — $0.6 million), related to grants issued to employees and directors in the plan. No income tax benefit is recorded in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for these costs.
     The Company’s policy is to issue new shares from treasury to satisfy stock options which are exercised.
     The Company utilizes a lattice-binomial option-pricing model (“Binomial Model”) to determine the fair value of stock-based payment awards. The fair value determined by the Binomial Model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the Company’s expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. The Binomial Model also considers the expected exercise multiple which is the multiple of exercise price to grant price at which exercises are expected to occur on average. Option-pricing models were developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting or hedging restrictions and are fully transferable. Because the Company’s employee stock options have certain characteristics that are significantly different from traded options, and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, in management’s opinion, the Binomial Model best provides a fair measure of the fair value of the Company’s employee stock options.
     The weighted average fair value of all common share options, granted to employees for the three months ended March 31, 2011 at the measurement date was $9.87 per share (2010 — $5.75 per share). The following assumptions were used:
         
    Three Months
    Ended March 31,
    2011   2010
Average risk-free interest rate
  2.87%   3.15%
Expected option life (in years)
  5.08 - 5.14   5.31 - 5.39
Expected volatility
  50%   61%
Annual termination probability
  8.31% - 8.49%   9.69%
Dividend yield
  0%   0%
     As at March 31, 2011, the Company has reserved a total of 12,850,988 (December 31, 2010 — 12,829,115) common shares for future issuance under the Stock Option Plan, of which options in respect of 7,595,086 common shares are outstanding at March 31, 2011. All awards of stock options are made at fair market value of the Company’s Common Shares on the date of grant. The fair market value of a Common Share on a given date means the higher of the closing price of a Common Share on the grant date (or the most recent trading date if the grant date is not a trading date) on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) and such national exchange, as may be designated by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Fair Market Value”). The options generally vest between one and 5 years and expire 10 years or less from the date granted. The Stock Option Plan provides that vesting will be accelerated if there is a change of control, as defined in the plan and upon certain conditions. At March 31, 2011, options in respect of 3,148,833 common shares were vested and exercisable.
     The following table summarizes certain information in respect of option activity under the Stock Option Plan for the three month periods ended March 31:

23


Table of Contents

                                 
                    Weighted Average Exercise  
    Number of Shares     Price Per Share  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Options outstanding, beginning of year
    6,743,272       6,173,795     $ 10.79     $ 6.52  
Granted
    979,930       331,217       31.25       15.73  
Exercised
    (109,366 )     (628,421 )     7.60       6.28  
Forfeited
    (18,750 )           7.57        
Expired
                       
Cancelled
                       
 
                           
Options outstanding, end of period
    7,595,086       5,876,591       13.49       7.06  
 
                           
Options exercisable, end of period
    3,148,833       3,130,946       6.46       6.12  
 
                           
     During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company did not cancel any stock options from its Stock Option Plan (2010 —nil) surrendered by Company employees.
     As at March 31, 2011, 6,992,209 options were fully vested or are expected to vest with a weighted average exercise price of $13.09, aggregate intrinsic value of $132.1 million and weighted average remaining contractual life of 4.9 years. As at March 31, 2011, options that are exercisable have an intrinsic value of $80.3 million and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.0 years. The intrinsic value of options exercised in the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $2.4 million (2010 — $5.7 million).
     Options to Non-Employees
     During the three months ended March 31, 2011, an aggregate of 103,944 (2010 — 11,217) common share options to purchase the Company’s common stock with an average exercise price of $27.64 (2010 — $14.31) were granted to certain advisors and strategic partners of the Company. These options have a maximum contractual life of 6 years. The granted options vested immediately. These options were granted under the Stock Option Plan.
     As at March 31, 2011, non-employee options outstanding amounted to 210,445 options (2010 — 68,775) with a weighted average exercise price of $20.75 (2010 — $6.51). Of these grants, 20,000 common share options are subject to vesting based on a performance commitment which has not been completed as at March 31, 2011 and no expense has been recorded. 103,944 options (2010 — 24,607) were exercisable with an average weighted exercise price of $27.64 (2010 — $10.93) and the vested options have an aggregate intrinsic value of $0.5 million (2010 — $0.2 million). The weighted average fair value of options granted to non-employees during the three months ended March 31, 2011 at the measurement date was $13.75 per share (2010 — $8.46 per share), utilizing a Binomial Model with the following underlying assumptions for periods ended March 31:
                 
    Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
    2011     2010  
Average risk-free interest rate
    2.38 %     2.97 %
Contractual option life
  6 years   6 years
Average expected volatility
    50 %     61 %
Dividend yield
    0 %     0 %
     For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded a charge of $0.2 million (2010 — less than $0.1 million million) to cost and expenses applicable to revenues — services and selling, general and administrative expenses related to the non-employee stock options. Included in accrued liabilities is an accrual of $0.2 million for non-employee stock options granted.
     Restricted Common Shares

24


Table of Contents

     Under the terms of certain employment agreements dated July 12, 2000, the Company was required to issue either 160,000 restricted common shares or pay their cash equivalent upon request by the employees at any time. The Company accounted for the obligation as a liability, which was classified within accrued liabilities. In December 2010, upon request by the employees, the Company paid $4.2 million in cash to settle the equivalent of the remaining 160,000 restricted common shares under these agreements. The Company recorded an expense of $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 related to the restricted common shares.
     Stock Appreciation Rights
     There were no stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) granted during the first quarters of 2011 or 2010. During 2007, 2,280,000 SARs with a weighted average exercise price of $6.20 per right were granted in lieu of stock options to certain Company executives. During the first quarter of 2011, 527,500 SARs were cash settled for $10.7 million (2010 — 210,000 SARs were cash settled for $2.1 million). The average exercise price for the settled SARs for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 was $6.86 (2010 — $4.34) per SAR. As at March 31, 2011, 605,000 SARs were outstanding, of which 572,000 SARs were exercisable. None of the SARs were forfeited, cancelled, or expired for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. The SARs vesting period ranges from immediately upon granting to 5 years, with a remaining contractual life ranging from 4.76 to 6.76 years as at March 31, 2011. The outstanding SARs had an average fair value of $25.05 per right as at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 — $21.21). The Company accounts for the obligation of these SARs as a liability (March 31, 2011 — $14.8 million; December 31, 2010 — $23.7 million), which is classified within accrued liabilities. The Company has recorded a $1.8 million expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — $8.0 million) to selling, general and administrative expenses related to these SARs. The following assumptions were used for measuring the fair value of the SARs:
         
    As at   As at
    March 31,   December 31,
    2011   2010
Average risk-free interest rate
  0.78%   0.65%
Expected option life (in years)
  0.11 - 2.14   0.24 - 2.51
Expected volatility
  50%   50% - 61%
Annual termination probability
  0% - 8.31%   0% - 8.31%
Dividend yield
  0%   0%
 
       
Warrants
       
     There were no warrants issued during the three months ended or outstanding as at March 31, 2011 and 2010.
  (c) (Loss) earnings per Share
     Reconciliations of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted per-share computations are comprised of the following:
                 
    Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
    2011     2010  
Net (loss) earnings from continuing operations applicable to common shareholders
  $ (1,003 )   $ 26,580  
 
           
Weighted average number of common shares (000’s):
               
Issued and outstanding, beginning of period
    64,146       62,832  
Weighted average number of shares issued during the period
    41       224  
 
           
Weighted average number of shares used in computing basic (loss) income per share
    64,187       63,056  
Assumed exercise of stock, net of shares assumed
          3,052  
 
           
Weighted average number of shares used in computing diluted (loss) income per share
    64,187       66,108  
 
           

25


Table of Contents

     The calculation of diluted loss per share for the first quarter of 2011 excludes 4,038,198 shares that are issuable upon exercise of stock options, net of shares assumed as the impact of these exercises would be antidilutive.
  (d) Shareholders’ Equity
     The following summarizes the movement of Shareholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
         
Balance as at December 31, 2010
  $ 158,458  
Issuance of common shares for stock options exercised
    830  
Net loss
    (1,003 )
Adjustment to other equity for employee stock options granted
    1,995  
Adjustment to other equity for non-employee stock options granted
    1,542  
Adjustment to capital stock for stock options exercised
    372  
Adjustment to other equity for stock options exercised
    (372 )
Adjustments to accumulated other comprehensive income to record unrealized hedging gains
    302  
Adjustments to accumulated other comprehensive income to record the realization of hedging gains upon settlement
    (258 )
Adjustments to accumulated other comprehensive income to record the amortization of actuarial loss on defined benefit plan
    54  
Tax effect of movement in accumulated other comprehensive income
    (28 )
 
     
Balance as at March 31, 2011
  $ 161,892  
 
     
     14. Segmented Information
     The Company has 8 reportable segments identified by category of product sold or service provided: IMAX systems; theater system maintenance; joint revenue sharing arrangements; film production and IMAX DMR; film distribution; film post-production; theater operations; and other. The IMAX systems segment designs, manufactures, sells or leases IMAX theater projection system equipment. The theater system maintenance segment maintains IMAX theater projection system equipment in the IMAX theater network. The joint revenue sharing arrangements segment provides IMAX theater projection system equipment to an exhibitor in exchange for a share of the box-office and concession revenues. The film production and IMAX DMR segment produces films and performs film re-mastering services. The film distribution segment distributes films for which the Company has distribution rights. The film post-production segment provides film post-production and film print services. The theater operations segment operates certain IMAX theaters. The Company refers to all theaters using the IMAX theater system as “IMAX theaters.” The other segment includes camera rentals and other miscellaneous items. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K.
     The Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), as defined in the Segment Reporting Topic of the FASB ASC, assesses segment performance based on segment revenues, gross margins and film performance. Selling, general and administrative expenses, research and development costs, amortization of intangibles, receivables provisions (recoveries), interest income, interest expense and tax provision (recovery) are not allocated to the segments.
     Transactions between the film production and IMAX DMR segment and the film post-production segment are valued at exchange value. Inter-segment profits are eliminated upon consolidation, as well as for the disclosures below.
     Transactions between the other segments are not significant.

26


Table of Contents

                 
    Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
    2011     2010  
Revenue(1)
               
IMAX systems
  $ 22,259     $ 10,953  
Theater system maintenance
    5,795       4,966  
Joint revenue sharing arrangements
    4,040       18,936  
Films
               
Production and IMAX DMR
    7,258       23,452  
Distribution
    2,617       3,273  
Post-production
    1,624       2,592  
Theater operations
    981       5,949  
Other
    586       2,663  
 
           
Total
  $ 45,160     $ 72,784  
 
           
 
               
Gross margins
               
IMAX systems(2)
  $ 11,735       4,500  
Theater system maintenance
    2,587       2,309  
Joint revenue sharing arrangements(2)
    2,178       16,812  
Films
               
Production and IMAX DMR(2)
    2,759       19,501  
Distribution(2)
    626       742  
Post-production
    1,689       2,054  
Theater operations
    (763 )     1,658  
Other
    (165 )     724  
 
           
Total
  $ 20,646     $ 48,300  
 
           
 
(1)   The Company’s two largest customers as at March 31, 2011 collectively represent 9.5% of total revenues (2010 — 24.3%).
 
(2)   IMAX systems include commission costs of $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — $0.2 million). Joint revenue sharing arrangements segment margins include advertising, marketing and commission costs of $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — $0.6 million). Production and DMR segment margins include marketing costs of $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — $0.2 million). Distribution segment margins include marketing costs of $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — $0.5 million).

27


Table of Contents

                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Assets
               
IMAX systems
  $ 127,245     $ 119,708  
Theater system maintenance
    14,872       13,548  
Joint revenue sharing arrangements
    82,323       81,376  
Films
               
Production and IMAX DMR
    5,521       17,229  
Distribution
    5,398       5,313  
Post-production
    4,505       2,877  
Theater operations
    507       582  
Other
    1,902       1,785  
Corporate and other non-segment specific assets
    94,301       106,670  
 
           
Total
  $ 336,574     $ 349,088  
 
           
Geographic Information
                 
    March 31,     March 31,  
    2011     2010  
Revenue
               
Canada
  $ 1,001     $ 1,897  
United States
    25,480       55,796  
Russia and the CIS
    3,917       1,639  
Western Europe
    2,282       4,692  
Rest of Europe
    2,324       332  
Asia (Excluding Greater China)
    2,319       2,513  
Greater China
    6,772       3,322  
Mexico
    356       1,260  
Rest of World
    709       1,333  
 
           
Total
  $ 45,160     $ 72,784  
 
           
     No single country in the Rest of the World, Western Europe, Rest of Europe or Asia (excluding Greater China) classifications comprises more than 5% of the total revenue.
15. Employees Pension and Postretirement Benefits
  (a) Defined Benefit Plan
     The Company has an unfunded U.S. defined benefit pension plan, the SERP, covering Richard L. Gelfond, Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of the Company and Bradley J. Wechsler, Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors. The SERP provides for a lifetime retirement benefit from age 55 determined as 75% of the member’s best average 60 consecutive months of earnings over the member’s employment history. The benefits were 50% vested as at July 2000, the SERP initiation date. The vesting percentage increases on a straight-line basis from inception until age 55. As at March 31, 2011, the benefits of Mr. Gelfond were 100% vested. Upon a termination for cause, prior to a change of control, the executive shall forfeit any and all benefits to which such executive may have been entitled, whether or not vested.
     Under the terms of the SERP, if Mr. Gelfond’s employment terminated other than for cause prior to August 1, 2010, he would have been entitled to receive SERP benefits in the form of monthly annuity payments until the earlier of a change of control or August 1, 2010, at which time he became entitled to receive remaining benefits in the form of a lump sum payment. If Mr. Gelfond’s employment is, or would have been, terminated other than for cause on or after August 1, 2010, he is, or would have been, entitled to receive SERP benefits in the form of a lump sum payment. SERP benefit payments to Mr. Gelfond are subject to a deferral for six months after the termination of his employment, at which time Mr. Gelfond will be entitled to receive interest on the deferred amount

28


Table of Contents

credited at the applicable federal rate for short-term obligations. The term of Mr. Gelfond’s current employment agreement has been extended through December 31, 2012.
     Under the terms of the SERP, monthly annuity payments payable to Mr. Wechsler, whose employment as Co-CEO terminated effective April 1, 2009, were deferred for six months and were paid in the form of a lump sum plus interest on the deferred amount on October 1, 2009. Thereafter, in accordance with the terms of the SERP, Mr. Wechsler was entitled to receive monthly annuity payments until the earlier of a change of control or August 1, 2010, at which time he was entitled to receive remaining benefits in the form of a lump sum payment. On August 1, 2010, the Company made a lump sum payment of $14.7 million to Mr. Wechsler in accordance with the terms of the plan, representing a settlement in full of Mr. Wechsler’s entitlement under the SERP.
     The amounts accrued for the SERP are determined as follows:
                 
    As at     As at  
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Obligation, beginning of period
  $ 18,108     $ 29,862  
Service cost
          448  
Interest cost
    70       351  
Benefits paid
          (15,199 )
Actuarial loss
          2,646  
 
           
Obligation, end of period and unfunded status
  $ 18,178     $ 18,108  
 
           
     The following table provides disclosure of pension expense for the SERP:
                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2011     2010  
Service cost
  $     $ 112  
Interest cost
    70       88  
Amortization of actuarial loss
    54        
 
           
Pension expense
  $ 124     $ 200  
 
           
     The accumulated benefit obligation for the SERP was $18.2 million at March 31, 2011 and $18.1 million at December 31, 2010.
     The following amounts were included in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) and will be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost in future periods:
                 
    As at     As at  
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Unrecognized actuarial loss
  $ 2,185     $ 2,239  
 
           
     No contributions are expected to be made for the SERP during 2011. The Company expects amortization of actuarial losses of $0.2 million to be recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost during the remainder of 2011.
     The following benefit payments are expected to be made as per the current SERP assumptions and the terms of the SERP in each of the next 5 years, and in the aggregate:

29


Table of Contents

         
2011 (nine months remaining)
  $  
2012
     
2013
    18,813  
2014
     
2015
     
 
     
Thereafter
  $ 18,813  
 
     
     At the time the Company established the SERP, it also took out life insurance policies on Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler with coverage amounts of $21.5 million in aggregate to which the Company was the beneficiary. During 2010, the Company obtained $3.2 million representing the cash surrender value of Mr. Gelfond’s policy and $4.6 million representing the cash surrender value of Mr. Wechsler’s policy.
(b) Defined Contribution Plan
     The Company also maintains defined contribution pension plans for its employees, including its executive officers. The Company makes contributions to these plans on behalf of employees in an amount up to 5% of their base salary subject to certain prescribed maximums. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company contributed and expensed an aggregate of $0.2 million (2010 — $0.2 million) to its Canadian plan and an aggregate of less than $0.1 million (2010 — less than $0.1 million) to its defined contribution employee pension plan under Section 401(k) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
(c) Postretirement Benefits
     The Company has an unfunded postretirement plan for Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler. The plan provides that the Company will maintain health benefits for Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler until they become eligible for Medicare and, thereafter, the Company will provide Medicare supplement coverage as selected by Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler. The postretirement benefits obligation as at March 31, 2011 is $0.5 million (December 31, 2010 — $0.5 million). The Company has expensed less than $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — less than $0.1 million).
     The following benefit payments are expected to be made as per the current plan assumptions in each of the next 5 years:
         
2011 (nine months remaining)
  $ 4  
2012
  $ 15  
2013
  $ 31  
2014
  $ 34  
2015
  $ 38  
Thereafter
  $  
16. Financial Instruments
  (a) Financial Instruments
     The Company maintains cash with various major financial institutions. The Company’s cash is invested with highly rated financial institutions.
     The Company’s accounts receivables and financing receivables are subject to credit risk. The Company’s accounts receivable and financing receivables are concentrated with the theater exhibition industry and film entertainment industry. To minimize the Company’s credit risk, the Company retains title to underlying theater systems leased, performs initial and ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and makes ongoing provisions for its estimate of potentially uncollectible amounts. The Company believes it has adequately provided for related exposures surrounding receivables and contractual commitments.
  (b) Fair Value Measurements

30


Table of Contents

     The carrying values of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities due within one year approximate fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The Company’s other financial instruments are comprised of the following:
                                 
    As at March 31, 2011     As at December 31, 2010  
    Carrying     Estimated     Carrying     Estimated  
    Amount     Fair Value     Amount     Fair Value  
Borrowings under Credit Facility
  $ 17,500     $ 17,500     $ 17,500     $ 17,500  
Financed sales receivable
  $ 50,996     $ 50,793     $ 43,620     $ 43,615  
Net investment in sales-type leases
  $ 24,948     $ 27,751     $ 29,981     $ 32,613  
Foreign exchange contracts — designated forwards
  $ 707     $ 707     $ 664     $ 664  
Foreign exchange contracts — non-designated forwards
  $ 1,200     $ 1,200     $ 1,249     $ 1,249  
     The carrying value of borrowings under the Credit Facility approximates fair value as the interest rates offered under the Credit Facility are close to March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 market rates for the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities (Level 2 input in accordance with the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB ASC hierarchy) as at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
     The estimated fair values of the Financed sales receivable and Net investment in sales-type leases are estimated based on discounting future cash flows at currently available interest rates with comparable terms (Level 2 input in accordance with the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB ASC hierarchy) as at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
     The fair value of foreign currency derivatives are determined using quoted prices in active markets (Level 2 input in accordance with the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB ASC hierarchy) as at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. These identical instruments are traded on a closed exchange.
  (c) Financing Receivables
     The Company’s net investment in leases and its financed sale receivables are subject to the disclosure requirements of ASC 310 “Receivables”. Due to differing risk profiles of its net investment in leases and its financed sales receivables, the Company views its net investment in leases and its financed sale receivables as separate classes of financing receivables. The Company does not aggregate financing receivables to assess impairment.
     The Company monitors the credit quality of each customer on a frequent basis through collections and aging analyses. The Company also holds meetings monthly in order to identify credit concerns and whether a change in credit quality classification is required for the customer. A customer may improve in their credit quality classification once a substantial payment is made on overdue balances or the customer has agreed to a payment plan with the Company and payments have commenced in accordance to the payment plan. The change in credit quality indicator is dependant upon management approval.
     The Company classifies its customers into three categories to indicate their credit quality internally:
     Good standing — Theater continues to be in good standing with the Company as the client’s payments and reporting are up-to-date.
     Pre-approved transactions only — Theater operator has begun to demonstrate a delay in payments with little or no communication with the Company. All service or shipments to the theater must be reviewed and approved by management. These financing receivables are considered to be in better condition than those receivables related to theaters in the “All transactions suspended” category, but not in as good of condition as those receivables in “Good standing”. Depending on the individual facts and circumstances of each customer, finance income recognition may be suspended if management believes the receivable to be impaired.
     All transactions suspended — Theater is severely delinquent, non-responsive or not negotiating in good faith with the Company. Once a theater is classified as “All transactions suspended”, the theater is placed on nonaccrual status and all revenue recognitions related to the theater are stopped.
     The following table discloses the recorded investment in financing receivables by credit quality indicator as at March 31, 2011:

31


Table of Contents

                         
    Net     Financed        
    Investment     Sales        
    in Leases     Receivables     Total  
In good standing
  $ 21,320     $ 50,052     $ 71,372  
Pre-approved transactions
    1,521             1,521  
Transactions suspended
    4,665       1,010       5,675  
 
                 
 
  $ 27,506     $ 51,062     $ 78,568  
 
                 
     While recognition of finance income is suspended, payments received by a customer are applied against the outstanding balance owed. If payments are sufficient to cover any unreserved receivables, a recovery of provision taken on the billed amount, if applicable, is recorded to the extent of the residual cash received. Once the collectibility issues are resolved and the customer has returned to being in good standing, the Company will resume recognition of finance income.
     The Company’s investment in financing receivables on nonaccrual status as at March 31, 2011 is as follows:
                 
    Recorded     Related  
    Investment     Allowance  
Net investment in leases
  $ 4,665     $ (2,442 )
Financed sales receivables
    691       (66 )
 
           
Total
  $ 5,356     $ (2,508 )
 
           
     The Company considers financing receivables with aging between 60-89 days as indications of theaters with potential collection concerns. The Company will begin to focus its review on these financing receivables and increase its discussions internally and with the theater regarding payment status. Once a theater’s aging exceeds 90 days, the Company’s policy is to review and assess collectibility on the theater’s past due accounts. Over 90 days past due is used by the Company as an indicator of potential impairment as invoices up to 90 days outstanding could be considered reasonable due to the time required for dispute resolution or for the provision of further information or supporting documentation to the customer.
     The Company’s aged financing receivables are as follows:
                                                                 
                                    Related                     Recorded  
                            Billed     Unbilled     Total             Investment  
                            Financing     Recorded     Recorded     Related     Net of  
    Current     30-89 Days     90+ Days     Receivables     Investment     Investment     Allowances     Allowances  
Net investment in leases
  $ 686     $ 267     $ 1,792     $ 2,745     $ 24,761     $ 27,506     $ (2,558 )   $ 24,948  
Financed sales receivables
    827       340       524       1,691       49,371       51,062       (66 )     50,996  
 
                                               
Total
  $ 1,513     $ 607     $ 2,316     $ 4,436     $ 74,132     $ 78,568     $ (2,624 )   $ 75,944  
 
                                               
     The Company’s recorded investment in past due financing receivables for which the Company continues to accrue finance income is as follows:

32


Table of Contents

                                                         
                                    Related             Recorded  
                            Billed     Unbilled             Investment  
                            Financing     Recorded     Related     Past Due  
    Current     30-89 Days     90+ Days     Receivables     Investment     Allowance     and Accruing  
Net investment in leases
  $ 72     $ 54     $ 581     $ 707     $ 1,198     $ (116 )   $ 1,789  
Financed sales receivables
    280       147       298       725       11,516             12,241  
 
                                         
Total
  $ 352     $ 201     $ 879     $ 1,432     $ 12,714     $ (116 )   $ 14,030  
 
                                         
     The Company considers financing receivables to be impaired when it believes it to be probable that it will not recover the full amount of principal and interest owing under the arrangement. The Company uses its knowledge of the industry and economic trends, as well as its prior experiences to determine the amount recoverable for impaired financing receivables. The following table discloses information regarding the Company’s impaired financing receivables:
                                         
    Impaired Financing Receivables  
    For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011  
                            Average     Interest  
    Recorded     Unpaid     Related     Recorded     Income  
    Investment     Principal     Allowanced     Investment     Recognized  
Recorded investment for which there is a related allowance:
                                       
Financed sales receivables
    239       183       (66 )     239        
 
                                       
Total recorded investment in impaired loans:
                                       
 
                             
Financed sales receivables
  $ 239     $ 183     $ (66 )   $ 239     $  
 
                             
     The Company’s activity in the allowance for credit losses for the period and the Company’s recorded investment in financing receivables is as follows:
                 
    For the Three Months ended March 31, 2011  
    Net Investment     Financed  
    in Leases     Sales Receivables  
Allowance for credit losses:
               
 
               
Beginning balance
  $ 4,838     $ 66  
Charge-offs
    (2,445 )      
Recoveries
           
Provision
    165        
 
           
Ending balance
  $ 2,558     $ 66  
 
           
 
               
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 2,558     $ 66  
 
           
 
               
Financing receivables:
               
 
               
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 27,506     $ 51,062  
 
           

33


Table of Contents

     
(d)   Foreign Exchange Risk Management
     The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency rates. A major portion of the Company’s revenues is denominated in U.S. dollars while a substantial portion of its costs and expenses is denominated in Canadian dollars. A portion of the net U.S. dollar cash flows of the Company is periodically converted to Canadian dollars to fund Canadian dollar expenses through the spot market. In Japan, the Company has ongoing operating expenses related to its operations in Japanese yen. Net Japanese yen cash flows are converted to U.S. dollars generally through the spot market. The Company also has cash receipts under leases denominated in Japanese yen, Canadian dollar and Euros which are converted to U.S. dollars generally through the spot market. The Company’s policy is to not use any financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.
     The Company entered into a series of foreign currency forward contracts to manage the Company’s risks associated with the volatility of foreign currencies. Certain of these foreign currency forward contracts met the criteria required for hedge accounting under the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB ASC at inception, and continue to meet hedge effectiveness tests at March 31, 2011 (the “Foreign Currency Hedges”), with settlement dates throughout 2011 and 2012. In addition, at March 31, 2011, the Company held foreign currency forward contracts to manage foreign currency risk on future anticipated Canadian dollar expenditures that were not considered Foreign Currency Hedges by the Company. Foreign currency derivatives are recognized and measured in the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value (gains or losses) are recognized in the condensed consolidated statement of operations except for derivatives designated and qualifying as foreign currency hedging instruments. For foreign currency hedging instruments, the effective portion of the gain or loss in a hedge of a forecasted transaction is reported in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and reclassified to the condensed consolidated statement of operations when the forecasted transaction occurs. Any ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.
     The following tabular disclosures reflect the impact that derivative instruments and hedging activities have on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements:
Notional value foreign exchange contracts as at:

34


Table of Contents

                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
               
Foreign exchange contracts — Forwards
  $ 8,668     $ 12,671  
 
               
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
               
Foreign exchange contracts — Forwards
    17,759       28,842  
 
           
 
  $ 26,427     $ 41,513  
 
           
Fair value of derivatives in foreign exchange contracts as at:
                         
            March 31,     December 31,  
    Balance Sheet Location     2011     2010  
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
                       
Foreign exchange contracts — Forwards
  Other assets   $ 707     $ 664  
 
                       
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
                       
Foreign exchange contracts — Forwards
  Other assets     1,200       1,249  
 
                   
 
          $ 1,907     $ 1,913  
 
                   
   
     Derivatives in Foreign Currency Hedging relationships for the three months ended March 31:  
   
            2011     2010  
Foreign exchange contracts — Forwards
  Derivative gain                
 
  recognized in OCI                
 
  (effective portion)   $ 302     $ 208  
 
                   
   
    Location of              
    derivative gain              
    reclassified from              
    AOCI into income              
    (effective portion)     2011     2010  
Foreign exchange contracts — Forwards
  Selling, general and                  
 
  administrative expenses     $ 258     $ 550  
 
                 
   
     Non Designated Derivatives in Foreign Currency relationships for the three months ended March 31:  
   
    Location of              
    derivative gain     2011     2010  
Foreign exchange contracts — Forwards
  Selling, general and                  
 
  administrative expenses     $ 628     $ 424  
 
                   
(e)  Investments in New Business Ventures
     The Company accounts for investments in new business ventures using the guidance of ASC 323 and ASC 320, as appropriate. At March 31, 2011, the equity method of accounting is being utilized for an investment with a carrying value of $2.9 million (December 31, 2010 — $1.6 million). For the three month period ended March 31, 2011, gross revenues, cost of revenue and net loss for the investment were $0.2 million, $1.4 million and $4.2 million, respectively. The Company has determined it is not the primary beneficiary of this VIE, and therefore it has not been consolidated. In addition, during 2010, the Company made an investment in preferred stock of another business venture of $1.5 million which meets the criteria for classification as a debt security under ASC 320 and is recorded at its fair value of $1.5 million at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 — $1.5 million). This investment is classified as an available-for-sale investment. The total carrying value of investments in new business ventures at March 31, 2011 is $4.4 million (December 31, 2010 — $3.1 million) and is recorded in Other Assets.

35


Table of Contents

IMAX CORPORATION
Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
OVERVIEW
     IMAX Corporation, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”), is one of the world’s leading entertainment technology companies, specializing in motion picture technologies and presentations. The Company’s principal business is the design and manufacture of premium digital and film-based theater systems (“IMAX theater systems”) and the sale or lease of IMAX theater systems or the contribution of IMAX theater systems under revenue-sharing arrangements to its customers. The IMAX theater systems are based on proprietary and patented technology developed over the course of the Company’s 43-year history. The Company’s customers who purchase, lease or otherwise acquire the IMAX theater systems are theater exhibitors that operate commercial theaters (particularly multiplexes), museums, science centers, or destination entertainment sites. The Company generally does not own IMAX theaters, but licenses the use of its trademarks along with the sale, lease or contribution of its equipment. The Company refers to all theaters using the IMAX theater system as “IMAX theaters.”
     The Company derives revenue principally from the sale or long-term lease of IMAX theater systems and associated maintenance and extended warranty services, the installation of IMAX theater systems under joint revenue sharing arrangements, the provision of film production and digital re-mastering services, the distribution of certain films, and the provision of post-production services, including the conversion of two-dimensional (“2D”) and three-dimensional (“3D”) Hollywood feature films for exhibition on IMAX theater systems around the world. The Company also derives revenue from the operation of its own theaters, camera rentals and the provision of aftermarket parts for its system components.
     The Company believes the IMAX theater network is the most extensive premium theater network in the world with 528 IMAX theaters (408 commercial, 120 institutional) operating in 46 countries as at March 31, 2011. This compares to 438 IMAX theaters (316 commercial, 122 institutional) operating in 47 countries as at March 31, 2010.
     Important factors that the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) Richard L. Gelfond uses in assessing the Company’s business and prospects include revenue, gross margins from the Company’s operating segments, film performance, earnings from operations as adjusted for unusual items that the Company views as non-recurring, the signing and financial performance of theater system arrangements (particularly its joint revenue sharing arrangements), the success of strategic initiatives such as the securing of new film projects (particularly IMAX DMR films) and the viability of new businesses, the overall execution, reliability and consumer acceptance of The IMAX Experience and related technologies and short- and long-term cash flow projections.
IMAX Systems, Theater System Maintenance and Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangements
     The Company provides IMAX theater systems to customers on a sales or long-term lease basis, typically with initial terms of approximately 10 years. These agreements typically provide for three major sources of cash flows: initial fees, ongoing fees (which can include a fixed minimum amount per annum and contingent fees in excess of the minimum payments) and maintenance and extended warranty fees. The initial fees vary depending on the system configuration and location of the theater and generally are paid to the Company in installments commencing upon the signing of the agreement. Finance income is derived over the term of the sales or sales-type lease arrangement as the unearned income on financed sales or sales-type leases is earned. Ongoing fees are paid monthly over the term of the contract, commencing after the theater system has been installed and are generally equal to the greater of a fixed minimum amount per annum or a percentage of box-office receipts. Both ongoing fees and maintenance and extended warranty fees are typically indexed to a local consumer price index.
     The Company also offers certain commercial clients joint revenue sharing arrangements, where the Company receives a portion of the theater’s box-office and concession revenue in exchange for placing an IMAX theater system at the theater operator’s venue.
     Revenue from theater system arrangements is recognized at a different time from when cash is collected. See “Critical Accounting Policies” below for further discussion on the Company’s revenue recognition policies.

36


Table of Contents

Sales Backlog and Theater Network
     The Company’s sales backlog fluctuates in both number of systems and dollar value from quarter to quarter depending on the signing of new theater system arrangements, which adds to backlog, and the installation and acceptance of theater systems and the settlement of contracts, both of which reduce backlog. Sales backlog typically represents the fixed contracted revenue under signed theater system sale and lease agreements that the Company believes will be recognized as revenue upon installation and acceptance of the associated theater. Sales backlog includes initial fees along with the estimated present value of contractual ongoing fees due over the lease term, but excludes amounts allocated to maintenance and extended warranty revenues as well as fees in excess of contractual ongoing fees that may be received in the future. The value of sales backlog does not include revenue from theaters in which the Company has an equity interest, joint revenue sharing arrangements, operating leases, letters of intent or long-term conditional theater commitments.
     The Company’s theater signings are as follows:
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2011     2010  
    Number of     Dollar Value     Number of     Dollar Value  
    Systems     (in millions)     Systems     (in millions)  
Full new sales and sale-type lease arrangements
    23 (1)   $ 26.9       8 (1)   $ 10.8  
Digital upgrades under sales and sale-type lease arrangements
    2 (2)     0.9       14 (2)     6.0  
Joint revenue sharing arrangements
    76 (3)     n/a       19 (3)     n/a  
 
                       
 
    101     $ 27.8       41     $ 16.8  
 
                       
 
(1)   Includes 1 installation in the first quarter of 2011 and 22 in backlog as at March 31, 2011 (2 installations in the first quarter of 2010 and 6 in backlog as at March 31, 2010).
 
(2)   Includes no installations in the first quarter of 2011 and 2 in backlog as at March 31, 2011 (8 installations in the first quarter of 2010 and 6 in backlog as at March 31, 2010).
 
(3)   Includes no installations in the first quarter of 2011 and 76 in backlog as at March 31, 2011 (nil installations in the first quarter of 2010 and 19 in backlog as at March 31, 2010).

37


Table of Contents

     The Company’s sales backlog is as follows:
                                 
    March 31, 2011     March 31, 2010  
    Number of     Dollar Value     Number of     Dollar Value  
    Systems     (in thousands)     Systems     (in thousands)  
Sales and sale-type lease arrangements
    158 (1)   $ 190,972       100 (1)   $ 123,233  
Joint revenue sharing arrangements
    125       n/a       56       n/a  
 
                       
 
    283 (2)   $ 190,972       156 (2)   $ 123,233  
 
                       
 
(1)   Includes 5 upgrades from film-based IMAX theater systems to IMAX digital theater systems as at March 31, 2011 (7 at March 31, 2010).
 
(2)   Reflects the minimum number of theaters arising from signed contracts in backlog. Up to an additional 23 theaters (nil at March 31, 2010) may be installed pursuant to certain provisions in signed contracts in backlog.
     Theater systems under joint revenue sharing arrangements carry no assigned backlog value. The Company believes that the contractual obligations for theater system installations that are listed in sales backlog are valid and binding commitments.
     The following chart shows the number of the Company’s theater systems by configuration, opened theater network base and backlog as at March 31:
                                 
    2011     2010  
    Theater             Theater        
    Network             Network        
    Base     Backlog     Base     Backlog  
Flat Screen (2D)
    27 (1)           35 (2)      
Dome Screen (2D)
    66             66        
IMAX 3D Dome (3D)
    3             2        
IMAX 3D GT (3D)
    70 (1)     2       88 (2)     5  
IMAX 3D SR (3D)
    34 (1)     1       47 (2)     1  
IMAX MPX (3D)
    12 (1)     4       28 (2)     11  
IMAX digital (3D)
    316 (1)     276 (3)     172 (2)     139 (3)
 
                       
Total
    528       283       438       156  
 
                       
 
(1)   During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company upgraded 22 film-based IMAX theater systems to IMAX digital theater systems (all sales arrangements).
 
(2)   During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company upgraded 10 film-based IMAX theater systems to IMAX digital theater systems (9 sales arrangements and 1 joint revenue sharing arrangement).
 
(3)   Includes 125 and 56 theater systems as at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, under joint revenue sharing arrangements.
     The following table outlines the breakdown of the theater network by type and geographic location as at March 31:

38


Table of Contents

                                                                 
    2011 Theater Network Base     2010 Theater Network Base  
    Commercial     Commercial                     Commercial     Commercial              
    Multiplex     Destination     Institutional     Total     Multiplex     Destination     Institutional     Total  
United States
    228       8       65       301       178       8       66       252  
Canada
    17       2       7       26       13       2       7       22  
Mexico
    7             10       17       8             11       19  
Russia & the CIS
    18                   18       6                   6  
Western Europe
    34       7       9       50       25       7       9       41  
Rest of Europe
    9                   9       9                   9  
Japan
    9       2       6       17       5       2       7       14  
Greater China(1)
    26             18       44       14             17       31  
Rest of World
    38       3       5       46       37       2       5       44  
 
                                               
Total
    386       22       120       528       295       21       122       438  
 
                                               
 
(1)   Greater China includes China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macau.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
     The Company prepares its interim condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”).
     The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, including those related to selling prices associated with the individual elements in multiple element arrangements; residual values of leased theater systems; economic lives of leased assets; allowances for potential uncollectibility of accounts receivable, financing receivables and net investment in leases; provisions for inventory obsolescence; ultimate revenues for film assets; impairment provisions for film assets, long-lived assets and goodwill; depreciable lives of property, plant and equipment; useful lives of intangible assets; pension plan and post retirement assumptions; accruals for contingencies including tax contingencies; valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets; and, estimates of the fair value and expected exercise dates of stock-based payment awards. Management bases its estimates on historic experience, future expectations and other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable at the date of the consolidated financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates due to uncertainty involved in measuring, at a specific point in time, events which are continuous in nature, and differences may be material. The Company’s significant accounting policies are discussed in note 2 to its audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “2010 Form 10-K”) and are summarized below.
     The Company considers the following significant estimates, assumptions and judgments to have the most significant effect on its results:
Revenue Recognition
     The Company generates revenue from various sources as follows:
    design, manufacture, sale and lease of proprietary theater systems for IMAX theaters principally owned and operated by commercial and institutional customers located in 46 countries as at March 31, 2011;
    production, digital re-mastering, post-production and/or distribution of certain films shown throughout the IMAX theater network;
    operation of certain IMAX theaters primarily in the United States;
    provision of other services to the IMAX theater network, including ongoing maintenance and extended warranty services for IMAX theater systems; and

39


Table of Contents

    other activities, which includes short-term rental of cameras and aftermarket sales of projector system components.
  Multiple Element Arrangements
     The Company’s revenue arrangements with certain customers may involve multiple elements consisting of a theater system (projector, sound system, screen system and, if applicable, 3D glasses cleaning machine); services associated with the theater system including theater design support, supervision of installation, and projectionist training; a license to use of the IMAX brand; 3D glasses; maintenance and extended warranty services; and licensing of films. The Company evaluates all elements in an arrangement to determine what are considered typical deliverables for accounting purposes and which of the deliverables represent separate units of accounting based on the applicable accounting guidance in the Leases Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC” or “Codification”); the Guarantees Topic of the FASB ASC; the Entertainment — Films Topic of FASB ASC; and the Revenue Recognition Topic of the FASB ASC. If separate units of accounting are either required under the relevant accounting standards or determined to be applicable under the Revenue Recognition Topic, the total consideration received or receivable in the arrangement is allocated based on the applicable guidance in the above noted standards.
  Theater Systems
     The Company has identified the projection system, sound system, screen system and, if applicable, 3D glasses cleaning machine, theater design support, supervision of installation, projectionist training and the use of the IMAX brand to be a single deliverable and a single unit of accounting (the “System Deliverable”). When an arrangement does not include all the elements of a System Deliverable, the elements of the System Deliverable included in the arrangement are considered by the Company to be a single deliverable and a single unit of accounting. The Company is not responsible for the physical installation of the equipment in the customer’s facility; however, the Company supervises the installation by the customer. The customer has the right to use the IMAX brand from the date the Company and the customer enter into an arrangement.
     The Company’s System Deliverable arrangements involve either a lease or a sale of the theater system. Consideration in the Company’s arrangements that are not joint revenue sharing arrangements, consists of upfront or initial payments made before and after the final installation of the theater system equipment and ongoing payments throughout the term of the lease or over a period of time, as specified in the arrangement. The ongoing payments are the greater of an annual fixed minimum amount or a certain percentage of the theater box-office. Amounts received in excess of the annual fixed minimum amounts are considered contingent payments. The Company’s arrangements are non-cancellable, unless the Company fails to perform its obligations. In the absence of a material default by the Company, there is no right to any remedy for the customer under the Company’s arrangements. If a material default by the Company exists, the customer has the right to terminate the arrangement and seek a refund only if the customer provides notice to the Company of a material default and only if the Company does not cure the default within a specified period.
  Sales Arrangements
     For arrangements qualifying as sales, the revenue allocated to the System Deliverable is recognized in accordance with the Revenue Recognition Topic of the FASB ASC, when all of the following conditions have been met: (i) the projector, sound system and screen system have been installed and are in full working condition, (ii) the 3D glasses cleaning machine, if applicable, has been delivered, (iii) projectionist training has been completed, and (iv) the earlier of (a) receipt of written customer acceptance certifying the completion of installation and run-in testing of the equipment and the completion of projectionist training or (b) public opening of the theater, provided there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
     The initial revenue recognized consists of the initial payments received and the present value of any future initial payments and fixed minimum ongoing payments that have been attributed to this unit of accounting. Contingent payments in excess of the fixed minimum ongoing payments are recognized when reported by theater operators, provided collectibility is reasonably assured.
     The Company has also agreed, on occasion, to sell equipment under lease or at the end of a lease term. Consideration agreed to for these lease buyouts is included in revenues from equipment and product sales, when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fees are fixed or determinable, collectibility is reasonably assured and title to the theater system passes from the Company to the customer.

40


Table of Contents

     In a certain sales arrangement not subject to the provisions of the amended ASC 605-25, “Revenue Recognition: Multiple-Element Arrangements” (“ASC 605-25”), the Company provided a customer with digital upgrades on several systems, including several specified upgrades to an as-of-yet undeveloped product. At the current period-end, the Company has not yet established the fair value of this product, and as a result, the Company cannot determine the arrangement’s consideration, nor its allocation of consideration between delivered and undelivered items. Consequently, revenue recognition has been deferred for all delivered items in the arrangement. Once the Company determines an objective and reliable fair value of the undeveloped specified upgrade, the Company will be able to calculate total arrangement consideration and consequently, the Company will be able to recognize revenue on the delivered elements of the arrangement. If the arrangement is materially modified in the future, the arrangement in its entirety would be subject to the provisions of the amended ASC 605-25 and the Company would be required to develop, absent an established selling price for the undeveloped specified upgrade, a best estimated selling price for the undeveloped specified upgrade, allocate the arrangement’s consideration on a relative selling price allocation basis, and recognize revenue on the delivered elements based on that allocation.
     Lease Arrangements
     The Company uses the Leases Topic of the FASB ASC to evaluate whether an arrangement is a lease and the classification of the lease. Arrangements not within the scope of the accounting standard are accounted for either as a sales or services arrangement, as applicable.
     For lease arrangements, the Company determines the classification of the lease in accordance with the Leases Topic of the FASB ASC. A lease arrangement that transfers substantially all of the benefits and risks incident to ownership of the equipment is classified as a sales-type lease based on the criteria established in the accounting standard; otherwise the lease is classified as an operating lease. Prior to commencement of the lease term for the equipment, the Company may modify certain payment terms or make concessions. If these circumstances occur, the Company reassesses the classification of the lease based on the modified terms and conditions.
     For sales-type leases, the revenue allocated to the System Deliverable is recognized when the lease term commences, which the Company deems to be when all of the following conditions have been met: (i) the projector, sound system and screen system have been installed and are in full working condition, (ii) the 3D glasses cleaning machine, if applicable, has been delivered, (iii) projectionist training has been completed, and (iv) the earlier of (a) receipt of the written customer acceptance certifying the completion of installation and run-in testing of the equipment and the completion of projectionist training or (b) public opening of the theater, provided collectibility is reasonably assured.
     The initial revenue recognized for sales-type leases consists of the initial payments received and the present value of future initial payments and fixed minimum ongoing payments computed at the interest rate implicit in the lease. Contingent payments in excess of the fixed minimum payments are recognized when reported by theater operators, provided collectibility is reasonably assured.
     For operating leases, initial payments and fixed minimum ongoing payments are recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For operating leases, the lease term is considered to commence when all of the following conditions have been met: (i) the projector, sound system and screen system have been installed and are in full working condition, (ii) the 3D glasses cleaning machine, if applicable, has been delivered, (iii) projectionist training has been completed, and (iv) the earlier of (a) receipt of the written customer acceptance certifying the completion of installation and run-in testing of the equipment and the completion of projectionist training or (b) public opening of the theater. Contingent payments in excess of fixed minimum ongoing payments are recognized as revenue when reported by theater operators, provided collectibility is reasonably assured.
     For joint revenue sharing arrangements, where the Company receives a portion of a theater’s box-office and concession revenues, in exchange for placing a theater system at the theater operator’s venue, revenue is recognized when box-office and concession revenues are reported by the theater operator, provided collectibility is reasonably assured.
     Equipment and components allocated to be used in future joint revenue sharing arrangements, as well as direct labor costs and an allocation of direct production costs, are included in assets under construction until such equipment is installed and in working condition, at which time the equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the term of the joint revenue sharing arrangement and the equipment’s anticipated useful life.

41


Table of Contents

  Finance Income
     Finance income is recognized over the term of the lease or over the period of time specified in the sales arrangement, provided collectibility is reasonably assured. Finance income recognition ceases when the Company determines that the associated receivable is not recoverable.
  Terminations, Consensual Buyouts and Concessions
     The Company enters into theater system arrangements with customers that provide for customer payment obligations prior to the scheduled installation of the theater system. During the period of time between signing and the installation of the theater system, which may extend several years, certain customers may be unable to, or elect not to, proceed with the theater system installation for a number of reasons including business considerations, or the inability to obtain certain consents, approvals or financing. Once the determination is made that the customer will not proceed with installation, the arrangement may be terminated under the default provisions of the arrangement or by mutual agreement between the Company and the customer (a “consensual buyout”). Terminations by default are situations when a customer does not meet the payment obligations under an arrangement and the Company retains the amounts paid by the customer. Under a consensual buyout, the Company and the customer agree, in writing, to a settlement and to release each other of any further obligations under the arrangement or an arbitrated settlement is reached. Any initial payments retained or additional payments received by the Company are recognized as revenue when the settlement arrangements are executed and the cash is received, respectively. These termination and consensual buyout amounts are recognized in Other revenues.
     In addition, the Company could agree with customers to convert their obligations for other theater system configurations that have not yet been installed to arrangements to acquire or lease the IMAX digital theater system. The Company considers these situations to be a termination of the previous arrangement and origination of a new arrangement for the IMAX digital theater system. For all arrangements entered into or modified prior to the date of adoption of the amended ASC 605-25, the Company continues to defer an amount of any initial fees received from the customer such that the aggregate of the fees deferred and the net present value of the future fixed initial and ongoing payments to be received from the customer equals the selling price of the IMAX digital theater system to be leased or acquired by the customer. Any residual portion of the initial fees received from the customer for the terminated theater system is recorded in Other revenues at the time when the obligation for the original theater system is terminated and the new theater system arrangement is signed. Under the amended ASC 605-25, as described in note 2 to the accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, for all arrangements entered into or materially modified after the date of adoption, the total arrangement consideration to be received is allocated on a relative selling price basis to the digital upgrade and the termination of the previous theater system. The arrangement consideration allocated to the termination of the existing arrangement is recorded in Other revenues at the time when the obligation for the original theater system is terminated and the new theater system arrangement is signed.
     The Company may offer certain incentives to customers to complete theater system transactions including payment concessions or free services and products such as film licenses or 3D glasses. Reductions in, and deferral of, payments are taken into account in determining the sales price either by a direct reduction in the sales price or a reduction of payments to be discounted in accordance with the Leases or Interests Topic of the FASB ASC. Free products and services are accounted for as separate units of accounting. Other consideration given by the Company to customers are accounted for in accordance with the Revenue Recognition Topic of the FASB ASC.
  Maintenance and Extended Warranty Services
     Maintenance and extended warranty services may be provided under a multiple element arrangement or as a separately priced contract. Revenues related to these services are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract period and are recognized in Services revenues. Maintenance and extended warranty services includes maintenance of the customer’s equipment and replacement parts. Under certain maintenance arrangements, maintenance services may include additional training services to the customer’s technicians. All costs associated with this maintenance and extended warranty program are expensed as incurred. A loss on maintenance and extended warranty services is recognized if the expected cost of providing the services under the contracts exceeds the related deferred revenue.
  Film Production and IMAX DMR Services
     In certain film arrangements, the Company produces a film financed by third parties, whereby the third party retains the copyright and the Company obtains exclusive distribution rights. Under these arrangements, the Company is entitled to receive a fixed fee or to retain as a fee the excess of funding over cost of production (the “production fee”). The third parties receive a portion of the revenues

42


Table of Contents

received by the Company from distributing the film, which is charged to costs and expenses applicable to revenues-services. The production fees are deferred, and recognized as a reduction in the cost of the film, based on the ratio of the Company’s distribution revenues recognized in the current period to the ultimate distribution revenues expected from the film.
     Revenue from film production services where the Company does not hold the associated distribution rights are recognized in Services revenues when performance of the contractual service is complete, provided there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
     Revenues from digitally re-mastering (IMAX DMR) films where third parties own or hold the copyrights and the rights to distribute the film are derived in the form of processing fees and recoupments calculated as a percentage of box-office receipts generated from the re-mastered films. Processing fees are recognized as Services revenues when the performance of the related re-mastering service is completed, provided there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Recoupments, calculated as a percentage of box-office receipts, are recognized as Services revenues when box-office receipts are reported by the third party that owns or holds the related film rights, provided collectibility is reasonably assured.
     Losses on film production and IMAX DMR services are recognized as costs and expenses applicable to revenues-services in the period when it is determined that the Company’s estimate of total revenues to be realized by the Company will not exceed estimated total production costs to be expended on the film production and the cost of IMAX DMR services.
  Film Distribution
     Revenue from the licensing of films is recognized in Services revenues when persuasive evidence of a licensing arrangement exists, the film has been completed and delivered, the license period has begun, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. When license fees are based on a percentage of box-office receipts, revenue is recognized when box-office receipts are reported by exhibitors, provided collectibility is reasonably assured.
  Film Post-Production Services
     Revenues from post-production film services are recognized in Services revenue when performance of the contracted services is complete provided there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
  Theater Operations Revenue
     The Company recognizes revenue in Services revenues from its owned and operated theaters resulting from box-office ticket and concession sales as tickets are sold, films are shown and upon the sale of various concessions. The sales are cash or credit card transactions with theatergoers based on fixed prices per seat or per concession item.
     In addition, the Company enters into commercial arrangements with third party theater owners resulting in the sharing of profits and losses which are recognized in Services revenues when reported by such theaters. The Company also provides management services to certain theaters and recognizes revenue over the term of such services.
  Other
     Revenues on camera rentals are recognized in Rental revenue over the rental period.
     Revenue from the sale of 3D glasses is recognized in Equipment and product sales revenue when the 3D glasses have been delivered to the customer.
     Other service revenues are recognized in Service revenues when the performance of contracted services is complete.

43


Table of Contents

Allowances for Accounts Receivable and Financing Receivables
     Allowances for doubtful accounts receivable are based on the Company’s assessment of the collectibility of specific customer balances, which is based upon a review of the customer’s credit worthiness, past collection history and the underlying asset value of the equipment, where applicable. Interest on overdue accounts receivable is recognized as income as the amounts are collected.
     The Company monitors the performance of the theaters to which it has leased or sold theater systems which are subject to ongoing payments. When facts and circumstances indicate that there is a potential impairment in the accounts receivable, net investment in lease or a financing receivable, the Company will evaluate the potential outcome of either renegotiations involving changes in the terms of the receivable or defaults on the existing lease or financed sale agreements. The Company will record a provision if it is considered probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the arrangement or a renegotiated lease amount will cause a reclassification of the sales-type lease to an operating lease.
     When the net investment in lease or the financing receivable is impaired, the Company will recognize a provision for the difference between the carrying value in the investment and the present value of expected future cash flows discounted using the effective interest rate for the net investment in the lease or the financing receivable. If the Company expects to recover the theater system, the provision is equal to the excess of the carrying value of the investment over the fair value of the equipment.
     When the minimum lease payments are renegotiated and the lease continues to be classified as a sales-type lease, the reduction in payments is applied to reduce unearned finance income.
     These provisions are adjusted when there is a significant change in the amount or timing of the expected future cash flows or when actual cash flows differ from cash flow previously expected.
     Once a net investment in lease or financing receivable is considered impaired, the Company does not recognize interest income until the collectibility issues are resolved. When finance income is not recognized, any payments received are applied against outstanding gross minimum lease amounts receivable or gross receivables from financed sales.
Inventories
     Inventories are carried at the lower of cost, determined on an average cost basis, and net realizable value except for raw materials, which are carried out at the lower of cost and replacement cost. Finished goods and work-in-process include the cost of raw materials, direct labor, theater design costs, and an applicable share of manufacturing overhead costs.
     The costs related to theater systems under sales and sales-type lease arrangement are relieved from inventory to costs and expenses applicable to revenues-equipment and product sales when revenue recognition criteria are met. The costs related to theater systems under operating lease arrangements and joint revenue sharing arrangements are transferred from inventory to assets under construction in property, plant and equipment when allocated to a signed joint revenue sharing arrangement or when the arrangement is first classified as an operating lease.
     The Company records provisions for excess and obsolete inventory based upon current estimates of future events and conditions, including the anticipated installation dates for the current backlog of theater system contracts, technological developments, signings in negotiation, growth prospects within the customers’ ultimate marketplace and anticipated market acceptance of the Company’s current and pending theater systems.
     Finished goods inventories can contain theater systems for which title has passed to the Company’s customer, under the contract, but the revenue recognition criteria as discussed above have not been met.
Asset Impairments
     The Company performs an impairment test on its goodwill on an annual basis, coincident with the year-end, as well as in quarters where events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
     Goodwill impairment is assessed at the reporting unit level by comparing the unit’s carrying value, including goodwill, to the fair value of the unit. Significant estimates are involved in the impairment test. The carrying values of each unit are subject to allocations of certain assets and liabilities that the Company has applied in a systematic and rational manner. The fair value of the Company’s

44


Table of Contents

units is assessed using a discounted cash flow model. The model is constructed using the Company’s budget and long-range plan as a base.
     Long-lived asset impairment testing is performed at the lowest level of an asset group at which identifiable cash flows are largely independent. In performing its review for recoverability, the Company estimates the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset or asset group and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset or asset group, an impairment loss is recognized in the consolidated statement of operations. Measurement of the impairment loss is based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset or asset group over the fair value calculated using discounted expected future cash flows.
     The Company’s estimates of future cash flows involve anticipating future revenue streams, which contain many assumptions that are subject to variability, as well as estimates for future cash outlays, the amounts of which, and the timing of which are both uncertain. Actual results that differ from the Company’s budget and long-range plan could result in a significantly different result to an impairment test, which could impact earnings.
Foreign Currency Translation
     Monetary assets and liabilities of the Company’s operations which are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing at the end of the period. Non-monetary items are translated at historical exchange rates. Revenue and expense transactions are translated at exchange rates prevalent at the transaction date. Such exchange gains and losses are included in the determination of earnings in the period in which they arise.
     Foreign currency derivatives are recognized and measured in the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value (gains or losses) are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations except for derivatives designated and qualifying as foreign currency hedging instruments. For foreign currency hedging instruments, the effective portion of the gain or loss in a hedge of a forecasted transaction is reported in other comprehensive income and reclassified to the consolidated statement of operations when the forecasted transaction occurs. Any ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the consolidated statement of operations.
Pension Plan and Postretirement Benefit Obligations Assumptions
     The Company’s pension plan and postretirement benefit obligations and related costs are calculated using actuarial concepts, within the framework of the Compensation — Retirement Benefits Topic of the FASB ASC. A critical assumption to this accounting is the discount rate. The Company evaluates this critical assumption annually or when otherwise required to by accounting standards. Other assumptions include factors such as expected retirement date, mortality rate, rate of compensation increase, and estimates of inflation.
     The discount rate enables the Company to state expected future cash payments for benefits as a present value on the measurement date. The guideline for setting this rate is a high-quality long-term corporate bond rate. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and increases pension expense. The Company’s discount rate was determined by considering the average of pension yield curves constructed from a large population of high-quality corporate bonds. The resulting discount rate reflects the matching of plan liability cash flows to the yield curves.
     The discount rate used is a key assumption in the determination of the pension benefit obligation and expense. A 1.0% change in the discount rate used could result in a $1.7 — $2.0 million increase or decrease in the pension benefit obligation with a corresponding benefit or charge recognized in other comprehensive income in the year. A one year delay in Mr. Gelfond’s retirement date would increase the discount rate by 0.3% and have a $0.4 million impact on the expected pension payment.
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation
     As at March 31, 2011, the Company had net deferred income tax assets of $57.4 million. The Company’s management assesses realization of its deferred tax assets based on all available evidence in order to conclude whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. Available evidence considered by the Company includes, but is not limited to, the Company’s historic operating results, projected future operating results, reversing temporary differences, contracted sales backlog at March 31, 2011, changing business circumstances, and the ability to realize certain deferred tax assets through loss and tax credit carry-back and carry-forward strategies.

45


Table of Contents

     When there is a change in circumstances that causes a change in judgment about the realizability of the deferred tax assets, the Company would adjust the applicable valuation allowance in the period when such change occurs.
Tax Exposures
     The Company is subject to ongoing tax exposures, examinations and assessments in various jurisdictions. Accordingly, the Company may incur additional tax expense based upon the outcomes of such matters. In addition, when applicable, the Company adjusts tax expense to reflect the Company’s ongoing assessments of such matters which require judgment and can materially increase or decrease its effective rate as well as impact operating results. The Company provides for such exposures in accordance with Income Taxes Topic of the FASB ASC.
Stock-Based Compensation
     The Company utilizes a lattice-binomial option-pricing model (the “Binomial Model”) to determine the fair value of stock-based payment awards. The fair value determined by the Binomial Model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the Company’s expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. The Binomial Model also considers the expected exercise multiple which is the multiple of exercise price to grant price at which exercises are expected to occur on average. Option-pricing models were developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting or hedging restrictions and are fully transferable. Because the Company’s employee stock options and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) have certain characteristics that are significantly different from traded options, and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, in management’s opinion, the Binomial Model best provides an accurate measure of the fair value of the Company’s employee stock options and SARs. Although the fair value of employee stock options and SARs are determined in accordance with the Equity topic of the FASB ASC using an option-pricing model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
     See note 2 to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 for information regarding recent changes in accounting policies and the impact of recently issued accounting pronouncements impacting the Company.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
     As identified in note 14 to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1, the Company has eight reportable segments identified by category of product sold or service provided: IMAX systems; theater system maintenance; joint revenue sharing arrangements; film production and IMAX DMR; film distribution; film post-production; theater operations; and other. The IMAX systems segment designs, manufactures, sells or leases IMAX theater projection system equipment. The theater system maintenance segment maintains IMAX theater projection system equipment in the IMAX theater network. The joint revenue sharing arrangements segment installs IMAX theater projection system equipment to an exhibitor in exchange for a certain percentage of box-office and concession revenue. The film production and IMAX DMR segment produces films and performs film re-mastering services. The film distribution segment distributes films for which the Company has distribution rights. The film post-production segment provides film post-production and film print services. The theater operations segment owns and operates certain IMAX theaters. The other segment includes camera rentals and other miscellaneous items. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K.
     The Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations have been organized and discussed with respect to the above stated segments. Management feels that a discussion and analysis based on its segments is significantly more relevant as the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations captions combine results from several segments.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 Versus Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
     The Company reported a net loss of $1.0 million or $0.02 loss per basic share and $0.02 loss per diluted share for the first quarter of 2011, as compared to net income of $26.6 million or $0.42 per basic share and $0.40 per diluted share for the first quarter of 2010. Net income for the quarter includes a $1.8 million charge (2010 — $8.7 million) or $0.03 per diluted share for variable share-based compensation expense primarily due to the increase in the Company’s stock price during the quarter (from $28.07 per share to

46


Table of Contents

$31.98 per share) and its impact on stock appreciation rights, a one-time $2.1 million charge ($0.03 per diluted share) due to an arbitration award arising from an arbitration proceeding brought against the Company in connection with a discontinued subsidiary, and a non-cash tax benefit of $0.3 million ($nil per diluted share). Excluding the impact of variable share-based compensation expense, the charge for an arbitration award, and the non-cash tax benefit, net income would have been $2.5 million or $0.04 per diluted share in the first quarter of 2011 as compared to net income of $35.3 million or $0.53 per diluted share for the first quarter of 2010.
     The following table sets forth the breakdown of revenue and gross margin by category:
                                 
    Revenue     Gross Margin  
    Three Months Ended March 31,     Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
IMAX Systems
                               
Sales and sales-type leases(1)
  $ 19,309     $ 8,531     $ 8,942     $ 2,063  
Ongoing rent, fees, and finance income(2)
    2,950       2,422       2,793       2,437  
 
                       
    22,259       10,953       11,735       4,500  
 
                       
Theater System Maintenance
    5,795       4,966       2,587       2,309  
 
                       
Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangements
    4,040       18,936       2,178       16,812  
 
                       
Film
                               
Production and IMAX DMR
    7,258       23,452       2,759       19,501  
Distribution
    2,617       3,273       626       742  
Post-production
    1,624       2,592       1,689       2,054  
 
                       
    11,499       29,317       5,074       22,297  
 
                       
Theater Operations
    981       5,949       (763 )     1,658  
 
                       
Other
    586       2,663       (165 )     724  
 
                       
  $ 45,160     $ 72,784     $ 20,646     $ 48,300  
 
                       
 
(1)   Includes initial payments and the present value of fixed minimum payments from equipment, sales and sales-type lease transactions.
 
(2)   Includes rental income from operating leases, contingent rents from operating and sales-type leases, contingent fees from sales arrangements and finance income.
     Revenues and Gross Margin
     The Company’s revenues for the first quarter of 2011 decreased by 38.0% to $45.2 million from $72.8 million in the same period last year due in large part to decreases in revenue from film and joint revenue sharing arrangements, partially offset by an increase in IMAX systems revenue. The gross margin across all segments in the first quarter of 2011 was $20.6 million, or 45.7% of total revenue, compared to $48.3 million, or 66.4% of total revenue in the first quarter of 2010.
     IMAX Systems
     IMAX systems revenue increased 103.2% to $22.3 million in the first quarter of 2011 as compared to $11.0 million in the first quarter of 2010, resulting primarily from the installation of 7 more full, theater systems (excluding digital upgrades) under sales or sales-type leases as compared to the prior year comparative period.
     Revenue from sales and sales-type leases increased 126.3% to $19.3 million in the first quarter of 2011 from $8.5 million in the first quarter of 2010. The Company recognized revenue on 11 full, new theater systems which qualified as either sales or sales-type leases in the first quarter of 2011, with a total value of $13.5 million, as compared to 3 in the first quarter of 2010 with a total value of

47


Table of Contents

$4.7 million. The Company also recognized revenue on 14 digital upgrades in the first quarter of 2011, with a total value of $5.5 million, as compared to 9 in the first quarter of 2010 with a total value of $2.7 million. Digital upgrades have lower sales prices and gross margin than full theater system installations. The Company has decided to offer digital upgrades at lower selling prices for strategic reasons since the Company believes that digital systems increase flexibility and profitability for the Company’s existing exhibition customers. There were no used systems installed during the three months ended March 31, 2011, as compared to one used system with a value of $0.9 million installed and recognized in the prior year comparative period.
     Average revenue per full, new sales and sales-type lease system was $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, as compared to $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Average revenue per full, new sales and sales-type lease system was lower in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the prior year comparative period primarily due to the mix of units sold in the quarter (see chart below). Average revenue per digital upgrade was $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, as compared to $0.3 million experienced during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The breakdown in mix of sales and sales-type lease and joint revenue sharing arrangement (see discussion below) installations by theater system configuration for the first quarter of 2011 and 2010 is outlined in the table below.
                 
    Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
    2011     2010  
Sales and Sales-type lease systems — installed and recognized
           
IMAX 3D SR
        1
IMAX Dome
        1
IMAX digital
    25 (1)     11 (3)
 
           
 
    25     13
IMAX digital — installed and deferred
    8 (2)    
 
           
 
    33     13
Joint revenue sharing arrangements — installed and operating
           
IMAX digital
    10 (1)     6 (3)
 
           
 
    43     19
 
           
 
(1)   Includes the digital upgrade of 14 systems (all sales arrangements) from film-based to digital.
 
(2)   Includes the digital upgrade of 8 systems (all sales arrangements) from film-based to digital.
 
(3)   Includes the digital upgrade of 10 systems (9 sales arrangements and 1 system under a joint revenue sharing arrangement) from film-based to digital.
     As noted in the table above, 8 theater systems under a digital upgrade sales arrangement were installed but revenue recognition was deferred in the three months ended March 31, 2011. The arrangement contained provisions providing the customer with standard digital upgrades, which were installed, and a number of as-of-yet undeveloped upgrades. The Company’s policy is such that once the fair value for the undeveloped upgrade is established, the Company allocates total contract consideration, including any upgrade revenues, between the delivered and undelivered elements on a relative fair value basis and recognizes the revenue allocated to the delivered elements with their associated costs. If the arrangement is materially modified in the future, the arrangement in its entirety would be subject to the provisions of the amended ASU 605-25 and the Company would be required to develop, absent an established selling price or third party evidence of the selling price for the undeveloped specified upgrade, a best estimated selling price for the undeveloped specified upgrade, allocate the arrangement’s consideration on a relative selling price allocation basis, and recognize revenue on the delivered elements based on that allocation. In the three month period ended March 31, 2010, the Company did not defer any recognitions.
     Settlement revenue was $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and $nil for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The amount recognized in the first quarter of 2011 related to a consensual buyout for one uninstalled theater system.
     IMAX theater systems gross margin from full, new sales and sale-type leases, excluding the impact of settlements and asset impairment charges, increased to 64.9% in the first quarter of 2011, from 59.2% in the first quarter of 2010. The gross margin on digital upgrades, excluding the impact of settlements and asset impairment charges, was $0.9 million in the first quarter of 2011 in

48


Table of Contents

comparison with a loss of $0.2 million in the prior year quarter. There were no used systems installed during the three months ended March 31, 2011, as compared to one used system with a gross margin of $0.1 million installed and recognized in the prior year comparative period.
     Ongoing rent revenue and finance income increased to $3.0 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to $2.4 million in the first quarter of 2010. Gross margin for ongoing rent and finance income increased in the first quarter of 2011 to $2.8 million from $2.4 million in the first quarter of 2010. The increase in revenue and gross margin was largely due to higher contingent fees which amounted to $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2011 and $0.2 million in the first quarter of 2010.
     Theater System Maintenance
     Theater system maintenance revenue increased 16.7% to $5.8 million during the first quarter of 2011 as compared to $5.0 million in the first quarter of 2010. Theater system maintenance gross margin increased $0.3 million to $2.6 million in the first quarter of 2011 as compared to $2.3 million in the prior year comparative period. Maintenance revenue continues to grow as the number of theaters in the IMAX theater network grows. Maintenance margins can vary depending on the mix of theater system configurations in the theater network and the date of installation.
     Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangements
     Revenue from joint revenue sharing arrangements decreased 78.7% to $4.0 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to $18.9 million in the first quarter of 2010. The Company ended the first quarter with 181 theaters under joint revenue sharing arrangements as compared to 122 theaters at the end of the first quarter of 2010. The decrease in revenues from joint revenue sharing arrangements was due to the lack of event type films during the quarter compared to the record performance of Avatar: An IMAX 3D Experience during the first quarter of 2010. During the quarter, the Company installed 10 full, new theaters under joint revenue sharing arrangements, as compared to 5 full, new theaters during the prior year quarter.
     The gross margin from joint revenue sharing arrangements in the first quarter of 2011 decreased to $2.2 million compared to $16.8 million in the first quarter of 2010. The decrease in gross margin was largely a result of a decrease in revenues. Included in the calculation of first quarter gross margin were certain advertising, marketing and selling expenses of $0.5 million, as compared to $0.6 million incurred in the prior year period. Excluding these launch expenses from both periods, the gross margin would have been $2.7 million in the first quarter of 2011, compared to $17.4 million in the first quarter of 2010.
     Film
     Revenues from the Company’s film segments decreased 60.8% to $11.5 million in the first quarter of 2011 from $29.3 million in the first quarter of 2010. Film production and IMAX DMR revenues decreased to $7.3 million in the first quarter of 2011 from $23.5 million in the first quarter of 2010. The decrease in film production and IMAX DMR revenues was primarily as a result of the lack of event type films during the quarter compared to the record breaking performance of Avatar: An IMAX 3D Experience during the first quarter of 2010. Gross box office generated by IMAX DMR films decreased to $62.1 million for the first quarter of 2011 from $232.2 million for the first quarter of 2010. In 2011, gross-box office was generated by the exhibition of 7 films listed below, as compared to 3 films exhibited during the first three months of 2010:
     
First Three Months — 2011 Films Exhibited   First Three Months — 2010 Films Exhibited
TRON: Legacy: An IMAX 3D Experience
  Avatar: An IMAX 3D Experience
The Green Hornet: An IMAX 3D Experience
  Alice in Wonderland: An IMAX 3D Experience
Tangled: An IMAX 3D Experience
  How to Train Your Dragon: An IMAX 3D Experience
Sanctum: An IMAX 3D Experience
   
I Am Number Four: The IMAX Experience
   
Mars Needs Moms: An IMAX 3D Experience
   
Sucker Punch: The IMAX Experience
   
     Film distribution revenues decreased to $2.6 million in the first quarter of 2011 from $3.3 million in the first quarter of 2010. During the first quarter of 2010, the Company launched Hubble 3D: An IMAX 3D Experience. The Company did not release any new, original titles in the first quarter of 2011. In April 2011, the Company, in conjunction with WB, released the original film Born to Be Wild 3D: An IMAX 3D Experience to its network.

49


Table of Contents

     Film post-production revenues decreased to $1.6 million in the first quarter of 2011 from $2.6 million in the first quarter of 2010 due to a decrease in third party business.
     The Company’s gross margin from its film segments decreased in the first quarter of 2011 to $5.1 million from $22.3 million in the first quarter of 2010. Film production and IMAX DMR gross margin decreased to $2.8 million in the first quarter of 2011 from $19.5 million in the first quarter of 2010 primarily due to the decreased gross box office in the first quarter of 2011 as compared to the first quarter of 2010. The film distribution gross margin decreased in the first quarter of 2011 to $0.6 million from $0.7 million in the first quarter of 2010, primarily as a result of the decrease in film distribution revenues. During the first quarter of 2011, the gross margin from post-production was $1.7 million as compared to $2.1 million in the first quarter of 2010.
     Theater Operations
     Theater operations revenue decreased to $1.0 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to $5.9 million experienced in the first quarter of 2010. This decrease was attributable to decreases in average ticket prices and attendance, primarily as a result of the record performance of Avatar: An IMAX 3D Experience in the first quarter of 2010 and comparatively weaker film performance.
     Theater operations gross margin decreased to a loss of $0.8 million in the first quarter of 2011 as compared to a profit of $1.7 million in the first quarter of 2010 due to a decrease in revenues.
     Other
     Other revenue decreased to $0.6 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to $2.7 million in the same period in 2010. Other revenue primarily includes revenue generated from the Company’s camera and rental business and after market sales of projection system parts and 3D glasses. Other revenue in the first quarter of 2010 was driven by high orders for 3D glasses as a result of the record breaking performance of Avatar: An IMAX 3D Experience.
     The gross margin on other revenue was a loss of $0.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as compared to a margin of $0.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
     Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
     Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $16.9 million in the first quarter of 2011 as compared to $19.5 million in the first quarter of 2010. The $2.6 million decrease experienced from the prior year comparative period was largely the result of the following:
    a $5.5 million decrease in the Company’s stock-based compensation expense (including $6.9 million for variable share-based awards) primarily due to there being substantially fewer variable stock awards outstanding as compared to the prior year period as a result of the settlement of a number of SARs in 2010 and the first quarter of 2011 (as at March 31, 2011, 605,000 variable stock awards were outstanding as compared to 1,960,000 as at March 31, 2010).
      This decrease was partially offset by:
    a $1.6 million increase in staff-related and compensation costs including (i) an increase in salaries and benefits of $1.3 million arising in part from a higher average Canadian dollar denominated salary expense ($0.3 million), increased staffing and normal merit increases, and (ii) a $0.3 million increase in travel and entertainment costs commensurate with business activity;
    a $1.1 million increase in legal and professional fees and other expenses, including work performed relating to new business initiatives; and
    a $0.2 million increase in other general corporate expenditures, which resulted from an expansion of the Company’s overall business.
     Provision for Arbitration Award
     During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded a provision of $2.1 million regarding an award issued in connection with an arbitration proceeding brought against the Company, relating to agreements entered into in 1994 and 1995 by its

50


Table of Contents

former Ridefilm subsidiary, whose business the Company discontinued through a sale to a third party in March 2001. The Company is seeking to have the award vacated. See note 9(c) to the condensed consolidated financial statements for more information on this matter.
     Research and Development
     Research and development expenses increased to $1.9 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to $1.2 million in the first of 2010. The increased research and development expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the prior year period are primarily attributable to ongoing enhancements to the Company’s digital projection technology to assure that the Company continues to provide the highest quality, premiere movie going experience available to consumers, as well as ongoing work performed on the Company’s portable theater initiative.
     Receivable Provisions, Net of Recoveries
     Receivable provisions net of recoveries for accounts receivable and financing receivables amounted to a net provision of $0.2 million and less than $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
     The Company’s accounts receivables and financing receivables are subject to credit risk. These receivables are concentrated with the leading theater exhibitors and studios in the film entertainment industry. To minimize the Company’s credit risk, the Company retains title to underlying theater systems that are leased, performs initial and ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and makes ongoing provisions for its estimate of potentially uncollectible amounts. Accordingly, the Company believes it has adequately protected itself against exposures relating to receivables and contractual commitments.
     Interest Income and Expense
     Interest income decreased to less than $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2011 as compared to $0.3 million in the first quarter of 2010.
     Interest expense decreased to $0.4 million in the first quarter of 2011 as compared to $0.7 million in the first quarter of 2010. Included in interest expense is the amortization of deferred finance costs of $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2011 and less than $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2010. The Company’s policy is to defer and amortize, over the life of the debt instrument, all the costs relating to debt financing which are paid directly to the debt provider.
     Income Taxes
     The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the statutory tax rate and will vary from year to year primarily as a result of numerous permanent differences, investments and other tax credits, the provision for income taxes at different rates in foreign and other provincial jurisdictions, enacted statutory tax rate increases or reductions in the year, changes due to foreign exchange, changes in the Company’s valuation allowance based on the Company’s recoverability assessments of deferred tax assets, and favorable or unfavorable resolution of various tax examinations.
     There was no change in the Company’s estimates of the recoverability of its deferred tax assets based on an analysis of both positive and negative evidence including projected future earnings. As at March 31, 2011, the Company had a gross deferred income tax asset of $65.3 million, against which the Company is carrying a $7.9 million valuation allowance. The Company recorded an income tax recovery of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, of which a provision of $0.1 million is related to an increase in unrecognized tax benefits. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $0.4 million, of which $0.1 million was related to an increase in unrecognized tax benefits.
     The Company anticipates that it will become a cash taxpayer in late 2012 or 2013.

51


Table of Contents

     Outlook
     The Company continues to expect higher revenues in 2011 as compared to 2010 as a result of (i) the recent and expected future growth of the Company’s commercial theater network, which drives revenue in several of the Company’s segments, and (ii) the anticipated performance of the remaining 2011 film slate. The recent and expected future growth in the theater network is being driven in part by the record number of theater signings the Company achieved in 2010. The high level of signings activity continued into the first quarter of 2011, with the Company entering into arrangements for a total of 101 theater systems (99 new, 2 digital upgrades).
     The Company installed 21 IMAX theater systems, not including digital upgrades, in the first three months of 2011. At March 31, 2011, this reflected an increase of 20.6% for the overall IMAX theater network and 30.8% for the IMAX commercial multiplex theater network as compared to March 31, 2010. Of the theater system arrangements in backlog as at March 31, 2011, the Company currently estimates that approximately 94-104 theater systems (excluding digital upgrades) will be installed during the reminder of 2011. As a result, by the end of 2011, the Company’s total theater network is expected to have increased by approximately 21.0% over the prior year and its commercial multiplex theater network by approximately 30.0% over the prior year as the majority of the new 2011 systems are to be installed in commercial settings. In addition, each year the Company installs a number of systems that are signed in that same calendar year. However, the Company cautions that theater system installations slip from period to period in the course of the Company’s business and such slippages remain a recurring and unpredictable part of its business.
     The Company’s pace of overall IMAX theater system signings increased significantly in the first three months of 2011 as compared to the prior year quarter. The Company signed deals for 101 theater systems during the first three months of 2011, as compared to 41 IMAX theater signings for the first three months of 2010. The Company believes that this increase in IMAX theater system signings will result in a larger IMAX theater network and, accordingly, increased revenue for the Company over the longer term. A substantial portion of the recent commercial theater network growth has come from theaters under joint revenue sharing arrangements in the United States and, increasingly, in certain international markets. Revenue sharing arrangements allow the Company to capitalize on its theater network growth by providing the Company with higher recurring revenue than under most sales or sales-type lease arrangements. The Company believes that the strategy of increasing the number of IMAX theaters under joint revenue sharing arrangements has driven increased profitability in recent years and the Company believes that it will continue to drive profitability in the future. The retirement of a significant portion of the Company’s debt during 2009 and increased cash flows from operations during 2009 and 2010 has allowed the Company the financial flexibility to fund the expansion of its joint revenue sharing strategy. To date, the Company has signed joint revenue sharing arrangements for 306 theater systems, including the Company’s recently announced 75-theater joint revenue sharing arrangement with Wanda Cinema Line Corporation, China’s top-grossing cinema chain. Of the 306 joint revenues sharing theaters signed, 181 have been installed as at March 31, 2011. The Company cautions that as an increasing portion of its revenues are derived from theaters under joint revenue sharing arrangements, it is increasingly subject to the success or failure of its IMAX DMR film slate.
     In recent years, the number of IMAX DMR films released to the IMAX theater network has also increased. The increased number of IMAX DMR films can minimize the impact of an individual film’s relatively weak performance. In addition, the increased number of titles with shorter release windows can mean a greater opportunity to capitalize on the early weeks of a movie’s release, when over half of a given title’s gross box office is typically generated. The increased number of films also permits the Company to select a diverse mix of titles to maximize the network’s box office potential. To date, the Company has signed contracts for 22 DMR films that will be exhibited on the IMAX theater network in 2011, as compared to 16 IMAX DMR titles in 2010 and 14 IMAX DMR titles in 2009. The Company remains in active discussions with every major Hollywood studio regarding future titles. However, the Company cautions that films can be subject to delays in production or changes in release schedule, which can negatively impact the number, timing and type of IMAX DMR and IMAX original films released to the IMAX theater network. The Company intends to continue to try and achieve the optimal film slate, with the appropriate number of mix and titles.
     During the first quarter of 2011, the Company’s DMR revenue decreased by 69.1% over the prior year quarter owing to the lack of event type IMAX DMR films exhibited during the quarter compared to the record performance of Avatar: An IMAX 3D Experience in the first quarter of 2010. IMAX DMR films exhibited during the quarter, however, continued to significantly outperform lower-cost formats on a per screen basis. The Company continues to expect increased revenue for 2011 over 2010 in part based on the anticipated performance of the remaining 2011 film slate.
     The Company believes that its international expansion is an important driver of future growth for the Company. On March 24, 2011, the Company announced a 75-theater joint revenue sharing agreement with Wanda Cinema Line Corporation. This agreement with Wanda, which represents IMAX’s first full revenue-sharing arrangement in China and its largest single international partnership

52


Table of Contents

to date, brings the total number of IMAX theaters open or in backlog in Greater China to 177. Under the terms of the new partnership, IMAX will install its digital technology into 25 of the exhibitor’s multiplex locations this year, with the remainder to be rolled out in 2012, 2013 and 2014. On March 29, 2011, the Company and Cinema Park, an exhibition chain owned by Russia’s largest media holding company, Profmedia, announced a sale agreement to install 8 additional digital IMAX theater systems (in addition for a deal for 10 systems in 2010). These theater systems are scheduled to be installed in various parts of Russia in 2012 and 2013. In addition, on March 30, 2011, the Company and PVR Cinemas, India’s leading cinema brand and operator of the country’s top-performing multiplexes, announced an agreement to install 4 digital IMAX theater systems in key locations throughout India.
     For the first three months of 2011, 48% of the Company’s gross box office from DMR films was generated from IMAX theaters in international markets, as compared with 43% in the first three months of 2010. In the first three months of 2011, 95 of the Company’s 101 theater signings were for theaters in international markets. During the remainder of 2011, the Company intends to continue to expand its international presence, including by expanding its number of theaters under international joint revenue sharing arrangements.
     To support its growth in international markets, the Company has begun, and expects to continue, to evaluate DMR opportunities in international markets. In July 2010, the Company exhibited its first DMR title outside of North America, Aftershock: The IMAX Experience, across IMAX theaters in China, other parts of Asia and key North American markets pursuant to an agreement between the Company and Huayi Bros. Media Corporation Ltd., China’s largest media group. On August 30, 2010, the Company announced that internationally acclaimed director John Woo and producer Terence Chang’s next film, the action epic Flying Tigers, is intended to be released to select IMAX theaters in early 2012. In December 2010, the Company also announced the release of The Founding of a Party: The IMAX Experience in China in June 2011. The Company is similarly committed to maximizing the productivity of its international theaters through international-only releases. The Company’s first international-only release Prince of Persia: Sands of Time: The IMAX Experience was released in May 2010 and the Company’s second international-only release, Tangled: An IMAX 3D Experience, was released in select Asian markets beginning in February 2011. The Company anticipates additional international-only releases in the future. Finally, in order to further strengthen the Company’s film slate internationally, the Company has recently announced certain IMAX-only early releases. For instance, TRON: Legacy: An IMAX 3D Experience was released in IMAX theaters in France four days prior to its wide release in that country. The Company and its studio partners also employed this IMAX-only early release strategy with Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part I: The IMAX Experience in France in November, with TRON: Legacy: An IMAX 3D Experience in Russia in December and with I Am Number Four: The IMAX Experience in Mexico in February.
     The Company’s historical domestic growth strategy has been to penetrate domestic urban markets with large national exhibition partners. More recently, however, the Company has signed several new theater agreements with smaller, regional exhibitors such as Warren Theatres and Premiere Cinemas. The Company has found that some of the top performing IMAX theatres in the United States are in smaller markets and as such will continue to pursue this growth initiative.
     In addition to the 7 DMR films that have already been shown in the IMAX theater network in the first three months of 2011, 15 additional DMR films are scheduled to be released to its theater network during the remaining nine months of 2011:
    Fast Five: The IMAX Experience (Universal, April 2011);
 
    Thor: An IMAX 3D Experience (Marvel, Paramount, May 2011);
 
    Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides: An IMAX 3D Experience (Disney, May 2011);
 
    Kung Fu Panda 2: An IMAX 3D Experience (Paramount, May 2011, to be released in select international markets);
 
    Super 8: The IMAX Experience (Paramount, June 2011);
 
    The Founding of a Party: The IMAX Experience (China Film Group, June 2011, to be released in the People’s Republic of China);
 
    Cars 2: An IMAX 3D Experience (Disney, June 2011);
 
    Transformers 3: Dark of the Moon: An IMAX 3D Experience (Paramount, July 2011);
 
    Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part II: An IMAX 3D Experience (WB, July 2011);
 
    Real Steel: The IMAX Experience (DreamWorks Studios Disney, October 2011);
 
    Contagion: The IMAX Experience (WB, October 2011);
 
    Puss in Boots: An IMAX 3D Experience (Paramount, November 2011);
 
    Happy Feet 2: An IMAX 3D Experience (WB, November 2011);
 
    Mission: Impossible — Ghost Protocol: The IMAX Experience (Paramount, December 2011); and
 
    The Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn: An IMAX 3D Experience (Paramount, December 2011).

53


Table of Contents

     In addition, the Company, in conjunction with WB, released the original film Born to Be Wild 3D: An IMAX 3D Experience to its network in April 2011.
     During the remainder of 2011, the Company expects to continue to explore new areas of brand extension such as: 3D in-home entertainment technology; increased post-production opportunities; alternative theater content; and partnering with technology, studio, programming, content and consumer electronics companies. In 2010, 3net was formed. 3net is a 24/7 3D television channel operated by a limited liability corporation owned by the Company, Discovery Communications and Sony Corporation.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
     On November 16, 2009, the Company amended and restated the terms of its senior secured credit facility, which had been scheduled to mature on October 31, 2010. The amended and restated facility, as further amended by the parties on January 21, 2011, (the “Credit Facility”) with a scheduled maturity of October 31, 2013, has a maximum borrowing capacity of $75.0 million, consisting of a revolving loan facility of $40.0 million, subject to a borrowing base calculation (as described below) and including a sublimit of $20.0 million for letters of credit and a term loan of $35.0 million. Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries serve as guarantors (the “Guarantors”) of the Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility is collateralized by a first priority security interest in all of the present and future assets of the Company and the Guarantors.
     The Company’s indebtedness under the Credit Facility includes the following:
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Term Loan
  $ 17,500     $ 17,500  
 
           
     As at March 31, 2011, the Company’s current borrowing capacity under the revolving portion of the Credit Facility was $35.2 million after deduction for the minimum Excess Availability reserve of $5.0 million. Outstanding borrowings and letters of credit and advance payment guarantees were $nil as at March 31, 2011. As at December 31, 2010, the borrowing capacity was $40.0 million after deduction of the minimum Excess Availability reserve of $5.0 million.
     The terms of the Credit Facility are set forth in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”), dated November 16, 2009, among the Company; Wells Fargo Capital Finance Corporation Canada (formerly Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Canada)), as agent, lender, sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner, (“Wells Fargo”); and Export Development Canada, as lender (“EDC”, together with Wells Fargo, the “Lenders”) and in various collateral and security documents entered into by the Company and the Guarantors. Each of the Guarantors has also entered into a guarantee in respect of the Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility.
     The revolving portion of the Credit Facility permits maximum aggregate borrowings equal to the lesser of:
(i) $40.0 million, and
(ii) a collateral calculation based on the percentages of the book values of the Company’s net investment in sales-type leases, financing receivables, certain trade accounts receivable, finished goods inventory allocated to backlog contracts and the appraised values of the expected future cash flows related to operating leases and the Company’s owned real property, reduced by certain accruals and accounts payable and subject to other conditions, limitations and reserve right requirements. It is also reduced by the settlement risk on its foreign currency forward contracts when the notional value exceeds the fair value of the forward contracts.
     The revolving portion of the Credit Facility bears interest, at the Company’s option, at either (i) LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75% per annum, or (ii) Wells Fargo’s prime rate plus a margin of 1.25% per annum. The term loan portion of the Credit Facility bears interest at the Company’s option, at either (i) LIBOR plus a margin of 3.75% per annum, or (ii) Wells Fargo’s prime rate plus a margin of 2.25% per annum. Under the Credit Facility, the effective interest rate for the three months ended March 31, 2011 for the term loan portion was 4.05% (2010 — 4.01%) and n/a for the revolving portion (2010 — 3.25%).
     The Credit Facility provides that so long as the term loan remains outstanding, the Company will be required to maintain: (i) a ratio of funded debt (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of not more than 2:1 through December 31, 2010, and (ii) a ratio of funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 1.75:1 thereafter. If the Company repays the

54


Table of Contents

term loan in full, it will remain subject to such ratio requirements only if Excess Availability (as defined in the Credit Agreement) is less than $10.0 million or Cash and Excess Availability (as defined in the Credit Agreement) is less than $15.0 million. The ratio of funded debt to EBITDA was 0.26:1 as at March 31, 2011, where Funded Debt (as defined in the Credit Agreement) is the sum of all obligations evidenced by notes, bonds, debentures or similar instruments and was $17.5 million. EBITDA is calculated as follows:
                 
    For the     For the  
    3 months ended     12 months ended  
EBITDA per Credit Facility:   March 31, 2011     March 31, 2011(1)  
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)                
Net (loss) earnings
  $ (1,003 )   $ 73,196
Add (subtract):
             
Loss from equity accounted investments
    422       915
Recovery of income taxes
    (309 )     (52,529 )
Interest expense, net of interest income
    425       1,542
Depreciation and amortization, including film asset amortization
    5,161       20,281
Write-downs net of recoveries including asset impairments and receivable provisions
    208       2,650
Stock and other non-cash compensation
    4,107       22,723
Other, net
          (356 )
 
           
  $ 9,011     $ 68,422
 
           
 
(1)   Ratio of funded debt calculated using twelve months ended EBITDA
          If Cash and Excess Availability is less than $25.0 million, the Company will also be required to maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of not less than 1.1:1.0; provided, however, that if the Company repays the term loan in full, it will remain subject to such ratio requirement only if Excess Availability is less than $10.0 million or Cash and Excess Availability is less than $15.0 million. At all times, under the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company is required to maintain minimum Excess Availability of not less than $5.0 million and minimum Cash and Excess Availability of not less than $15.0 million. These amounts were $40.2 million and $57.5 million, respectively at March 31, 2011. The Company was in compliance with all of these requirements as at March 31, 2011.
          The Credit Facility contains typical affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants that limit or restrict the ability of the Company and the Guarantors to: incur certain additional indebtedness; make certain loans, investments or guarantees; pay dividends; make certain asset sales; incur certain liens or other encumbrances; conduct certain transactions with affiliates and enter into certain corporate transactions.
     The Credit Facility also contains customary events of default, including upon an acquisition or change of control or upon a change in the business and assets of the Company or a Guarantor that in each case is reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company or Guarantor. If an event of default occurs and is continuing under the Credit Facility, the Lenders may, among other things, terminate their commitments and require immediate repayment of all amounts owed by the Company.
     On April 27, 2011, Wells Fargo entered into a commitment letter with the Company in which it, along with EDC, has committed to provide the Company with a senior secured revolving loan and revolving term loan facility in an amount up to $110.0 million (the “New Facility”). The New Facility would serve as an amendment and extension to the Credit Facility and would extend the maturity date of Credit Facility by two years to October 31, 2015. The New Facility would consist of up to $50.0 million in revolving loans and up to a $60.0 million revolving term loan with no scheduled repayments. Both the revolving loans and the revolving term loan will bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either (i) LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00% per annum, or (ii) Wells Fargo’s prime rate plus a margin of 0.50% per annum. This compares to the pre-amended interest rate under the Credit Facility, which was, at the Company’s option, either (i) LIBOR plus a margin of 3.75% or 2.75% per annum for the term loan and the revolving loan, respectively, or (ii) Wells Fargo’s prime rate plus a margin of 2.25% or 1.25% per annum for the term loan and the revolving loan, respectively. The Company anticipates entering into definitive documents with respect to the New Facility by the end of the second quarter of 2011.

55


Table of Contents

     Letters of Credit and Other Commitments
     As at March 31, 2011, the Company has letters of credit and advance payment guarantees of $nil outstanding (December 31, 2010 — $nil), under the Credit Facility.
     The Company also has a $10.0 million facility for advance payment guarantees and letters of credit through the Bank of Montreal for use solely in conjunction with guarantees fully insured by EDC (the “Bank of Montreal Facility”). The Bank of Montreal Facility is unsecured and includes typical affirmative and negative covenants, including delivery of annual consolidated financial statements within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year. The Bank of Montreal Facility is subject to periodic annual reviews. As at March 31, 2011, the Company had letters of credit outstanding of $1.2 million under the Bank of Montreal Facility as compared to $2.4 million as at December 31, 2010.
     Cash and Cash Equivalents
     As at March 31, 2011, the Company’s principal sources of liquidity included cash and cash equivalents of $17.4 million, the Credit Facility, anticipated collection from trade accounts receivable of $30.5 million, anticipated collection from financing receivables due in the next 12 months of $12.7 million, payments expected in the next 12 months on existing backlog deals and cash receipts from theaters under joint revenue sharing arrangements. As at March 31, 2011, the Company had drawn down $nil on the revolving portion of the Credit Facility, and had letters of credit of $nil outstanding under the Credit Facility and $1.2 million under the Bank of Montreal Facility.
     During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company’s operations used cash of $9.6 million and the Company used cash of $4.0 million to fund capital expenditures, principally to build equipment for use in joint revenue sharing arrangements and to purchase property, plant, and equipment. Based on management’s current operating plan for 2011, the Company expects to continue to use cash to deploy additional theater systems under joint revenue sharing arrangements. Cash flows from joint revenue sharing arrangements are derived from the theater box office and concession revenues and the Company invested directly in the roll out of 10 new theater systems under joint revenue sharing arrangements during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
     The Company believes that cash flow from operations together with existing cash and borrowing available under the Credit Facility will be sufficient to fund the Company’s business operations, including its strategic initiatives relating to existing joint revenue sharing arrangements for the next 12 months.
     The Company’s operating cash flow will be adversely affected if management’s projections of future signings for theater systems and film productions, installations and film performance are not realized. The Company forecasts its short-term liquidity requirements on a quarterly and annual basis. Since the Company’s future cash flows are based on estimates and there may be factors that are outside of the Company’s control (see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A in the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K), there is no guarantee that the Company will continue to be able to fund its operations through cash flows from operations. Under the terms of the Company’s typical sale and sales-type lease agreement, the Company receives substantial cash payments before the Company completes the performance of its obligations. Similarly, the Company receives cash payments for some of its film productions in advance of related cash expenditures.
     Operating Activities
     The Company’s net cash provided by operating activities is affected by a number of factors, including the proceeds associated with new signings of theater system lease and sale agreements in the year, costs associated with contributing systems under joint revenue sharing arrangements, the box-office performance of films distributed by the Company and/or exhibited in the Company’s theaters, increases or decreases in the Company’s operating expenses, including research and development, and the level of cash collections received from its customers.
     Cash used by operating activities amounted to $9.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. Changes in other non-cash operating assets as compared to December 31, 2010 include: an increase of $2.3 million in financing receivables; a decrease of $8.9 million in accounts receivable; an increase of $2.7 million in inventories; an increase of $0.7 million in prepaid expenses, which primarily relates to an increase in prepaid benefits and film distribution expenses; and a $2.0 million decrease in other assets which includes a $1.3 million decrease in insurance recoveries receivable, a $0.6 million decrease in other assets, and a $0.1 million decrease in commission and agency fees. Changes in other operating liabilities as compared to December 31, 2010 include: a decrease in deferred revenue of $2.4 million related to amounts relieved from deferred revenue related to theater system installations offset by

56


Table of Contents

backlog payments received in the current period; a decrease in accounts payable of $0.3 million; and a decrease of $16.9 million in accrued liabilities including payments of $10.7 million for variable stock-based compensation expense.
     Included in accrued liabilities at March 31, 2011 was $18.2 million in respect of accrued pension obligations.
     Investing Activities
     Net cash used in investing activities amounted to $4.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, which includes an investment in joint revenue sharing equipment of $3.2 million, purchases of $0.8 million in property, plant and equipment, and an increase in other intangible assets of $0.2 million.
     Financing Activities
     Net cash provided by financing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2011 amounted to $0.8 million due to the proceeds from the issuance of common shares from stock option exercises.
     Capital Expenditures
     Capital expenditures, including the Company’s investment in joint revenue sharing equipment, purchase of property, plant and equipment, net of sales proceeds, and investments in film assets were $6.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to $3.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
     Payments to be made by the Company under contractual obligations are as follows:
                                                         
  Payments Due by Period  
  Total                                      
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)   Obligations     2011     2012     2013     2014     2015     Thereafter  
Pension obligations (1)
  $ 18,813     $     $     $ 18,813     $     $     $  
Credit Facility(2)
    17,500       11,667       5,833                          
Operating lease obligations (3)
    14,998       4,240       5,449       2,088       899       510       1,812  
Purchase obligations (4)
    13,481       13,481                                
Postretirement benefits obligations
    122       4       15       31       34       38        
Capital lease obligations (5)
    63       19       23       21                    
 
                                         
  $ 64,977     $ 29,411     $ 11,320     $ 20,953     $ 933     $ 548     $ 1,812  
 
                                         
                                                       
 
(1)   The SERP assumptions are that Mr. Gelfond will receive a lump sum payment at the beginning of 2013 upon retirement at the end of the current term of his employment agreement, although Mr. Gelfond has not informed the Company that he intends to retire at that time.
 
(2)   Interest on the Credit Facility is payable monthly in arrears based on the applicable variable rate and is not included above.
 
(3)   The Company’s total minimum annual rental payments to be made under operating leases, mostly consisting of rent at the Company’s properties in New York and Santa Monica, and at the various owned and operated theaters.
 
(4)   The Company’s total payments to be made under binding commitments with suppliers and outstanding payments to be made for supplies ordered but yet to be invoiced.
 
(5)   The Company’s total minimum annual payments to be made under capital leases, mostly consisting of payments for IT hardware and various other fixed assets.

57


Table of Contents

     Pension and Postretirement Obligations
     The Company has an unfunded defined benefit pension plan, the SERP, covering Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler. As at March 31, 2011, the Company had an unfunded and accrued projected benefit obligation of approximately $18.2 million (December 31, 2010 — $18.1 million) in respect of the SERP. At the time the Company established the SERP, it also took out life insurance policies on Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler with coverage amounts of $21.5 million in aggregate. During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Company obtained $3.2 million representing the cash surrender value of Mr. Gelfond’s policy. The proceeds were used to pay down the term loan under the Credit Facility. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Company obtained $4.6 million representing the cash surrender value of Mr. Wechsler’s policy. The amount was used to fund part of the $14.7 million lump sum payment made to Mr. Wechsler on August 1, 2010 under the SERP, which settled in full Mr. Wechsler’s entitlement under the SERP. At March 31, 2011, the cash surrender value of these policies was $nil.
     Under the terms of the SERP, if Mr. Gelfond’s employment had been terminated other than for cause prior to August 1, 2010, he would have been entitled to receive SERP benefits in the form of monthly annuity payments until the earlier of a change of control or August 1, 2010, at which time he would have become entitled to receive remaining benefits in the form of a lump sum payment. If Mr. Gelfond’s employment is, or would have been, terminated other than for cause on or after August 1, 2010, he is, or would have been, entitled to receive SERP benefits in the form of a lump sum payment. SERP benefit payments to Mr. Gelfond are subject to a deferral for six months after the termination of his employment, at which time Mr. Gelfond will be entitled to receive interest on the deferred amount credited at the applicable federal rate for short-term obligations. The term of Mr. Gelfond’s current employment agreement has been extended through December 31, 2012.
     Under the terms of SERP, monthly annuity payments payable to Mr. Wechsler, whose employment as Co-CEO terminated effective April 1, 2009, were deferred for six months and were paid in the form of a lump sum plus interest on the deferred amount on October 1, 2009. These monthly annuity payments continued through to August 1, 2010. On August 1, 2010, the Company made a lump sum payment of $14.7 million to Mr. Wechsler in accordance with the terms of the plan, representing a settlement in full of Mr. Wechsler’s entitlement under the SERP.
     In July 2000, the Company agreed to maintain health benefits for Messrs. Gelfond and Wechsler upon retirement. As at March 31, 2011, the Company had an unfunded benefit obligation of $0.5 million (December 31, 2010 — $0.5 million).
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
     There are currently no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on the Company’s financial condition.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Factors about Market Risk
     The Company is exposed to market risk from foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, which could affect operating results, financial position and cash flows. Market risk is the potential change in an instrument’s value caused by, for example, fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates. The Company’s primary market risk exposure is the risk of unfavorable movements in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar. The Company does not use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.
     Foreign Exchange Rate Risk
     A majority of the Company’s revenue is denominated in U.S. dollars while a significant portion of its costs and expenses is denominated in Canadian dollars. A portion of the Company’s net U.S. dollar cash flows is converted to Canadian dollars to fund Canadian dollar expenses through the spot market. In Japan, the Company has ongoing operating expenses related to its operations. Net Japanese yen cash flows are converted to U.S. dollars through the spot market. The Company also has cash receipts under leases denominated in Japanese yen, Euros and Canadian dollars.
     The Company manages its exposure to foreign exchange rate risks through the Company’s regular operating and financing activities and, when appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. These derivative financial instruments are utilized to hedge economic exposures as well as reduce earnings and cash flow volatility resulting from shifts in market rates.

58


Table of Contents

     For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded a foreign exchange gain of $0.6 million as compared with a foreign exchange gain of $0.3 million in 2010 associated with the translation of foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities and unhedged foreign exchange contracts.
     The Company entered into a series of foreign currency forward contracts to manage the Company’s risks associated with the volatility of foreign currencies with settlement dates throughout 2011. In addition, at March 31, 2011, the Company held foreign currency forward contracts to manage foreign currency risk on future anticipated Canadian dollar expenditures that were not considered foreign currency hedges by the Company. Foreign currency derivatives are recognized and measured in the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value (gains or losses) are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations except for derivatives designated and qualifying as foreign currency hedging instruments. For foreign currency hedging instruments, the effective portion of the gain or loss in a hedge of a forecasted transaction is reported in other comprehensive income and reclassified to the consolidated statement of operations when the forecasted transaction occurs. Any ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the consolidated statement of operations. The notional value of these contracts at March 31, 2011 was $8.7 million (December 31, 2010 — $12.7 million). A gain of $0.3 million was recorded to Other Comprehensive Income with respect to the appreciation in the value of these contracts in the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — gain of $0.2 million). A gain of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 — gain of $0.6 million) was reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to selling, general and administrative expenses. Appreciation or depreciation on forward contracts not meeting the requirements for hedge accounting in the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are recorded to selling, general and administrative expenses. The notional value of forward contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting at March 31, 2011 was $17.8 million (December 31, 2010 — $28.8 million).
     For all derivative instruments, the Company is subject to counterparty credit risk to the extent that the counterparty may not meet its obligations to the Company. To manage this risk, the Company enters into derivative transactions only with major financial institutions.
     At March 31, 2011, the Company’s net investment in leases and working capital items denominated in Canadian dollar and Euros aggregated to $1.9 million. Assuming a 10% appreciation or depreciation in foreign currency exchange rates from the quoted foreign currency exchange rates at March 31, 2011, the potential change in the fair value of foreign currency-denominated net investment in leases and working capital items would be $0.2 million. A significant portion of the Company’s selling, general, and administrative expenses are denominated in Canadian dollars. Assuming a 1% change appreciation or depreciation in foreign currency exchange rates at March 31, 2011, the potential change in the amount of selling, general, and administrative expenses would be $0.1 million for every $10.0 million in Canadian denominated expenditures.
     Interest Rate Risk Management
     The Company’s earnings are also affected by changes in interest rates due to the impact those changes have on its interest income from cash, and its interest expense from variable-rate borrowings under the Credit Facility.
     As at March 31, 2011, the Company borrowings under the Credit Facility were $17.5 million (December 31, 2010 — $17.5 million).
     The Company’s largest exposure with respect to variable rate debt comes from changes in the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The Company had variable rate debt instruments representing approximately 10.0% and 9.2% of its total liabilities as at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. If interest rates available to the Company increased by 10%, the Company’s interest expense would increase by approximately $0.1 million and interest income from cash would increase by approximately less than $0.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. These amounts are determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on the Company’s variable-rate debt and cash balances at March 31, 2011.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
     The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the specified time periods and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, to allow timely discussions regarding required disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures.

59


Table of Contents

Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
     The Company’s management, with the participation of its CEO and its CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) as at March 31, 2011 and has concluded that, as at the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective. The Company will continue to periodically evaluate its disclosure controls and procedures and will make modifications from time to time as deemed necessary to ensure that information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
     There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting which occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
     See note 9 to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements for information regarding legal proceedings involving the Company.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
     There have been no material changes to the factors disclosed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
     None.
Item 5. Other Information
     None.
Item 6. Exhibits
     
Exhibit    
No.   Description
31.1
  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002, dated April 28, 2011, by Richard L. Gelfond.
 
   
31.2
  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002, dated April 28, 2011, by Joseph Sparacio.
 
   
32.1
  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002, dated April 28, 2011, by Richard L. Gelfond.
 
   
32.2
  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002, dated April 28, 2011, by Joseph Sparacio.

60


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  IMAX CORPORATION
 
 
Date: April 28, 2011  By:   /s/ JOSEPH SPARACIO    
    Joseph Sparacio   
    Executive Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) 
 
 
     
Date: April 28, 2011  By:   /s/ JEFFREY VANCE    
    Jeffrey Vance   
    Senior Vice-President, Finance & Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) 
 
 

61

exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
IMAX CORPORATION
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002
I, Richard L. Gelfond, certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 of the registrant, IMAX Corporation;
 
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
  (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
  (b)   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
  (c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
  (d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
  (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
         
     
Date: April 28, 2011  By:   /s/ Richard L. Gelfond    
    Name:   Richard L. Gelfond   
    Title:   Chief Executive Officer   

 

exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
IMAX CORPORATION
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002
I, Joseph Sparacio, certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 of the registrant, IMAX Corporation;
 
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
  (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
  (b)   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
  (c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
  (d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
  (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
         
     
Date: April 28, 2011  By:   /s/ Joseph Sparacio    
    Name:   Joseph Sparacio   
    Title:   Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer   

 

exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
IMAX CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (A) and (B) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Richard L. Gelfond, Chief Executive Officer of IMAX Corporation, a Canadian corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:
     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
         
     
Date: April 28, 2011  /s/ Richard L. Gelfond    
  Richard L. Gelfond   
  Chief Executive Officer   
 

 

exv32w2
Exhibit 32.2
IMAX CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (A) and (B) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Joseph Sparacio, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of IMAX Corporation, a Canadian corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:
     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
         
     
Date: April 28, 2011  /s/ Joseph Sparacio    
  Joseph Sparacio   
  Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer